scholarly journals The effect of anteroposterior perturbations on the control of the center of mass during treadmill walking

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maud van den Bogaart ◽  
Sjoerd M. Bruijn ◽  
Jaap H. van Dieën ◽  
Pieter Meyns
Keyword(s):  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Force Plate ◽  
Gait Pattern ◽  
Therapeutic Interventions ◽  
Heel Strike ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Relative Contribution ◽  
Counter Rotation

AbstractShifts of the center of pressure (CoP) through modulation of foot placement and ankle moments (CoP-mechanism) cause accelerations of the center of mass (CoM) that can be used to stabilize gait. An additional mechanism that can be used to stabilize gait, is the counter-rotation mechanism, i.e., changing the angular momentum of segments around the CoM to change the direction of the ground reaction force. The relative contribution of these mechanisms to the control of the CoM is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to determine the relative contribution of these mechanisms to control the CoM in the anteroposterior (AP) direction during a normal step and the first recovery step after perturbation in healthy adults. Nineteen healthy subjects walked on a split-belt treadmill and received unexpected belt acceleration perturbations of various magnitudes applied immediately after right heel-strike. Full-body kinematic and force plate data were obtained to calculate the contributions of the CoP-mechanism and the counter-rotation mechanism to control the CoM. We found that the CoP-mechanism contributed to corrections of the CoM acceleration after the AP perturbations, while the counter-rotation mechanism actually contributed to CoM acceleration in the direction of the perturbation, but only in the initial phases of the first step after the perturbation. The counter-rotation mechanism appeared to prevent interference with the gait pattern, rather than using it to control the CoM after the perturbation. Understanding the mechanisms used to stabilize gait may have implications for the design of therapeutic interventions that aim to decrease fall incidence.Summary statementUnderstanding the mechanisms used to stabilize gait during unperturbed and perturbed walking may have implications for the design of therapeutic interventions that aim to decrease fall incidence.

scholarly journals The effect of constraining mediolateral ankle moments and foot placement on the use of the counter-rotation mechanism during walking

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maud van den Bogaart ◽  
Sjoerd M. Bruijn ◽  
Joke Spildooren ◽  
Jaap H. van Dieën ◽  
Pieter Meyns
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Force Plate ◽  
Gait Pattern ◽  
Task Constraints ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Counter Rotation ◽  
Body Kinematic

Stability during walking can be maintained by shifts of the Center of Pressure through modulation of foot placement and ankle moments (CoP-mechanism). An additional mechanism to stabilize gait, is the counter-rotation mechanism i.e. changing the angular momentum of segments around the Center of Mass (CoM) to change the direction of the ground reaction force. It is unknown if and how humans use the counter-rotation mechanism to control the CoM during walking and how this interacts with the CoP-mechanism. Thirteen healthy adults walked on a treadmill, while full-body kinematic and force plate data were obtained. The contributions of the CoP and the counter-rotation mechanisms to control the CoM were calculated during steady-state walking, walking on LesSchuh, i.e. constraining mediolateral CoP shifts underneath the stance foot and walking on LesSchuh at 50% of normal step width, constraining both foot placement and ankle mechanisms (LesSchuh50%). A decreased magnitude of within-stride control by the CoP-mechanism was compensated for by an increased magnitude of within-stride control by the counter-rotation mechanism during LesSchuh50% compared to steady-state walking. This suggests that the counter-rotation mechanism is used to stabilize gait when needed. However, the mean contribution of the counter-rotation mechanism over strides did not increase during LesSchuh50% compared to steady-state walking. The CoP-mechanism was the main contributor to the total CoM acceleration. The use of the counter-rotation mechanism may be limited because angular accelerations ultimately need to be reversed and because of interference with other task constraints, such as head stabilization and preventing interference with the gait pattern.

scholarly journals Active foot placement control ensures stable gait: Effect of constraints on foot placement and ankle moments

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0242215
Author(s):  
A. M. van Leeuwen ◽  
J. H. van Dieën ◽  
A. Daffertshofer ◽  
S. M. Bruijn
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Stride Frequency ◽  
Tight Control ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Ankle Moment ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Moment Control

Step-by-step foot placement control, relative to the center of mass (CoM) kinematic state, is generally considered a dominant mechanism for maintenance of gait stability. By adequate (mediolateral) positioning of the center of pressure with respect to the CoM, the ground reaction force generates a moment that prevents falling. In healthy individuals, foot placement is complemented mainly by ankle moment control ensuring stability. To evaluate possible compensatory relationships between step-by-step foot placement and complementary ankle moments, we investigated the degree of (active) foot placement control during steady-state walking, and under either foot placement-, or ankle moment constraints. Thirty healthy participants walked on a treadmill, while full-body kinematics, ground reaction forces and EMG activities were recorded. As a replication of earlier findings, we first showed step-by-step foot placement is associated with preceding CoM state and hip ab-/adductor activity during steady-state walking. Tight control of foot placement appears to be important at normal walking speed because there was a limited change in the degree of foot placement control despite the presence of a foot placement constraint. At slow speed, the degree of foot placement control decreased substantially, suggesting that tight control of foot placement is less essential when walking slowly. Step-by-step foot placement control was not tightened to compensate for constrained ankle moments. Instead compensation was achieved through increases in step width and stride frequency.

scholarly journals Active foot placement control ensures stable gait: Effect of constraints on foot placement and ankle moments

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.M. van Leeuwen ◽  
J.H. van Dieën ◽  
A. Daffertshofer ◽  
S.M. Bruijn
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Stride Frequency ◽  
Tight Control ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Ankle Moment ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Moment Control

AbstractStep-by-step foot placement control, relative to the center of mass (CoM) kinematic state, is generally considered a dominant mechanism for maintenance of gait stability. By adequate (mediolateral) positioning of the center of pressure with respect to the CoM, the ground reaction force generates a moment that prevents falling. In healthy individuals, foot placement is complemented mainly by ankle moment control ensuring stability. To evaluate possible compensatory relationships between step-by-step foot placement and complementary ankle moments, we investigated the degree of (active) foot placement control during steady-state walking, and under either foot placement-, or ankle moment constraints. Thirty healthy participants walked on a treadmill, while full-body kinematics, ground reaction forces and EMG activities were recorded. As a replication of earlier findings, we first showed step-by-step foot placement is associated with preceding CoM state and hip ab-/adductor activity during steady-state walking. Tight control of foot placement appears to be important at normal walking speed because there was a limited change in the degree of foot placement control despite the presence of a foot placement constraint. At slow speed, the degree of foot placement control decreased substantially, suggesting that tight control of foot placement is less essential when walking slowly. Step-by-step foot placement control was not tightened to compensate for constrained ankle moments. Instead compensation was achieved through increases in step width and stride frequency.

scholarly journals Ankle muscles activate: mediolateral center of pressure control ensures stable gait

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anina Moira van Leeuwen ◽  
Jaap H van Dieen ◽  
Andreas Daffertshofer ◽  
Sjoerd M Bruijn
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Pressure Control ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Ankle Moment ◽  
Ankle Muscle ◽  
Moment Control

During steady-state walking mediolateral gait stability can be maintained by controlling the center of pressure (CoP). The CoP modulates the moment of the ground reaction force, which brakes and reverses movement of the center of mass (CoM) towards the lateral border of the base of support. In addition to foot placement, ankle moments serve to control the CoP. We hypothesized that, during steady-state walking, single stance ankle moments establish a CoP shift to correct for errors in foot placement. We expected ankle muscle activity to be associated with this complementary CoP shift. During treadmill walking, full-body kinematics, ground reaction forces and electromyography were recorded in thirty healthy participants. We found a negative relationship between preceding foot placement error and CoP displacement during single stance. Too medial steps were compensated for by a lateral CoP shift and vice versa, too lateral steps were compensated for by a medial CoP shift. Peroneus longus, soleus and tibialis anterior activity correlated with these CoP shifts. As such, we identified an (active) ankle strategy during steady-state walking. As expected, absolute explained CoP variance by foot placement error decreased when walking with shoes constraining ankle moments. Yet, contrary to our expectations that ankle moment control would compensate for constrained foot placement, the absolute explained CoP variance by foot placement error did not increase when foot placement was constrained. We argue that this lack of compensation reflects the interdependent nature of ankle moment and foot placement control. We suggest that single stance ankle moments do not only compensate for preceding foot placement errors, but also assist control of the subsequent foot placement. Foot placement and ankle moment control are caught in a circular relationship, in which constraints imposed on one will also influence the other.

scholarly journals Pressure-Sensitive Insoles for Real-Time Gait-Related Applications

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 1448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Martini ◽  
Tommaso Fiumalbi ◽  
Filippo Dell’Agnello ◽  
Zoran Ivanić ◽  
Marko Munih ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Force Plate ◽  
Vertical Component ◽  
The Body ◽  
Heel Strike ◽  
Pressure Sensitive ◽  
Time Accuracy

Wearable robotic devices require sensors and algorithms that can recognize the user state in real-time, in order to provide synergistic action with the body. For devices intended for locomotion-related applications, shoe-embedded sensors are a common and convenient choice, potentially advantageous for performing gait assessment in real-world environments. In this work, we present the development of a pair of pressure-sensitive insoles based on optoelectronic sensors for the real-time estimation of temporal gait parameters. The new design makes use of a simplified sensor configuration that preserves the time accuracy of gait event detection relative to previous prototypes. The system has been assessed relatively to a commercial force plate recording the vertical component of the ground reaction force (vGRF) and the coordinate of the center of pressure along the so-called progression or antero-posterior plane (CoPAP) in ten healthy participants during ground-level walking at two speeds. The insoles showed overall median absolute errors (MAE) of 0.06 (0.02) s and 0.04 (0.02) s for heel-strike and toe-off recognition, respectively. Moreover, they enabled reasonably accurate estimations of the stance phase duration (2.02 (2.03) % error) and CoPAP profiles (Pearson correlation coefficient with force platform ρCoP = 0.96 (0.02)), whereas the correlation with vGRF measured by the force plate was lower than that obtained with the previous prototype (ρvGRF = 0.47 (0.20)). These results confirm the suitability of the insoles for online sensing purposes such as timely gait phase estimation and discrete event recognition.

Controlling Propulsive Forces in Gait Initiation in Transfemoral Amputees

2008 ◽  
Vol 130 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Helco G. van Keeken ◽  
Aline H. Vrieling ◽  
At L. Hof ◽  
Jan P. K. Halbertsma ◽  
Tanneke Schoppen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Force Measurement ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Force Plate ◽  
Measurement Data ◽  
Gait Initiation ◽  
Postural Adjustment ◽  
Applied Forces ◽  
Ankle Function

During prosthetic gait initiation, transfemoral (TF) amputees control the spatial and temporal parameters that modulate the propulsive forces, the positions of the center of pressure (CoP), and the center of mass (CoM). Whether their sound leg or the prosthetic leg is leading, the TF amputees reach the same end velocity. We wondered how the CoM velocity build up is influenced by the differences in propulsive components in the legs and how the trajectory of the CoP differs from the CoP trajectory in able bodied (AB) subjects. Seven TF subjects and eight AB subjects were tested on a force plate and on an 8m long walkway. On the force plate, they initiated gait two times with their sound leg and two times with their prosthetic leg. Force measurement data were used to calculate the CoM velocity curves in horizontal and vertical directions. Gait initiated on the walkway was used to determine the leg preference. We hypothesized that because of the differences in propulsive components, the motions of the CoP and the CoM have to be different, as ankle muscles are used to help generate horizontal ground reaction force components. Also, due to the absence of an active ankle function in the prosthetic leg, the vertical CoM velocity during gait initiation may be different when leading with the prosthetic leg compared to when leading with the sound leg. The data showed that whether the TF subjects initiated a gait with their prosthetic leg or with their sound leg, their horizontal end velocity was equal. The subjects compensated the loss of propulsive force under the prosthesis with the sound leg, both when the prosthetic leg was leading and when the sound leg was leading. In the vertical CoM velocity, a tendency for differences between the two conditions was found. When initiating gait with the sound leg, the downward vertical CoM velocity at the end of the gait initiation was higher compared to when leading with the prosthetic leg. Our subjects used a gait initiation strategy that depended mainly on the active ankle function of the sound leg; therefore, they changed the relative durations of the gait initiation anticipatory postural adjustment phase and the step execution phase. Both legs were controlled in one single system of gait propulsion. The shape of the CoP trajectories, the applied forces, and the CoM velocity curves are described in this paper.

scholarly journals Ankle muscles drive mediolateral center of pressure control to ensure stable steady state gait

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. van Leeuwen ◽  
J. H. van Dieën ◽  
A. Daffertshofer ◽  
S. M. Bruijn
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Pressure Control ◽  
Stable Steady State ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Ankle Moment ◽  
Moment Control

AbstractDuring steady-state walking, mediolateral gait stability can be maintained by controlling the center of pressure (CoP). The CoP modulates the moment of the ground reaction force, which brakes and reverses movement of the center of mass (CoM) towards the lateral border of the base of support. In addition to foot placement, ankle moments serve to control the CoP. We hypothesized that, during steady-state walking, single stance ankle moments establish a CoP shift to correct for errors in foot placement. We expected ankle muscle activity to be associated with this complementary CoP shift. During treadmill walking, full-body kinematics, ground reaction forces and electromyography were recorded in thirty healthy participants. We found a negative relationship between preceding foot placement error and CoP displacement during single stance; steps that were too medial were compensated for by a lateral CoP shift and vice versa, steps that were too lateral were compensated for by a medial CoP shift. Peroneus longus, soleus and tibialis anterior activity correlated with these CoP shifts. As such, we identified an (active) ankle strategy during steady-state walking. As expected, absolute explained CoP variance by foot placement error decreased when walking with shoes constraining ankle moments. Yet, contrary to our expectations that ankle moment control would compensate for constrained foot placement, the absolute explained CoP variance by foot placement error did not increase when foot placement was constrained. We argue that this lack of compensation reflects the interdependent nature of ankle moment and foot placement control. We suggest that single stance ankle moments do not only compensate for preceding foot placement errors, but also assist control of the subsequent foot placement. Foot placement and ankle moment control are ‘caught’ in a circular relationship, in which constraints imposed on one will also influence the other.

scholarly journals Interdependence of balance mechanisms during bipedal locomotion

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler Fettrow ◽  
Hendrik Reimann ◽  
David Grenet ◽  
Elizabeth Thompson ◽  
Jeremy Crenshaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Heel Strike ◽  
Systematic Change ◽  
Lateral Ankle ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Balance System ◽  
Bipedal Gait ◽  
Walking Balance

AbstractOur main interest is to identify how humans maintain upright while walking. Balance during standing and walking is different, primarily due to a gait cycle which the nervous system must contend with a variety of body configurations and frequent perturbations (i.e., heel-strike). We have identified three mechanisms that healthy young adults use to respond to a visually perceived fall to the side. The lateral ankle mechanism and the foot placement mechanism are used to shift the center of pressure in the direction of the perceived fall, and the center of mass away from the perceived fall. The push-off mechanism, a systematic change in ankle plan-tarflexion angle in the trailing leg, results in fine adjustments to medial-lateral balance near the end of double stance. The focus here is to understand how the three basic balance mechanisms are coordinated to produce an overall balance response. The results indicate that lateral ankle and foot placement mechanisms are inversely related. Larger lateral ankle responses lead to smaller foot placement changes. Correlations involving the push-off mechanism, while significant, were weak. However, the consistency of the correlations across stimulus conditions suggest the push-off mechanism has the role of small adjustments to medial-lateral movement near the end of the balance response. This verifies that a fundamental feature of human bipedal gait is a highly flexible balance system that recruits and coordinates multiple mechanisms to maintain upright balance during walking to accommodate extreme changes in body configuration and frequent perturbations.

Dynamic and Reactive Walking for Humanoid Robots Based on Foot Placement Control

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (02) ◽  
pp. 1550041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Alejandro Castano ◽  
Zhibin Li ◽  
Chengxu Zhou ◽  
Nikos Tsagarakis ◽  
Darwin Caldwell
Keyword(s):  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Humanoid Robots ◽  
Gait Pattern ◽  
Gait Patterns ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Inverted Pendulum Model ◽  
Gait Parameters ◽  
Pendulum Model ◽  
Single Mass ◽  
Walking Velocity

This paper presents a novel online walking control that replans the gait pattern based on our proposed foot placement control using the actual center of mass (COM) state feedback. The analytic solution of foot placement is formulated based on the linear inverted pendulum model (LIPM) to recover the walking velocity and to reject external disturbances. The foot placement control predicts where and when to place the foothold in order to modulate the gait given the desired gait parameters. The zero moment point (ZMP) references and foot trajectories are replanned online according to the updated foothold prediction. Hence, only desired gait parameters are required instead of predefined or fixed gait patterns. Given the new ZMP references, the extended prediction self-adaptive control (EPSAC) approach to model predictive control (MPC) is used to minimize the ZMP response errors considering the acceleration constraints. Furthermore, to ensure smooth gait transitions, the conditions for the gait initiation and termination are also presented. The effectiveness of the presented gait control is validated by extensive disturbance rejection studies ranging from single mass simulation to a full body humanoid robot COMAN in a physics based simulator. The versatility is demonstrated by the control of reactive gaits as well as reactive stepping from standing posture. We present the data of the applied disturbances, the prediction of sagittal/lateral foot placements, the replanning of the foot/ZMP trajectories, and the COM responses.

scholarly journals Dynamic Balancing Responses in Unilateral Transtibial Amputees Following Outward-Directed Perturbations During Slow Treadmill Walking Differ Considerably for Amputated and Non-Amputated Side

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrej Olenšek ◽  
Matjaž Zadravec ◽  
Helena Burger ◽  
Zlatko Matjačić
Keyword(s):  
Stance Phase ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Dynamic Balancing ◽  
Transtibial Amputation ◽  
Control Subjects ◽  
Foot Strike ◽  
Transtibial Amputees ◽  
Proprioceptive Function

Abstract BackgroundDue to disrupted motor and proprioceptive function lower limb amputation imposes considerable challenges associated with balance and greatly increases risk of falling in case of perturbations during walking. The aim of this study was to investigate dynamic balancing responses in unilateral transtibial amputees when they were subjected to perturbing pushes to the pelvis in outward direction at the time of foot strike on non-amputated and amputated side during slow walking.MethodsFourteen subjects with unilateral transtibial amputation and nine control subjects participated in the study. They were subjected to perturbations that were delivered to the pelvis at the time of foot strike of either the left or right leg. We recorded trajectories of center of pressure and center of mass, durations of in-stance and stepping periods as well as ground reaction forces. Statistical analysis was performed to determine significant differences in dynamic balancing responses between control subjects and subjects with amputation when subjected to outward-directed perturbation upon entering stance phases with non-amputated or amputated side.ResultsWhen outward-directed perturbations were delivered at the time of foot strike of the non-amputated leg, subjects with amputation were able to modulate center of pressure and ground reaction force similarly as control subjects which indicates application of in-stance balancing strategies. On the other hand, there was a complete lack of in-stance response when perturbations were delivered when the amputated leg entered the stance phase. Subjects with amputations instead used the stepping strategy and adjusted placement of the non-amputated leg in the ensuing stance phase to make a cross-step. Such response resulted in significantly higher displacement of center of mass. ConclusionsResults of this study suggest that due to the absence of the COP modulation mechanism, which is normally supplied by ankle motor function, people with unilateral transtibial amputation are compelled to choose the stepping strategy over in-stance strategy when they are subjected to outward-directed perturbation on the amputated side. However, the stepping response is less efficient than in-stance response. To improve their balancing responses to unexpected balance perturbation people fitted with passive transtibial prostheses should undergo perturbation-based balance training during clinical rehabilitation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document