Production Amplitudes. II. Partial-Wave Decomposition and Analytic Continuation in Total Angular Momentum

1965 ◽  
Vol 138 (5B) ◽  
pp. B1128-B1135 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. O. Barut ◽  
Y. C. Leung
2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (11n13) ◽  
pp. 843-846 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. ABDULRAHMAN ◽  
I. FACHRUDDIN

A new technique has been developed to calculate scattering of [Formula: see text] and spin-0 particles. The so called momentum-helicity basis states are constructed from the helicity and the momentum states, which are not expanded in the angular momentum states. Thus, all angular momentum states are taken into account. Compared with the partial-wave approach this technique will then give more benefit especially in calculations for higher energies. Taking as input a simple spin-orbit potential, the Lippman-Schwinger equations for the T -matrix elements are solved and some observables are calculated.


2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (11) ◽  
pp. 1179
Author(s):  
Yu.V. Kulish ◽  
E.V. Rybachuk

The currents of higher-spin fermion interactions with zero- and half-spin particles are derived. They can be used for the N*(J) ↔ Nπ-transitions (N*(J) is thenucleon resonance with the J spin). In accordance with the theorem on currents and fields, the spin-tensors of these currents are traceless, and their products with the γ-matrices and the higher-spin fermion momentum vanish, similarly to the field spin-tensors. Such currents are derived explicitly for J=3/2and 5/2. It is shown that, in the present approach, the scale dimension of a higher spin fermion propagator equals to –1 for any J ≥ 1/2. The calculations indicate that the off-mass-shell N* contributions to the s-channel amplitudes correspond to J = JπN only ( JπN is the total angular momentum of the πN-system). As contrast, in the usually exploited approaches, such non-zero amplitudes correspond to 1/2 ≤  JπN ≤ J. In particular, the usually exploited approaches give non-zero off-mass-shell contributions of the ∆(1232)-resonance to the amplitudes S31, P31( JπN = 1/2) and P33, D33(JπN = 3/2), but our approach – to P33 and D33 only. The comparison of these results with the data of the partial wave analysis on the S31-amplitude in the ∆(1232)-region shows the better agreement for the present approach.


2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (02n06) ◽  
pp. 452-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
IMAM FACHRUDDIN ◽  
CHARLOTTE ELSTER ◽  
WALTER GLÖCKLE

The pd break-up amplitude in the Faddeev scheme is calculated by employing a three-dimensional method without partial wave decomposition (PWD). In the first step and in view of higher energies only the leading term is evaluated and this for the process d(p,n)pp. A comparison with the results based on PWD reveals discrepancies in the cross section around 200 MeV. This indicates the onset of a limitation of the partial wave scheme. Also around 200 MeV relativistic effects are clearly visible and the use of relativistic kinematics shifts the cross section peak to where the experimental peak is located. The theoretical peak height, however, is wrong and calls first of all for the inclusion of rescattering terms, which are shown to be important in a nonrelativistic full Faddeev calculation in PWD.


2000 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. V. Kotlyar ◽  
H. Kamada ◽  
J. Golak ◽  
W. Glöckle

2011 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Skibiński ◽  
J. Golak ◽  
K. Topolnicki ◽  
H. Witała ◽  
H. Kamada ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document