scholarly journals SLIC-CAGE: high-resolution transcription start site mapping using nanogram-levels of total RNA

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 1943-1956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nevena Cvetesic ◽  
Harry G. Leitch ◽  
Malgorzata Borkowska ◽  
Ferenc Müller ◽  
Piero Carninci ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivek Bhardwaj ◽  
Giuseppe Semplicio ◽  
Niyazi Umut Erdogdu ◽  
Asifa Akhtar

Abstract Below we present a simple and quick TSS quantification protocol, MAPCap (Multiplexed Affinity Purification of Capped RNA) that enables users to combine high-resolution detection of transcription start-sites and differential expression analysis. MAPCap can be used to profile TSS from dozens of samples in a multiplexed way, in 16-18 hours. MAPCap data can be analyzed using our easy-to-use software icetea (https://bioconductor.org/packages/icetea), which allows users to detect robust TSS using replicates, and perform differential TSS analysis.


RNA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Paquette ◽  
Jeffrey S. Mugridge ◽  
David E. Weinberg ◽  
John D. Gross

2003 ◽  
pp. 105-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farahnaz Movahedzadeh ◽  
Jorge A. Gonzalez-Y-Merchand ◽  
Robert A Cox

2021 ◽  
pp. 166813
Author(s):  
Eric J. Tomko ◽  
Olivia Luyties ◽  
Jenna K. Rimel ◽  
Chi-Lin Tsai ◽  
Jill O. Fuss ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (21) ◽  
pp. E2899-E2905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina O. Vvedenskaya ◽  
Hanif Vahedian-Movahed ◽  
Yuanchao Zhang ◽  
Deanne M. Taylor ◽  
Richard H. Ebright ◽  
...  

During transcription initiation, RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme unwinds ∼13 bp of promoter DNA, forming an RNAP-promoter open complex (RPo) containing a single-stranded transcription bubble, and selects a template-strand nucleotide to serve as the transcription start site (TSS). In RPo, RNAP core enzyme makes sequence-specific protein–DNA interactions with the downstream part of the nontemplate strand of the transcription bubble (“core recognition element,” CRE). Here, we investigated whether sequence-specific RNAP–CRE interactions affect TSS selection. To do this, we used two next-generation sequencing-based approaches to compare the TSS profile of WT RNAP to that of an RNAP derivative defective in sequence-specific RNAP–CRE interactions. First, using massively systematic transcript end readout, MASTER, we assessed effects of RNAP–CRE interactions on TSS selection in vitro and in vivo for a library of 47 (∼16,000) consensus promoters containing different TSS region sequences, and we observed that the TSS profile of the RNAP derivative defective in RNAP–CRE interactions differed from that of WT RNAP, in a manner that correlated with the presence of consensus CRE sequences in the TSS region. Second, using 5′ merodiploid native-elongating-transcript sequencing, 5′ mNET-seq, we assessed effects of RNAP–CRE interactions at natural promoters in Escherichia coli, and we identified 39 promoters at which RNAP–CRE interactions determine TSS selection. Our findings establish RNAP–CRE interactions are a functional determinant of TSS selection. We propose that RNAP–CRE interactions modulate the position of the downstream end of the transcription bubble in RPo, and thereby modulate TSS selection, which involves transcription bubble expansion or transcription bubble contraction (scrunching or antiscrunching).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document