scholarly journals Kinesin KIF18A is a novel PUM regulated target promoting mitotic progression and survival of human male germ cell line - TCam-2

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maciej Jerzy Smialek ◽  
Bogna Kuczynska ◽  
Erkut Ilaslan ◽  
Damian Mikolaj Janecki ◽  
Marcin Piotr Sajek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Germ Cell ◽  
Germ Cells ◽  
Posttranscriptional Regulation ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Luciferase Reporter ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Transcriptional Level ◽  
Human Male

ABSTRACTRegulation of proliferation, apoptosis and cell cycle is crucial for the physiology of germ cells. Their malfunction contributes to infertility and germ cell tumours. Kinesin KIF18A is an important germ cell specific regulator which downregulates apoptosis while promoting cell proliferation in animal models. Whereas regulation of KIF18A expression was studied at the transcriptional level, its posttranscriptional regulation has not been extensively explored. Due to the presence of two PUM Binding Elements (PBEs) within 3’UTR, KIF18A mRNA is a potential target of PUMs, well known RNA-binding proteins involved in posttranscriptional gene regulation (PTGR). We investigated that possibility in TCam-2 cells originating from seminoma, representing human male germ cells. We conducted RNA co-immunoprecipitation combined with RT-qPCR, as well as luciferase reporter assay by applying appropriate luciferase construct encoding the wild type KIF18A 3’UTR, upon PUM1 and PUM2 overexpression or knockdown. We found that KIF18A is repressed by PUM1 and PUM2. To study how this regulation influences KIF18A function in TCam-2 cells, MTS proliferation assay, apoptosis and cell cycle, analysis using flow cytometry was performed upon KIF18A siRNA knockdown. We uncovered that KIF18A significantly influences proliferation, apoptosis and cell cycle, these effects being opposite to PUM effects in TCam-2 cells. We propose that repression by PUM proteins may represent one of mechanisms influencing KIF18A level in controlling proliferation, cell cycle and apoptosis in TCam-2 cells. To the best of our knowledge, this paper identifies the first mammalian functionally germ cell specific gene that is regulated by Pum proteins via 3’UTR.

scholarly journals The RNA-binding protein ELAVL1/HuR is essential for mouse spermatogenesis, acting both at meiotic and postmeiotic stages

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (16) ◽  
pp. 2875-2885 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mai Nguyen Chi ◽  
Jacques Auriol ◽  
Bernard Jégou ◽  
Dimitris L. Kontoyiannis ◽  
James M.A. Turner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cells ◽  
Posttranscriptional Regulation ◽  
Target Gene ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Rna Binding Protein ◽  
Female Sterility ◽  
Targeted Deletion

Posttranscriptional mechanisms are crucial to regulate spermatogenesis. Accurate protein synthesis during germ cell development relies on RNA binding proteins that control the storage, stability, and translation of mRNAs in a tightly and temporally regulated manner. Here, we focused on the RNA binding protein Embryonic Lethal Abnormal Vision (ELAV) L1/Human antigen R (HuR) known to be a key regulator of posttranscriptional regulation in somatic cells but the function of which during gametogenesis has never been investigated. In this study, we have used conditional loss- and gain-of-function approaches to address this issue in mice. We show that targeted deletion of HuR specifically in germ cells leads to male but not female sterility. Mutant males are azoospermic because of the extensive death of spermatocytes at meiotic divisions and failure of spermatid elongation. The latter defect is also observed upon HuR overexpression. To elucidate further the molecular mechanisms underlying spermatogenesis defects in HuR-deleted and -overexpressing testes, we undertook a target gene approach and discovered that heat shock protein (HSP)A2/HSP70-2, a crucial regulator of spermatogenesis, was down-regulated in both situations. HuR specifically binds hspa2 mRNA and controls its expression at the translational level in germ cells. Our study provides the first genetic evidence of HuR involvement during spermatogenesis and reveals Hspa2 as a target for HuR.

scholarly journals NANOS2 suppresses the cell cycle by repressing mTORC1 activators in embryonic male germ cells

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryuki Shimada ◽  
Hiroko Koike ◽  
Takamasa Hirano ◽  
Yumiko Saga
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Germ Cell ◽  
Germ Cells ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Initial Step ◽  
Sexually Dimorphic ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Male Germ Cells ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Male Specific

AbstractDuring murine germ cell development, male germ cells enter the mitotically arrested G0 stage, which is an initial step of sexually dimorphic differentiation. The male specific RNA-binding protein NANOS2 has a key role in suppressing the cell cycle in germ cells. However, the detailed mechanism of how NANOS2 regulates the cell cycle remains unclear. Using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), we extracted the cell cycle state of each germ cell in wild-type and Nanos2-KO testes, and revealed that Nanos2 expression starts in mitotic cells and induces mitotic arrest. We also found that NANOS2 and p38 MAPK work in parallel to regulate the cell cycle, suggesting that several different cascades are involved in the induction of cell cycle arrest. Furthermore, we identified Rheb, a regulator of mTORC1, and Ptma as possible targets of NANOS2. We propose that the repression of the cell cycle is a primary function of NANOS2 and that it is mediated via the suppression of mTORC1 activity by repressing Rheb in a post-transcriptional manner.

scholarly journals Characterization of RNP Networks of PUM1 and PUM2 Post-Transcriptional Regulators in TCam-2 Cells, a Human Male Germ Cell Model

Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 984
Author(s):  
Maciej J. Smialek ◽  
Erkut Ilaslan ◽  
Marcin P. Sajek ◽  
Aleksandra Swiercz ◽  
Damian M. Janecki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Germ Cell ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Cell Model ◽  
Human Reproduction ◽  
Male Germ Cell ◽  
Binding Motif ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Human Male

Mammalian Pumilio (PUM) proteins are sequence-specific, RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) with wide-ranging roles. They are involved in germ cell development, which has functional implications in development and fertility. Although human PUM1 and PUM2 are closely related to each other and recognize the same RNA binding motif, there is some evidence for functional diversity. To address that problem, first we used RIP-Seq and RNA-Seq approaches, and identified mRNA pools regulated by PUM1 and PUM2 proteins in the TCam-2 cell line, a human male germ cell model. Second, applying global mass spectrometry-based profiling, we identified distinct PUM1- and PUM2-interacting putative protein cofactors, most of them involved in RNA processing. Third, combinatorial analysis of RIP and RNA-Seq, mass spectrometry, and RNA motif enrichment analysis revealed that PUM1 and PUM2 form partially varied RNP-regulatory networks (RNA regulons), which indicate different roles in human reproduction and testicular tumorigenesis. Altogether, this work proposes that protein paralogues with very similar and evolutionary highly conserved functional domains may play divergent roles in the cell by combining with different sets of protein cofactors. Our findings highlight the versatility of PUM paralogue-based post-transcriptional regulation, offering insight into the mechanisms underlying their diverse biological roles and diseases resulting from their dysfunction.

scholarly journals Functional reconstruction of NANOS3 expression in the germ cell lineage by a novel transgenic reporter reveals distinct subcellular localizations of NANOS3

Reproduction ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 139 (2) ◽  
pp. 381-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masashi Yamaji ◽  
Takashi Tanaka ◽  
Mayo Shigeta ◽  
Shinichiro Chuma ◽  
Yumiko Saga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Germ Cells ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Primordial Germ Cells ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Processing Bodies

Mutations of RNA-binding proteins such as NANOS3, TIAL1, and DND1 in mice have been known to result in the failure of survival and/or proliferation of primordial germ cells (PGCs) soon after their fate is specified (around embryonic day (E) 8.0), leading to the infertility of these animals. However, the mechanisms of actions of these RNA-binding proteins remain largely unresolved. As a foundation to explore the role of these RNA-binding proteins in germ cells, we established a novel transgenic reporter strain that expresses NANOS3 fused with EGFP under the control of Nanos3 regulatory elements. NANOS3–EGFP exhibited exclusive expression in PGCs as early as E7.25, and continued to be expressed in female germ cells until around E14.5 and in male germ cells throughout the fetal period with declining expression levels after E16.5. NANOS3–EGFP resumed strong expression in postnatal spermatogonia and continued to be expressed in undifferentiated spermatogonial cells in adults. Importantly, the Nanos3–EGFP transgene rescued the sterile phenotype of Nanos3 homozygous mutants, demonstrating the functional equivalency of NANOS3–EGFP with endogenous NANOS3. We found that throughout germ cell development, a predominant amount of  NANOS3–EGFP co-localized with TIAL1 (also known as TIAR) and phosphorylated eukaryotic initiation factor 2α, markers for the stress granules, whereas a fraction of it showed co-localization with DCP1A, a marker for the processing bodies. On the other hand, NANOS3–EGFP did not co-localize with Tudor domain-containing protein 1, a marker for the intermitochondrial cements, in spermatogenic cells. These findings unveil the presence of distinct posttranscriptional regulations in PGCs soon after their specification, for which RNA-binding proteins such as NANOS3 and TIAL1 would play critical functions.

167. MUSASHI FAMILY OF RNA BINDING PROTEINS: CELL CYCLE REGULATORS IN SPERMATOGENESIS

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 85
Author(s):  
E. A. McLaughlin ◽  
B. A. Fraser ◽  
V. Pye ◽  
M. Bigland ◽  
N. A. Siddall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Differentiation ◽  
Germ Cell ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Translational Repression ◽  
Germ Cell Differentiation ◽  
Pachytene Spermatocytes

Mammalian meiosis is a tightly regulated process involving specialized cell cycle progression and morphogenetic changes. We have demonstrated that the Musashi family of RNA binding proteins is implicated in the regulation of spermatogonial stem self renewal and germ cell differentiation. Here we describe the novel mechanism by which the Musashi family proteins, Msi1 and Msi2, act to control exit from spermatogonial mitotic amplification and normal entry into meiosis. Gene and protein analysis indicated overlapping Msi1 and Msi2 profiles in enriched populations of isolated germ cells and reciprocal subcellular expression patterns in spermatogonia and pachytene spermatocytes/ round spermatids in testes sections. Recombinant Msi1 protein-RNA pulldown and microarray analysis coupled with in vitro shRNA knockdown studies in spermatogonial culture and subsequent immunoprecipitation and qPCR established that Msi1 targeted Msi2 mRNA for post transcriptional translational repression. Immunoprecipitation of Msi2 target mRNA and subsequent qPCR together with in vitro shRNA knockdown studies inround spermatidculture identified a cell cycle inhibitor protein CDKN1C (p57kip2) as the principal target of Msi2 translational inhibition. Immunolocalisation of CDKN1C protein indicated that expression of this cell cycle regulator coincided with the nuclear import of Msi1 and the appearance of cytoplasmic Msi2 expression in early pachytene spermatocytes. Using a transgenic Msi1 overexpression mouse model in conjunction with quantitative gene and protein expression, we confirmed Msi1 targeting of Msi2 and subsequent Msi2 targeting of CDKN1C for translational repression in vivo. Ectopic overexpression of Msi1 in germ cellsinduces substantial Msi2 downregulation and aberrant CDKN1C expression, resulting in abnormal spermatogenic differentiation, germ cell apoptosis/arrest and sterility. In conclusion, our results indicate a sophisticated molecular switch encompassing cell cycle protein regulation by Musashi family proteins, is required for normal exit from mitotic division, entry into meiosis and post meiotic germ cell differentiation.

scholarly journals Genetic and structural analysis of the in vivo functional redundancy between murine NANOS2 and NANOS3

Development ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. dev.191916
Author(s):  
Danelle Wright ◽  
Makoto Kiso ◽  
Yumiko Saga
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Germ Cells ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Double Knockout ◽  
Germ Cell Differentiation ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved ◽  
Male Specific

NANOS2 and NANOS3 are evolutionarily conserved RNA-binding proteins involved in murine germ cell development. NANOS3 is required for protection from apoptosis during migration and gonadal colonization in both sexes, whereas NANOS2 is male-specific and required for the male-type differentiation of germ cells. Ectopic NANOS2 rescues the functions of NANOS3, but NANOS3 cannot rescue NANOS2 function even though its expression is up-regulated in Nanos2-null conditions. It is unknown why NANOS3 cannot rescue NANOS2 function and it is unclear whether NANOS3 plays any role in male germ cell differentiation. To address these questions, we made conditional Nanos3/Nanos2 knockout mice and chimeric mice expressing chimeric NANOS proteins. Conditional double knockout of Nanos2 and 3 led to the rapid loss of germ cells, and in vivo and in vitro experiments revealed that DND1 and NANOS2 binding is dependent on the specific NANOS2 zinc finger structure. Moreover, murine NANOS3 failed to bind CNOT1, an interactor of NANOS2 at its N-terminal. Collectively, our study suggests that the inability of NANOS3 to rescue NANOS2 function is due to poor DND1 recruitment and CNOT1 binding.

scholarly journals Positive mRNA Translational Control in Germ Cells by Initiation Factor Selectivity

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Friday ◽  
Brett D. Keiper
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Germ Cells ◽  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Translational Control ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Positive Function ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Initiation Factors

Ultimately, the production of new proteins in undetermined cells pushes them to new fates. Other proteins hold a stem cell in a mode of self-renewal. In germ cells, these decision-making proteins are produced largely from translational control of preexisting mRNAs. To date, all of the regulation has been attributed to RNA binding proteins (RBPs) that repress mRNAs in many models of germ cell development (Drosophila, mouse,C. elegans, andXenopus). In this review, we focus on the selective, positive function of translation initiation factors eIF4E and eIF4G, which recruit mRNAs to ribosomes upon derepression. Evidence now shows that the two events are not separate but rather are coordinated through composite complexes of repressors and germ cell isoforms of eIF4 factors. Strikingly, the initiation factor isoforms are themselves mRNA selective. The mRNP complexes of translation factors and RBPs are built on specific populations of mRNAs to prime them for subsequent translation initiation. Simple rearrangement of the partners causes a dormant mRNP to become synthetically active in germ cells when and where they are required to support gametogenesis.

scholarly journals Multi-modal regulation of C. elegans hermaphrodite spermatogenesis by the GLD-1-FOG-2 complex

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuang Hu ◽  
Lauren E. Ryan ◽  
Ebru Kaymak ◽  
Lindsay Freeberg ◽  
Te-Wen Lo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sex Determination ◽  
Germ Cell ◽  
Germ Cells ◽  
Translational Control ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Target Mrnas ◽  
Mrna Targets

AbstractProper germ cell sex determination in Caenorhabditis nematodes requires a network of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) and their target mRNAs. In some species, changes in this network enabled limited XX spermatogenesis, and thus self-fertility. In C. elegans, one of these selfing species, the global sex-determining gene tra-2 is regulated in germ cells by a conserved RBP, GLD-1, via the 3’ untranslated region (3’UTR) of its transcript. A C. elegans-specific GLD-1 cofactor, FOG-2, is also required for hermaphrodite sperm fate, but how it modifies GLD-1 function is unknown. Germline feminization in gld-1 and fog-2 null mutants has been interpreted as due to cell-autonomous elevation of TRA-2 translation. Consistent with the proposed role of FOG-2 in translational control, the abundance of nearly all GLD-1 target mRNAs (including tra-2) is unchanged in fog-2 mutants. Epitope tagging reveals abundant TRA-2 expression in somatic tissues, but an undetectably low level in wild-type germ cells. Loss of gld-1 function elevates germline TRA-2 expression to detectable levels, but loss of fog-2 function does not. A simple quantitative model of tra-2 activity constrained by these results can successfully sort genotypes into normal or feminized groups. Surprisingly, fog-2 and gld-1 activity enable the sperm fate even when GLD-1 cannot bind to the tra-2 3’ UTR. This suggests the GLD-1-FOG-2 complex regulates uncharacterized sites within tra-2, or other mRNA targets. Finally, we quantify the RNA-binding capacities of dominant missense alleles of GLD-1 that act genetically as “hyperrepressors” of tra-2 activity. These variants bind RNA more weakly in vitro than does wild-type GLD-1. These results indicate that gld-1 and fog-2 regulate germline sex via multiple interactions, and that our understanding of the control and evolution of germ cell sex determination in the C. elegans hermaphrodite is far from complete.

Examination of the dynamics of global DNA methylation pattern establishment during spermatogenesiss

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 90
Author(s):  
Kirsten Niles ◽  
Sophie La Salle ◽  
Christopher Oakes ◽  
Jacquetta Trasler
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Germ Cell ◽  
Germ Cells ◽  
Epigenetic Modification ◽  
Methylation Pattern ◽  
Chromosome 9 ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Global Methylation ◽  
Dna Methylation Pattern ◽  
Methylation Patterns

Background: DNA methylation is an epigenetic modification involved in gene expression, genome stability, and genomic imprinting. In the male, methylation patterns are initially erased in primordial germ cells (PGCs) as they enter the gonadal ridge; methylation patterns are then acquired on CpG dinucleotides during gametogenesis. Correct pattern establishment is essential for normal spermatogenesis. To date, the characterization and timing of methylation pattern acquisition in PGCs has been described using a limited number of specific gene loci. This study aimed to describe DNA methylation pattern establishment dynamics during male gametogenesis through global methylation profiling techniques in a mouse model. Methods: Using a chromosome based approach, primers were designed for 24 regions spanning chromosome 9; intergenic, non-repeat, non-CpG island sequences were chosen for study based on previous evidence that these types of sequences are targets for testis-specific methylation events. The percent methylation was determined in each region by quantitative analysis of DNA methylation using real-time PCR (qAMP). The germ cell-specific pattern was determined by comparing methylation between spermatozoa and liver. To examine methylation in developing germ cells, spermatogonia from 2 day- and 6 day-old Oct4-GFP (green fluorescent protein) mice were isolated using fluorescence activated cell sorting. Results: As compared to liver, four loci were hypomethylated and five loci were hypermethylated in spermatozoa, supporting previous results indicating a unique methylation pattern in male germ cells. Only one region was hypomethylated and no regions were hypermethylated in day 6 spermatogonia as compared to mature spermatozoa, signifying that the bulk of DNA methylation is established prior to type A spermatogonia. The methylation in day 2 spermatogonia, germ cells that are just commencing mitosis, revealed differences of 15-20% compared to day 6 spermatogonia at five regions indicating that the most crucial phase of DNA methylation acquisition occurs prenatally. Conclusion: Together, these studies provide further evidence that germ cell methylation patterns differ from those in somatic tissues and suggest that much of methylation at intergenic sites is acquired during prenatal germ cell development. (Supported by CIHR)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document