scholarly journals Constraining cosmological and galaxy parameters using strong gravitational lensing systems

2021 ◽  
Vol 103 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Darshan Kumar ◽  
Deepak Jain ◽  
Shobhit Mahajan ◽  
Amitabha Mukherjee ◽  
Nisha Rani
Keyword(s):  
Gravitational Lensing ◽  
Strong Gravitational Lensing

scholarly journals Strong gravitational lensing by Kerr and Kerr-Newman black holes

2021 ◽  
Vol 103 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tien Hsieh ◽  
Da-Shin Lee ◽  
Chi-Yong Lin
Keyword(s):  
Black Holes ◽  
Gravitational Lensing ◽  
Strong Gravitational Lensing

Strong Gravitational Lensing Time Delay Statistics and the Density Profile of Dark Halos

2002 ◽  
Vol 568 (2) ◽  
pp. 488-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masamune Oguri ◽  
Atsushi Taruya ◽  
Yasushi Suto ◽  
Edwin L. Turner
Keyword(s):  
Time Delay ◽  
Density Profile ◽  
Gravitational Lensing ◽  
Strong Gravitational Lensing

scholarly journals Strong Gravitational Lensing and Dark Energy

2001 ◽  
Vol 561 (2) ◽  
pp. L147-L151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick Sarbu ◽  
David Rusin ◽  
Chung-Pei Ma
Keyword(s):  
Dark Energy ◽  
Gravitational Lensing ◽  
Strong Gravitational Lensing

scholarly journals MACS J0416.1–2403: Impact of line-of-sight structures on strong gravitational lensing modelling of galaxy clusters

2018 ◽  
Vol 614 ◽  
pp. A8 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Chirivì ◽  
S. H. Suyu ◽  
C. Grillo ◽  
A. Halkola ◽  
I. Balestra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Galaxy Clusters ◽  
Gravitational Lensing ◽  
Line Of Sight ◽  
Mass Distributions ◽  
Strong Gravitational Lensing ◽  
Cluster Mass ◽  
Critical Curves ◽  
Single Lens ◽  
Best Fitting ◽  
Modelling Techniques

Exploiting the powerful tool of strong gravitational lensing by galaxy clusters to study the highest-redshift Universe and cluster mass distributions relies on precise lens mass modelling. In this work, we aim to present the first attempt at modelling line-of-sight (LOS) mass distribution in addition to that of the cluster, extending previous modelling techniques that assume mass distributions to be on a single lens plane. We have focussed on the Hubble Frontier Field cluster MACS J0416.1–2403, and our multi-plane model reproduces the observed image positions with a rms offset of ~0.′′53. Starting from this best-fitting model, we simulated a mock cluster that resembles MACS J0416.1–2403 in order to explore the effects of LOS structures on cluster mass modelling. By systematically analysing the mock cluster under different model assumptions, we find that neglecting the lensing environment has a significant impact on the reconstruction of image positions (rms ~0.′′3); accounting for LOS galaxies as if they were at the cluster redshift can partially reduce this offset. Moreover, foreground galaxies are more important to include into the model than the background ones. While the magnification factor of the lensed multiple images are recovered within ~10% for ~95% of them, those ~5% that lie near critical curves can be significantly affected by the exclusion of the lensing environment in the models. In addition, LOS galaxies cannot explain the apparent discrepancy in the properties of massive sub-halos between MACS J0416.1–2403 and N-body simulated clusters. Since our model of MACS J0416.1–2403 with LOS galaxies only reduced modestly the rms offset in the image positions, we conclude that additional complexities would be needed in future models of MACS J0416.1–2403.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document