scholarly journals Realism and causality. I. Pilot wave and retrocausal models as possible facilitators

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliahu Cohen ◽  
Marina Cortês ◽  
Avshalom Elitzur ◽  
Lee Smolin
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Wave

scholarly journals Shedding light on pilot-wave phenomena

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
P.-T. Brun ◽  
Daniel M. Harris ◽  
Victor Prost ◽  
Julio Quintela ◽  
John W. M. Bush
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Wave ◽  
Wave Phenomena

scholarly journals Tunneling with a hydrodynamic pilot-wave model

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
André Nachbin ◽  
Paul A. Milewski ◽  
John W. M. Bush
Keyword(s):  
Wave Model ◽  
Pilot Wave

The condensate in 4He II as a pilot wave

1971 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 196-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.W. Cummings
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Wave

scholarly journals On the impossible pilot wave

1982 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 989-999 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. S. Bell
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Wave

Quantum Narratives and the Power of Rhetorical Omission

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-55
Author(s):  
José G. Perillán
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Theory ◽  
Scientific Community ◽  
Fundamental Principle ◽  
International Scientific Community ◽  
Physics Community ◽  
Pilot Wave ◽  
History Of ◽  
Quantum Interpretation ◽  
History Of Quantum Theory ◽  
Pedagogical Discourses

John S. Bell openly questioned the dominance of an orthodox quantum interpretation that had seemingly raised the principle of indeterminism from an epistemological question to an ontological truth in the late 1920s. He understood the inevitability of indeterminism to be a theoretical choice made by the founding architects of quantum theory, not a fundamental principle of reality necessitated by experimental facts. As a result, Bell decried the general lull in quantum interpretation debates within the physics community, and in particular, the complete omission of Louis de Broglie’s deterministic pilot wave interpretation from all theoretical and pedagogical discourses. This paper reexamines the pilot wave’s rise, abandonment, and subsequent omission in the history of quantum theory. What emerges is not a straightforward story of victimization and hegemonic marginalization. Instead, it is a story that grapples with tensions between the polyphony of individual voices and a physics community’s evolving identity and consensus in response to particular sociopolitical and scientific contexts. At the heart of these tensions sits an international scientific community transitioning from a politically fractured and intellectually divergent community to one embracing a somewhat forced pragmatic convergence around rationally reconstructed narratives and concepts like the impossibility of determinism. The story of the pilot wave’s omission gives us a window into the inherent power that theoretical choice and a congealing rhetoric of orthodoxy have on a scientific community’s consensus, pedagogical canons, and the future development of science itself.

scholarly journals A Pilot-Wave Gravity and the Titius-Bode Law

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Croca J.R. ◽  
◽  
Castro P. ◽  
Gatta M. ◽  
Cardoso A. ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Wave
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document