scholarly journals Gravitomagnetic Love tensor of a slowly rotating body: Post-Newtonian theory

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Poisson
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-249
Author(s):  
E. N. Kuznetsov ◽  
V. Yu. Lunin ◽  
A. V. Panyushkin ◽  
I. L. Chernyshev
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Concha ◽  
Lucrezia Ravera ◽  
Evelyn Rodríguez ◽  
Gustavo Rubio

Abstract In the present work we find novel Newtonian gravity models in three space-time dimensions. We first present a Maxwellian version of the extended Newtonian gravity, which is obtained as the non-relativistic limit of a particular U(1)-enlargement of an enhanced Maxwell Chern-Simons gravity. We show that the extended Newtonian gravity appears as a particular sub-case. Then, the introduction of a cosmological constant to the Maxwellian extended Newtonian theory is also explored. To this purpose, we consider the non-relativistic limit of an enlarged symmetry. An alternative method to obtain our results is presented by applying the semigroup expansion method to the enhanced Nappi-Witten algebra. The advantages of considering the Lie algebra expansion procedure is also discussed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-192
Author(s):  
Mei Xiaochun

In general relativity, the values of constant terms in the equations of motions of planets and light have not been seriously discussed. Based on the Schwarzschild metric and the geodesic equations of the Riemann geometry, it is proved in this paper that the constant term in the time-dependent equation of motion of planet in general relativity must be equal to zero. Otherwise, when the correction term of general relativity is ignored, the resulting Newtonian gravity formula would change its basic form. Due to the absence of this constant term, the equation of motion cannot describe the elliptical and the hyperbolic orbital motions of celestial bodies in the solar gravitational field. It can only describe the parabolic orbital motion (with minor corrections). Therefore, it becomes meaningless to use general relativity calculating the precession of Mercury's perihelion. It is also proved that the time-dependent orbital equation of light in general relativity is contradictory to the time-independent equation of light. Using the time-independent orbital equation to do calculation, the deflection angle of light in the solar gravitational field is <mml:math display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1.7</mml:mn> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mo>″</mml:mo> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . But using the time-dependent equation to do calculation, the deflection angle of light is only a small correction of the prediction value <mml:math display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0.87</mml:mn> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mo>″</mml:mo> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> of the Newtonian gravity theory with a magnitude order of <mml:math display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . The reason causing this inconsistency was the Einstein's assumption that the motion of light satisfied the condition <mml:math display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> in gravitational field. It leads to the absence of constant term in the time-independent equation of motion of light and destroys the uniqueness of geodesic in curved space-time. Meanwhile, light is subjected to repulsive forces in the gravitational field, rather than attractive forces. The direction of deflection of light is opposite, inconsistent with the predictions of present general relativity and the Newtonian theory of gravity. Observing on the earth surface, the wavelength of light emitted by the sun is violet shifted. This prediction is obviously not true. Practical observation is red shift. Finally, the practical significance of the calculation of the Mercury perihelion's precession and the existing problems of the light's deflection experiments of general relativity are briefly discussed. The conclusion of this paper is that general relativity cannot have consistence with the Newtonian theory of gravity for the descriptions of motions of planets and light in the solar system. The theory itself is not self-consistent too.


1977 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Carmeli ◽  
M Kaye

1981 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 147-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. Barron ◽  
J. T. Wiley

Hypersonic small-disturbance theory is extended to consider the problem of dusty-gas flow past thin two-dimensional bodies. The mass fraction of suspended particles is assumed to be sufficiently large that the two-way interaction between particle phase and gas phase must be considered. The system of eight governing equations is further reduced by considering the Newtonian approximation γ → 1 andM∞→ ∞. The Newtonian theory up to second order is studied and the equations are solved for the case of a thin wedge at zero angle of attack. Expressions for the streamlines, dust-particle paths, shock-wave location and all flow variables are obtained. It is seen that the presence of the dust increases the pressure along the wedge surface and tends to bend the shock wave towards the body surface. Other effects of the interaction of the two phases are also discussed.


2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (S261) ◽  
pp. 112-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. A. Klioner ◽  
E. Gerlach ◽  
M. H. Soffel

AbstractRelativistic modelling of rotational motion of extended bodies represents one of the most complicated problems of Applied Relativity. The relativistic reference systems of IAU (2000) give a suitable theoretical framework for such a modelling. Recent developments in the post-Newtonian theory of Earth rotation in the limit of rigidly rotating multipoles are reported below. All components of the theory are summarized and the results are demonstrated. The experience with the relativistic Earth rotation theory can be directly applied to model the rotational motion of other celestial bodies. The high-precision theories of rotation of the Moon, Mars and Mercury can be expected to be of interest in the near future.


Optica ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin P. J. Lavery ◽  
Stephen M. Barnett ◽  
Fiona C. Speirits ◽  
Miles J. Padgett

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document