scholarly journals Non-junctional Cadherin3 regulates cell migration and contact inhibition of locomotion via domain-dependent opposing regulations of Rac1

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takehiko Ichikawa ◽  
Carsten Stuckenholz ◽  
Lance A. Davidson
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Contact Inhibition ◽  
Cell Contact ◽  
Collective Cell Migration ◽  
Cell Contacts ◽  
Rac1 Activity ◽  
Classical Cadherins ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Cell Cell

AbstractClassical cadherins are well-known primary adhesion molecules responsible for physically connecting neighboring cells and signaling the cell-cell contact. Recent studies have suggested novel signaling roles for “non-junctional” cadherins (Niessen and Gottardi, 2008; Padmanabhan et al., 2017); however, the function of cadherin signaling independent of cell-cell contacts remains unknown. In this study, we used mesendoderm cells and tissues from gastrula stage Xenopus laevis embryos to demonstrate that extracellular and cytoplasmic cadherin domains regulate Rac1 in opposing directions in the absence of cell-cell contacts. Furthermore, we found that non-junctional cadherins regulate contact inhibition of locomotion (CIL) during gastrulation through alterations in the stability of the cytoskeleton. Live FRET imaging of Rac1 activity illustrated how non-junction cadherin3 (formerly C-cadherin) spatio-temporally regulates CIL. Our study provides novel insights into adhesion-independent signaling by cadherin3 and its role in regulating single and collective cell migration in vivo.

scholarly journals Non-junctional role of Cadherin3 in cell migration and contact inhibition of locomotion via domain-dependent, opposing regulation of Rac1

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takehiko Ichikawa ◽  
Carsten Stuckenholz ◽  
Lance A. Davidson
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Contact Inhibition ◽  
Cell Contact ◽  
Collective Cell Migration ◽  
Rac1 Activity ◽  
Classical Cadherins ◽  
Migration Assays ◽  
Spatio Temporal ◽  
Cell Cell

Abstract Classical cadherins are well-known adhesion molecules responsible for physically connecting neighboring cells and signaling this cell–cell contact. Recent studies have suggested novel signaling roles for “non-junctional” cadherins (NJCads); however, the function of cadherin signaling independent of cell–cell contacts remains unknown. In this study, mesendodermal cells and tissues from gastrula stage Xenopus laevis embryos demonstrate that deletion of extracellular domains of Cadherin3 (Cdh3; formerly C-cadherin in Xenopus) disrupts contact inhibition of locomotion. In both bulk Rac1 activity assays and spatio-temporal FRET image analysis, the extracellular and cytoplasmic Cdh3 domains disrupt NJCad signaling and regulate Rac1 activity in opposing directions. Stabilization of the cytoskeleton counteracted this regulation in single cell migration assays. Our study provides novel insights into adhesion-independent signaling by Cadherin3 and its role in regulating single and collective cell migration.

scholarly journals Collective cell migration requires suppression of actomyosin at cell–cell contacts mediated by DDR1 and the cell polarity regulators Par3 and Par6

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Hidalgo-Carcedo ◽  
Steven Hooper ◽  
Shahid I. Chaudhry ◽  
Peter Williamson ◽  
Kevin Harrington ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Cell Polarity ◽  
Collective Cell Migration ◽  
Cell Contacts ◽  
Cell Cell

scholarly journals The formation of ordered nanoclusters controls cadherin anchoring to actin and cell–cell contact fluidity

2015 ◽  
Vol 210 (2) ◽  
pp. 333-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre-Olivier Strale ◽  
Laurence Duchesne ◽  
Grégoire Peyret ◽  
Lorraine Montel ◽  
Thao Nguyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adherens Junction ◽  
Intercellular Junctions ◽  
Cell Contact ◽  
Collective Cell Migration ◽  
Contact Stability ◽  
Junction Formation ◽  
Mediate Cell ◽  
The Stability ◽  
E Cadherin ◽  
Cell Cell

Oligomerization of cadherins could provide the stability to ensure tissue cohesion. Cadherins mediate cell–cell adhesion by forming trans-interactions. They form cis-interactions whose role could be essential to stabilize intercellular junctions by shifting cadherin clusters from a fluid to an ordered phase. However, no evidence has been provided so far for cadherin oligomerization in cellulo and for its impact on cell–cell contact stability. Visualizing single cadherins within cell membrane at a nanometric resolution, we show that E-cadherins arrange in ordered clusters, providing the first demonstration of the existence of oligomeric cadherins at cell–cell contacts. Studying the consequences of the disruption of the cis-interface, we show that it is not essential for adherens junction formation. Its disruption, however, increased the mobility of junctional E-cadherin. This destabilization strongly affected E-cadherin anchoring to actin and cell–cell rearrangement during collective cell migration, indicating that the formation of oligomeric clusters controls the anchoring of cadherin to actin and cell–cell contact fluidity.

scholarly journals The interplay of cell–cell and cell–substrate adhesion in collective cell migration

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (100) ◽  
pp. 20140684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenlu Wang ◽  
Sagar Chowdhury ◽  
Meghan Driscoll ◽  
Carole A. Parent ◽  
S. K. Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Cell Surface ◽  
Actin Polymerization ◽  
Collective Cell Migration ◽  
Cell Contacts ◽  
Substrate Adhesion ◽  
Cell Substrate ◽  
Cell Shapes ◽  
Cell Substrate Adhesion ◽  
Cell Cell

Collective cell migration often involves notable cell–cell and cell–substrate adhesions and highly coordinated motion of touching cells. We focus on the interplay between cell–substrate adhesion and cell–cell adhesion. We show that the loss of cell-surface contact does not significantly alter the dynamic pattern of protrusions and retractions of fast migrating amoeboid cells ( Dictyostelium discoideum ), but significantly changes their ability to adhere to other cells. Analysis of the dynamics of cell shapes reveals that cells that are adherent to a surface may coordinate their motion with neighbouring cells through protrusion waves that travel across cell–cell contacts. However, while shape waves exist if cells are detached from surfaces, they do not couple cell to cell. In addition, our investigation of actin polymerization indicates that loss of cell-surface adhesion changes actin polymerization at cell–cell contacts. To further investigate cell–cell/cell–substrate interactions, we used optical micromanipulation to form cell–substrate contact at controlled locations. We find that both cell-shape dynamics and cytoskeletal activity respond rapidly to the formation of cell–substrate contact.

scholarly journals Tissue self-organization based on collective cell migration by contact activation of locomotion and chemotaxis

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (10) ◽  
pp. 4291-4296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taihei Fujimori ◽  
Akihiko Nakajima ◽  
Nao Shimada ◽  
Satoshi Sawai
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Cell Movement ◽  
Tissue Level ◽  
Cell Contact ◽  
Collective Cell Migration ◽  
Contact Activation ◽  
Membrane Recruitment ◽  
Cell Rearrangement ◽  
Cell Protrusion ◽  
Cell Cell

Despite their central role in multicellular organization, navigation rules that dictate cell rearrangement remain largely undefined. Contact between neighboring cells and diffusive attractant molecules are two of the major determinants of tissue-level patterning; however, in most cases, molecular and developmental complexity hinders one from decoding the exact governing rules of individual cell movement. A primordial example of tissue patterning by cell rearrangement is found in the social amoebaDictyostelium discoideumwhere the organizing center or the “tip” self-organizes as a result of sorting of differentiating prestalk and prespore cells. By employing microfluidics and microsphere-based manipulation of navigational cues at the single-cell level, here we uncovered a previously overlooked mode ofDictyosteliumcell migration that is strictly directed by cell–cell contact. The cell–cell contact signal is mediated by E-set Ig-like domain-containing heterophilic adhesion molecules TgrB1/TgrC1 that act in trans to induce plasma membrane recruitment of the SCAR complex and formation of dendritic actin networks, and the resulting cell protrusion competes with those induced by chemoattractant cAMP. Furthermore, we demonstrate that both prestalk and prespore cells can protrude toward the contact signal as well as to chemotax toward cAMP; however, when given both signals, prestalk cells orient toward the chemoattractant, whereas prespore cells choose the contact signal. These data suggest a model of cell sorting by competing juxtacrine and diffusive cues, each with potential to drive its own mode of collective cell migration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document