Higher-order calculation in1N

1982 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 583-586 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. C. R. Wijewardhana
1966 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 190C-190C
Author(s):  
Kiyoji Uehara ◽  
Koichi Shimoda

2000 ◽  
Vol 473 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 6-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang Ho Hyun ◽  
Tae-Sun Park ◽  
Dong-Pil Min

1980 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 1711-1724 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. T. Mahanthappa ◽  
Marc A. Sher

1996 ◽  
Vol 06 (03) ◽  
pp. 485-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
HARRY DANKOWICZ

This paper derives an alternative approach to the Melnikov method, which greatly reduces the amount of algebra involved in higher-order calculations. To illustrate this, a particular system is studied for which such a higher-order analysis is necessary, due to an identically vanishing first-order Melnikov function. The results of a second-order calculation imply the existence of transverse homoclinic orbits and, consequently, the existence of a horseshoe.


1973 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 665-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. Wong ◽  
D. A. Hutchinson ◽  
J. K. S. Wan

1985 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Fujimoto ◽  
R. Grigjanis

1965 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 338-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glen W. Erickson

1975 ◽  
Vol 53 (9) ◽  
pp. 913-916
Author(s):  
R. W. Gaskell ◽  
L. Resnick ◽  
M. K. Sundaresan

It is pointed out in this paper that it is not necessary to assume that the physical Higgs' scalar is very massive in order to avoid conflict with low branching ratios for certain strangeness changing decays. Results of an explicit higher order calculation in the context of a SU(2) × U(1) model in which the Glashow, Illiopoulos, Maiani mechanism is operative, are presented.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document