scholarly journals Low Affinity Binding Sites in an Activating CRM Mediate Negative Autoregulation of the Drosophila Hox Gene Ultrabithorax

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca K Delker ◽  
Vikram Ranade ◽  
Ryan Loker ◽  
Roumen Voutev ◽  
Richard S Mann
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Transcriptional Level ◽  
Regulation Of Transcription ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Hox Gene ◽  
Endogenous Locus

AbstractSpecification of cell identity and the proper functioning of a mature cell depend on precise regulation of gene expression. Both binary ON/OFF regulation of transcription, as well as more fine-tuned control of transcription levels in the ON state, are required to define cell types. The Drosophila melanogaster Hox gene, Ultrabithorax (Ubx), exhibits both of these modes of control during development. While ON/OFF regulation is needed to specify the fate of the developing wing (Ubx OFF) and haltere (Ubx ON), the levels of Ubx within the haltere differ between compartments along the proximal-distal axis. Here, we identify and molecularly dissect the novel contribution of a previously identified Ubx cis-regulatory module (CRM), anterobithorax (abx), to a negative auto-regulatory loop that maintains decreased Ubx expression in the proximal compartment of the haltere as compared to the distal compartment. We find that Ubx, in complex with the known Hox cofactors, Homothorax (Hth) and Extradenticle (Exd), acts through low-affinity Ubx-Exd binding sites to reduce the levels of Ubx transcription in the proximal compartment. Importantly, we also reveal that Ubx-Exd-binding site mutations sufficient to result in de-repression of abx activity in the proximal haltere in a transgenic context are not sufficient to de-repress Ubx expression when mutated at the endogenous locus, suggesting the presence of multiple mechanisms through which Ubx-mediated repression occurs. Our results underscore the complementary nature of CRM analysis through transgenic reporter assays and genome modification of the endogenous locus; but, they also highlight the increasing need to understand gene regulation within the native context to capture the potential input of multiple genomic elements on gene control.Author SummaryOne of the most fundamental questions in biology is how information encoded in the DNA is translated into the diversity of cell-types that exist within a multicellular organism, each with the same genome. Regulation at the transcriptional level, mediated through the activity of transcription factors bound to cis-regulatory modules (CRMs), plays a key role in this process. While we typically distinguish cell-type by the specific subset of genes that are transcriptionally ON or OFF, it is also important to consider the more fine-tuned transcriptional control of gene expression level. We focus on the regulatory logic of the Hox developmental regulator, Ultrabithorax (Ubx), in fruit flies, which exhibits both forms of transcriptional control. While ON/OFF control of Ubx is required to define differential appendage fate in the T2 and T3 thoracic segments, respectively, more fine-tuned control of transcription levels is observed in distinct compartments within the T3 appendage, itself, in which all cells exhibit a Ubx ON state. Through genetic analysis of regulatory inputs, and dissection of a Ubx CRM in a transgenic context and at the endogenous locus, we reveal a compartment-specific negative autoregulatory loop that dampens Ubx transcription to maintain distinct transcriptional levels within a single developing tissue.

scholarly journals Regulatory signals in messenger RNA: determinants of nutrient–gene interaction and metabolic compartmentation

1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 307-321
Author(s):  
John E. Hesketh ◽  
M. Helena Vasconcelos ◽  
Giovanna Bermano
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcriptional Regulation ◽  
Mrna Stability ◽  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Untranslated Regions ◽  
Nutritional Requirements ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Metabolic Compartmentation ◽  
Post Transcriptional Regulation

Nutrition has marked influences on gene expression and an understanding of the interaction between nutrients and gene expression is important in order to provide a basis for determining the nutritional requirements on an individual basis. The effects of nutrition can be exerted at many stages between transcription of the genetic sequence and production of a functional protein. This review focuses on the role of post-transcriptional control, particularly mRNA stability, translation and localization, in the interactions of nutrients with gene expression. The effects of both macronutrients and micronutrients on regulation of gene expression by post-transcriptional mechanisms are presented and the post-transcriptional regulation of specific genes of nutritional relevance (glucose transporters, transferrin, selenoenzymes, metallothionein, lipoproteins) is described in detail. The function of the regulatory signals in the untranslated regions of the mRNA is highlighted in relation to control of mRNA stability, translation and localization and the importance of these mRNA regions to regulation by nutrients is illustrated by reference to specific examples. The localization of mRNA by signals in the untranslated regions and its function in the spatial organization of protein synthesis is described; the potential of such mechanisms to play a key part in nutrient channelling and metabolic compartmentation is discussed. It is concluded that nutrients can influence gene expression through control of the regulatory signals in these untranslated regions and that the post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression by these mechanisms may influence nutritional requirements. It is emphasized that in studies of nutritional control of gene expression it is important not to focus only on regulation through gene promoters but also to consider the possibility of post-transcriptional control.

scholarly journals RsmV a small non-coding regulatory RNA in Pseudomonas aeruginosa that sequesters RsmA and RsmF from target mRNAs

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kayley H. Janssen ◽  
Manisha R. Diaz ◽  
Cindy J. Gode ◽  
Matthew C. Wolfgang ◽  
Timothy L. Yahr
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Secretion System ◽  
Transcriptional Level ◽  
Type Vi Secretion System ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Target Mrnas

ABSTRACTThe Gram-negative opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa has distinct genetic programs that favor either acute or chronic virulence gene expression. Acute virulence is associated with twitching and swimming motility, expression of a type III secretion system (T3SS), and the absence of alginate, Psl, or Pel polysaccharide production. Traits associated with chronic infection include growth as a biofilm, reduced motility, and expression of a type VI secretion system (T6SS). The Rsm post-transcriptional regulatory system plays an important role in the inverse control of phenotypes associated with acute and chronic virulence. RsmA and RsmF are RNA-binding proteins that interact with target mRNAs to control gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. Previous work found that RsmA activity is controlled by at least three small, non-coding regulatory RNAs (RsmW, RsmY, and RsmZ). In this study, we took an in-silico approach to identify additional sRNAs that might function in the sequestration of RsmA and/or RsmF and identified RsmV, a 192 nt transcript with four predicted RsmA/RsmF consensus binding sites. RsmV is capable of sequestering RsmA and RsmF in vivo to activate translation of tssA1, a component of the T6SS, and to inhibit T3SS gene expression. Each of the predicted RsmA/RsmF consensus binding sites contribute to RsmV activity. Electrophoretic mobility shifts assays show that RsmF binds RsmV with >10-fold higher affinity than RsmY and RsmZ. Gene expression studies revealed that the temporal expression pattern of RsmV differs from RsmW, RsmY, and RsmZ. These findings suggest that each sRNA may play distinct roles in controlling RsmA and RsmF activity.IMPORTANCEThe role of RsmF in post-transcriptional control of gene expression remains enigmatic. While numerous rsmA-dependent phenotypes are more pronounced in an rsmAF double mutant, deletion of rsmF alone has only modest effects. Understanding mechanisms that control RsmF activity will provide insight into additional roles for RsmF. In the current study we identify RsmV as an sRNA that controls RsmA and RsmF activity, and show that RsmV, RsmW, RsmY, and RsmZ are differentially expressed during growth.

scholarly journals Chromatin-associated protein complexes link DNA base J and transcription termination in Leishmania

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan C Jensen ◽  
Isabelle Q. Phan ◽  
Jacquelyn R. McDonald ◽  
Aakash Sur ◽  
Mark A. Gillespie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcriptional Regulation ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Transcription Termination ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Regulation Of Transcription ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Polycistronic Transcription ◽  
Post Transcriptional Regulation

AbstractUnlike most other eukaryotes, Leishmania and other trypanosomatid protozoa have largely eschewed transcriptional control of gene expression; relying instead on post-transcriptional regulation of mRNAs derived from polycistronic transcription units (PTUs). In these parasites, a novel modified nucleotide base (β-D-glucopyranosyloxymethyluracil) known as J plays a critical role in ensuring that transcription termination occurs only at the end of each PTU, rather than at the polyadenylation sites of individual genes. To further understand the biology of J-associated processes, we used tandem affinity purification (TAP-tagging) and mass spectrometry to reveal proteins that interact with the glucosyltransferase performing the final step in J synthesis. These studies identified four proteins reminiscent of subunits in the PTW/PP1 complex that controls transcription termination in higher eukaryotes. Moreover, bioinformatic analyses identified the DNA-binding subunit of Leishmania PTW/PP1 as a novel J-binding protein (JBP3). Down-regulation of JBP3 expression levels in Leishmania resulted in a substantial increase in transcriptional read-through at the 3’ end of most PTUs. Additional TAP-tagging experiments showed that JBP3 also associates with two other protein complexes. One consists of subunits with domains suggestive of a role in chromatin modification/remodeling; while the other contains subunits with similarity to those found in the PAF1 complex involved in regulation of transcription in other eukaryotes. Thus, trypanosomatids utilize protein complexes similar to those used to control transcription termination in other eukaryotes and JBP3 appears to function as a hub linking these modules to base J, thereby enabling the parasites’ unique reliance on polycistronic transcription and post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression.

scholarly journals NMDAR-mediated transcriptional control of gene expression in the specification of interneuron subtype identity

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivek Mahadevan ◽  
Apratim Mitra ◽  
Yajun Zhang ◽  
Areg Peltekian ◽  
Ramesh Chittajallu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Medial Ganglionic Eminence ◽  
Membrane Excitability ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Road Map ◽  
Physiological Properties ◽  
Nmdar Subunit

AbstractMedial ganglionic eminence (MGE)-derived parvalbumin (PV)+, somatostatin (SST)+ and Neurogliaform (NGFC)-type cortical and hippocampal interneurons, have distinct molecular, anatomical and physiological properties. However, the molecular mechanisms regulating their diversity remain poorly understood. Here, via single-cell transcriptomics, we show that the obligate NMDA-type glutamate receptor (NMDAR) subunit gene Grin1 mediates subtype-specific transcriptional regulation of gene expression in MGE-derived interneurons, leading to altered subtype identities. Notably, MGE-specific conditional Grin1 loss results in a systemic downregulation of diverse transcriptional, synaptogenic and membrane excitability regulatory programs. These widespread gene expression abnormalities mirror aberrations that are typically associated with neurodevelopmental disorders, particularly schizophrenia. Our study hence provides a road map for the systematic examination of NMDAR signaling in interneuron subtypes, revealing potential MGE-specific genetic targets that could instruct future therapies of psychiatric disorders.

scholarly journals Transcriptional Control of Gene Expression and the Heterogeneous Cellular Identity of Erythroblastic Island Macrophages

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaustav Mukherjee ◽  
James J. Bieker
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Cellular Heterogeneity ◽  
Erythroid Progenitors ◽  
Distinct Cell Type ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Erythroblastic Island ◽  
Isolation And Characterization

During definitive erythropoiesis, maturation of erythroid progenitors into enucleated reticulocytes requires the erythroblastic island (EBI) niche comprising a central macrophage attached to differentiating erythroid progenitors. Normally, the macrophage provides a nurturing environment for maturation of erythroid cells. Its critical physiologic importance entails aiding in recovery from anemic insults, such as systemic stress or acquired disease. Considerable interest in characterizing the central macrophage of the island niche led to the identification of putative cell surface markers enriched in island macrophages, enabling isolation and characterization. Recent studies focus on bulk and single cell transcriptomics of the island macrophage during adult steady-state erythropoiesis and embryonic erythropoiesis. They reveal that the island macrophage is a distinct cell type but with widespread cellular heterogeneity, likely suggesting distinct developmental origins and biological function. These studies have also uncovered transcriptional programs that drive gene expression in the island macrophage. Strikingly, the master erythroid regulator EKLF/Klf1 seems to also play a major role in specifying gene expression in island macrophages, including a putative EKLF/Klf1-dependent transcription circuit. Our present review and analysis of mouse single cell genetic patterns suggest novel expression characteristics that will enable a clear enrichment of EBI subtypes and resolution of island macrophage heterogeneity. Specifically, the discovery of markers such as Epor, and specific features for EKLF/Klf1-expressing island macrophages such as Sptb and Add2, or for SpiC-expressing island macrophage such as Timd4, or for Maf/Nr1h3-expressing island macrophage such as Vcam1, opens exciting possibilities for further characterization of these unique macrophage cell types in the context of their critical developmental function.

Epigenetics of the vascular endothelium

2010 ◽  
Vol 109 (3) ◽  
pp. 916-926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Shu-Ching Yan ◽  
Charles C. Matouk ◽  
Philip A. Marsden
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Endothelial Cells ◽  
Posttranslational Modifications ◽  
Cell Biology ◽  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
Vascular Endothelial Cells ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Classical Models

Classical models of transcription in vascular endothelial cells, specifically the cis/trans paradigm, have limitations. For instance, how does the environment have chronic effects on gene expression in endothelial cells after weeks or years? When an endothelial cell divides, how is this information transmitted to daughter cells? Epigenetics refers to chromatin-based pathways important in the regulation of gene expression and includes three distinct, but highly interrelated, mechanisms: DNA methylation, histone density and posttranslational modifications, and RNA-based mechanisms. Together they offer a newer perspective on transcriptional control paradigms in vascular endothelial cells and provide a molecular basis for understanding how the environment impacts the genome to modify disease susceptibility. This alternative viewpoint for transcriptional regulation allows a reassessment of the cis/trans model and even helps explain some of its limitations. This review provides an introduction to epigenetic concepts for vascular biologists and uses topical examples in cell biology to provide insight into how cell types or even whole organisms, such as monozygotic human twins with the same DNA sequence, can exhibit heterogeneous patterns of gene expression, phenotype, or diseases prevalence. Using endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS3) as an example, we examine the growing body of evidence implicating epigenetic pathways in the control of vascular endothelial gene expression in health and disease.

scholarly journals Auto-regulatory feedback by RNA-binding proteins

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 930-939 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michaela Müller-McNicoll ◽  
Oliver Rossbach ◽  
Jingyi Hui ◽  
Jan Medenbach
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Feedback Regulation ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions

Abstract RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are key regulators in post-transcriptional control of gene expression. Mutations that alter their activity or abundance have been implicated in numerous diseases such as neurodegenerative disorders and various types of cancer. This highlights the importance of RBP proteostasis and the necessity to tightly control the expression levels and activities of RBPs. In many cases, RBPs engage in an auto-regulatory feedback by directly binding to and influencing the fate of their own mRNAs, exerting control over their own expression. For this feedback control, RBPs employ a variety of mechanisms operating at all levels of post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. Here we review RBP-mediated autogenous feedback regulation that either serves to maintain protein abundance within a physiological range (by negative feedback) or generates binary, genetic on/off switches important for e.g. cell fate decisions (by positive feedback).

Linking transcription, RNA polymerase II elongation and alternative splicing

2020 ◽  
Vol 477 (16) ◽  
pp. 3091-3104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciana E. Giono ◽  
Alberto R. Kornblihtt
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Alternative Splicing ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Environmental Changes ◽  
Transcription Elongation ◽  
Single Gene ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Regulation Of Transcription ◽  
Stepping Stones ◽  
Eukaryotic Transcription

Gene expression is an intricately regulated process that is at the basis of cell differentiation, the maintenance of cell identity and the cellular responses to environmental changes. Alternative splicing, the process by which multiple functionally distinct transcripts are generated from a single gene, is one of the main mechanisms that contribute to expand the coding capacity of genomes and help explain the level of complexity achieved by higher organisms. Eukaryotic transcription is subject to multiple layers of regulation both intrinsic — such as promoter structure — and dynamic, allowing the cell to respond to internal and external signals. Similarly, alternative splicing choices are affected by all of these aspects, mainly through the regulation of transcription elongation, making it a regulatory knob on a par with the regulation of gene expression levels. This review aims to recapitulate some of the history and stepping-stones that led to the paradigms held today about transcription and splicing regulation, with major focus on transcription elongation and its effect on alternative splicing.

Regulation of gene expression during spermatogenesis at transcriptional level

2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 1300-1307
Author(s):  
Xiu-Jun ZHANG ◽  
Mei-Ling LIU ◽  
Meng-Chun JIA
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Transcriptional Level
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document