scholarly journals Quantum-state-selective decay spectroscopy of Ra213

2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ch. Lorenz ◽  
L. G. Sarmiento ◽  
D. Rudolph ◽  
D. E. Ward ◽  
M. Block ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quantum State ◽  
Decay Spectroscopy ◽  
Selective Decay

scholarly journals Geant4-aided Quantum State Selective Decay Spectroscopy of 213 Ra

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Lorenz ◽  
Luis Sarmiento ◽  
Dirk Rudolph ◽  
Michael Block
Keyword(s):  
Quantum State ◽  
Decay Spectroscopy ◽  
Selective Decay

Probability and Explanation

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Healey
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Theory ◽  
Quantum State ◽  
Causal Explanation ◽  
Born Rule ◽  
Correct Application

We can use quantum theory to explain an enormous variety of phenomena by showing why they were to be expected and what they depend on. These explanations of probabilistic phenomena involve applications of the Born rule: to accept quantum theory is to let relevant Born probabilities guide one’s credences about presently inaccessible events. We use quantum theory to explain a probabilistic phenomenon by showing how its probabilities follow from a correct application of the Born rule, thereby exhibiting the phenomenon’s dependence on the quantum state to be assigned in circumstances of that type. This is not a causal explanation since a probabilistic phenomenon is not constituted by events that may manifest it: but each of those events does depend causally on events that actually occur in those circumstances. Born probabilities are objective and sui generis, but not all Born probabilities are chances.

Assigning Values and States

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Healey
Keyword(s):  
Quantum State ◽  
Density Operator ◽  
Entangled State ◽  
Physical Situation ◽  
Born Rule ◽  
Correct Assignment ◽  
Significant Magnitude ◽  
Good Advice ◽  
Empirical Significance ◽  
Important Idea

If a quantum state is prescriptive then what state should an agent assign, what expectations does this justify, and what are the grounds for those expectations? I address these questions and introduce a third important idea—decoherence. A subsystem of a system assigned an entangled state may be assigned a mixed state represented by a density operator. Quantum state assignment is an objective matter, but the correct assignment must be relativized to the physical situation of an actual or hypothetical agent for whom its prescription offers good advice, since differently situated agents have access to different information. However this situation is described, it is true, empirically significant magnitude claims that make the description correct, while others provide the objective grounds for the agent’s expectations. Quantum models of environmental decoherence certify the empirical significance of these magnitude claims while also licensing application of the Born rule to others without mentioning measurement.

Entanglement

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Healey
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Theory ◽  
Quantum State ◽  
Physical Condition ◽  
Physical System ◽  
Polarization State ◽  
Quantum Systems ◽  
Ghz State ◽  
Mathematical Representation ◽  
Entangled State ◽  
Physical Relation

Often a pair of quantum systems may be represented mathematically (by a vector) in a way each system alone cannot: the mathematical representation of the pair is said to be non-separable: Schrödinger called this feature of quantum theory entanglement. It would reflect a physical relation between a pair of systems only if a system’s mathematical representation were to describe its physical condition. Einstein and colleagues used an entangled state to argue that its quantum state does not completely describe the physical condition of a system to which it is assigned. A single physical system may be assigned a non-separable quantum state, as may a large number of systems, including electrons, photons, and ions. The GHZ state is an example of an entangled polarization state that may be assigned to three photons.

scholarly journals Jordan products of quantum channels and their compatibility

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Girard ◽  
Martin Plávala ◽  
Jamie Sikora
Keyword(s):  
Quantum State ◽  
Sufficient Conditions ◽  
The Other ◽  
Independent Interest ◽  
Quantum Channels ◽  
Semidefinite Programs ◽  
Jordan Product ◽  
Marginal Problem ◽  
Jordan Products ◽  
Product Of Matrices

AbstractGiven two quantum channels, we examine the task of determining whether they are compatible—meaning that one can perform both channels simultaneously but, in the future, choose exactly one channel whose output is desired (while forfeiting the output of the other channel). Here, we present several results concerning this task. First, we show it is equivalent to the quantum state marginal problem, i.e., every quantum state marginal problem can be recast as the compatibility of two channels, and vice versa. Second, we show that compatible measure-and-prepare channels (i.e., entanglement-breaking channels) do not necessarily have a measure-and-prepare compatibilizing channel. Third, we extend the notion of the Jordan product of matrices to quantum channels and present sufficient conditions for channel compatibility. These Jordan products and their generalizations might be of independent interest. Last, we formulate the different notions of compatibility as semidefinite programs and numerically test when families of partially dephasing-depolarizing channels are compatible.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document