scholarly journals The Impact of Genetic Background and Cell Lineage on the Level and Pattern of Position Effect Variegation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidney H. Wang ◽  
Sarah C.R. Elgin
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Background ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
Inbred Lines ◽  
Laboratory Population ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Fourth Chromosome ◽  
Heterochromatin Formation ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
The Impact

AbstractBackgroundChromatin-based transcriptional silencing is often described as a stochastic process, largely because of the mosaic expression observed in position effect variegation (PEV), where a euchromatic reporter gene is juxtaposed with heterochromatin. Here we closely examine the impact of genetic background on PEV phenotypes in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster.ResultsUsing consecutive generations of selective breeding, we isolated, from a single laboratory population, two inbred lines exhibiting contrasting degrees of variegation (A1: low expression, D1: high expression). Within each inbred population, remarkable similarity is observed in both the degree and the pattern of variegation. 89.63% of the differences between the two inbred lines in the degree of silencing can be explained by genotype, while a modest but significant sex effect is also observed. Further analyses of the PEV phenotype in the progeny of crosses between A1 and D1 suggest that the genotypic effect is the result of the combined effect of multiple independent trans-acting loci. While the initial observations are based on a PEV phenotype scored in the fly eye (hsp70-white reporter), similar degrees of silencing were observed using a beta-gal reporter that can be scored across the whole fly. The pattern of variegating hsp70-white expression among individual flies becomes almost identical after five generations of inbreeding. Using a reporter inserted into the heterochromatic fourth chromosome, image analysis found significant enrichment of pigmentation in the ventral-posterior quadrant in both the A1 and D1 lines, and in the F1 and F2 progeny produced from a cross between A1 and D1, despite different degrees of expression.ConclusionsCombining these results with the spreading model for local heterochromatin formation, we propose an augmented stochastic model to describe PEV. In this model, the genetic background, which determines the overall level of silencing, works with the cell lineage specific regulatory environment to determine the on/ off probability at the reporter locus in each cell. This model acknowledges cell-type specific events, as well as the general impact of heterochromatin formation.

scholarly journals The impact of genetic background and cell lineage on the level and pattern of gene expression in position effect variegation

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidney H. Wang ◽  
Sarah C. R. Elgin
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Genetic Background ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
Inbred Lines ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Fourth Chromosome ◽  
Heterochromatin Formation ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Chromatin-based transcriptional silencing is often described as a stochastic process, largely because of the mosaic expression observed in position effect variegation (PEV), where a euchromatic reporter gene is silenced in some cells as a consequence of juxtaposition with heterochromatin. High levels of variation in PEV phenotypes are commonly observed in reporter stocks. To ascertain whether background mutations are the major contributors to this variation, we asked how much of the variation is determined by genetic variants segregating in the population, examining both the level and pattern of expression using the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, as the model. Results Using selective breeding of a fourth chromosome PEV reporter line, 39C-12, we isolated two inbred lines exhibiting contrasting degrees of variegation (A1: low expression, D1: high expression). Within each inbred population, remarkable similarity is observed in the degree of variegation: 90% of the variation between the two inbred lines in the degree of silencing can be explained by genotype. Further analyses suggest that this result reflects the combined effect of multiple independent trans-acting loci. While the initial observations are based on a PEV phenotype scored in the fly eye (hsp70-white reporter), similar degrees of silencing were observed using a beta-gal reporter scored across the whole fly. Further, the pattern of variegation becomes almost identical within each inbred line; significant pigment enrichment in the same quadrant of the eye was found for both A1 and D1 lines despite different degrees of expression. Conclusions The results indicate that background genetic variants play the major role in determining the variable degrees of PEV commonly observed in laboratory stocks. Interestingly, not only does the degree of variegation become consistent in inbred lines, the patterns of variegation also appear similar. Combining these observations with the spreading model for local heterochromatin formation, we propose an augmented stochastic model to describe PEV in which the genetic background drives the overall level of silencing, working with the cell lineage-specific regulatory environment to determine the on/off probability at the reporter locus in each cell. This model acknowledges cell type-specific events in the context of broader genetic impacts on heterochromatin formation.

Mechanisms for the construction and developmental control of heterochromatin formation and imprinted chromosome domains

Development ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 35-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth D. Tartof ◽  
Marilyn Bremer
Keyword(s):  
Position Effect ◽  
Model System ◽  
Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Position Effects ◽  
Developmental Control ◽  
Heterochromatin Formation ◽  
Material Basis ◽  
Chromosome Domains ◽  
Effect Variegation

The study of variegating position effects in Drosophila provides a model system to explore the mechanism and material basis for the construction and developmental control of heterochromatin domains and the imprinted genomic structures that they may create. The results of our experiments in this regard have implications for a diverse assortment of long-range chromosome phenomena related to gene and chromosome inactivation. Specifically, as a consequence of our studies on position effect variegation, we propose a simple mechanism of X-chromosome inactivation, suggest a purpose for genomic imprinting, and postulate a general means for regulating the time in development at which certain genes become heterochromatically repressed.

Evidence for intrinsic differences in the formation of chromatin domains in Drosophila melanogaster.

Genetics ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 1063-1069 ◽  
Author(s):  
C P Bishop
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Genetic Background ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
The Other ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Compaction Process ◽  
Chromatin Domains ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Reporter Systems

Abstract The results of an investigation into intrinsic differences in the formation of two different heterochromatic domains are presented. The study utilized two different position effect variegation mutants in Drosophila melanogaster for investigating the process of compacting different stretches of DNA into heterochromatin. Each stretch of DNA encodes for a gene that affects different aspects of bristle morphology. The expression of each gene is prevented when it is compacted into heterochromatin thus the genes serve as effective reporter systems to monitor the spread of heterochromatin. Both variegating mutants are scored in the same cell such that environmental and genetic background differences are unambiguously eliminated. Any differences observed in the repression of the two genes must therefore be the result of intrinsic differences in the heterochromatic compaction process for the two stretches of DNA. Studies of the effects different enhancers of variegation have upon the compaction of the two genes indicate each compaction event occurs independently of the other, and that different components are involved in the two processes. These results are discussed with regard to spreading heterochromatin and the role this process may play in regulating gene expression.

scholarly journals A Drosophila Homologue of Sir2 Modifies Position-Effect Variegation but Does Not Affect Life Span

Genetics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 162 (4) ◽  
pp. 1675-1685
Author(s):  
Brenda L Newman ◽  
James R Lundblad ◽  
Yang Chen ◽  
Sarah M Smolik
Keyword(s):  
Life Span ◽  
Histone Deacetylase ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Creb Binding Protein ◽  
Developmentally Regulated ◽  
Heterochromatin Formation ◽  
Chromatin Regulator ◽  
Effect Variegation

Abstract Control of chromosome structure is important in the regulation of gene expression, recombination, DNA repair, and chromosome stability. In a two-hybrid screen for proteins that interact with the Drosophila CREB-binding protein (dCBP), a known histone acetyltransferase and transcriptional coactivator, we identified the Drosophila homolog of a yeast chromatin regulator, Sir2. In yeast, Sir2 silences genes via an intrinsic NAD+-dependent histone deacetylase activity. In addition, Sir2 promotes longevity in yeast and in Caenorhabditis elegans. In this report, we characterize the Drosophila Sir2 (dSir2) gene and its product and describe the generation of dSir2 amorphic alleles. We found that dSir2 expression is developmentally regulated and that dSir2 has an intrinsic NAD+-dependent histone deacetylase activity. The dSir2 mutants are viable, fertile, and recessive suppressors of position-effect variegation (PEV), indicating that, as in yeast, dSir2 is not an essential function for viability and is a regulator of heterochromatin formation and/or function. However, mutations in dSir2 do not shorten life span as predicted from studies in yeast and worms.

The enhancer of polycomb gene of Drosophila encodes a chromatin protein conserved in yeast and mammals

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (20) ◽  
pp. 4055-4066 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Stankunas ◽  
J. Berger ◽  
C. Ruse ◽  
D.A. Sinclair ◽  
F. Randazzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Position Effect ◽  
Polytene Chromosomes ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Chromatin Protein ◽  
Heterochromatin Formation ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Polycomb Group Genes ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Or Gene

The Polycomb group of genes in Drosophila are homeotic switch gene regulators that maintain homeotic gene repression through a possible chromatin regulatory mechanism. The Enhancer of Polycomb (E(Pc)) gene of Drosophila is an unusual member of the Polycomb group. Most PcG genes have homeotic phenotypes and are required for repression of homeotic loci, but mutations in E(Pc) exhibit no homeotic transformations and have only a very weak effect on expression of Abd-B. However, mutations in E(Pc) are strong enhancers of mutations in many Polycomb group genes and are also strong suppressors of position-effect variegation, suggesting that E(Pc) may have a wider role in chromatin formation or gene regulation than other Polycomb group genes. E(Pc) was cloned by transposon tagging, and encodes a novel 2023 amino acid protein with regions enriched in glutamine, alanine and asparagine. E(Pc) is expressed ubiquitously in Drosophila embryogenesis. E(Pc) is a chromatin protein, binding to polytene chromosomes at about 100 sites, including the Antennapedia but not the Bithorax complex, 29% of which are shared with Polycomb-binding sites. Surprisingly, E(Pc) was not detected in the heterochromatic chromocenter. This result suggests that E(Pc) has a functional rather than structural role in heterochromatin formation and argues against the heterochromatin model for PcG function. Using homology cloning techniques, we identified a mouse homologue of E(Pc), termed Epc1, a yeast protein that we name EPL1, and as well as additional ESTs from Caenorhabditis elegans, mice and humans. Epc1 shares a long, highly conserved domain in its amino terminus with E(Pc) that is also conserved in yeast, C. elegans and humans. The occurrence of E(Pc) across such divergent species is unusual for both PcG proteins and for suppressors of position-effect variegation, and suggests that E(Pc) has an important role in the regulation of chromatin structure in eukaryotes.

scholarly journals Is hobo permissivity related to I reactivity and sensitive to chromatin compaction in Drosophila melanogaster?

2004 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-79
Author(s):  
CLAUDE BAZIN ◽  
BÉATRICE DEJONGHE ◽  
DOMINIQUE HIGUET
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Transposable Element ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Hybrid Dysgenesis ◽  
Chromatin State ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Chromatin Compaction ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Strain Variability

In Drosophila melanogaster, the hobo transposable element is responsible for a hybrid dysgenesis syndrome. It appears in the germline of progenies from crosses between females devoid of hobo elements (E) and males bearing active hobo elements (H). In the HE system, permissivity is the ability of females to permit hobo activity in their progeny when they have been crossed with H males. Permissivity displays both intra- and inter-strain variability and decreases with the age of the females. Such characteristics are reminiscent of those for the reactivity in the IR system. The reactivity is the ability of R females (devoid of I factors) to permit activity of the I LINE retrotransposon in the F1 females resulting from crosses with I males (bearing I factors). Here we investigated permissivity properties in the HE system related to reactivity in the IR system. Previously it had been shown that reactivity increases with the number of Su(var)3-9 genes, which increases chromatin compaction near heterochromatin. Using the same lines, we show that permissivity increases with the number of Su(var)3-9 genes. To investigate the impact of chromatin compaction on permissivity we have tested the polymorphism of position-effect variegation (PEV) on the whitemottled4 locus in RE strains. Our results suggest a model of regulation in which permissivity could depend on the chromatin state and on the hobo vestigial sequences.

scholarly journals Comparative Analysis of Position–Effect Variegation Mutations in Drosophila melanogaster Delineates the Targets of Modifiers

Genetics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 148 (2) ◽  
pp. 733-741
Author(s):  
Georgette L Sass ◽  
Steven Henikoff
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Chromosomal Rearrangements ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Reporter Genes ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Heterochromatin Formation ◽  
Transposon Insertion ◽  
Effect Variegation

Abstract In Drosophila melanogaster, heterochromatin-induced silencing or position–effect variegation (PEV) of a reporter gene has provided insights into the properties of heterochromatin. Class I modifiers suppress PEV, and class II modifiers enhance PEV when the modifier gene is present in fewer than two doses. We have examined the effects of both class I and class II modifiers on four PEV mutations. These mutations include the inversions In(1)wm4 and In(2R)bwVDe2, which are classical chromosomal rearrangements that typify PEV mutations. The other mutations are a derivative of brownDominant, in which brown+ reporters are inactivated by a large block of heterochromatin, and a P[white+] transposon insertion associated with second chromosome heterochromatin. In general, we find that class I modifiers affect both classical and nonclassical PEV mutations, whereas class II modifiers affect only classical PEV mutations. We suggest that class II modifiers affect chromatin architecture in the vicinity of reporter genes, and only class I modifiers identify proteins that are potentially involved in heterochromatin formation or maintenance. In addition, our observations support a model in which there are different constraints on the process of heterochromatin-induced silencing in classical vs. nonclassical PEV mutations.

scholarly journals Mutational Analysis of a Histone Deacetylase in Drosophila melanogaster: Missense Mutations Suppress Gene Silencing Associated With Position Effect Variegation

Genetics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 154 (2) ◽  
pp. 657-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randy Mottus ◽  
Richard E Sobel ◽  
Thomas A Grigliatti
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Histone Deacetylase ◽  
Transcriptional Activity ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Transcriptional Regulator ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Missense Mutations ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
New Mutations

Abstract For many years it has been noted that there is a correlation between acetylation of histones and an increase in transcriptional activity. One prediction, based on this correlation, is that hypomorphic or null mutations in histone deacetylase genes should lead to increased levels of histone acetylation and result in increased levels of transcription. It was therefore surprising when it was reported, in both yeast and fruit flies, that mutations that reduced or eliminated a histone deacetylase resulted in transcriptional silencing of genes subject to telomeric and heterochromatic position effect variegation (PEV). Here we report the first mutational analysis of a histone deacetylase in a multicellular eukaryote by examining six new mutations in HDAC1 of Drosophila melanogaster. We observed a suite of phenotypes accompanying the mutations consistent with the notion that HDAC1 acts as a global transcriptional regulator. However, in contrast to recent findings, here we report that specific missense mutations in the structural gene of HDAC1 suppress the silencing of genes subject to PEV. We propose that the missense mutations reported here are acting as antimorphic mutations that “poison” the deacetylase complex and propose a model that accounts for the various phenotypes associated with lesions in the deacetylase locus.

pitkinD, a Novel Gain-of-Function Enhancer of Position-Effect Variegation, Affects Chromatin Regulation During Oogenesis and Early Embryogenesis in Drosophila

Genetics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 157 (3) ◽  
pp. 1227-1244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffi Kuhfittig ◽  
János Szabad ◽  
Gunnar Schotta ◽  
Jan Hoffmann ◽  
Endre Máthé ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Germ Line ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Early Embryogenesis ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Chromatin Regulation ◽  
Gain Of Function ◽  
Position Effects ◽  
Dominant Female ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Female Germ Line

Abstract The vast majority of the >100 modifier genes of position-effect variegation (PEV) in Drosophila have been identified genetically as haplo-insufficient loci. Here, we describe pitkinDominant (ptnD), a gain-of-function enhancer mutation of PEV. Its exceptionally strong enhancer effect is evident as elevated spreading of heterochromatin-induced gene silencing along euchromatic regions in variegating rearrangements. The ptnD mutation causes ectopic binding of the SU(VAR)3-9 heterochromatin protein at many euchromatic sites and, unlike other modifiers of PEV, it also affects stable position effects. Specifically, it induces silencing of white+ transgenes inserted at a wide variety of euchromatic sites. ptnD is associated with dominant female sterility. +/+ embryos produced by ptnD/+ females mated with wild-type males die at the end of embryogenesis, whereas the ptnD/+ sibling embryos arrest development at cleavage cycle 1-3, due to a combined effect of maternally provided mutant product and an early zygotic lethal effect of ptnD. This is the earliest zygotic effect of a mutation so far reported in Drosophila. Germ-line mosaics show that ptn+ function is required for normal development in the female germ line. These results, together with effects on PEV and white+ transgenes, are consistent with the hypothesis that the ptn gene plays an important role in chromatin regulation during development of the female germ line and in early embryogenesis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document