scholarly journals Dividing cellular asymmetry: asymmetric cell division and its implications for stem cells and cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (23) ◽  
pp. 2675-2699 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Neumuller ◽  
J. A. Knoblich
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Cellular Asymmetry

Centromere assembly and non-random sister chromatid segregation in stem cells

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben L. Carty ◽  
Elaine M. Dunleavy
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Germline Stem Cells ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Centromere Protein A ◽  
Oocyte Meiosis

Abstract Asymmetric cell division (ACD) produces daughter cells with separate distinct cell fates and is critical for the development and regulation of multicellular organisms. Epigenetic mechanisms are key players in cell fate determination. Centromeres, epigenetically specified loci defined by the presence of the histone H3-variant, centromere protein A (CENP-A), are essential for chromosome segregation at cell division. ACDs in stem cells and in oocyte meiosis have been proposed to be reliant on centromere integrity for the regulation of the non-random segregation of chromosomes. It has recently been shown that CENP-A is asymmetrically distributed between the centromeres of sister chromatids in male and female Drosophila germline stem cells (GSCs), with more CENP-A on sister chromatids to be segregated to the GSC. This imbalance in centromere strength correlates with the temporal and asymmetric assembly of the mitotic spindle and potentially orientates the cell to allow for biased sister chromatid retention in stem cells. In this essay, we discuss the recent evidence for asymmetric sister centromeres in stem cells. Thereafter, we discuss mechanistic avenues to establish this sister centromere asymmetry and how it ultimately might influence cell fate.

scholarly journals Phase Separation and Mechanical Forces in Regulating Asymmetric Cell Division of Neural Stem Cells

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (19) ◽  
pp. 10267
Author(s):  
Yiqing Zhang ◽  
Heyang Wei ◽  
Wenyu Wen
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Phase Separation ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Neural Stem Cells ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Stem Cell Population ◽  
Mechanical Forces ◽  
Major Mechanism ◽  
Asymmetrically Distributed

Asymmetric cell division (ACD) of neural stem cells and progenitors not only renews the stem cell population but also ensures the normal development of the nervous system, producing various types of neurons with different shapes and functions in the brain. One major mechanism to achieve ACD is the asymmetric localization and uneven segregation of intracellular proteins and organelles into sibling cells. Recent studies have demonstrated that liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) provides a potential mechanism for the formation of membrane-less biomolecular condensates that are asymmetrically distributed on limited membrane regions. Moreover, mechanical forces have emerged as pivotal regulators of asymmetric neural stem cell division by generating sibling cell size asymmetry. In this review, we will summarize recent discoveries of ACD mechanisms driven by LLPS and mechanical forces.

Asymmetric organelle inheritance predicts human blood stem cell fate

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Loeffler ◽  
Florin Schneiter ◽  
Weijia Wang ◽  
Arne Wehling ◽  
Tobias Kull ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Human Blood ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Stem Cell Fate ◽  
Blood Stem Cells

Understanding human hematopoietic stem cell fate control is important for their improved therapeutic manipulation. Asymmetric cell division, the asymmetric inheritance of factors during division instructing future daughter cell fates, was recently described in mouse blood stem cells. In human blood stem cells, the possible existence of asymmetric cell division remained unclear due to technical challenges in its direct observation. Here, we use long-term quantitative single-cell imaging to show that lysosomes and active mitochondria are asymmetrically inherited in human blood stem cells and that their inheritance is a coordinated, non-random process. Furthermore, multiple additional organelles, including autophagosomes, mitophagosomes, autolysosomes and recycling endosomes show preferential asymmetric co-segregation with lysosomes. Importantly, asymmetric lysosomal inheritance predicts future asymmetric daughter cell cycle length, differentiation and stem cell marker expression, while asymmetric inheritance of active mitochondria correlates with daughter metabolic activity. Hence, human hematopoietic stem cell fates are regulated by asymmetric cell division, with both mechanistic evolutionary conservation and differences to the mouse system.

scholarly journals Cytokine receptor-Eb1 interaction couples cell polarity and fate during asymmetric cell division

eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cuie Chen ◽  
Ryan Cummings ◽  
Aghapi Mordovanakis ◽  
Alan J Hunt ◽  
Michael Mayer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Cell Polarity ◽  
Adult Stem Cells ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Cytokine Receptor ◽  
Spindle Orientation ◽  
Germline Stem Cells ◽  
Self Renewal

Asymmetric stem cell division is a critical mechanism for balancing self-renewal and differentiation. Adult stem cells often orient their mitotic spindle to place one daughter inside the niche and the other outside of it to achieve asymmetric division. It remains unknown whether and how the niche may direct division orientation. Here we discover a novel and evolutionary conserved mechanism that couples cell polarity to cell fate. We show that the cytokine receptor homolog Dome, acting downstream of the niche-derived ligand Upd, directly binds to the microtubule-binding protein Eb1 to regulate spindle orientation in Drosophila male germline stem cells (GSCs). Dome’s role in spindle orientation is entirely separable from its known function in self-renewal mediated by the JAK-STAT pathway. We propose that integration of two functions (cell polarity and fate) in a single receptor is a key mechanism to ensure an asymmetric outcome following cell division.

From endocytosis to tumors through asymmetric cell division of stem cells

2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 462-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franck Coumailleau ◽  
Marcos González-Gaitán
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division

scholarly journals Emerging mechanisms of asymmetric stem cell division

2018 ◽  
Vol 217 (11) ◽  
pp. 3785-3795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zsolt G. Venkei ◽  
Yukiko M. Yamashita
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Binary Outcomes ◽  
Cellular Mechanisms ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Divisions ◽  
Cell Divisions ◽  
Dividing Cells ◽  
Stem Cell Division

The asymmetric cell division of stem cells, which produces one stem cell and one differentiating cell, has emerged as a mechanism to balance stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Elaborate cellular mechanisms that orchestrate the processes required for asymmetric cell divisions are often shared between stem cells and other asymmetrically dividing cells. During asymmetric cell division, cells must establish asymmetry/polarity, which is guided by varying degrees of intrinsic versus extrinsic cues, and use intracellular machineries to divide in a desired orientation in the context of the asymmetry/polarity. Recent studies have expanded our knowledge on the mechanisms of asymmetric cell divisions, revealing the previously unappreciated complexity in setting up the cellular and/or environmental asymmetry, ensuring binary outcomes of the fate determination. In this review, we summarize recent progress in understanding the mechanisms and regulations of asymmetric stem cell division.

scholarly journals Partitioning of Chromosomal DNA during Establishment of Cellular Asymmetry in Bacillus subtilis

2002 ◽  
Vol 184 (6) ◽  
pp. 1743-1749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joe Pogliano ◽  
Marc D. Sharp ◽  
Kit Pogliano
Keyword(s):  
Bacillus Subtilis ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Chromosome Structure ◽  
Chromosomal Dna ◽  
Chromosome Partitioning ◽  
Cellular Asymmetry ◽  
The Future ◽  
Asymmetric Partitioning ◽  
Polar Division

ABSTRACT The switch from symmetric to asymmetric cell division is a key feature of development in many organisms, including Bacillus subtilis sporulation. Here we demonstrate that, prior to the onset of asymmetric cell division, the B. subtilis chromosome is partitioned into two unequally sized domains, with the origin-proximal one-third of the future forespore chromosome condensed near one pole of the cell. Asymmetric chromosome partitioning is independent of polar division, as it occurs in cells depleted of FtsZ but depends on two transcription factors that govern the initiation of sporulation, σH and Spo0A-P. It is also independent of chromosome partitioning proteins Spo0J and Soj, suggesting the existence of a novel mechanism controlling chromosome structure. Thus, our results demonstrate that, during sporulation, two separable events prepare B. subtilis for asymmetric cell division: the relocation of cell division sites to the cell poles and the asymmetric partitioning of the future forespore chromosome.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document