scholarly journals Gene expression profiling in single cells from the pancreatic islets of Langerhans reveals lognormal distribution of mRNA levels

2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 1388-1392 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bengtsson
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. BMI.S6487 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZhongFa Zhang ◽  
See-Tong Pang ◽  
Katherine A. Kasper ◽  
Chunyan Luan ◽  
Bill Wondergem ◽  
...  

Objective Urothelial carcinoma (UC) of the kidney is a relatively rare but aggressive form of kidney cancer. Differential diagnosis of renal UC from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can be difficult, but is critical for correct patient management. We aimed to use global gene expression profiling to identify genes specifically expressed in urothelial carcinoma (UC) of the kidney, with purpose of finding new biomarkers for differential diagnosis of UC of both upper and lower tract from normal tissues. Materials and Methods Microarray gene expression profiling was performed on a variety of human kidney tumor samples, including clear cell, papillary, chromophobe, oncocytoma, renal UC and normal kidney controls. Differentially expressed mRNAs in various kidney tumor subtypes were thus identified. Protein expression in human UC tumor samples from both upper and lower urinary tract was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Results FXYD3 (MAT-8) mRNA was specifically expressed in UC of the kidney and not in normal kidney tissue or in any RCC tumor subtypes. FXYD3 mRNA levels displayed equal or better prediction rate for the detection of renal UC than the mRNA levels of selected known UC markers as p63, vimentin, S100P, KRT20 and KRT7. Finally, immunohistochemical staining of clinical UC samples showed that FXYD3 protein is overexpressed in majority of UC of the upper genitourinary tract (encompassing the kidney, ~90%) and in majority of high grade bladder UC (~84%, it's < 40% in low grade tumors, P < 0.001) compared to normal kidney and bladder tissues. Conclusion FXYD3 may be a promising novel biomarker for the differential diagnosis of renal UC and a promising prognosis marker of UC from bladder. Because it was identified genome-widely, FXYD3 may have important biological ramifications for the genetic study of UC.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3075-3075
Author(s):  
Travis S Johnson ◽  
Christina Y Yu ◽  
Chuanpeng Dong ◽  
Tongxin Wang ◽  
Mohammad Issam Abu Zaid ◽  
...  

Background: Clonal heterogeneity is a known issue in multiple myeloma (MM) and the emergence of drug resistant clones is responsible for the incurability of the disease. Multiple studies of bulk CD138+ bone marrow samples have attempted to stratify MM patients into smaller, more distinct, patient risk groups based on molecular phenotypes. Recently, single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technology has been applied in MM to identify cell clones. This leads to a new question: can we classify patients with scRNA-seq data guided by previously defined subtypes, and how do the single cell results correspond with the classification? Methods: We developed a novel, deep transfer learning framework to predict MM patient subtypes in patients with scRNA-seq based on patient classifications from microarray data. While the problem of scRNA-seq batch corrections has been intensively studied using transfer learning, there has been less work on similar comparisons between scRNA-seq and patient-level data. To address this issue, we utilized domain adaptation, a specific transfer learning approach, to combine scRNA-seq profiles and patient-level microarray data using a multitask learning framework. Figure 1 illustrates our computational framework. Its aim is to classify both cells and patients (with scRNA-seq data) according to patient level classifications derived from previous gene expression profiling studies for MM. Specifically, we adopted the 10-subtype classifications derived from microarray data1. Patients with scRNA-seq were summarized into a single vector by averaging gene counts across all the cells. Gene expression profiling data (including scRNA-seq and microarray) for MM patients from multiple studies were input into the transfer learning network consisting of 5 hidden layers. The last hidden layer was used to calculate the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) between the patients from scRNA-seq and microarray to integrate the datasets. The datasets in this study are summarized in Table 1. Two microarray datasets (GSE19784, GSE2658) and one scRNA-seq dataset (GSE117156) were obtained from NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. IUSM data were locally generated. One microarray and one scRNA-seq dataset were used in training and testing. GSE19784 was split into 80% training and 20% testing. GSE117156, due to the smaller sample size (11 patients), was split into 90% training and 10% testing. We ran 20 rounds of random cross validation using TensorFlow on a GTX1080 GPU. The expression profiles of patients and single cells from all datasets (GSE19784, GSE117156, GSE2658, IUSM) were input into the trained model after each round of cross validation to produce low-dimensional representations and predictions for each training, testing, and validation sample. Results: We found that our model was able to identify signals in the data based on expression profiles from patient-level and single cell data. The patient classification labels can be consistently reproduced in a held-out test set of patients as well as in a validation cohort of microarray data from 559 MM patients (GSE2658) and scRNA-seq from 4 MM patients from IUSM (Figure 2). These results show that the model can learn the subtypes across multiple datasets and platforms. The 4 IUSM patients tended to cluster similarly to their individual CD138+ cells after training, while GSE2658 patients still maintained some separation between MM subtype clusters (Figure 3). The single cells from our cohort of 4 patients did not necessarily classify to the same subtype as their patient. Conclusions: We found that a domain adaptive classifier can be trained across scRNA-seq and bulk gene expression profiling data from MM patients to integrate data and transfer knowledge. These models showed that single cells within a patient do not necessarily match the patient level molecular characteristics. Not surprisingly, similar results have been found in other cancer types2. As our novel framework is further refined and more patients are sequenced, we expect more unique insights into both inter- and intra-tumor MM heterogeneity. References: 1. Broyl A, Hose D, Lokhorst H, et al. Gene expression profiling for molecular classification of multiple myeloma in newly diagnosed patients. Blood. 2010;116(14):2543-2553. 2. Patel AP, Tirosh I, Trombetta JJ, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma. Science. 2014;344(6190):1396-1401. Disclosures Abonour: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Roodman:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1943-1943
Author(s):  
Irina Bonzheim ◽  
Martin Irmler ◽  
Natasa Anastasov ◽  
Margit Klier-Richter ◽  
Sabine Schaefer ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1943 Poster Board I-966 Introduction: ALK+ anaplastic large cell lymphomas (ALCL) overexpress C/EBPβ, as a consequence of NPM-ALK kinase activity. We recently reported C/EBPβ as a transcription regulator of NPM-ALK induced cellular proliferation. To identify the downstream targets of C/EBPβ that might be responsible for cell proliferation and survival, we performed gene expression profiling and pathway analyses after C/EBPβ gene silencing Materials and Methods: C/EBPβ knockdown was done by lentiviral shRNA-transduction into two ALK+ ALCL cell lines with strong C/EBPβ expression – SUDHL1 and KiJK. At day three after infection, RNA was extracted and used for Gene Chip expression analysis (U133 Plus 2.0 arrays/ Affymetrix). Genes regulated in both cell lines were applied to Genomatix Bibliosphere Pathway analysis. Candidate genes were either strongly influenced by C/EBPβ knockdown, or had promoter binding sites for C/EBPβ, or showed remarkable pathway connections. The influence of C/EBPβ on these genes was validated by qRT-PCR and in part by Western blot. Results: Gene expression profiling analysis resulted in 167 genes being regulated in both cell lines, of which 26 genes were chosen for further analysis. Validation by qRT-PCR confirmed 23/26 genes. Pathway analysis revealed c-Jun, which is a member of the dimeric transcription factor AP-1, as a regulator of C/EBPβ expression. Silencing C/EBPβ led to a clear up-regulation of c-Jun mRNA. Western blot analysis demonstrated that C/EBPβ influenced not only the expression of c-Jun but also its phosphorylation on Ser63 and Ser73. In contrast to what has been reported, we found very low levels of c-Jun expression in ALK+ALCL cells lines and its expression correlated inversely with C/EBPβ mRNA levels. Although it has been shown that c-Jun regulates C/EBPβ expression directly, in ALK+ALCL the expression of C/EBPβ is clearly independent of c-Jun. Our data suggest that c-Jun up-regulation after C/EBPβ knockdown is a compensatory mechanism to maintain C/EBPβ expression. Additionally, of the 26 selected genes, Bibliosphere Analysis identified 12 genes, which might be transcriptionally regulated by C/EBPβ and are primary targets in C/EBPβ downstream signalling. Two of these genes are of particular interest. The anti-apoptotic protein BCL2A1 contains a promoter-binding site for C/EBPβ and has been shown previously to be both strongly regulated in ALK+ALCL and absolutely necessary for its transformation. The second is a DEAD box nucleolar RNA helicase protein involved in ribosomal RNA production and proliferation which we found to be strongly expressed in ALK+ALCL cell lines and primary cases. Conclusions: C/EBPβ silencing in ALK+ALCL cell lines showed 1) an inverse correlation between c-Jun and C/EBPβ mRNA expression levels, 2) the expression of C/EBPβ in ALK+ALCL is independent of c-Jun, 3) genes transcriptionally regulated by C/EBPβ seem to be essential for proliferation and survival in ALK+ALCL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Methods ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth J. Livak ◽  
Quin F. Wills ◽  
Alex J. Tipping ◽  
Krishnalekha Datta ◽  
Rowena Mittal ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20097-e20097
Author(s):  
Gareth Rivalland ◽  
Ulf Schmitz ◽  
Ramyar Molania ◽  
Chuck Bailey ◽  
Gavin Michael Wright ◽  
...  

e20097 Background: Recent success with the use of checkpoint inhibition in SCLC has increased the importance of understanding the immunological tumour microenvironment. In many tumours gene expression profiling (GEP) of T-cell inflammation and IFN-gamma is correlated with response to checkpoint inhibitors. We present GEP results in a SCLC cohort and correlation of gene expression with IHC analysis of common checkpoints. Methods: SCLC tissue microarrays from 105 histologically confirmed SCLC specimens were scored for IHC staining of immune checkpoints on tumour and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). A subgroup of 30 patients had sufficient tissue for GEP. Nanostring nCounter Pan-cancer immune panel, using the previously described RUVIII normalisation method, was used to examine GEP. A 28-gene IFN-G related signature was examined. Results: Median age 67y (range 53 – 86); male: 16/30 (53%); stage: limited 22/30 (73%), 5/30 (17%) extensive, 3/30 (10%) stage unknown. Significant heterogeneity was observed in gene expression. Pearson correlation co-efficients between IHC analysis and corresponding mRNA of PD-L1, PD-L2, LAG3 and TIM3, on both tumour and TILs, were not statistically significant. Significant positive correlation was found for mRNA levels of HAVCR2 (TIM3) with LAG3 and with PDCD1LG2 (PD-L2). As in the larger cohort, TIL co-expression of PD-L1, PD-L2, TIM3 and LAG3 were all associated with improved survival; med OS 89.3 v 15.7 mo; p < 0.01. The cohort clustered into 4 groups with respect to the IFN-G GEP. The group with the highest level of gene expression (5/30 pts, 16.7%) had numerically improved OS; 89.3 v 21.3 mo, p = 0.23. Conclusions: In this limited cohort, gene expression did not consistently correlate with IHC. Co-ordinated expression of T-cell inflamed/IFN-G immune checkpoints occurred in 16.7% SCLC and was associated with improved survival.


2007 ◽  
Vol 81 (16) ◽  
pp. 8707-8721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susana Guerra ◽  
José Luis Nájera ◽  
José Manuel González ◽  
Luis A. López-Fernández ◽  
Nuria Climent ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Although recombinants based on the attenuated poxvirus vectors MVA and NYVAC are currently in clinical trials, the nature of the genes triggered by these vectors in antigen-presenting cells is poorly characterized. Using microarray technology and various analysis conditions, we compared specific changes in gene expression profiling following MVA and NYVAC infection of immature human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDC). Microarray analysis was performed at 6 h postinfection, since these viruses induced extensive cytopathic effects, rRNA breakdown, and apoptosis at late times postinfection. MVA- and NYVAC-infected MDDC shared upregulation of 195 genes compared to uninfected cells: MVA specifically upregulated 359 genes, and NYVAC upregulated 165 genes. Microarray comparison of NYVAC and MVA infection revealed 544 genes with distinct expression patterns after poxvirus infection and 283 genes specifically upregulated after MVA infection. Both vectors upregulated genes for cytokines, cytokine receptors, chemokines, chemokine receptors, and molecules involved in antigen uptake and processing, including major histocompatibility complex genes. mRNA levels for interleukin 12β (IL-12β), beta interferon, and tumor necrosis factor alpha were higher after MVA infection than after NYVAC infection. The expression profiles of transcription factors such as NF-κB/Rel and STAT were regulated similarly by both viruses; in contrast, OASL, MDA5, and IRIG-I expression increased only during MVA infection. Type I interferon, IL-6, and Toll-like receptor pathways were specifically induced after MVA infection. Following MVA or NYVAC infection in MDDC, we found similarities as well as differences between these virus strains in the expression of cellular genes with immunological function, which should have an impact when these vectors are used as recombinant vaccines.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse Q. Zhang ◽  
Christian A. Siltanen ◽  
Leqian Liu ◽  
Kai-Chun Chang ◽  
Zev J. Gartner ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document