Differential cross section and analyzing power measurements for p+p elastic scattering at 497.5 MeV

1988 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 397-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. W. Hoffmann ◽  
M. L. Barlett ◽  
R. W. Fergerson ◽  
J. A. Marshall ◽  
J. A. McGill ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Maeda ◽  
H. Sakai ◽  
K. Fujita ◽  
M. B. Greenfield ◽  
K. Hatanaka ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 581 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Skill ◽  
R. Baumann ◽  
G. Keil ◽  
N. Kniest ◽  
E. Pfaff ◽  
...  

1980 ◽  
Vol 334 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Berg ◽  
W. Arnold ◽  
E. Huttel ◽  
H.H. Krause ◽  
J. Ulbricht ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 74 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 505-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. Finch ◽  
Á. Kövér ◽  
M. Charlton ◽  
G. Laricchia

Differential cross sections for elastic scattering and ionization in positron–argon collisions as a function of energy (40–150 eV) are reported at 60°. Of particular interest is the energy range 55–60 eV, where earlier measurements by the Detroit group found a drop in the elastic-scattering cross section of a factor of 2. This structure has been tentatively attributed to a cross channel-coupling effect with an open inelastic-scattering channel, most likely ionization. Our results indicate that ionization remains an important channel over the same energy range and only begins to decrease at an energy above 60 eV.


1957 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 210-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. R. Bolmgren ◽  
G. D. Freier ◽  
J. G. Likely ◽  
K. F. Famularo

2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (05) ◽  
pp. 787-798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. A. KHAN ◽  
MINITA SINGH

Based on the (spin-independent) Sugar–Blanckenbecler eikonal expansion for the T-matrix, we parametrize the (spin-dependent) NN amplitude (SNN) which successfully describes the pp and pn elastic scattering observables at ~ 1 GeV up to the available momentum transfers. Using SNN, we calculate the differential cross-section, polarization, and spin-rotation function of ~ 1 GeV protons on 4 He within the framework of the Glauber model. The analysis also includes the phase variation in the NN amplitude. It is found that the use of SNN, in comparision with the usually parametrized one-term amplitude, improves the agreement with the experimental data. The introduction of a global phase variation provides only a slight improvement over the results with a constant phase. However, if we allow different phases in the central- and spin-dependent parts of the NN amplitude, the agreement with the polarization data improves further without affecting the differential cross-section results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document