scholarly journals SODA: Multi-locus species delimitation using quartet frequencies

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Rabiee ◽  
Siavash Mirarab
Keyword(s):  
Species Delimitation ◽  
Branch Length ◽  
Large Datasets ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Gene Trees ◽  
Species Trees ◽  
Very Large Datasets ◽  
Tree Inference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Tree Estimation

AbstractMotivationSpecies delimitation, the process of deciding how to group a set of organisms into units called species, is one of the most challenging problems in evolutionary computational biology. While many methods exist for species delimitation, most based on the coalescent theory, few are scalable to very large datasets and methods that scale tend to be not accurate. Species delimitation is closely related to species tree inference from discordant gene trees, a problem that has enjoyed rapid advances in recent years.ResultsIn this paper, we build on the accuracy and scalability of recent quartet-based methods for species tree estimation and propose a new method called SODA for species delimitation. SODA relies heavily on a recently developed method for testing zero branch length in species trees. In extensive simulations, we show that SODA can easily scale to very large datasets while maintaining high accuracy.AvailabilityThe code and data presented here are available on https://github.com/maryamrabiee/[email protected]

scholarly journals Comparing Methods for Species Tree Estimation With Gene Duplication and Loss

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Willson ◽  
Mrinmoy Saha Roddur ◽  
Tandy Warnow
Keyword(s):  
Gene Duplication ◽  
Data Bank ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Biological Research ◽  
Gene Trees ◽  
Species Trees ◽  
Tree Inference ◽  
Multiple Copies ◽  
Gene Duplication And Loss ◽  
Tree Estimation

AbstractSpecies tree inference from gene trees is an important part of biological research. One confounding factor in estimating species trees is gene duplication and loss which can lead to gene trees with multiple copies of the same gene. In recent years there have been several new methods developed to address this problem that have substantially improved on earlier methods; however, the best performing methods (ASTRAL-Pro, ASTRID-multi, and FastMulRFS) have not yet been directly compared. In this study, we compare ASTRAL-Pro, ASTRID-multi, and FastMulRFS under a wide variety of conditions. Our study shows that while all three have very good accuracy, nearly the same under many conditions, ASTRAL-Pro and ASTRID-multi are more reliably accurate than FastMuLRFS, and that ASTRID-multi is often faster than ASTRAL-Pro. The datasets generated for this study are freely available in the Illinois Data Bank at https://databank.illinois.edu/datasets/IDB-2418574

scholarly journals Impact of Ghost Introgression on Coalescent-based Species Tree Inference and Estimation of Divergence Time

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
XiaoXu Pang ◽  
Da-Yong Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Incomplete Lineage Sorting ◽  
Divergence Time ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Gene Trees ◽  
Species Trees ◽  
Lineage Sorting ◽  
Multispecies Coalescent ◽  
Tree Inference ◽  
Tree Methods ◽  
The Impact

The species studied in any evolutionary investigation generally constitute a very small proportion of all the species currently existing or that have gone extinct. It is therefore likely that introgression, which is widespread across the tree of life, involves "ghosts," i.e., unsampled, unknown, or extinct lineages. However, the impact of ghost introgression on estimations of species trees has been rarely studied and is thus poorly understood. In this study, we use mathematical analysis and simulations to examine the robustness of species tree methods based on a multispecies coalescent model under gene flow sourcing from an extant or ghost lineage. We found that very low levels of extant or ghost introgression can result in anomalous gene trees (AGTs) on three-taxon rooted trees if accompanied by strong incomplete lineage sorting (ILS). In contrast, even massive introgression, with more than half of the recipient genome descending from the donor lineage, may not necessarily lead to AGTs. In cases involving an ingroup lineage (defined as one that diverged no earlier than the most basal species under investigation) acting as the donor of introgression, the time of root divergence among the investigated species was either underestimated or remained unaffected, but for the cases of outgroup ghost lineages acting as donors, the divergence time was generally overestimated. Under many conditions of ingroup introgression, the stronger the ILS was, the higher was the accuracy of estimating the time of root divergence, although the topology of the species tree is more prone to be biased by the effect of introgression.

scholarly journals Phylogenomic terraces: presence and implication in species tree estimation from gene trees

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ishrat Tanzila Farah ◽  
Md Muktadirul Islam ◽  
Kazi Tasnim Zinat ◽  
Atif Hasan Rahman ◽  
Md Shamsuzzoha Bayzid
Keyword(s):  
Incomplete Lineage Sorting ◽  
Gene Tree ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Gene Trees ◽  
Species Trees ◽  
Lineage Sorting ◽  
Deep Coalescence ◽  
Tree Estimation ◽  
Tree Space ◽  
Multiple Species

AbstractSpecies tree estimation from multi-locus dataset is extremely challenging, especially in the presence of gene tree heterogeneity across the genome due to incomplete lineage sorting (ILS). Summary methods have been developed which estimate gene trees and then combine the gene trees to estimate a species tree by optimizing various optimization scores. In this study, we have formalized the concept of “phylogenomic terraces” in the species tree space, where multiple species trees with distinct topologies may have exactly the same optimization score (quartet score, extra lineage score, etc.) with respect to a collection of gene trees. We investigated the presence and implication of terraces in species tree estimation from multi-locus data by taking ILS into account. We analyzed two of the most popular ILS-aware optimization criteria: maximize quartet consistency (MQC) and minimize deep coalescence (MDC). Methods based on MQC are provably statistically consistent, whereas MDC is not a consistent criterion for species tree estimation. Our experiments, on a collection of dataset simulated under ILS, indicate that MDC-based methods may achieve competitive or identical quartet consistency score as MQC but could be significantly worse than MQC in terms of tree accuracy – demonstrating the presence and affect of phylogenomic terraces. This is the first known study that formalizes the concept of phylogenomic terraces in the context of species tree estimation from multi-locus data, and reports the presence and implications of terraces in species tree estimation under ILS.

scholarly journals Reversible Polymorphism-Aware Phylogenetic Models and their Application to Tree Inference

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominik Schrempf ◽  
Bui Quang Minh ◽  
Nicola De Maio ◽  
Arndt von Haeseler ◽  
Carolin Kosiol
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Incomplete Lineage Sorting ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Species Trees ◽  
Lineage Sorting ◽  
Substitution Models ◽  
Tree Inference ◽  
Genome Wide Data ◽  
Tree Estimation ◽  
Dna Substitution

AbstractWe present a reversible Polymorphism-Aware Phylogenetic Model (revPoMo) for species tree estimation from genome-wide data. revPoMo enables the reconstruction of large scale species trees for many within-species samples. It expands the alphabet of DNA substitution models to include polymorphic states, thereby, naturally accounting for incomplete lineage sorting. We implemented revPoMo in the maximum likelihood software IQ-TREE. A simulation study and an application to great apes data show that the runtimes of our approach and standard substitution models are comparable but that revPoMo has much better accuracy in estimating trees, divergence times and mutation rates. The advantage of revPoMo is that an increase of sample size per species improves estimations but does not increase runtime. Therefore, revPoMo is a valuable tool with several applications, from speciation dating to species tree reconstruction.

scholarly journals wQFM: Statistically Consistent Genome-scale Species Tree Estimation from Weighted Quartets

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahim Mahbub ◽  
Zahin Wahab ◽  
Rezwana Reaz ◽  
M. Saifur Rahman ◽  
Md. Shamsuzzoha Bayzid
Keyword(s):  
Incomplete Lineage Sorting ◽  
Gene Tree ◽  
Accurate Method ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Estimation Methods ◽  
Gene Trees ◽  
Species Trees ◽  
Lineage Sorting ◽  
Tree Estimation ◽  
Source Form

AbstractMotivationSpecies tree estimation from genes sampled from throughout the whole genome is complicated due to the gene tree-species tree discordance. Incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) is one of the most frequent causes for this discordance, where alleles can coexist in populations for periods that may span several speciation events. Quartet-based summary methods for estimating species trees from a collection of gene trees are becoming popular due to their high accuracy and statistical guarantee under ILS. Generating quartets with appropriate weights, where weights correspond to the relative importance of quartets, and subsequently amalgamating the weighted quartets to infer a single coherent species tree allows for a statistically consistent way of estimating species trees. However, handling weighted quartets is challenging.ResultsWe propose wQFM, a highly accurate method for species tree estimation from multi-locus data, by extending the quartet FM (QFM) algorithm to a weighted setting. wQFM was assessed on a collection of simulated and real biological datasets, including the avian phylogenomic dataset which is one of the largest phylogenomic datasets to date. We compared wQFM with wQMC, which is the best alternate method for weighted quartet amalgamation, and with ASTRAL, which is one of the most accurate and widely used coalescent-based species tree estimation methods. Our results suggest that wQFM matches or improves upon the accuracy of wQMC and ASTRAL.AvailabilitywQFM is available in open source form at https://github.com/Mahim1997/wQFM-2020.

scholarly journals ASTRID: Accurate Species TRees from Internode Distances

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pranjal Vachaspati ◽  
Tandy Warnow
Keyword(s):  
Good Accuracy ◽  
Incomplete Lineage Sorting ◽  
Current Method ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Estimation Methods ◽  
Gene Trees ◽  
Species Trees ◽  
Lineage Sorting ◽  
Tree Estimation ◽  
Source Form

Background: Incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), modelled by the multi-species coalescent (MSC), is known to create discordance between gene trees and species trees, and lead to inaccurate species tree estimations unless appropriate methods are used to estimate the species tree. While many statistically consistent methods have been developed to estimate the species tree in the presence of ILS, only ASTRAL-2 and NJst have been shown to have good accuracy on large datasets. Yet, NJst is generally slower and less accurate than ASTRAL-2, and cannot run on some datasets. Results: We have redesigned NJst to enable it to run on all datasets, and we have expanded its design space so that it can be used with different distance-based tree estimation methods. The resultant method, ASTRID, is statistically consistent under the MSC model, and has accuracy that is competitive with ASTRAL-2. Furthermore, ASTRID is much faster than ASTRAL-2, completing in minutes on some datasets for which ASTRAL-2 used hours. Conclusions: ASTRID is a new coalescent-based method for species tree estimation that is competitive with the best current method in terms of accuracy, while being much faster. ASTRID is available in open source form on github.

scholarly journals ASTRAL-Pro: Quartet-Based Species-Tree Inference despite Paralogy

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 3292-3307
Author(s):  
Chao Zhang ◽  
Celine Scornavacca ◽  
Erin K Molloy ◽  
Siavash Mirarab
Keyword(s):  
Simulated Data ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Single Copy ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Alternative Methods ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Gene Trees ◽  
Species Trees ◽  
Tree Inference ◽  
Genome Wide Data

Abstract Phylogenetic inference from genome-wide data (phylogenomics) has revolutionized the study of evolution because it enables accounting for discordance among evolutionary histories across the genome. To this end, summary methods have been developed to allow accurate and scalable inference of species trees from gene trees. However, most of these methods, including the widely used ASTRAL, can only handle single-copy gene trees and do not attempt to model gene duplication and gene loss. As a result, most phylogenomic studies have focused on single-copy genes and have discarded large parts of the data. Here, we first propose a measure of quartet similarity between single-copy and multicopy trees that accounts for orthology and paralogy. We then introduce a method called ASTRAL-Pro (ASTRAL for PaRalogs and Orthologs) to find the species tree that optimizes our quartet similarity measure using dynamic programing. By studying its performance on an extensive collection of simulated data sets and on real data sets, we show that ASTRAL-Pro is more accurate than alternative methods.

Multispecies Coalescent: Theory and Applications in Phylogenetics

2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siavash Mirarab ◽  
Luay Nakhleh ◽  
Tandy Warnow
Keyword(s):  
Incomplete Lineage Sorting ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Phylogenetic Networks ◽  
Biological Research ◽  
Annual Review ◽  
Publication Date ◽  
Gene Trees ◽  
Species Trees ◽  
Basic Part ◽  
Tree Estimation

Species tree estimation is a basic part of many biological research projects, ranging from answering basic evolutionary questions (e.g., how did a group of species adapt to their environments?) to addressing questions in functional biology. Yet, species tree estimation is very challenging, due to processes such as incomplete lineage sorting, gene duplication and loss, horizontal gene transfer, and hybridization, which can make gene trees differ from each other and from the overall evolutionary history of the species. Over the last 10–20 years, there has been tremendous growth in methods and mathematical theory for estimating species trees and phylogenetic networks, and some of these methods are now in wide use. In this survey, we provide an overview of the current state of the art, identify the limitations of existing methods and theory, and propose additional research problems and directions. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, Volume 52 is November 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

scholarly journals STELAR: A statistically consistent coalescent-based species tree estimation method by maximizing triplet consistency

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mazharul Islam ◽  
Kowshika Sarker ◽  
Trisha Das ◽  
Rezwana Reaz ◽  
Md. Shamsuzzoha Bayzid
Keyword(s):  
Incomplete Lineage Sorting ◽  
Gene Tree ◽  
Estimation Method ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Mcmc Methods ◽  
Consistent Estimate ◽  
Gene Trees ◽  
Species Trees ◽  
Lineage Sorting ◽  
Tree Estimation

AbstractBackgroundSpecies tree estimation is frequently based on phylogenomic approaches that use multiple genes from throughout the genome. However, estimating a species tree from a collection of gene trees can be complicated due to the presence of gene tree incongruence resulting from incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), which is modelled by the multi-species coalescent process. Maximum likelihood and Bayesian MCMC methods can potentially result in accurate trees, but they do not scale well to large datasets.ResultsWe present STELAR (Species Tree Estimation by maximizing tripLet AgReement), a new fast and highly accurate statistically consistent coalescent-based method for estimating species trees from a collection of gene trees. We formalized the constrained triplet consensus (CTC) problem and showed that the solution to the CTC problem is a statistically consistent estimate of the species tree under the multi-species coalescent (MSC) model. STELAR is an efficient dynamic programming based solution to the CTC problem which is highly accurate and scalable. We evaluated the accuracy of STELAR in comparison with SuperTriplets, which is an alternate fast and highly accurate triplet-based supertree method, and with MP-EST and ASTRAL – two of the most popular and accurate coalescent-based methods. Experimental results suggest that STELAR matches the accuracy of ASTRAL and improves on MP-EST and SuperTriplets.ConclusionsTheoretical and empirical results (on both simulated and real biological datasets) suggest that STELAR is a valuable technique for species tree estimation from gene tree distributions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document