scholarly journals Phase diagram of the SU(8) quantum spin tube

2000 ◽  
Vol 61 (22) ◽  
pp. 15196-15202 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. de Gier ◽  
M. T. Batchelor ◽  
M. Maslen
Keyword(s):  
2009 ◽  
Vol 150 (4) ◽  
pp. 042036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Furukawa ◽  
Y Sumida ◽  
K Kumagai ◽  
H Nojiri ◽  
P Korgerler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 596-600
Author(s):  
Kouichi Okunishi ◽  
Masahiro Sato ◽  
Tôru Sakai ◽  
Kiyomi Okamoto ◽  
Chigaku Itoi

2005 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 297-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kouichi Okunishi ◽  
Shin-ichiro Yoshikawa ◽  
Tôru Sakai ◽  
Seiji Miyashita

2012 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kouichi Okunishi ◽  
Masahiro Sato ◽  
Tôru Sakai ◽  
Kiyomi Okamoto ◽  
Chigak Itoi

2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shou-Shu Gong ◽  
W. Zhu ◽  
J.-X. Zhu ◽  
D. N. Sheng ◽  
Kun Yang

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 1739-1753 ◽  
Author(s):  
PÉTER LAJKÓ

We introduce variants of the Ma-Dasgupta renormalization-group (RG) approach for random quantum spin chains, in which the energy-scale is reduced by decimation built on either perturbative or non-perturbative principles. In one non-perturbative version of the method, we require the exact invariance of the lowest gaps, while in a second class of perturbative Ma-Dasgupta techniques, different decimation rules are utilized. For the S = 1 random antiferromagnetic Heisenberg chain, both type of methods provide the same type of disorder dependent phase diagram, which is in agreement with density-matrix renormalization-group calculations and previous studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document