Light-fermion mass hierarchy and grand unification

1980 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 1424-1427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen M. Barr
Keyword(s):  
Grand Unification ◽  
Fermion Mass ◽  
Mass Hierarchy ◽  
Light Fermion

scholarly journals Neutrino masses along with fermion mass hierarchy

2012 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dilip Kumar Ghosh ◽  
R. S. Hundi
Keyword(s):  
Fermion Mass ◽  
Neutrino Masses ◽  
Mass Hierarchy

scholarly journals A SOLUTION TO THE STRONG CP PROBLEM TRANSFORMING THE THETA ANGLE TO THE KM CP-VIOLATING PHASE

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (32) ◽  
pp. 5897-5911 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOSÉ BORDES ◽  
HONG-MO CHAN ◽  
SHEUNG TSUN TSOU
Keyword(s):  
Mass Matrix ◽  
Fermion Mass ◽  
Mass Hierarchy ◽  
Order Unity ◽  
Ckm Matrix ◽  
Cp Violations ◽  
Fermion Mass Matrix

It is shown that in the scheme with a rotating fermion mass matrix (i.e. one with a scale-dependent orientation in generation space) suggested earlier for explaining fermion mixing and mass hierarchy, the theta angle term in the QCD action of topological origin can be eliminated by chiral transformations, while giving still nonzero masses to all quarks. Instead, the effects of such transformations get transmitted by the rotation to the CKM matrix as the KM phase giving, for θ of order unity, a Jarlskog invariant typically of order 10-5, as experimentally observed. Strong and weak CP violations appear then as just two facets of the same phenomenon.

The role of 75H in fermion mass hierarchy

1984 ◽  
Vol 134 (6) ◽  
pp. 425-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jihn E. Kim ◽  
Murat Özer
Keyword(s):  
Fermion Mass ◽  
Mass Hierarchy

scholarly journals Fermion mass hierarchy and nonhierarchical mass ratios inSU(5)×U(1)F

2008 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis F. Duque ◽  
Diego A. Gutierrez ◽  
Enrico Nardi ◽  
Jorge Noreña
Keyword(s):  
Fermion Mass ◽  
Mass Hierarchy ◽  
Mass Ratios

scholarly journals THE DUALIZED STANDARD MODEL AND ITS APPLICATIONS — AN INTERIM REPORT

1999 ◽  
Vol 14 (14) ◽  
pp. 2173-2203 ◽  
Author(s):  
HONG-MO CHAN ◽  
SHEUNG TSUN TSOU
Keyword(s):  
Standard Model ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Fermion Mass ◽  
Mass Hierarchy ◽  
Matrix Elements ◽  
Ckm Matrix ◽  
High Energy Cosmic Rays ◽  
Perturbative Method ◽  
Ckm Matrix Elements ◽  
Physical Consequences

Based on a non-Abelian generalization of electric–magnetic duality, the Dualized Standard Model (DSM) suggests a natural explanation for exactly three generations of fermions as the "dual colour" [Formula: see text] symmetry broken in a particular manner. The resulting scheme then offers on the one hand a fermion mass hierarchy and a perturbative method for calculating the mass and mixing parameters of the Standard Model fermions, and on the other hand testable predictions for new phenomena ranging from rare meson decays to ultra-high energy cosmic rays. Calculations to one-loop order gives, at the cost of adjusting only three real parameters, values for the following quantities all (except one) in very good agreement with experiment: the quark CKM matrix elements ‖Vrs‖, the lepton CKM matrix elements ‖Urs‖, and the second generation masses mc, ms, mμ. This means, in particular, that it gives near maximal mixing Uμ3 between νμ and ντ as observed by SuperKamiokande, Kamiokande and Soudan, while keeping small the corresponding quark angles Vcb, Vts. In addition, the scheme gives (i) rough order-of-magnitude estimates for the masses of the lowest generation, (ii) predictions for low energy FCNC effects such as KL→ eμ, and (iii) a possible explanation for the long-standing puzzle of air showers beyond the GZK cut-off. All these together, however, still represent but a portion of the possible physical consequences derivable from the DSM scheme, the majority of which are yet to be explored.

Implications of a natural fermion mass hierarchy

1981 ◽  
Vol 106 (6) ◽  
pp. 487-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.D. Froggatt ◽  
H.B. Nielsen
Keyword(s):  
Fermion Mass ◽  
Mass Hierarchy

scholarly journals Fermion Mass Hierarchy and New Physics at the TeV Scale

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Nandi ◽  
George Alverson ◽  
Pran Nath ◽  
Brent Nelson
Keyword(s):  
New Physics ◽  
Fermion Mass ◽  
Mass Hierarchy

scholarly journals The gravitational condensate of the higgs field

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vitaly Kuyukov
Keyword(s):  
Higgs Boson ◽  
Standard Model ◽  
Higgs Field ◽  
Higgs Bosons ◽  
Grand Unification ◽  
Gravitational Potential Energy ◽  
Mass Hierarchy ◽  
The Standard Model ◽  
Cell Condensation ◽  
The Difference

This paper analyses a method of producing the Higgs mass via the gravitational field. This approach has become very popular in recent years, as the consideration of other forces do not help in solving the problem of mass hierarchy. Not understand the difference between scales of the standard model and Grand unification theory. Here, we present a heuristic mechanism which eliminated this difference. The idea is that the density of the condensate of the Higgs is increased so that it is necessary to take into account self gravitational potential energy of the Higgs boson. The result is as follows. The mass of the Higgs is directly proportional to the cell density of the Higgs bosons. Or else the mass of the Higgs is inversely proportional to the cell volume, which is the Higgs boson in the condensate. The most interesting dimension of this cell condensation is equal to the scale of Grand unification. This formula naturally combines the scale of the standard model and Grand unification through gravitational condensation.

scholarly journals Muon and electron g − 2 and the origin of the fermion mass hierarchy

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoyuki Haba ◽  
Yasuhiro Shimizu ◽  
Toshifumi Yamada
Keyword(s):  
Charged Lepton ◽  
Higgs Sector ◽  
Vacuum Expectation ◽  
Fermion Mass ◽  
Mass Hierarchy ◽  
Lepton Flavor Violation ◽  
Scalar Particles ◽  
Lepton Flavor ◽  
Flavor Violation ◽  
Charged Leptons

Abstract We present a model that gives a natural explanation to the charged lepton mass hierarchy and study the contributions to the electron and the muon $g-2$. In the model, we introduce lepton-flavor-dependent $U(1)_F$ symmetry and three additional Higgs doublets with $U(1)_F$ charges, to realize that each generation of charged leptons couples to one of the three additional Higgs doublets. The $U(1)_F$ symmetry is softly broken by $+1$ charges, and the smallness of the soft breaking naturally gives rise to the hierarchy of the Higgs vacuum expectation values, which then accounts for the charged lepton mass hierarchy. Since electron and muon couple to different scalar particles, each scalar contributes to the electron and the muon $g-2$ differently. We survey the space of parameters of the Higgs sector and find that there are sets of parameters that explain the muon $g-2$ discrepancy. On the other hand, we cannot find parameter sets that can explain the $g-2$ discrepancy within 2 $\sigma$. Here, the $U(1)_F$ symmetry suppresses charged lepton flavor violation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document