scholarly journals Structural differences in translation initiation between pathogenic trypanosomatids and their mammalian hosts

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Bochler ◽  
Jailson Brito Querido ◽  
Terezie Prilepskaja ◽  
Heddy Soufari ◽  
Angelita Simonetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Trypanosoma Cruzi ◽  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Mass Spectrometry Data ◽  
Initiation Complex ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factors ◽  
Structural Differences

SUMMARYCanonical mRNA translation in eukaryotes begins with the formation of the 43S pre-initiation complex (PIC). Its assembly requires the binding of several eukaryotic initiation factors (eIF 1, 1A, 2, 3 and 5), Met-tRNAiMet and the small ribosomal subunit (40S). Compared to their mammalian hosts, trypanosomatids present significant structural differences in their 40S suggesting substantial variability in translation initiation. Here we determined the structure of the 43S PIC from Trypanosoma cruzi, the parasite causing the Chagas disease. Our structure shows numerous specific features, such as the variant eIF3 structure and its unique interactions with the large rRNA ESs 9S, 7S and 6S, and the association of a kinetoplastid-specific ~245 kDa DDX60-like helicase. It also revealed the so-far-elusive 40S-binding site of the eIF5 C-terminal domain and the structures of key terminal tails of several conserved eIFs underlying their activities within the PIC. Our results are corroborated by GST-pulldown assays in both human and T. cruzi and mass-spectrometry data.

scholarly journals Role of Eukaryotic Initiation Factors during Cellular Stress and Cancer Progression

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Divya Khandige Sharma ◽  
Kamiko Bressler ◽  
Harshil Patel ◽  
Nirujah Balasingam ◽  
Nehal Thakor
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Tumor Development ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Translation Control ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factors ◽  
Rate Limiting Step ◽  
Precise Understanding

Protein synthesis can be segmented into distinct phases comprising mRNA translation initiation, elongation, and termination. Translation initiation is a highly regulated and rate-limiting step of protein synthesis that requires more than 12 eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs). Extensive evidence shows that the transcriptome and corresponding proteome do not invariably correlate with each other in a variety of contexts. In particular, translation of mRNAs specific to angiogenesis, tumor development, and apoptosis is altered during physiological and pathophysiological stress conditions. In cancer cells, the expression and functions of eIFs are hampered, resulting in the inhibition of global translation and enhancement of translation of subsets of mRNAs by alternative mechanisms. A precise understanding of mechanisms involving eukaryotic initiation factors leading to differential protein expression can help us to design better strategies to diagnose and treat cancer. The high spatial and temporal resolution of translation control can have an immediate effect on the microenvironment of the cell in comparison with changes in transcription. The dysregulation of mRNA translation mechanisms is increasingly being exploited as a target to treat cancer. In this review, we will focus on this context by describing both canonical and noncanonical roles of eIFs, which alter mRNA translation.

scholarly journals Inhibition of translation initiation complex formation by GE81112 unravels a 16S rRNA structural switch involved in P-site decoding

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (16) ◽  
pp. E2286-E2295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Attilio Fabbretti ◽  
Andreas Schedlbauer ◽  
Letizia Brandi ◽  
Tatsuya Kaminishi ◽  
Anna Maria Giuliodori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Dynamic Equilibrium ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Structural Level ◽  
Initiation Complex ◽  
Stem Loop ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Initiation Phase

In prokaryotic systems, the initiation phase of protein synthesis is governed by the presence of initiation factors that guide the transition of the small ribosomal subunit (30S) from an unlocked preinitiation complex (30S preIC) to a locked initiation complex (30SIC) upon the formation of a correct codon–anticodon interaction in the peptidyl (P) site. Biochemical and structural characterization of GE81112, a translational inhibitor specific for the initiation phase, indicates that the main mechanism of action of this antibiotic is to prevent P-site decoding by stabilizing the anticodon stem loop of the initiator tRNA in a distorted conformation. This distortion stalls initiation in the unlocked 30S preIC state characterized by tighter IF3 binding and a reduced association rate for the 50S subunit. At the structural level we observe that in the presence of GE81112 the h44/h45/h24a interface, which is part of the IF3 binding site and forms ribosomal intersubunit bridges, preferentially adopts a disengaged conformation. Accordingly, the findings reveal that the dynamic equilibrium between the disengaged and engaged conformations of the h44/h45/h24a interface regulates the progression of protein synthesis, acting as a molecular switch that senses and couples the 30S P-site decoding step of translation initiation to the transition from an unlocked preIC to a locked 30SIC state.

scholarly journals The Jigsaw Puzzle of mRNA Translation Initiation in Eukaryotes: A Decade of Structures Unraveling the Mechanics of the Process

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaser Hashem ◽  
Joachim Frank
Keyword(s):  
Structural Biology ◽  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Start Codon ◽  
Jigsaw Puzzle ◽  
Reading Frame ◽  
Eukaryotic Translation ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factors ◽  
Initiation Process

Translation initiation in eukaryotes is a highly regulated and rate-limiting process. It results in the assembly and disassembly of numerous transient and intermediate complexes involving over a dozen eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs). This process culminates in the accommodation of a start codon marking the beginning of an open reading frame at the appropriate ribosomal site. Although this process has been extensively studied by hundreds of groups for nearly half a century, it has been only recently, especially during the last decade, that we have gained deeper insight into the mechanics of the eukaryotic translation initiation process. This advance in knowledge is due in part to the contributions of structural biology, which have shed light on the molecular mechanics underlying the different functions of various eukaryotic initiation factors. In this review, we focus exclusively on the contribution of structural biology to the understanding of the eukaryotic initiation process, a long-standing jigsaw puzzle that is just starting to yield the bigger picture.

Alternative mechanisms of initiating translation of mammalian mRNAs

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 1231-1241 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.J. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Site Selection ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Aggregate Size ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Initiation Site ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Viral Mrnas ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Scanning Mechanism

Of all the steps in mRNA translation, initiation is the one that differs most radically between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Not only is there no equivalent of the prokaryotic Shine–Dalgarno rRNA–mRNA interaction, but also what requires only three initiation factor proteins (aggregate size ∼125 kDa) in eubacteria needs at least 28 different polypeptides (aggregate >1600 kDa) in mammalian cells, which is actually larger than the size of the 40 S ribosomal subunit. Translation of the overwhelming majority of mammalian mRNAs occurs by a scanning mechanism, in which the 40 S ribosomal subunit, primed for initiation by the binding of several initiation factors including the eIF2 (eukaryotic initiation factor 2)–GTP–MettRNAi complex, is loaded on the mRNA immediately downstream of the 5′-cap, and then scans the RNA in the 5′→3′ direction. On recognition of (usually) the first AUG triplet via base-pairing with the Met-tRNAi anticodon, scanning ceases, triggering GTP hydrolysis and release of eIF2–GDP. Finally, ribosomal subunit joining and the release of the other initiation factors completes the initiation process. This sketchy outline conceals the fact that the exact mechanism of scanning and the precise roles of the initiation factors remain enigmatic. However, the factor requirements for initiation site selection on some viral IRESs (internal ribosome entry sites/segments) are simpler, and investigations into these IRES-dependent mechanisms (particularly picornavirus, hepatitis C virus and insect dicistrovirus IRESs) have significantly enhanced our understanding of the standard scanning mechanism. This article surveys the various alternative mechanisms of initiation site selection on mammalian (and other eukaryotic) cellular and viral mRNAs, starting from the simplest (in terms of initiation factor requirements) and working towards the most complex, which paradoxically happens to be the reverse order of their discovery.

scholarly journals A Complementary Mechanism of Bacterial mRNA Translation Inhibition by Tetracyclines

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Barrenechea ◽  
Maryhory Vargas-Reyes ◽  
Miguel Quiliano ◽  
Pohl Milón
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Resistance Mechanisms ◽  
Dissociation Rate ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Translation Elongation ◽  
Initiation Phase ◽  
Complementary Mechanism

Tetracycline has positively impacted human health as well as the farming and animal industries. Its extensive usage and versatility led to the spread of resistance mechanisms followed by the development of new variants of the antibiotic. Tetracyclines inhibit bacterial growth by impeding the binding of elongator tRNAs to the ribosome. However, a small number of reports indicated that Tetracyclines could also inhibit translation initiation, yet the molecular mechanism remained unknown. Here, we use biochemical and computational methods to study how Oxytetracycline (Otc), Demeclocycline (Dem), and Tigecycline (Tig) affect the translation initiation phase of protein synthesis. Our results show that all three Tetracyclines induce Initiation Factor IF3 to adopt a compact conformation on the 30S ribosomal subunit, similar to that induced by Initiation Factor IF1. This compaction was faster for Tig than Dem or Otc. Furthermore, all three tested tetracyclines affected IF1-bound 30S complexes. The dissociation rate constant of IF1 in early 30S complexes was 14-fold slower for Tig than Dem or Otc. Late 30S initiation complexes (30S pre-IC or IC) exhibited greater IF1 stabilization by Tig than for Dem and Otc. Tig and Otc delayed 50S joining to 30S initiation complexes (30S ICs). Remarkably, the presence of Tig considerably slowed the progression to translation elongation and retained IF1 in the resulting 70S initiation complex (70S IC). Molecular modeling of Tetracyclines bound to the 30S pre-IC and 30S IC indicated that the antibiotics binding site topography fluctuates along the initiation pathway. Mainly, 30S complexes show potential contacts between Dem or Tig with IF1, providing a structural rationale for the enhanced affinity of the antibiotics in the presence of the factor. Altogether, our data indicate that Tetracyclines inhibit translation initiation by allosterically perturbing the IF3 layout on the 30S, retaining IF1 during 70S IC formation, and slowing the transition toward translation elongation. Thus, this study describes a new complementary mechanism by which Tetracyclines may inhibit bacterial protein synthesis.

scholarly journals Dynamic competition between SARS-CoV-2 NSP1 and mRNA on the human ribosome inhibits translation initiation

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (6) ◽  
pp. e2017715118
Author(s):  
Christopher P. Lapointe ◽  
Rosslyn Grosely ◽  
Alex G. Johnson ◽  
Jinfan Wang ◽  
Israel S. Fernández ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Molecule ◽  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Start Codon ◽  
Messenger Rnas ◽  
Eukaryotic Translation ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Translation Initiation Factors ◽  
40S Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factors

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a beta-CoV that recently emerged as a human pathogen and is the causative agent of the COVID-19 pandemic. A molecular framework of how the virus manipulates host cellular machinery to facilitate infection remains unclear. Here, we focus on SARS-CoV-2 NSP1, which is proposed to be a virulence factor that inhibits protein synthesis by directly binding the human ribosome. We demonstrate biochemically that NSP1 inhibits translation of model human and SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNAs (mRNAs). NSP1 specifically binds to the small (40S) ribosomal subunit, which is required for translation inhibition. Using single-molecule fluorescence assays to monitor NSP1–40S subunit binding in real time, we determine that eukaryotic translation initiation factors (eIFs) allosterically modulate the interaction of NSP1 with ribosomal preinitiation complexes in the absence of mRNA. We further elucidate that NSP1 competes with RNA segments downstream of the start codon to bind the 40S subunit and that the protein is unable to associate rapidly with 80S ribosomes assembled on an mRNA. Collectively, our findings support a model where NSP1 proteins from viruses in at least two subgenera of beta-CoVs associate with the open head conformation of the 40S subunit to inhibit an early step of translation, by preventing accommodation of mRNA within the entry channel.

scholarly journals Translation initiation in cancer at a glance

2021 ◽  
Vol 134 (1) ◽  
pp. jcs248476
Author(s):  
Rachael C. L. Smith ◽  
Georgios Kanellos ◽  
Nikola Vlahov ◽  
Constantinos Alexandrou ◽  
Anne E. Willis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Ribosomal Subunits ◽  
Eukaryotic Translation ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factors ◽  
Tumour Formation ◽  
Multistep Process ◽  
Proliferation And Metastasis ◽  
Regulated Gene Expression ◽  
And Function

ABSTRACTCell division, differentiation and function are largely dependent on accurate proteome composition and regulated gene expression. To control this, protein synthesis is an intricate process governed by upstream signalling pathways. Eukaryotic translation is a multistep process and can be separated into four distinct phases: initiation, elongation, termination and recycling of ribosomal subunits. Translation initiation, the focus of this article, is highly regulated to control the activity and/or function of eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs) and permit recruitment of mRNAs to the ribosomes. In this Cell Science at a Glance and accompanying poster, we outline the mechanisms by which tumour cells alter the process of translation initiation and discuss how this benefits tumour formation, proliferation and metastasis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document