scholarly journals Unification of Airy structure in inelasticα+16O scattering andα-cluster structure with core excitation in20Ne

2013 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Hirabayashi ◽  
S. Ohkubo
Keyword(s):  
Cluster Structure ◽  
Core Excitation

A quantitative approach to inner shell losses

1978 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 526-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.D. Leapman ◽  
P. Rez ◽  
D.F. Mayers
Keyword(s):  
Energy Transfer ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Cross Sections ◽  
Accurate Determination ◽  
Background Intensity ◽  
Core Excitation ◽  
Quantitative Basis ◽  
Cross Section Differential ◽  
Bound Electrons

Microanalysis by EELS has been developing rapidly and though the general form of the spectrum is now understood there is a need to put the technique on a more quantitative basis (1,2). Certain aspects important for microanalysis include: (i) accurate determination of the partial cross sections, σx(α,ΔE) for core excitation when scattering lies inside collection angle a and energy range ΔE above the edge, (ii) behavior of the background intensity due to excitation of less strongly bound electrons, necessary for extrapolation beneath the signal of interest, (iii) departures from the simple hydrogenic K-edge seen in L and M losses, effecting σx and complicating microanalysis. Such problems might be approached empirically but here we describe how computation can elucidate the spectrum shape.The inelastic cross section differential with respect to energy transfer E and momentum transfer q for electrons of energy E0 and velocity v can be written as

MEMORY EFFECTS IN THE FRAGMENTATION OF MOLECULES FOLLOWING SITE-SPECIFIC CORE EXCITATION

1987 ◽  
Vol 48 (C9) ◽  
pp. C9-741-C9-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. HABENICHT ◽  
L. A. CHEWTER ◽  
M. SANDER ◽  
K. MÜLLER-DETHLEFS ◽  
E. W. SCHLAG
Keyword(s):  
Memory Effects ◽  
Core Excitation ◽  
Site Specific

Studying the Cluster Structure of the 11B Nucleus

2020 ◽  
Vol 84 (10) ◽  
pp. 1179-1182
Author(s):  
M. A. Zhusupov ◽  
R. S. Kabatayeva ◽  
A. S. Kopenbayeva
Keyword(s):  
Cluster Structure

Age and architecture of the largest African Baobabs from Mayotte, France

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Patrut ◽  
Roxana Patrut ◽  
Laszlo Rakosy ◽  
Karl von Reden
Keyword(s):  
Life Cycle ◽  
Radiocarbon Dating ◽  
Cluster Structure ◽  
Radiocarbon Date ◽  
General State ◽  
Adansonia Digitata ◽  
Open Ring ◽  
The Indian Ocean ◽  
Ring Shaped Structure ◽  
Comoro Islands

The volcanic Comoro Islands, located in the Indian Ocean in between mainland Africa and Madagascar, host several thousand African baobabs (Adansonia digitata). Most of them are found in Mayotte, which currently belongs to France, as an overseas department. We report the investigation of the largest two baobabs of Mayotte, the Big baobab of Musical Plage and the largest baobab of Plage N’Gouja. The Big baobab of Musical Plage exhibits a cluster structure and consists of 5 fused stems, out of which 4 are common stems and one is a false stem. The baobab of Plage N’Gouja has an open ring-shaped structure and consists of 7 partially fused stems, out of which 3 stems are large and old, while 4 are young. Several wood samples were collected from both baobabs and analyzed via radiocarbon dating. The oldest dated sample from the baobab of Musical Plage has a radiocarbon date of 275 ± 25 BP, which corresponds to a calibrated calendar age of 365 ± 15 yr. On its turn, the oldest sample from Plage N’Gouja has a radiocarbon date of 231 ± 20 BP, which translates into a calibrated age of 265 ± 15 yr. These results indicate that the Big baobab of Musical Plage is around 420 years old, while the baobab of Plage N’Gouja has an age close to 330 years. In present, both baobabs are in a general state of deterioration with many broken or damaged branches, and the Baobab of Plage N’Gouja has several missing stems. These observations suggest that the two baobabs are in decline and, most likely, close to the end of their life cycle.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document