scholarly journals Differential modulation of ventral tegmental area circuits by the nociceptin/orphanin FQ system

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Driscoll ◽  
Tanya L. Wallace ◽  
Kasra A. Mansourian ◽  
William J. Martin ◽  
Elyssa B. Margolis

AbstractThe neuropeptide nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) can be released by stressors and is associated with disorders of emotion regulation and reward processing. N/OFQ and its receptor, NOP, are enriched in dopaminergic pathways, and intra-ventricular agonist delivery decreases dopamine levels in the dorsal striatum, nucleus accumbens (NAc), and ventral tegmental area (VTA). We used whole cell electrophysiology in acute rat midbrain slices to investigate synaptic actions of N/OFQ. N/OFQ was primarily inhibitory, causing outward currents in both immunocytochemically identified dopaminergic (tyrosine hydroxylase positive (TH(+)) and non-dopaminergic (TH(−)) VTA neurons (effect at 1 μM: 20 ± 4 pA). Surprisingly, this effect was mediated by augmentation of postsynaptic GABAAR currents, unlike the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc), where the N/OFQ induced outward currents were K+ channel dependent. A smaller population, 19% of all VTA neurons, responded to low concentrations N/OFQ with inward currents (10 nM: −11 ± 2 pA). Following 100 nM N/OFQ, the response to a second N/OFQ application was markedly diminished in VTA neurons (14 ± 10% of first response), but not in SNc neurons (90 ± 20% of first response). N/OFQ generated outward currents in medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC)-projecting VTA neurons, but inward currents in a subset of posterior anterior cingulate cortex-projecting VTA neurons. While N/OFQ inhibited NAc-projecting VTA cell bodies, it had little effect on electrically or optogenetically evoked terminal dopamine release in the NAc measured ex vivo with fast scan cyclic voltammetry. These results extend our understanding of the N/OFQ system in brainstem circuits implicated in many neurobehavioral disorders.Significance statementThe neuropeptide nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) and its receptor (NOP) are engaged under conditions of stress and are associated with reward processing disorders. Both peptide and receptor are highly enriched in ventral tegmental area (VTA) pathways underlying motivation and reward. Using whole cell electrophysiology in rat midbrain slices we found: 1) NOPs are functional on both dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic VTA neurons; 2) N/OFQ differentially regulates VTA neurons based on neuroanatomical projection target; and 3) repeated application of N/OFQ produces evidence of receptor desensitization in the VTA but not the SNc. These results reveal candidate mechanisms by which the NOP system regulates motivation and emotion.

2021 ◽  
Vol 226 (4) ◽  
pp. 1155-1167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne C. Trutti ◽  
Laura Fontanesi ◽  
Martijn J. Mulder ◽  
Pierre-Louis Bazin ◽  
Bernhard Hommel ◽  
...  

AbstractFunctional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) BOLD signal is commonly localized by using neuroanatomical atlases, which can also serve for region of interest analyses. Yet, the available MRI atlases have serious limitations when it comes to imaging subcortical structures: only 7% of the 455 subcortical nuclei are captured by current atlases. This highlights the general difficulty in mapping smaller nuclei deep in the brain, which can be addressed using ultra-high field 7 Tesla (T) MRI. The ventral tegmental area (VTA) is a subcortical structure that plays a pivotal role in reward processing, learning and memory. Despite the significant interest in this nucleus in cognitive neuroscience, there are currently no available, anatomically precise VTA atlases derived from 7 T MRI data that cover the full region of the VTA. Here, we first provide a protocol for multimodal VTA imaging and delineation. We then provide a data description of a probabilistic VTA atlas based on in vivo 7 T MRI data.


1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 853-862 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. Rice ◽  
S. J. Cragg ◽  
S. A. Greenfield

Rice, M. E., S. J. Cragg, and S. A. Greenfield. Characteristics of electrically evoked somatodendritic dopamine release in substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area in vitro. J. Neurophysiol. 77: 853–862, 1997. Somatodendritic dopamine (DA) release from neurons of the midbrain represents a nonclassical form of neuronal signaling. We assessed characteristics of DA release during electrical stimulation of the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) in guinea pig midbrain slices. With the use of parameters optimized for this region, we compared stimulus-induced increases in extracellular DA concentration ([DA]o) in medial and lateral SNc, ventral tegmental area (VTA), and dorsal striatum in vitro. DA release was monitored directly with carbon-fiber microelectrodes and fast-scan cyclic voltammetry. Detection of DA in SNc was confirmed by electrochemical, pharmacological, and anatomic criteria. Voltammograms of the released substance had the same peak potentials as those of DA obtained during in vitro calibration, but different from those of the indoleamine 5-hydroxytryptamine. Similar voltammograms were also obtained in the DA-rich striatum during local electrical stimulation. Contribution from the DA metabolite 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid to somatodendritic release was negligible, as indicated by the lack of effect of the monoamine oxidase inhibitor pargyline (20 μM) on the signal. Lastly, DA voltammograms could only be elicited in regions that were subsequently determined to be positive for tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactivity (TH-ir). The frequency dependence of stimulated DA release in SNc was determined over a range of 1–50 Hz, with a constant duration of 10 s. Release was frequency dependent up to 10 Hz, with no further increase at higher frequencies. Stimulation at 10 Hz was used in all subsequent experiments. With this paradigm, DA release in SNc was tetrodotoxin insensitive, but strongly Ca2+ dependent. Stimulated [DA]o in the midbrain was also site specific. At the midcaudal level examined, DA efflux was significantly greater in VTA (1.04 ± 0.05 μM, mean ± SE) than in medial SNc (0.52 ± 0.05 μM), which in turn was higher than in lateral SNc (0.35 ± 0.03 μM). This pattern followed the apparent density of TH-ir, which was also VTA > medial SNc > lateral SNc. This report has introduced a new paradigm for the study of somatodendritic DA release. Voltammetric recording with electrodes of 2–4 μm tip diameter permitted highly localized, direct detection of endogenous DA. The Ca2+ dependence of stimulated release indicated that the process was physiologically relevant. Moreover, the findings that somatodendritic release was frequency dependent across a range characteristic of DA cell firing rates and that stimulated [DA]o varied markedly among DA cell body regions have important implications for how dendritically released DA may function in the physiology and pathophysiology of substantia nigra and VTA.


eNeuro ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. ENEURO.0381-18.2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleanor J. Paul ◽  
Eliza Kalk ◽  
Kyoko Tossell ◽  
Elaine E. Irvine ◽  
Nicholas P. Franks ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 98 (6) ◽  
pp. 3388-3396 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Russel Keath ◽  
Michael P. Iacoviello ◽  
Lindy E. Barrett ◽  
Huibert D. Mansvelder ◽  
Daniel S. McGehee

Midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons are found in two nuclei, the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) and ventral tegmental area (VTA). The SNc dopaminergic projections to the dorsal striatum are involved in voluntary movement and habit learning, whereas the VTA projections to the ventral striatum contribute to reward and motivation. Nicotine induces profound DA release from VTA dopamine neurons but substantially less from the SNc. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) expression differs between these nuclei, but it is unknown whether there are differences in nAChR expression on the afferent projections to these nuclei. Here we have compared the nicotinic modulation of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs to VTA and SNc dopamine neurons. Although nicotine enhances both the excitatory and inhibitory drive to SNc DA cells with response magnitudes similar to those seen in the VTA, the prevalence of these responses in SNc is much lower. We also found that a mixture of nAChR subtypes underlies the synaptic modulation in SNc, further distinguishing this nucleus from the VTA, where α7 nAChRs enhance glutamate inputs and non-α7 receptors enhance GABA inputs. Finally, we compared the nicotine sensitivity of DA neurons in these two nuclei and found larger response magnitudes in VTA relative to SNc. Thus the observed differences in nicotine-induced DA release from VTA and SNc are likely due to differences in nAChR expression on the afferent inputs as well as on the DA neurons themselves. This may explain why nicotine has a greater effect on behaviors associated with the VTA than the SNc.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document