scholarly journals Mitogen-independent cell cycle progression in B lymphocytes

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Singh ◽  
Matthew H. Spitzer ◽  
Jaimy P. Joy ◽  
Mary Kaileh ◽  
Xiang Qiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
B Lymphocytes ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Adaptive Immune System ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Extensive Cell Death ◽  
Extensive Cell

AbstractThe canonical view of the cell cycle posits that G1 progression signals are essential after each mitosis to enter S phase. A subset of tumor cells bypass this requirement and progress to the next cell division in the absence of continued signaling. B and T lymphocytes of the adaptive immune system undergo a proliferative burst, termed clonal expansion, to generate pools of antigen specific cells for effective immunity. There is evidence that rules for lymphocyte cell division digress from the canonical model. Here we show that B lymphocytes sustain several rounds of mitogen-independent cell division following the first mitosis. Such division is driven by unique characteristics of the post mitotic G1 phase and limited by extensive cell death that can be circumvented by appropriate anti-apoptotic signals. An essential component for continued cell division is Birc5 (survivin), a protein associated with chromosome segregation in G2/M. Our observation provides direct evidence for Pardee’s hypothesis that retention of features of G2M in post-mitotic cells could trigger further cell cycle progression. The partially active G1 phase and propensity for apoptosis that is inherited after each division may permit rapid burst of proliferation and cell death that are hallmarks of immune responses.

scholarly journals B Lymphocytes Differentially Use the Rel and Nuclear Factor κB1 (NF-κB1) Transcription Factors to Regulate Cell Cycle Progression and Apoptosis in Quiescent and Mitogen-activated Cells

1998 ◽  
Vol 187 (5) ◽  
pp. 663-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raelene J. Grumont ◽  
Ian J. Rourke ◽  
Lorraine A. O'Reilly ◽  
Andreas Strasser ◽  
Kensuke Miyake ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
B Cells ◽  
B Cell ◽  
B Lymphocytes ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Nuclear Factor ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Regulate Cell Cycle Progression

Rel and nuclear factor (NF)-κB1, two members of the Rel/NF-κB transcription factor family, are essential for mitogen-induced B cell proliferation. Using mice with inactivated Rel or NF-κB1 genes, we show that these transcription factors differentially regulate cell cycle progression and apoptosis in B lymphocytes. Consistent with an increased rate of mature B cell turnover in naive nfkb1−/− mice, the level of apoptosis in cultures of quiescent nfkb1−/−, but not c-rel−/−, B cells is higher. The failure of c-rel−/− or nfkb1−/− B cells to proliferate in response to particular mitogens coincides with a cell cycle block early in G1 and elevated cell death. Expression of a bcl-2 transgene prevents apoptosis in resting and activated c-rel−/− and nfkb1−/− B cells, but does not overcome the block in cell cycle progression, suggesting that the impaired proliferation is not simply a consequence of apoptosis and that Rel/NF-κB proteins regulate cell survival and cell cycle control through independent mechanisms. In contrast to certain B lymphoma cell lines in which mitogen-induced cell death can result from Rel/NF-κB–dependent downregulation of c-myc, expression of c-myc is normal in resting and stimulated c-rel−/− B cells, indicating that target gene(s) regulated by Rel that are important for preventing apoptosis may differ in normal and immortalized B cells. Collectively, these results are the first to demonstrate that in normal B cells, NF-κB1 regulates survival of cells in G0, whereas mitogenic activation induced by distinct stimuli requires different Rel/NF-κB factors to control cell cycle progression and prevent apoptosis.

scholarly journals Regulation of cell division cycle progression by bcl-2 expression: a potential mechanism for inhibition of programmed cell death.

1996 ◽  
Vol 183 (5) ◽  
pp. 2219-2226 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Mazel ◽  
D Burtrum ◽  
H T Petrie
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Control Point ◽  
Cell Division Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Distribution ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Critical Control Point

Expression of the bcl-2 gene has been shown to effectively confer resistance to programmed cell death under a variety of circumstances. However, despite a wealth of literature describing this phenomenon, very little is known about the mechanism of resistance. In the experiments described here, we show that bcl-2 gene expression can result in an inhibition of cell division cycle progression. These findings are based upon the analysis of cell cycle distribution, cell cycle kinetics, and relative phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein, using primary tissues in vivo, ex vivo, and in vitro, as well as continuous cell lines. The effects of bcl-2 expression on cell cycle progression appear to be focused at the G1 to S phase transition, which is a critical control point in the decision between continued cell cycle progression or the induction programmed cell death. In all systems tested, bcl-2 expression resulted in a substantial 30-60% increase in the length of G1 phase; such an increase is very substantial in the context of other regulators of cell cycle progression. Based upon our findings, and the related findings of others, we propose a mechanism by which bcl-2 expression might exert its well known inhibition of programmed cell death by regulating the kinetics of cell cycle progression at a critical control point.

scholarly journals Benzyladenine arrests cell cycle progression in G1 phase in tobacco BY-2 cells preceding induction of cell death

2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriko Suda ◽  
Hiroaki Iwai ◽  
Shinobu Satoh ◽  
Shingo Sakai
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression

scholarly journals Regulation of Cell Division in Bacteria by Monitoring Genome Integrity and DNA Replication Status

2019 ◽  
Vol 202 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter E. Burby ◽  
Lyle A. Simmons
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Bacterial Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Content Type

ABSTRACT All organisms regulate cell cycle progression by coordinating cell division with DNA replication status. In eukaryotes, DNA damage or problems with replication fork progression induce the DNA damage response (DDR), causing cyclin-dependent kinases to remain active, preventing further cell cycle progression until replication and repair are complete. In bacteria, cell division is coordinated with chromosome segregation, preventing cell division ring formation over the nucleoid in a process termed nucleoid occlusion. In addition to nucleoid occlusion, bacteria induce the SOS response after replication forks encounter DNA damage or impediments that slow or block their progression. During SOS induction, Escherichia coli expresses a cytoplasmic protein, SulA, that inhibits cell division by directly binding FtsZ. After the SOS response is turned off, SulA is degraded by Lon protease, allowing for cell division to resume. Recently, it has become clear that SulA is restricted to bacteria closely related to E. coli and that most bacteria enforce the DNA damage checkpoint by expressing a small integral membrane protein. Resumption of cell division is then mediated by membrane-bound proteases that cleave the cell division inhibitor. Further, many bacterial cells have mechanisms to inhibit cell division that are regulated independently from the canonical LexA-mediated SOS response. In this review, we discuss several pathways used by bacteria to prevent cell division from occurring when genome instability is detected or before the chromosome has been fully replicated and segregated.

scholarly journals Analysis of Cell Cycle and Replication of Mouse Macrophages afterIn VivoandIn VitroCryptococcus neoformans Infection Using Laser Scanning Cytometry

2012 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 1467-1478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Coelho ◽  
Lydia Tesfa ◽  
Jinghang Zhang ◽  
Johanna Rivera ◽  
Teresa Gonçalves ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cytotoxic Effect ◽  
Laser Scanning ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Laser Scanning Cytometry

ABSTRACTWe investigated the outcome of the interaction ofCryptococcus neoformanswith murine macrophages using laser scanning cytometry (LSC). Previous results in our lab had shown that phagocytosis ofC. neoformanspromoted cell cycle progression. LSC allowed us to simultaneously measure the phagocytic index, macrophage DNA content, and 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) incorporation such that it was possible to study host cell division as a function of phagocytosis. LSC proved to be a robust, reliable, and high-throughput method for quantifying phagocytosis. Phagocytosis ofC. neoformanspromoted cell cycle progression, but infected macrophages were significantly less likely to complete mitosis. Hence, we report a new cytotoxic effect associated with intracellularC. neoformansresidence that manifested itself in impaired cell cycle completion as a consequence of a block in the G2/M stage of the mitotic cell cycle. Cell cycle arrest was not due to increased cell membrane permeability or DNA damage. We investigated alveolar macrophage replicationin vivoand demonstrated that these cells are capable of low levels of cell division in the presence or absence ofC. neoformansinfection. In summary, we simultaneously studied phagocytosis, the cell cycle state of the host cell and pathogen-mediated cytotoxicity, and our results demonstrate a new cytotoxic effect ofC. neoformansinfection on murine macrophages: fungus-induced cell cycle arrest. Finally, we provide evidence for alveolar macrophage proliferationin vivo.

scholarly journals Developmental HCN channelopathy results in decreased neural progenitor proliferation and microcephaly in mice

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Katharina Schlusche ◽  
Sabine Ulrike Vay ◽  
Niklas Kleinenkuhnen ◽  
Steffi Sandke ◽  
Rafael Campos-Martin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Membrane Potential ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cortical Development ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
Hcn Channel ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Channel Function ◽  
Stem And Progenitor Cells

ABSTRACTThe development of the cerebral cortex relies on the controlled division of neural stem and progenitor cells. The requirement for precise spatiotemporal control of proliferation and cell fate places a high demand on the cell division machinery, and defective cell division can cause microcephaly and other brain malformations. Cell-extrinsic and intrinsic factors govern the capacity of cortical progenitors to produce large numbers of neurons and glia within a short developmental time window. In particular, ion channels shape the intrinsic biophysical properties of precursor cells and neurons and control their membrane potential throughout the cell cycle. We found that hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated cation (HCN)-channel subunits are expressed in mouse, rat, and human neural progenitors. Loss of HCN-channel function in rat neural stem cells impaired their proliferation by affecting the cell-cycle progression, causing G1 accumulation and dysregulation of genes associated with human microcephaly. Transgene-mediated, dominant-negative loss of HCN-channel function in the embryonic mouse telencephalon resulted in pronounced microcephaly. Together, our findings suggest a novel role for HCN-channel subunits as a part of a general mechanism influencing cortical development in mammals.Significance StatementImpaired cell cycle regulation of neural stem and progenitor cells can affect cortical development and cause microcephaly. During cell cycle progression, the cellular membrane potential changes through the activity of ion channels and tends to be more depolarized in proliferating cells. HCN channels, which mediate a depolarizing current in neurons and cardiac cells, are linked to neurodevelopmental diseases, also contribute to the control of cell-cycle progression and proliferation of neuronal precursor cells. In this study, HCN-channel deficiency during embryonic and fetal brain development resulted in marked microcephaly of mice designed to be deficient in HCN-channel function in dorsal forebrain progenitors. The findings suggest that HCN-channel subunits are part of a general mechanism influencing cortical development in mammals.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document