scholarly journals Phase Shifts for High-Energy Nucleon-Nucleon Scattering

1954 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
pp. 1706-1706
Author(s):  
Burton D. Fried
Keyword(s):  
Nucleon Nucleon ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Phase Shifts ◽  
Nucleon Scattering

The phase-functions method and scalar amplitude of nucleon–nucleon scattering

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 1650088
Author(s):  
V. I. Zhaba
Keyword(s):  
Single Channel ◽  
Scattering Amplitude ◽  
Nucleon Nucleon ◽  
Phase Shifts ◽  
Computational Method ◽  
Nucleon Scattering ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Scalar Scattering ◽  
Scalar Amplitude ◽  
Phase Functions

A known phase-functions method (PFM) has been considered for calculation of a single-channel nucleon–nucleon scattering. The following partial waves of a nucleon–nucleon scattering have been considered using the phase shifts by PFM: 1S0-, 3P0-, 3P1-, 1D2-, 3F3-states for nn-scattering, 1S0-, 3P0-, 3P1-, 1D2-states for pp-scattering and 1S0-, 1P1-, 3P0-, 3P1-, 1D2-, 3D2-states for np-scattering. The calculations have been carried out using phenomenological nucleon–nucleon Nijmegen group potentials (NijmI, NijmII, Nijm93 and Reid93) and Argonne v18 potential. The scalar scattering amplitude has been calculated using the obtained phase shifts. Our results are not much different from those obtained by using the known phase shifts published in other papers. The difference between calculations depending on a computational method of phase shifts makes: for real (imaginary) parts 0.14–4.36% (0.16–4.05%) for NijmI. 0.02–4.79% (0.08–3.88%) for NijmII. 0.01–5.49% (0.01–4.14%) for Reid93 and 0.01–5.11% (0.01–2.40%) for Argonne v18 potentials.

scholarly journals High-Energy Nucleon-Nucleon Scattering

1963 ◽  
Vol 130 (4) ◽  
pp. 1571-1584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan J. Muzinich
Keyword(s):  
Nucleon Nucleon ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Nucleon Scattering
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document