scholarly journals Estimating Northern Fur Seal Pup Production: A Case Study of Batch Mark Abundance Estimation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devin S. Johnson ◽  
Rodney G. Towell ◽  
Jason B. Baker

AbstractWe describe a hierarchical N-mixture model for estimating northern fur seal pup production from batch mark-resight data. Our goal was to improve upon a traditional design-based estimation method used for over 50 years. To this end, we propose a hierarchical N-mixture model to account for differences in animal availability for resighting and observer detection probabilities. A Bayesian approach is used for inference with three separate methods proposed for necessary computations. First a straightforward posterior sample is drawn using MCMC. This was considered the gold standard for this analysis. However, we also consider an approximate model-based on Gaussian approximation of the Poisson and binomial distributions used in the exact hierarchical model. By using the Gaussian approximations, analytic integration can be used to marginalize over latent components. Inference can then be made by maximizing the posterior to find the mode. Following this we investigate both delta-method and parametric bootstrap approaches for calculating abundance and the associated standard errors. Each of the three methods produced nearly identical estimates and standard errors, providing support for using Gaussian approximations in other latent abundance models where the abundance is relatively large.

1997 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 675-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. B. Scheffer ◽  
A. E. York

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 1130-1145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan K Mikulich-Gilbertson ◽  
Brandie D Wagner ◽  
Paula D Riggs ◽  
Gary O Zerbe

Different types of outcomes (e.g. binary, count, continuous) can be simultaneously modeled with multivariate generalized linear mixed models by assuming: (1) same or different link functions, (2) same or different conditional distributions, and (3) conditional independence given random subject effects. Others have used this approach for determining simple associations between subject-specific parameters (e.g. correlations between slopes). We demonstrate how more complex associations (e.g. partial regression coefficients between slopes adjusting for intercepts, time lags of maximum correlation) can be estimated. Reparameterizing the model to directly estimate coefficients allows us to compare standard errors based on the inverse of the Hessian matrix with more usual standard errors approximated by the delta method; a mathematical proof demonstrates their equivalence when the gradient vector approaches zero. Reparameterization also allows us to evaluate significance of coefficients with likelihood ratio tests and to compare this approach with more usual Wald-type t-tests and Fisher’s z transformations. Simulations indicate that the delta method and inverse Hessian standard errors are nearly equivalent and consistently overestimate the true standard error. Only the likelihood ratio test based on the reparameterized model has an acceptable type I error rate and is therefore recommended for testing associations between stochastic parameters. Online supplementary materials include our medical data example, annotated code, and simulation details.


1984 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel R. Griben ◽  
Helene R. Johnson ◽  
Betty B. Gallucci ◽  
Vincent F. Gallucci

2020 ◽  
pp. 014662162096574
Author(s):  
Zhonghua Zhang

Researchers have developed a characteristic curve procedure to estimate the parameter scale transformation coefficients in test equating under the nominal response model. In the study, the delta method was applied to derive the standard error expressions for computing the standard errors for the estimates of the parameter scale transformation coefficients. This brief report presents the results of a simulation study that examined the accuracy of the derived formulas and compared the performance of this analytical method with that of the multiple imputation method. The results indicated that the standard errors produced by the delta method were very close to the criterion standard errors as well as those yielded by the multiple imputation method under all the simulation conditions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document