scholarly journals Mechanosensitive recruitment of BAF to the nuclear membrane inhibits nuclear E2F1 and Yap levels

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.P. Unnikannan ◽  
Adriana Reuveny ◽  
Devora Tamar Grunberg ◽  
Talila Volk
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Nuclear Membrane ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Underlying Mechanism ◽  
Nuclear Accumulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulators ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Dna Endoreplication ◽  
Nuclear Levels

AbstractMechanotransduction has been implicated as an important factor in regulating cell cycle progression; however, the underlying mechanism has not been fully elucidated. Here, we describe a novel mechano-sensitive component, namelybarrier to autointegration factor, (BAF), which regulates DNA endocycling inDrosophilamuscle fibers. We show that BAF negatively regulates DNA endoreplication by inhibiting of the nuclear entrance of E2F1 and Yap/Yorkie, two key components in cell cycle control. Furthermore, BAF localization at the nuclear membrane is mechanosensitive, as it was downregulated in LINC mutant larval muscles, or following nuclear deformation caused by disruption of nucleus-sarcomere connections. BAF forms a protein complex with E2F1, which is sensitive to BAF phosphorylation. Knockdown of BAF kinase VRK1/Ball disrupted localization of BAF at the nuclear membrane and resulted in increased E2F1 nuclear levels. Taken together, our results reveal a novel mechanosensitive pathway controlling BAF phosphorylation and localization at the nuclear membrane, which in turn, represses nuclear accumulation of positive cell cycle regulators.

scholarly journals Bacterial cell cycle control by citrate synthase independent of enzymatic activity

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthieu Bergé ◽  
Julian Pezzatti ◽  
Víctor González-Ruiz ◽  
Laurence Degeorges ◽  
Serge Rudaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Citrate Synthase ◽  
Caulobacter Crescentus ◽  
Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Tca Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulators ◽  
Central Metabolism ◽  
Cycle Enzyme

ABSTRACTCoordination of cell cycle progression with central metabolism is fundamental to all cell types and likely underlies differentiation into dispersal cells in bacteria. How central metabolism is monitored to regulate cell cycle functions is poorly understood. A forward genetic selection for cell cycle regulators in the polarized alpha-proteobacterium Caulobacter crescentus unearthed the uncharacterized CitA citrate synthase, a TCA (tricarboxylic acid) cycle enzyme, as unprecedented checkpoint regulator of the G1→S transition. We show that loss of the CitA protein provokes a (p)ppGpp alarmone-dependent G1-phase arrest without apparent metabolic or energy insufficiency. While S-phase entry is still conferred when CitA is rendered catalytically inactive, the paralogous CitB citrate synthase has no overt role other than sustaining TCA cycle activity when CitA is absent. With eukaryotic citrate synthase paralogs known to fulfill regulatory functions, our work extends the moonlighting paradigm to citrate synthase coordinating central (TCA) metabolism with development and perhaps antibiotic tolerance in bacteria.

Cdk1-Dependent Phosphorylation ofNPM Overrides G2/M Checkpoint and Increases Leukemic Blasts in Mice

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1322-1322
Author(s):  
Wei Du ◽  
Yun Zhou ◽  
Suzette Pike ◽  
Qishen Pang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Xenograft Model ◽  
Phosphorylation Sites ◽  
M Cell ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Regulation Of Cell Cycle

Abstract An elevated level of nucleophosmin (NPM) is often found in actively proliferative cells including human tumors. To identify the regulatory role for NPM phosphorylation in proliferation and cell cycle control, a series of mutants targeting the consensus cyclin-dependent kinase (CKD) phosphorylation sites was created to mimic or abrogate either single-site or multi-site phosphorylation. Cells expressing the phosphomimetic NPM mutants showed enhanced proliferation and G2/M cell-cycle transition; whereas nonphosphorylatable mutants induced G2/M cell-cycle arrest. Simultaneous inactivation of two CKD phosphorylation sites at Ser10 and Ser70 (S10A/S70A, NPM-AA) induced phosphorylation of Cdk1 at Tyr15 (Cdc2Tyr15) and increased cytoplasmic accumulation of Cdc25C. Strikingly, stress-induced Cdk1Tyr15 and Cdc25C sequestration were completely suppressed by expression of a double phosphomimetic NPM mutant (S10E/S70E, NPM-EE). Further analysis revealed that phosphorylation of NPM at both Ser10 and Ser70 sites were required for proper interaction between Cdk1 and Cdc25C in mitotic cells. Moreover, the NPM-EE mutant directly bound to Cdc25C and prevented phosphorylation of Cdc25C at Ser216 during mitosis. Finally, NPM-EE overrided stress-induced G2/M arrest, increased peripheral-blood blasts and splenomegaly in a NOD/SCID xenograft model, and promoted leukemia development in Fanconi mouse hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Thus, these findings reveal a novel function of NPM on regulation of cell-cycle progression, in which Cdk1-dependent phosphorylation of NPM controls cell-cycle progression at G2/M transition through modulation of Cdc25C activity.

scholarly journals JAK/STAT pathway promotes Drosophila neuroblast proliferation via the direct CycE regulation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lijuan Du ◽  
Jian Wang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Signaling Pathway ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Control Cell ◽  
Proliferative Potential ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulators ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Stat Signaling ◽  
Stat Pathway

AbstractHow neural stem cells regulate their proliferative potential and lineage diversity is a central problem in developmental neurobiology. Drosophila Mushroom bodies (MBs), centers of olfactory learning and memory, are generated by a specific set of neuroblasts (Nbs) that are born in the embryonic stage and continuously proliferate till the end of the pupal stage. Although MB presents an excellent model for studying neural stem cell proliferation, the genetic and molecular mechanisms that control the unique proliferative characteristics of the MB Nbs are largely unknown. Further, the signaling cues controlling cell cycle regulators to promote cell cycle progression in MB Nbs remain poorly understood. Here, we report that JAK/STAT signaling pathway is required for the proliferation activity and maintenance of MB Nbs. Loss of JAK/STAT activity severely reduces the later-born MB neuron types and leads to premature neuroblast termination, which can be rescued by tissue-specific overexpression of CycE and diap1. Higher JAK/STAT pathway activity in MB results in more neurons, without producing supernumerary Nbs. Furthermore, we show that JAK/STAT signaling effector Stat92E directly regulates CycE transcription in MB Nbs. Finally, MB Nb clones of loss or excess CycE phenocopy those of decreased or increased JAK/STAT signaling pathway activities. We conclude that JAK/STAT signaling controls MB Nb proliferative activity through directly regulating CycE expression to control cell cycle progression.

scholarly journals The Multiple Roles of the Cdc14 Phosphatase in Cell Cycle Control

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 709
Author(s):  
Javier Manzano-López ◽  
Fernando Monje-Casas
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Multiple Roles ◽  
Special Focus ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cycle Progression

The Cdc14 phosphatase is a key regulator of mitosis in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cdc14 was initially described as playing an essential role in the control of cell cycle progression by promoting mitotic exit on the basis of its capacity to counteract the activity of the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdc28/Cdk1. A compiling body of evidence, however, has later demonstrated that this phosphatase plays other multiple roles in the regulation of mitosis at different cell cycle stages. Here, we summarize our current knowledge about the pivotal role of Cdc14 in cell cycle control, with a special focus in the most recently uncovered functions of the phosphatase.

The MEIS1 Interactome in Megakaryocytes Reveals a Role in Cell Cycle Regulation,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3380-3380
Author(s):  
Vishal A Salunkhe ◽  
Iain Macaulay ◽  
Sylvia Nuernberg ◽  
Cathal McCarthy ◽  
Willem Hendrik Ouwehand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cyclin D3 ◽  
Haematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Nuclear Fraction ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulators ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Regulation

Abstract Abstract 3380 Haematopoiesis is highly coordinated process of fate determination at branch points that is regulated by transcription factors and their cofactors. Our comprehensive catalogue of transcripts in the eight main mature blood cell elements, including erythroblasts and megakaryocytes (MKs) showed that the transcription factor MEIS1 is uniquely transcribed in MKs and the CD34+ haematopoietic stem cell. Gene silencing studies in mice and zebrafish has shown a pivotal role for MEIS1 in haematopoiesis, megakaryopoiesis and vasculogenesis, although its precise hierarchical position and function remain unknown. To gain further insight in the role of MEIS1 in megakaryopoiesis, we used a proteomics approach to search for its nuclear interaction partners. Co-immunoprecipitation was used to isolate MEIS1 interacting proteins from the nuclear fraction of the MK cell line, CHRF 288–11 and resulting eluates were subjected to proteomics analysis using one-dimensional electrophoresis and liquid chromatography (LC) coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (MS) or GeLC-MS/MS. In total 70 proteins were identified to co-immunoprecipitate with MEIS1 from 3 replicate MS analyses. These included the previously validated MEIS1 interactors PBX1 and HOXB9, as well as numerous novel interactors such as ARID3B and DHX9. Network analysis of our MEIS1 interactome dataset revealed a strong association with cell cycle regulation. In fact, we had identified a myriad of cell cycle regulators including CDK1, CDK2, CDK9, CUL3, PCNA, CDC5L, ARID3B and MDC1. These interactions are consistent with recent microarray studies in promyelocytic leukemic cell lines that link MEIS1 with cell cycle entry and its regulation of genes such as CDK2, CDK6, CDKN3, CDC7 and Cyclin D3 among others. To confirm the novel interaction of MK MEIS1 with cell cycle regulators we performed reverse immuno-precipitation/immunoblot analysis in CHRF cells and purified MEIS1 containing multiprotein complexes from L8057 murine megakaryoblastic cells. Using a cell cycle specific PCR array, we demonstrate that MEIS1 overexpression in L8057 cells regulates numerous cell cycle regulatory genes. Preliminary analysis using flow cytometry demonstrated that MEIS1 overexpression resulted in an altered cell cycle progression. Furthermore, genome wide ChIP-Seq analysis in CHRF cells for MEIS1 revealed binding sites in Cyclin D3 and CDK6, two known key regulators of the cell cycle and megakaryopoiesis. Taken together this study provides evidence linking MEIS1 to the cell cycle control of MKs and will help elucidate the role of MEIS1 in cell cycle progression, megakaryopoiesis and associated disorders. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Functional Differentiation of SWI/SNF Remodelers in Transcription and Cell Cycle Control

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 651-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuri M. Moshkin ◽  
Lisette Mohrmann ◽  
Wilfred F. J. van Ijcken ◽  
C. Peter Verrijzer
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Function Analysis ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Functional Differentiation ◽  
Transcription Control ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
The Core

ABSTRACT Drosophila BAP and PBAP represent two evolutionarily conserved subclasses of SWI/SNF chromatin remodelers. The two complexes share the same core subunits, including the BRM ATPase, but differ in a few signature subunits: OSA defines BAP, whereas Polybromo (PB) and BAP170 specify PBAP. Here, we present a comprehensive structure-function analysis of BAP and PBAP. An RNA interference knockdown survey revealed that the core subunits BRM and MOR are critical for the structural integrity of both complexes. Whole-genome expression profiling suggested that the SWI/SNF core complex is largely dysfunctional in cells. Regulation of the majority of target genes required the signature subunit OSA, PB, or BAP170, suggesting that SWI/SNF remodelers function mostly as holoenzymes. BAP and PBAP execute similar, independent, or antagonistic functions in transcription control and appear to direct mostly distinct biological processes. BAP, but not PBAP, is required for cell cycle progression through mitosis. Because in yeast the PBAP-homologous complex, RSC, controls cell cycle progression, our finding reveals a functional switch during evolution. BAP mediates G2/M transition through direct regulation of string/cdc25. Its signature subunit, OSA, is required for directing BAP to the string/cdc25 promoter. Our results suggest that the core subunits play architectural and enzymatic roles but that the signature subunits determine most of the functional specificity of SWI/SNF holoenzymes in general gene control.

Cell cycle control

2016 ◽  
pp. 31-41
Author(s):  
Simon M. Carr ◽  
Nicholas B. La Thangue
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Final Stage ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Control Mechanisms ◽  
Chromosomal Dna ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
M Phase ◽  
Cellular Components ◽  
Regulate Cell Cycle Progression

All cells arise by the division of existing cells in a highly regulated series of events known as the cell cycle. Whilst duplication of other cellular contents occurs throughout all stages of the cycle, chromosomal DNA is replicated only once at a stage known as S phase. Once this is complete, distribution of chromosomes and other cellular components occurs during the final stage of the cell cycle, known as M phase, or mitosis. The cell cycle is therefore regulated in a temporal fashion, so that entry into subsequent cell cycle stages only occurs once the previous stage has been completed. A number of signalling mechanisms monitor the integrity of cell cycle progression, and later cell cycle stages can be delayed if any errors need correction. This chapter gives an overview of the major control mechanisms that regulate cell cycle progression, and how these are circumvented during the onset of cancer.

scholarly journals Reversible cytoplasmic localization of the proteasome in quiescent yeast cells

2008 ◽  
Vol 181 (5) ◽  
pp. 737-745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damien Laporte ◽  
Bénédicte Salin ◽  
Bertrand Daignan-Fornier ◽  
Isabelle Sagot
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
26S Proteasome ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulators ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Vast Number ◽  
Proteasome Subunits ◽  
Storage Granules ◽  
Cytoplasmic Structures

The 26S proteasome is responsible for the controlled proteolysis of a vast number of proteins, including crucial cell cycle regulators. Accordingly, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, 26S proteasome function is mandatory for cell cycle progression. In budding yeast, the 26S proteasome is assembled in the nucleus, where it is localized throughout the cell cycle. We report that upon cell entry into quiescence, proteasome subunits massively relocalize from the nucleus into motile cytoplasmic structures. We further demonstrate that these structures are proteasome cytoplasmic reservoirs that are rapidly mobilized upon exit from quiescence. Therefore, we have named these previously unknown structures proteasome storage granules (PSGs). Finally, we observe conserved formation and mobilization of these PSGs in the evolutionary distant yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. This conservation implies a broad significance for these proteasome reserves.

scholarly journals Ubiquitin signaling in cell cycle control and tumorigenesis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabin Dang ◽  
Li Nie ◽  
Wenyi Wei
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligases ◽  
E3 Ubiquitin Ligases ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Precise Control ◽  
Cycle Regulation

Abstract Cell cycle progression is a tightly regulated process by which DNA replicates and cell reproduces. The major driving force underlying cell cycle progression is the sequential activation of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), which is achieved in part by the ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis of their cyclin partners and kinase inhibitors (CKIs). In eukaryotic cells, two families of E3 ubiquitin ligases, anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome and Skp1-Cul1-F-box protein complex, are responsible for ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of many of these CDK regulators, ensuring cell cycle progresses in a timely and precisely regulated manner. In the past couple of decades, accumulating evidence have demonstrated that the dysregulated cell cycle transition caused by inefficient proteolytic control leads to uncontrolled cell proliferation and finally results in tumorigenesis. Based upon this notion, targeting the E3 ubiquitin ligases involved in cell cycle regulation is expected to provide novel therapeutic strategies for cancer treatment. Thus, a better understanding of the diversity and complexity of ubiquitin signaling in cell cycle regulation will shed new light on the precise control of the cell cycle progression and guide anticancer drug development.

scholarly journals Inhibition of Cellular DNA Synthesis by the Human Cytomegalovirus IE86 Protein Is Necessary for Efficient Virus Replication

2006 ◽  
Vol 80 (8) ◽  
pp. 3872-3883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dustin T. Petrik ◽  
Kimberly P. Schmitt ◽  
Mark F. Stinski
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Human Cytomegalovirus ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Single Amino Acid ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Artificial Chromosomes ◽  
Early Genes ◽  
Cellular Dna

ABSTRACT Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) expresses several proteins that manipulate normal cellular functions, including cellular transcription, apoptosis, immune response, and cell cycle control. The IE2 gene, which is expressed from the HCMV major immediate-early (MIE) promoter, encodes the IE86 protein. IE86 is a multifunctional protein that is essential for viral replication. The functions of IE86 include transactivation of cellular and viral early genes, negative autoregulation of the MIE promoter, induction of cell cycle progression from G0/G1 to G1/S, and arresting cell cycle progression at the G1/S transition in p53-positive human foreskin fibroblast (HFF) cells. Mutations were introduced into the IE2 gene in the context of the viral genome using bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs). From these HCMV BACs, a recombinant virus (RV) with a single amino acid substitution in the IE86 protein was isolated that replicates slower and to lower titers than wild-type HCMV. HFF cells infected with the Q548R RV undergo cellular DNA synthesis and do not arrest at any point in the cell cycle. The Q548R RV is able to negatively autoregulate the MIE promoter, transactivate viral early genes, activate cellular E2F-responsive genes, and produce infectious virus. This is the first report of a viable recombinant HCMV that is unable to inhibit cellular DNA synthesis in infected HFF cells.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document