scholarly journals Release of initiation factors from 48S complexes during ribosomal subunit joining and the link between establishment of codon-anticodon base-pairing and hydrolysis of eIF2-bound GTP

2004 ◽  
Vol 18 (24) ◽  
pp. 3078-3093 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Unbehaun
Keyword(s):  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Base Pairing ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Subunit Joining ◽  
Hydrolysis Of

scholarly journals Interaction between Eukaryotic Initiation Factors 1A and 5B Is Required for Efficient Ribosomal Subunit Joining

2006 ◽  
Vol 281 (13) ◽  
pp. 8469-8475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Acker ◽  
Byung-Sik Shin ◽  
Thomas E. Dever ◽  
Jon R. Lorsch
Keyword(s):  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factors ◽  
Subunit Joining

scholarly journals eIF5B and eIF1A remodel human translation initiation complexes to mediate ribosomal subunit joining

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher P. Lapointe ◽  
Rosslyn Grosely ◽  
Masaaki Sokabe ◽  
Carlos Alvarado ◽  
Jinfan Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Molecule ◽  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Messenger Rna ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Ribosomal Subunits ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Architectural Framework ◽  
Subunit Joining ◽  
Structural Methods

Joining of the ribosomal subunits at a translation start site on a messenger RNA during initiation commits the ribosome to synthesize a protein. Here, we combined single-molecule spectroscopy and structural methods using an in vitro reconstituted system to examine how the human ribosomal subunits join. Single-molecule fluorescence revealed when universally-conserved eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs) eIF1A and eIF5B associate with and depart from initiation complexes. Guided by single-molecule dynamics, we examined initiation complexes that contained both eIF1A and eIF5B using single-particle electron cryo-microscopy. The resulting structure illuminated how eukaryote-specific contacts between eIF1A and eIF5B remodel the initiation complex to orient initiator tRNA in a conformation compatible with ribosomal subunit joining. Collectively, our findings provide a quantitative and architectural framework for the molecular choreography orchestrated by eIF1A and eIF5B during human translation initiation.

X-ray structures of eIF5B and the eIF5B–eIF1A complex: the conformational flexibility of eIF5B is restricted on the ribosome by interaction with eIF1A

2014 ◽  
Vol 70 (12) ◽  
pp. 3090-3098 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aiping Zheng ◽  
Jian Yu ◽  
Reo Yamamoto ◽  
Toyoyuki Ose ◽  
Isao Tanaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Structural Flexibility ◽  
80S Ribosome ◽  
Core Domain ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Translation Initiation Factors ◽  
Density Map ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Subunit Joining ◽  
Electron Density Map

eIF5B and eIF1A are two translation-initiation factors that are universally conserved among all kingdoms. They show a unique interaction in eukaryotes which is important for ribosomal subunit joining. Here, the structures of two isolated forms of yeast eIF5B and of the eIF5B–eIF1A complex (eIF1A and eIF5B do not contain the respective N-terminal domains) are reported. The eIF5B–eIF1A structure shows that the C-terminal tail of eIF1A binds to eIF5B domain IV, while the core domain of eIF1A is invisible in the electron-density map. Although the individual domains in all structures of eIF5B or archaeal IF5B (aIF5B) are similar, their domain arrangements are significantly different, indicating high structural flexibility, which is advantageous for conformational change during ribosomal subunit joining. Based on these structures, models of eIF5B, eIF1A and tRNAiMeton the 80S ribosome were built. The models suggest that the interaction between the eIF1A C-terminal tail and eIF5B helps tRNAiMetto bind to eIF5B domain IV, thus preventing tRNAiMetdissociation, stabilizing the interface for subunit joining and providing a checkpoint for correct ribosome assembly.

scholarly journals Characterization of the nuclear export adaptor protein Nmd3 in association with the 60S ribosomal subunit

2010 ◽  
Vol 189 (7) ◽  
pp. 1079-1086 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayati Sengupta ◽  
Cyril Bussiere ◽  
Jesper Pallesen ◽  
Matthew West ◽  
Arlen W. Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Large Subunit ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Adaptor Protein ◽  
Structural Data ◽  
Release Mechanism ◽  
Nuclear Pore ◽  
Subunit Joining

The nucleocytoplasmic shuttling protein Nmd3 is an adaptor for export of the 60S ribosomal subunit from the nucleus. Nmd3 binds to nascent 60S subunits in the nucleus and recruits the export receptor Crm1 to facilitate passage through the nuclear pore complex. In this study, we present a cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) reconstruction of the 60S subunit in complex with Nmd3 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The density corresponding to Nmd3 is directly visible in the cryo-EM map and is attached to the regions around helices 38, 69, and 95 of the 25S ribosomal RNA (rRNA), the helix 95 region being adjacent to the protein Rpl10. We identify the intersubunit side of the large subunit as the binding site for Nmd3. rRNA protection experiments corroborate the structural data. Furthermore, Nmd3 binding to 60S subunits is blocked in 80S ribosomes, which is consistent with the assigned binding site on the subunit joining face. This cryo-EM map is a first step toward a molecular understanding of the functional role and release mechanism of Nmd3.

Alternative mechanisms of initiating translation of mammalian mRNAs

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 1231-1241 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.J. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Site Selection ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Aggregate Size ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Initiation Site ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Viral Mrnas ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Scanning Mechanism

Of all the steps in mRNA translation, initiation is the one that differs most radically between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Not only is there no equivalent of the prokaryotic Shine–Dalgarno rRNA–mRNA interaction, but also what requires only three initiation factor proteins (aggregate size ∼125 kDa) in eubacteria needs at least 28 different polypeptides (aggregate >1600 kDa) in mammalian cells, which is actually larger than the size of the 40 S ribosomal subunit. Translation of the overwhelming majority of mammalian mRNAs occurs by a scanning mechanism, in which the 40 S ribosomal subunit, primed for initiation by the binding of several initiation factors including the eIF2 (eukaryotic initiation factor 2)–GTP–MettRNAi complex, is loaded on the mRNA immediately downstream of the 5′-cap, and then scans the RNA in the 5′→3′ direction. On recognition of (usually) the first AUG triplet via base-pairing with the Met-tRNAi anticodon, scanning ceases, triggering GTP hydrolysis and release of eIF2–GDP. Finally, ribosomal subunit joining and the release of the other initiation factors completes the initiation process. This sketchy outline conceals the fact that the exact mechanism of scanning and the precise roles of the initiation factors remain enigmatic. However, the factor requirements for initiation site selection on some viral IRESs (internal ribosome entry sites/segments) are simpler, and investigations into these IRES-dependent mechanisms (particularly picornavirus, hepatitis C virus and insect dicistrovirus IRESs) have significantly enhanced our understanding of the standard scanning mechanism. This article surveys the various alternative mechanisms of initiation site selection on mammalian (and other eukaryotic) cellular and viral mRNAs, starting from the simplest (in terms of initiation factor requirements) and working towards the most complex, which paradoxically happens to be the reverse order of their discovery.

scholarly journals Dynamic competition between SARS-CoV-2 NSP1 and mRNA on the human ribosome inhibits translation initiation

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (6) ◽  
pp. e2017715118
Author(s):  
Christopher P. Lapointe ◽  
Rosslyn Grosely ◽  
Alex G. Johnson ◽  
Jinfan Wang ◽  
Israel S. Fernández ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Molecule ◽  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Start Codon ◽  
Messenger Rnas ◽  
Eukaryotic Translation ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Translation Initiation Factors ◽  
40S Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factors

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a beta-CoV that recently emerged as a human pathogen and is the causative agent of the COVID-19 pandemic. A molecular framework of how the virus manipulates host cellular machinery to facilitate infection remains unclear. Here, we focus on SARS-CoV-2 NSP1, which is proposed to be a virulence factor that inhibits protein synthesis by directly binding the human ribosome. We demonstrate biochemically that NSP1 inhibits translation of model human and SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNAs (mRNAs). NSP1 specifically binds to the small (40S) ribosomal subunit, which is required for translation inhibition. Using single-molecule fluorescence assays to monitor NSP1–40S subunit binding in real time, we determine that eukaryotic translation initiation factors (eIFs) allosterically modulate the interaction of NSP1 with ribosomal preinitiation complexes in the absence of mRNA. We further elucidate that NSP1 competes with RNA segments downstream of the start codon to bind the 40S subunit and that the protein is unable to associate rapidly with 80S ribosomes assembled on an mRNA. Collectively, our findings support a model where NSP1 proteins from viruses in at least two subgenera of beta-CoVs associate with the open head conformation of the 40S subunit to inhibit an early step of translation, by preventing accommodation of mRNA within the entry channel.

Bidirectional RNA helicase activity of eucaryotic translation initiation factors 4A and 4F

1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 1134-1144 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Rozen ◽  
I Edery ◽  
K Meerovitch ◽  
T E Dever ◽  
W C Merrick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Structure ◽  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Direct Evidence ◽  
Rna Helicase ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Helicase Activity ◽  
Ribosome Binding ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Translation Initiation Factors ◽  
Hydrolysis Of

The mechanism of ribosome binding to eucaryotic mRNAs is not well understood, but it requires the participation of eucaryotic initiation factors eIF-4A, eIF-4B, and eIF-4F and the hydrolysis of ATP. Evidence has accumulated in support of a model in which these initiation factors function to unwind the 5'-proximal secondary structure in mRNA to facilitate ribosome binding. To obtain direct evidence for initiation factor-mediated RNA unwinding, we developed a simple assay to determine RNA helicase activity, and we show that eIF-4A or eIF-4F, in combination with eIF-4B, exhibits helicase activity. A striking and unprecedented feature of this activity is that it functions in a bidirectional manner. Thus, unwinding can occur either in the 5'-to-3' or 3'-to-5' direction. Unwinding in the 5'-to-3' direction by eIF-4F (the cap-binding protein complex), in conjunction with eIF-4B, was stimulated by the presence of the RNA 5' cap structure, whereas unwinding in the 3'-to-5' direction was completely cap independent. These results are discussed with respect to cap-dependent versus cap-independent mechanisms of ribosome binding to eucaryotic mRNAs.

scholarly journals Coupled Release of Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factors 5B and 1A from 80S Ribosomes following Subunit Joining

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 2384-2397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanne M. Fringer ◽  
Michael G. Acker ◽  
Christie A. Fekete ◽  
Jon R. Lorsch ◽  
Thomas E. Dever
Keyword(s):  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Translation Initiation Factor ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Eukaryotic Translation ◽  
Cell Extracts ◽  
Eukaryotic Translation Initiation ◽  
Subunit Joining

ABSTRACT The translation initiation GTPase eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5B (eIF5B) binds to the factor eIF1A and catalyzes ribosomal subunit joining in vitro. We show that rapid depletion of eIF5B in Saccharomyces cerevisiae results in the accumulation of eIF1A and mRNA on 40S subunits in vivo, consistent with a defect in subunit joining. Substituting Ala for the last five residues in eIF1A (eIF1A-5A) impairs eIF5B binding to eIF1A in cell extracts and to 40S complexes in vivo. Consistently, overexpression of eIF5B suppresses the growth and translation initiation defects in yeast expressing eIF1A-5A, indicating that eIF1A helps recruit eIF5B to the 40S subunit prior to subunit joining. The GTPase-deficient eIF5B-T439A mutant accumulated on 80S complexes in vivo and was retained along with eIF1A on 80S complexes formed in vitro. Likewise, eIF5B and eIF1A remained associated with 80S complexes formed in the presence of nonhydrolyzable GDPNP, whereas these factors were released from the 80S complexes in assays containing GTP. We propose that eIF1A facilitates the binding of eIF5B to the 40S subunit to promote subunit joining. Following 80S complex formation, GTP hydrolysis by eIF5B enables the release of both eIF5B and eIF1A, and the ribosome enters the elongation phase of protein synthesis.

scholarly journals Structural characterization of ribosome recruitment and translocation by type IV IRES

eLife ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Murray ◽  
Christos G Savva ◽  
Byung-Sik Shin ◽  
Thomas E Dever ◽  
V Ramakrishnan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Ribosomal Entry Site ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Elongation Factor ◽  
Post Translational Modification ◽  
Entry Site ◽  
Small Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Type Iv ◽  
Peptidyl Transfer ◽  
Initiation Of Translation

Viral mRNA sequences with a type IV IRES are able to initiate translation without any host initiation factors. Initial recruitment of the small ribosomal subunit as well as two translocation steps before the first peptidyl transfer are essential for the initiation of translation by these mRNAs. Using electron cryomicroscopy (cryo-EM) we have structurally characterized at high resolution how the Cricket Paralysis Virus Internal Ribosomal Entry Site (CrPV-IRES) binds the small ribosomal subunit (40S) and the translocation intermediate stabilized by elongation factor 2 (eEF2). The CrPV-IRES restricts the otherwise flexible 40S head to a conformation compatible with binding the large ribosomal subunit (60S). Once the 60S is recruited, the binary CrPV-IRES/80S complex oscillates between canonical and rotated states (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Fernández et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Koh et al., 2014</xref>), as seen for pre-translocation complexes with tRNAs. Elongation factor eEF2 with a GTP analog stabilizes the ribosome-IRES complex in a rotated state with an extra ~3 degrees of rotation. Key residues in domain IV of eEF2 interact with pseudoknot I (PKI) of the CrPV-IRES stabilizing it in a conformation reminiscent of a hybrid tRNA state. The structure explains how diphthamide, a eukaryotic and archaeal specific post-translational modification of a histidine residue of eEF2, is involved in translocation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document