scholarly journals The Role of Carbon Nanoparticle in Lymph Node Detection and Parathyroid Gland Protection during Thyroidectomy- a Meta Analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shao-Wei Xu ◽  
Zhi-Feng Li ◽  
Man-Bin Xu ◽  
Han-Wei Peng
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Parathyroid Gland ◽  
Carbon Nanoparticles ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Initial Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Transient Hypoparathyroidism

AbstractObjectiveTo assess the efficiency of the carbon nanoparticles (CNs) in lymph node identification and parathyroid gland protection during thyroidectomy.MethodsA systematic literature search for relevant literatures published up to December 2018 in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library was performed. Both English and Chinese literatures were retrieved and analyzed. Randomized controlled trials or nonrandomized controlled trials on the use of CNs during thyroidectomy were enrolled in this study. The primary outcomes included the number of lymph nodes harvesed, rate of lymph nodes involvement, and the rates of accidental parathyroidectomy, hypoparathyroidism, and hypocalcemia. Weighted mean differences (WMDs), odds ratios (ORs) and risk differences (RDs) were calculated for the dichotomous outcome variables. Between-study heterogeneity was tested using the Q tests and the I2 statistics. All analyses were performed using Review Manager (version 5.3.5).Results25 studies comprising 3266 patients were included in this analysis. The total number of lymph nodes harvested in the groups of carbon nanoparticles was significant higher than that in the control groups (WMD, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.40 to 3.32; P <0.01). Administrating carbon nanoparticles was associated with a lower incidence of accidental parathyroid gland removal (OR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.40, P <0.01) and lower rates of both postoperative transient hypoparathyroidism (OR =0.46, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.64, P <0.01) and transient hypocalcemia (OR =0.55, 95% CI = 0.09 to 3.43, P =0.52). There was no significant difference of identified lymph node metastatic rates between the patients with and without use of carbon nanoparticles. Subgroup analyses indicated that the application of CNs in thyroid cancer reoperation also decreased the rate of transient hypoparathyroidism (OR =0.20, 95% CI = 0.36 to 0.04, P =0.01) and the possibility of accidental parathyroid glands removal (OR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.05 to 0.73, P<0.05).ConclusionsThe application of CNs for thyroidectomy results in higher number of lymph node harvested and better parathyroid gland protection during initial surgery and reoperation for thyroid cancer.

scholarly journals The role of carbon nanoparticle in lymph node detection and parathyroid gland protection during thyroidectomy for non-anaplastic thyroid carcinoma- a meta-analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. e0223627
Author(s):  
Shaowei Xu ◽  
Zhifeng Li ◽  
Manbin Xu ◽  
Hanwei Peng
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Node ◽  
Thyroid Carcinoma ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Parathyroid Gland ◽  
Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Transient Hypoparathyroidism

Objective To assess the efficiency of the carbon nanoparticles (CNs) in lymph node identification and parathyroid gland (PG) protection during thyroidectomy for non-anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (N-ATC). Methods A systematic literature search for relevant literatures published up to December 2018 in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library was performed. Both English and Chinese literatures were retrieved and analyzed. Randomized controlled trials or nonrandomized controlled trials comparing the use of CNs with the use of methylene blue or a blank control in patients undergoing thyroidectomy for N-ATC were enrolled in this study. The primary outcomes included the number of lymph nodes harvested, the rate of lymph nodes involved, and the rates of accidental parathyroidectomy, hypoparathyroidism, and hypocalcemia. Weighted mean differences (WMDs), odds ratios (ORs) and risk differences (RDs) were calculated for the dichotomous outcome variables. Between study heterogeneity was tested using the Q tests and the I2 statistics. All analyses were performed using Review Manager (version 5.3.5). Results 25 studies comprising 3266 patients were included in this analysis. The total number of lymph nodes harvested in the CNs groups was significantly higher than that in the control groups (WMD, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.40 to 3.32; P <0.01). Administrating CNs was associated with a lower incidence of accidental PG removal (OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.21 to 0.37, P<0.01) and lower rates of both postoperative transient hypoparathyroidism (OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.64, P <0.01) and transient hypocalcemia (OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.65, P <0.01). No significant difference was found concerning lymph node metastatic rates between CNs group and control group. Subgroup analysis indicated that the application of CNs in reoperation thyroidectomy reduced both the rate of transient hypoparathyroidism (OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.06 to 0.75, P = 0.02) and the possibility of accidental PGs removal (OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.62, P = 0.004, P<0.05). Conclusions The application of CNs in thyroidectomy for N-ATC results in higher number of lymph node harvested and better PG protection during both initial and reoperation thyroidectomy.

Prognostic significance of the N1 classification pattern: a meta-analysis of different subclassification methods

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zihuai Wang ◽  
Hanle Yang ◽  
Xiaohu Hao ◽  
Jian Zhou ◽  
Nan Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Survival Curve ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Single Station

Summary OBJECTIVES The number of positive lymph node stations has been viewed as a subclassification in the N1 category in the new revision of tumour node metastasis (TNM) staging. However, the survival curve of these patients overlapped with that of some patients in the N2 categories. Our study focused on the prognostic significance of different subclassifications for N1 patients. METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library on the topic of N1 lymph node dissection. Hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the prognostic significance of N1 metastases. I2 statistics was used to evaluate heterogeneity among the studies: If significant heterogeneity existed (P ≤ 0.10; I2 &gt;50%), a random effect model was adopted. RESULTS After a careful investigation, a total of 17 articles were included in the analysis. The results showed that patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with multistation N1 disease have worse survival compared with those with single-station N1 disease (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.32–1.77; P &lt; 0.001; I2 = 5.1%). No significant difference was observed between groups when we assessed the number of positive lymph nodes (single or multiple) (HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.96–1.64; P = 0.097; I2 = 72.5%). Patients with positive hilar zone lymph nodes had poorer survival than those limited to the intrapulmonary zone (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.57–2.07; P &lt; 0.001; I2 = 0%). A subgroup analysis conducted according to the different validated lymph node maps showed a stable result. CONCLUSIONS Our result confirmed the prognostic significance of the N1 subclassification based on station number. Meanwhile, location-based classifications, especially zone-based, were also identified as prognostically significant, which may need further confirmation and validation in the staged population.

scholarly journals Preliminary Study on the Clinical Significance and Methods of Using Carbon Nanoparticles in Endoscopic Papillary Thyroid Cancer Surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Shangrui Rao ◽  
Zhonglin Wang ◽  
Congtao Pan ◽  
Yi Wang ◽  
Zhe Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Clinical Significance ◽  
Carbon Nanoparticles ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Papillary Thyroid ◽  
Injection Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Preliminary Study

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to find the clinical significance and methods of using CN in endoscopic treatment for PTC. Materials and Methods. A total of 108 cases were randomly enrolled and divided into two groups, with 50 cases in the CN injection group who were injected with CN and 58 cases in the control group with no CN injection. All cases were analyzed with the size of carcinoma, the number of lymph node, and parathyroid gland injury. Results. All operations were successfully completed. The lymph node dissection number was 274 for the control group and 322 (the rate of black stained was 87%) for the CN injection group. The average number of lymph nodes in the CN injection group was 6.44 ± 2.08, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (4.72 ± 1.89). The control group had a relatively higher incidence of incidental parathyroidectomy, compared to the CN injection group (27.6% in the control group vs. 12% in the CN injection group, P = 0.045 ). However, the incidence of hypoparathyroidism failed to show the significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion. Using CN in endoscopic PTC surgery could increase the detection rate of lymph nodes and reduce the injury of parathyroid glands to a certain extent.

Efficacy and Safety of Non-Steroidal Anti-Androgens in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammed Rashid ◽  
Madhan Ramesh ◽  
K. Shamshavali ◽  
Amit Dang ◽  
Himanshu Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the sixth primary cause of cancer death. However, conflicts are present about the efficacy and safety of Non-steroidal anti-androgens (NSAA) for its treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of NSAAs versus any comparator for the treatment of advanced or metastatic PCa (mPCa). Methodology: MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library were searched. References of included studies and clinicaltrials.gov were also searched for relevant studies. Only English language studies after 1990 were considered for review. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy and safety of NSAAs as compared with any other comparator including surgery or chemotherapy in mPCa patients were included. The outcomes include efficacy, safety and the tolerability of the treatment. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool was used for quality assessment. Two authors were independently involved in the selection, extraction and quality assessment of included studies and disagreements were resolved by discussion or by consulting a third reviewer. Results: Fifty-eight out of 1307 non-duplicate RCTs with 29154 patients were considered for the review. NSAA showed significantly better progression-free survival [PFS] (Hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-0.78; P=0.0001), time to distant metastasis or death [TTD] (HR, 0.80; 95% CI 0.73-0.91; p<0.0001), objective response (Odds ratio [OR], 1.64; 95% CI 1.06-2.54; P=0.03) and clinical benefits (OR, 1.33; 95% CI 1.08-1.63; P=0.006) as compared to the control group. There was no significant difference observed between the groups in terms of overall survival (HR, 0.95; 95%CI, 0.87-1.03; P=0.18) and time to progression (HR, 0.93; 95% CI 0.77-1.11; P=0.43). Treatment-related adverse events were more with the NSAA group, but the discontinuation due to lack of efficacy reason was 43% significantly lesser than the control group in patients with mPCa. Rest of the outcomes were appeared to be non-significant. Conclusion: Treatment with NSAA was appeared to be better efficacious with respect to PFS, TTD, and response rate with considerable adverse events when compared to the control group in patients with metastatic PCa.

Early Versus Routine Stoma Closure in Patients With Colorectal Resection: A Meta-Analysis of 7 Randomized Controlled Trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-298
Author(s):  
Yinyin Guo ◽  
Yanxin Luo ◽  
Hui Zhao ◽  
Liangliang Bai ◽  
Juan Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Bowel Obstruction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Stoma Closure ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference

Background. A substantial proportion of patients undergoing colorectal surgery receive a temporary stoma, and the timing for stoma closure remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of early stoma closure (ESC) compared with routine stoma closure (RSC) after colorectal surgery. Methods. We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials that compared ESC and RSC after colorectal surgery. Results. A total of 7 randomized controlled trials with 814 enrolled patients were identified for this meta-analysis. There were no significant differences between the ESC and RSC groups regarding the complications of stoma closure (26.8% and 16.6%, respectively; odds ratio [OR]: 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-1.90; P = .17). A subgroup analysis was conducted by Clavien-Dindo grade of complication, and no significant difference was observed in any subgroup ( P > .05). However, the ESC group had a significantly higher risk of wound complications than the RSC group (17.6% and 7.8%, respectively; OR: 2.61; 95% CI: 1.43-4.76; P = .002), and the RSC group had more cases of small bowel obstruction than the ESC group (3.1% and 8.4%, respectively; OR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.15-0.87; P = .02). Conclusions. ESC is a safe and effective therapeutic approach in patients who have undergone colorectal surgery; it is associated with a reduced risk of bowel obstruction but a higher risk of wound complications.

scholarly journals Nanoparticles can improve the positive rate of metastatic lymph node in thyroid cancer surgery

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xindi Su ◽  
Fang Chai ◽  
Benrui Lin ◽  
Lu Qu ◽  
Keyi Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Metastatic Lymph Node ◽  
Cancer Surgery ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Blood Calcium ◽  
Metastatic Lymph ◽  
Positive Rate ◽  
Experimental Group

Abstract Objective. To investigate the application of carbon nanoparticles in lymph node dissection and parathyroid gland protection during thyroid cancer surgery. Subjects and Methods. Retrospective analysis was performed on 282 cases of thyroid cancer surgery in our hospital from 2018 to 2019. All patients underwent total thyroidectomy and cervical central lymph node dissection. Nanocarbon was not used in the control group, but was used in the experimental group. The general situation of the patients, the number of postoperative lymph nodes and the number of metastasis were collected, and the differences between serum parathyroid hormone and blood calcium were compared before and on the 3rd and 30th day after surgery. Results. There was no difference in age, sex and TNM stage between the two groups (P > 0.05). The number of metastatic lymph nodes in the experimental group (9.80 ± 4.80) was different from that in the control group (6.95 ± 3.86) (P < 0.05), and the number of metastatic lymph nodes in the experimental group was different from that in the control group (χ2 = 14.968, P < 0.05). There was no difference in blood calcium and PTH between the two groups before and at 3 and 30 days after surgery (P > 0. 05). Conclusion. The application of carbon nanoparticles in thyroid cancer surgery can significantly increase the number of lymph nodes seized and the positive rate of metastatic lymph node removal, but the protection of parathyroid gland is not obvious.

scholarly journals Outcome of Cervical Lymph Nodes Dissection for Thyroid Cancer with Nodal Metastases: A Southeast Asian 3-Year Experience

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Raymond Z. M. Lim ◽  
Juin Y. Ooi ◽  
Jih H. Tan ◽  
Henry C. L. Tan ◽  
Seniyah M. Sikin
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Neck Dissection ◽  
Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
Endocrine Surgery ◽  
Node Dissection ◽  
Referral Centre ◽  
Local Data ◽  
Cervical Lymph Nodes

Introduction. Therapeutic nodal dissection is still the mainstay of treatment for patients with lymph node metastases in many centres. The local data, however, on the outcome of therapeutic LND remains limited. Hence, this study aims to inform practice by presenting the outcomes of LND for thyroid cancer patients and our experience in a tertiary referral centre.Methods. This is a single-centre retrospective observational study in a Malaysian tertiary endocrine surgery referral centre. Patients who underwent total thyroidectomy with lymph node dissection between years 2013 and 2015 were included and electronic medical records over a 3-year follow-up period were reviewed. The outcomes of different lymph node dissection (LND), including central neck dissection, lateral neck dissection, or both, were compared.Results. Of the 43 subjects included, 28 (65.1%) had Stage IV cancer. Among the 43 subjects included, 8 underwent central LND, and 15 had lateral LND while the remaining 20 had dissection of both lateral and central lymph nodes. Locoregional recurrence was found in 16 (37.2%) of our subjects included, with no statistical difference between the central (2/8), lateral (7/15), and both (7/20). Postoperative hypocalcaemia occurred in 7 (16.3%) patients, and vocal cord palsy occurred in 5 (11.6%), whereas 9 patients (20.9%) required reoperation. Death occurred in 4 of our patients.Conclusion. High recurrence and reoperative rates were observed in our centre. While the routine prophylactic LND remains controversial, high risk patients may be considered for prophylactic LND. The long-term risk and benefit of prophylactic LND with individualised patient selection in the local setting deserve further studies.

Comparison of Standard Distal Pancreatectomy and Splenectomy with Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy

2014 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Trottman ◽  
Katrina Swett ◽  
Perry Shen ◽  
Joseph Sirintrapun
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Distal Pancreatectomy ◽  
Tumor Staging ◽  
The Body ◽  
Lymph Node Count ◽  
Standard Resection ◽  
Lymph Node Retrieval ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy

Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) has been reported to provide improved margin resection and lymph node retrieval for tumors of the body and tail of the pancreas compared with standard resection. We examined our experience with RAMPS and standard resection to determine differences in clinicopathologic outcomes. A comparison of RAMPS procedures was made to standard distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy examining various clinicopathologic variables through retrospective chart review. Twenty-six patients underwent distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy between November 2004 and June 2011. Twenty patients underwent standard resection and six patients underwent RAMPS procedures for a variety of histologies. As a result of the heterogeneity of diseases, which included benign lesions, margin status was not applicable in some cases and therefore was not assessed overall. Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum tests demonstrated a significant difference in number of lymph nodes removed with mean of 4.3 and 11.2 lymph nodes obtained for standard resection and RAMPS, respectively ( P = 0.03). The RAMPS procedure for lesions of the body and tail of the pancreas retrieved significantly more lymph nodes than standard distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. It should be the preferred surgical approach when lymph node count is important for tumor staging.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Sinomenine Preparation for Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Randomized Controlled Trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Shan-Shan Lin ◽  
Chun-Xiang Liu ◽  
Jun-Hua Zhang ◽  
Hui Wang ◽  
Jing-Bo Zhai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Morning Stiffness ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference

Objectives. To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of sinomenine preparation (SP) for treating ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Methods. Clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of SP for treating AS were systematically identified in six electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP), and Wanfang Databases from the inception up to 31 October 2019. Cochrane’s risk of bias tool was used to assess the methodological quality and Review Manager 5.3 software was used to analyze data. Results. A total of 12 RCTs involving 835 patients were finally included. According to interventions, RCTs were divided into two types. The intervention in 10 RCTs was SP combined with conventional pharmacotherapy (CPT) versus CPT and that in 2 RCTs was SP alone versus CPT. The results of the meta-analysis showed that, compared with CPT alone, SP combined with oral CPT has better improvement in BASDAI (WMD = −1.84, 95% CI [−3.31, −0.37], P=0.01), morning stiffness time (WMD = −13.46, 95% CI [−16.12, −10.79], P<0.00001), the Schober test (WMD = 1.26, 95% CI [0.72, 1.80], P<0.00001), the occipital wall test (WMD = −0.55, 95% CI [−0.96, −0.14], P=0.009), the finger-to-ground distance (WMD = −3.28, 95% CI [−5.64, −0.93], P=0.006), 15 m walking time (WMD = −8.81, 95% CI [−13.42, −4.20], P=0.0002), the C-reactive protein (CRP) (WMD = −1.84, 95% CI [−3.24, −0.45], P=0.01), and the total effective rate (RR = 1.10, 95% CI [1.01, 1.20], P=0.03). Besides, it also showed that oral SP alone may be more effective in improving morning stiffness time (WMD = −31.89, 95% CI [−34.91, −28.87], P<0.00001) compared with CPT alone. However, this study cannot provide evidence that loading the injectable SP based on CPT can significantly increase the efficacy due to the insufficient number of studies included. In terms of adverse events, there was no statistically significant difference between the experimental group and the control group. Conclusions. This study shows that oral SP may be effective and safe in the treatment of AS. Due to the low methodological quality of the included RCTs and the limitations of the meta-analysis, it is still necessary to carry out more multicenter, large-sample, and high-quality RCTs to further verify the conclusions. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42018099170), and the review was constructed following the PRISMA guidelines (Annex 1).

scholarly journals Dexmedetomidine versus magnesium sulfate as an adjuvant to local anesthetics in spinal anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 030006052094617
Author(s):  
Jinguo Wang ◽  
Zaitang Wang ◽  
Xuesong Song ◽  
Na Wang
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Magnesium Sulfate ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Local Anesthetics ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Sensory Blockade ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference

Objective To compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulfate as an adjuvant to local anesthetics in spinal anesthesia. Methods A search of PubMed, Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was performed. Randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulfate as a local anesthetic adjuvant in spinal anesthesia were identified. The primary outcome was sensory block duration. The mean difference (MD) or odds ratio along with the 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to analyze the outcomes. Results Six studies involving 360 patients were included. Intrathecal dexmedetomidine was associated with a significantly longer sensory block duration (MD = −73.62; 95% CI = −101.09 to −46.15), faster onsets of sensory blockade and motor blockade, and a longer motor block duration than intrathecal magnesium sulfate. There was no significant difference between the regarding the rates of hypotension, bradycardia, shivering, and postoperative nausea and vomiting between the groups. Conclusions Dexmedetomidine is superior to magnesium sulfate as an adjuvant to local anesthetics in spinal anesthesia because of its more rapid onset and longer duration of spinal block without significant adverse effects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document