γ-ray lines as a probe for a cold-dark-matter halo

1989 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 3168-3186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alain Bouquet ◽  
Pierre Salati ◽  
Joseph Silk
1998 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward A. Baltz ◽  
Andrew J. Westphal ◽  
Daniel P. Snowden-Ifft

2017 ◽  
Vol 839 (1) ◽  
pp. 20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelson Caldwell ◽  
Matthew G. Walker ◽  
Mario Mateo ◽  
Edward W. Olszewski ◽  
Sergey Koposov ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 487 (4) ◽  
pp. 5711-5720 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Savchenko ◽  
A Rudakovskyi

ABSTRACTDwarf spheroidal galaxies (dSphs) are the most compact dark-matter-dominated objects observed so far. The Pauli exclusion principle limits the number of fermionic dark matter particles that can compose a dSph halo. This results in a well-known lower bound on their particle mass. So far, such bounds were obtained from the analysis of individual dSphs. In this paper, we model dark matter halo density profiles via the semi-analytical approach and analyse the data from eight ‘classical’ dSphs assuming the same mass of dark matter fermion in each object. First, we find out that modelling of Carina dSph results in a much worse fitting quality compared to the other seven objects. From the combined analysis of the kinematic data of the remaining seven ‘classical’ dSphs, we obtain a new 2σ lower bound of m ≳ 190 eV on the dark matter fermion mass. In addition, by combining a sub-sample of four dSphs – Draco, Fornax, Leo I, and Sculptor – we conclude that 220 eV fermionic dark matter appears to be preferred over the standard cold dark matter at about the 2σ level. However, this result becomes insignificant if all seven objects are included in the analysis. Future improvement of the obtained bound requires more detailed data, both from ‘classical’ and ultra-faint dSphs.


1999 ◽  
Vol 183 ◽  
pp. 155-155
Author(s):  
Toshiyuki Fukushige ◽  
Junichiro Makino

We performed N-body simulation on special-purpose computer, GRAPE-4, to investigate the structure of dark matter halos (Fukushige, T. and Makino, J. 1997, ApJL, 477, L9). Universal profile proposed by Navarro, Frenk, and White (1996, ApJ, 462, 563), which has cusp with density profiles ρ ∝r−1in density profile, cannot be reproduced in the standard Cold Dark Matter (CDM) picture of hierarchical clustering. Previous claims to the contrary were based on simulations with relatively few particles, and substantial softening. We performed simulations with particle numbers an order of magnitude higher, and essentially no softening, and found that typical central density profiles are clearly steeper than ρ ∝r−1, as shown in Figure 1. In addition, we confirm the presence of a temperature inversion in the inner 5 kpc of massive galactic halos, and give a natural explanation for formation of the temperature structure.


2003 ◽  
Vol 208 ◽  
pp. 391-392
Author(s):  
Andreea S. Font ◽  
Julio F. Navarro

We investigate recent suggestions that substructure in cold dark matter (CDM) halos has potentially destructive effects on galactic disks. N-body simulations of disk/bulge models of the Milky Way, embedded in a dark matter halo with substructure similar to that found in cosmological simulations, show that tides from substructure halos play only a minor role in the dynamical heating of the stellar disk. This suggests that substructure might not preclude CDM halos from being acceptable hosts of thin stellar disks.


2020 ◽  
Vol 498 (4) ◽  
pp. 6013-6033
Author(s):  
Mario H Amante ◽  
Juan Magaña ◽  
V Motta ◽  
Miguel A García-Aspeitia ◽  
Tomás Verdugo

ABSTRACT Inspired by a new compilation of strong-lensing systems, which consist of 204 points in the redshift range 0.0625 < zl < 0.958 for the lens and 0.196 < zs < 3.595 for the source, we constrain three models that generate a late cosmic acceleration: the ω-cold dark matter model, the Chevallier–Polarski–Linder, and the Jassal–Bagla–Padmanabhan parametrizations. Our compilation contains only those systems with early-type galaxies acting as lenses, with spectroscopically measured stellar velocity dispersions, estimated Einstein radius, and both the lens and source redshifts. We assume an axially symmetric mass distribution in the lens equation, using a correction to alleviate differences between the measured velocity dispersion (σ) and the dark matter halo velocity dispersion (σDM) as well as other systematic errors that may affect the measurements. We have considered different subsamples to constrain the cosmological parameters of each model. Additionally, we generate a mock data of SLS to asses the impact of the chosen mass profile on the accuracy of Einstein radius estimation. Our results show that cosmological constraints are very sensitive to the selected data: Some cases show convergence problems in the estimation of cosmological parameters (e.g. systems with observed distance ratio Dobs < 0.5), others show high values for the χ2 function (e.g. systems with a lens equation Dobs > 1 or high velocity dispersion σ > 276 km s−1). However, we obtained a fiduciary sample with 143 systems, which improves the constraints on each tested cosmological model.


2007 ◽  
Vol 383 (2) ◽  
pp. 546-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaun Cole ◽  
John Helly ◽  
Carlos S. Frenk ◽  
Hannah Parkinson

2006 ◽  
Vol 368 (4) ◽  
pp. 1931-1940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Lu ◽  
H. J. Mo ◽  
N. Katz ◽  
M. D. Weinberg

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (25n28) ◽  
pp. 2113-2120
Author(s):  
HANG BAE KIM

Light dark matter aims at explaining the 511 keV γ-ray line emission from the galactic bulge as well as cold dark matter in our universe. The former is achieved via the annihilations or decays of light dark matter particles, which implies interesting observational consequences in addition to 511 keV γ-rays. We consider the axino in the 1 ~ 10 MeV mass range as the light dark matter particle and discuss the particle physics models for it, its cosmological production, and its decay arising from R-parity violation. For additional observational signals, we consider the connection to the neutrino data made by bilinear R-parity violations and the continuum γ-ray emission from light dark matter particles.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document