scholarly journals Simulating bipedal walking using a translating center of pressure

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karna Potwar ◽  
Dongheui Lee
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Walking Speed ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Bipedal Walking ◽  
Upper Body ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Fast Walking ◽  
Walking Speeds ◽  
Steady State Solutions

AbstractDuring walking, foot orientation and foot placement allow humans to stabilize their gait and to move forward. Consequently the upper body adapts to the ground reaction force (GRF) transmitted through the feet. The foot-ground contact is often modeled as a fixed pivot in bipedal models for analysis of locomotion. The fixed pivot models, however, cannot capture the effect of shift in the pivot point from heel to toe. In this study, we propose a novel bipedal model, called SLIPCOP, which employs a translating center of pressure (COP) in a spring loaded inverted pendulum (SLIP) model. The translating COP has two modes: one with a constant speed of translation and the other as the weighted function of the GRF in the fore aft direction. We use the relation between walking speed and touchdown (TD) angle as well as walking speed and COP speed, from existing literature, to restrict steady state solutions within the human walking domain. We find that with these relations, SLIPCOP provides steady state solutions for very slow to very fast walking speeds unlike SLIP. SLIPCOP for normal to very fast walking speed shows good accuracy in estimating COM amplitude and swing stance ratio. SLIPCOP is able to estimate the distance traveled by the COP during stance with high precision.

scholarly journals Active foot placement control ensures stable gait: Effect of constraints on foot placement and ankle moments

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0242215
Author(s):  
A. M. van Leeuwen ◽  
J. H. van Dieën ◽  
A. Daffertshofer ◽  
S. M. Bruijn
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Stride Frequency ◽  
Tight Control ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Ankle Moment ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Moment Control

Step-by-step foot placement control, relative to the center of mass (CoM) kinematic state, is generally considered a dominant mechanism for maintenance of gait stability. By adequate (mediolateral) positioning of the center of pressure with respect to the CoM, the ground reaction force generates a moment that prevents falling. In healthy individuals, foot placement is complemented mainly by ankle moment control ensuring stability. To evaluate possible compensatory relationships between step-by-step foot placement and complementary ankle moments, we investigated the degree of (active) foot placement control during steady-state walking, and under either foot placement-, or ankle moment constraints. Thirty healthy participants walked on a treadmill, while full-body kinematics, ground reaction forces and EMG activities were recorded. As a replication of earlier findings, we first showed step-by-step foot placement is associated with preceding CoM state and hip ab-/adductor activity during steady-state walking. Tight control of foot placement appears to be important at normal walking speed because there was a limited change in the degree of foot placement control despite the presence of a foot placement constraint. At slow speed, the degree of foot placement control decreased substantially, suggesting that tight control of foot placement is less essential when walking slowly. Step-by-step foot placement control was not tightened to compensate for constrained ankle moments. Instead compensation was achieved through increases in step width and stride frequency.

scholarly journals Active foot placement control ensures stable gait: Effect of constraints on foot placement and ankle moments

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.M. van Leeuwen ◽  
J.H. van Dieën ◽  
A. Daffertshofer ◽  
S.M. Bruijn
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Stride Frequency ◽  
Tight Control ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Ankle Moment ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Moment Control

AbstractStep-by-step foot placement control, relative to the center of mass (CoM) kinematic state, is generally considered a dominant mechanism for maintenance of gait stability. By adequate (mediolateral) positioning of the center of pressure with respect to the CoM, the ground reaction force generates a moment that prevents falling. In healthy individuals, foot placement is complemented mainly by ankle moment control ensuring stability. To evaluate possible compensatory relationships between step-by-step foot placement and complementary ankle moments, we investigated the degree of (active) foot placement control during steady-state walking, and under either foot placement-, or ankle moment constraints. Thirty healthy participants walked on a treadmill, while full-body kinematics, ground reaction forces and EMG activities were recorded. As a replication of earlier findings, we first showed step-by-step foot placement is associated with preceding CoM state and hip ab-/adductor activity during steady-state walking. Tight control of foot placement appears to be important at normal walking speed because there was a limited change in the degree of foot placement control despite the presence of a foot placement constraint. At slow speed, the degree of foot placement control decreased substantially, suggesting that tight control of foot placement is less essential when walking slowly. Step-by-step foot placement control was not tightened to compensate for constrained ankle moments. Instead compensation was achieved through increases in step width and stride frequency.

scholarly journals Ankle muscles activate: mediolateral center of pressure control ensures stable gait

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anina Moira van Leeuwen ◽  
Jaap H van Dieen ◽  
Andreas Daffertshofer ◽  
Sjoerd M Bruijn
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Pressure Control ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Ankle Moment ◽  
Ankle Muscle ◽  
Moment Control

During steady-state walking mediolateral gait stability can be maintained by controlling the center of pressure (CoP). The CoP modulates the moment of the ground reaction force, which brakes and reverses movement of the center of mass (CoM) towards the lateral border of the base of support. In addition to foot placement, ankle moments serve to control the CoP. We hypothesized that, during steady-state walking, single stance ankle moments establish a CoP shift to correct for errors in foot placement. We expected ankle muscle activity to be associated with this complementary CoP shift. During treadmill walking, full-body kinematics, ground reaction forces and electromyography were recorded in thirty healthy participants. We found a negative relationship between preceding foot placement error and CoP displacement during single stance. Too medial steps were compensated for by a lateral CoP shift and vice versa, too lateral steps were compensated for by a medial CoP shift. Peroneus longus, soleus and tibialis anterior activity correlated with these CoP shifts. As such, we identified an (active) ankle strategy during steady-state walking. As expected, absolute explained CoP variance by foot placement error decreased when walking with shoes constraining ankle moments. Yet, contrary to our expectations that ankle moment control would compensate for constrained foot placement, the absolute explained CoP variance by foot placement error did not increase when foot placement was constrained. We argue that this lack of compensation reflects the interdependent nature of ankle moment and foot placement control. We suggest that single stance ankle moments do not only compensate for preceding foot placement errors, but also assist control of the subsequent foot placement. Foot placement and ankle moment control are caught in a circular relationship, in which constraints imposed on one will also influence the other.

scholarly journals The effect of constraining mediolateral ankle moments and foot placement on the use of the counter-rotation mechanism during walking

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maud van den Bogaart ◽  
Sjoerd M. Bruijn ◽  
Joke Spildooren ◽  
Jaap H. van Dieën ◽  
Pieter Meyns
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Force Plate ◽  
Gait Pattern ◽  
Task Constraints ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Counter Rotation ◽  
Body Kinematic

Stability during walking can be maintained by shifts of the Center of Pressure through modulation of foot placement and ankle moments (CoP-mechanism). An additional mechanism to stabilize gait, is the counter-rotation mechanism i.e. changing the angular momentum of segments around the Center of Mass (CoM) to change the direction of the ground reaction force. It is unknown if and how humans use the counter-rotation mechanism to control the CoM during walking and how this interacts with the CoP-mechanism. Thirteen healthy adults walked on a treadmill, while full-body kinematic and force plate data were obtained. The contributions of the CoP and the counter-rotation mechanisms to control the CoM were calculated during steady-state walking, walking on LesSchuh, i.e. constraining mediolateral CoP shifts underneath the stance foot and walking on LesSchuh at 50% of normal step width, constraining both foot placement and ankle mechanisms (LesSchuh50%). A decreased magnitude of within-stride control by the CoP-mechanism was compensated for by an increased magnitude of within-stride control by the counter-rotation mechanism during LesSchuh50% compared to steady-state walking. This suggests that the counter-rotation mechanism is used to stabilize gait when needed. However, the mean contribution of the counter-rotation mechanism over strides did not increase during LesSchuh50% compared to steady-state walking. The CoP-mechanism was the main contributor to the total CoM acceleration. The use of the counter-rotation mechanism may be limited because angular accelerations ultimately need to be reversed and because of interference with other task constraints, such as head stabilization and preventing interference with the gait pattern.

scholarly journals Ankle muscles drive mediolateral center of pressure control to ensure stable steady state gait

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. van Leeuwen ◽  
J. H. van Dieën ◽  
A. Daffertshofer ◽  
S. M. Bruijn
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Pressure Control ◽  
Stable Steady State ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Ankle Moment ◽  
Moment Control

AbstractDuring steady-state walking, mediolateral gait stability can be maintained by controlling the center of pressure (CoP). The CoP modulates the moment of the ground reaction force, which brakes and reverses movement of the center of mass (CoM) towards the lateral border of the base of support. In addition to foot placement, ankle moments serve to control the CoP. We hypothesized that, during steady-state walking, single stance ankle moments establish a CoP shift to correct for errors in foot placement. We expected ankle muscle activity to be associated with this complementary CoP shift. During treadmill walking, full-body kinematics, ground reaction forces and electromyography were recorded in thirty healthy participants. We found a negative relationship between preceding foot placement error and CoP displacement during single stance; steps that were too medial were compensated for by a lateral CoP shift and vice versa, steps that were too lateral were compensated for by a medial CoP shift. Peroneus longus, soleus and tibialis anterior activity correlated with these CoP shifts. As such, we identified an (active) ankle strategy during steady-state walking. As expected, absolute explained CoP variance by foot placement error decreased when walking with shoes constraining ankle moments. Yet, contrary to our expectations that ankle moment control would compensate for constrained foot placement, the absolute explained CoP variance by foot placement error did not increase when foot placement was constrained. We argue that this lack of compensation reflects the interdependent nature of ankle moment and foot placement control. We suggest that single stance ankle moments do not only compensate for preceding foot placement errors, but also assist control of the subsequent foot placement. Foot placement and ankle moment control are ‘caught’ in a circular relationship, in which constraints imposed on one will also influence the other.

scholarly journals Influence of Treadmill Speed and Perturbation Intensity on Selection of Balancing Strategies during Slow Walking Perturbed in the Frontal Plane

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zlatko Matjačić ◽  
Matjaž Zadravec ◽  
Andrej Olenšek
Keyword(s):  
Ground Reaction Force ◽  
Stance Phase ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Frontal Plane ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Slow Walking ◽  
Hip Strategy ◽  
Walking Speeds ◽  
Stance Duration

Background. Common understanding is that adequate foot placement (stepping strategy) is crucial in maintaining stability during walking at normal speed. The aim of this study was to investigate strategies that humans use to cope with lateral perturbations during very slow walking. Methods. Ten healthy individuals underwent an experimental protocol whereby a set of perturbations directed inward (medially to a stance leg) and outward (laterally to a stance leg) of three intensities (F1=5%, F2=10%, and F3=15% of body weight), applied at three instances of a stance phase, were delivered in random order to the pelvis using a balance assessment robot while walking on a treadmill at three walking speeds (S1=0.4, S2=0.6, and S3=0.8 m/s). We analyzed the peak center of mass displacements; step length, step width, and step times; and the lateral component of ground reaction force for perturbations that were delivered at the beginning of the gait cycle. Results. Responses after inward perturbations were similar at all tested speeds and consistently employed stepping strategy that was further facilitated by a shortened stance. Wider and shorter steps were applied with increased perturbation intensity. Responses following outward perturbations were more complex. At S1, hip strategy (impulse-like increase of mediolateral ground reaction force) augmented with ankle strategy (mediolateral shift of the center of pressure) mainly contributed to responses already during the stance phase. The stance duration was significantly longer for all perturbation intensities. At S2, the relative share of hip strategy was reduced while with increased perturbation intensity, stepping strategy was gradually added. The stance duration was significantly longer for F1 and F2. At S3, stepping strategy was mainly used while the duration of stance was similar to the one in unperturbed walking. Responses following both inward and outward perturbations at all speeds were characterized by temporary slowing down movement in a sagittal plane that was more pronounced with increased perturbation intensity. Conclusions. This study provides novel insights into balancing strategies used at slower walking speeds which may be more relevant to understand the challenges of gait stability following perturbations in the frontal plane in clinical populations.

scholarly journals Optimized hip–knee–ankle exoskeleton assistance at a range of walking speeds

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gwendolyn M. Bryan ◽  
Patrick W. Franks ◽  
Seungmoon Song ◽  
Alexandra S. Voloshina ◽  
Ricardo Reyes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Walking Speed ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Metabolic Energy ◽  
Positive Power ◽  
Fast Walking ◽  
Slow Walking ◽  
Limited Success ◽  
Ankle Exoskeleton ◽  
Walking Speeds ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract Background Autonomous exoskeletons will need to be useful at a variety of walking speeds, but it is unclear how optimal hip–knee–ankle exoskeleton assistance should change with speed. Biological joint moments tend to increase with speed, and in some cases, optimized ankle exoskeleton torques follow a similar trend. Ideal hip–knee–ankle exoskeleton torque may also increase with speed. The purpose of this study was to characterize the relationship between walking speed, optimal hip–knee–ankle exoskeleton assistance, and the benefits to metabolic energy cost. Methods We optimized hip–knee–ankle exoskeleton assistance to reduce metabolic cost for three able-bodied participants walking at 1.0 m/s, 1.25 m/s and 1.5 m/s. We measured metabolic cost, muscle activity, exoskeleton assistance and kinematics. We performed Friedman’s tests to analyze trends across walking speeds and paired t-tests to determine if changes from the unassisted conditions to the assisted conditions were significant. Results Exoskeleton assistance reduced the metabolic cost of walking compared to wearing the exoskeleton with no torque applied by 26%, 47% and 50% at 1.0, 1.25 and 1.5 m/s, respectively. For all three participants, optimized exoskeleton ankle torque was the smallest for slow walking, while hip and knee torque changed slightly with speed in ways that varied across participants. Total applied positive power increased with speed for all three participants, largely due to increased joint velocities, which consistently increased with speed. Conclusions Exoskeleton assistance is effective at a range of speeds and is most effective at medium and fast walking speeds. Exoskeleton assistance was less effective for slow walking, which may explain the limited success in reducing metabolic cost for patient populations through exoskeleton assistance. Exoskeleton designers may have more success when targeting activities and groups with faster walking speeds. Speed-related changes in optimized exoskeleton assistance varied by participant, indicating either the benefit of participant-specific tuning or that a wide variety of torque profiles are similarly effective.

scholarly journals Influence of walking speed on locomotor time production

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrice MEGROT ◽  
Carole MEGROT
Keyword(s):  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Walking Speed ◽  
The Other ◽  
Temporal Perception ◽  
Time Production ◽  
Fast Walking ◽  
Slow Walking ◽  
Perception Of Time ◽  
Walking Speeds

The aim of the present study was to determine whether or not walking speed affects temporal perception. It was hypothesized that fast walking would reduce the perceived length of time while slow walking increase production estimates. 16 healthy subjects were included. After a first « calibration » phase allowing the determination of different walking speeds, the subjects were instructed to demonstrate periods of time or « target times » of 3s and 7s, by a walking movement. Then, subjects were asked to simulate walking by raising one foot after the other without advancing. Finally, a third condition, Motionless, involved producing the target times while standing without movement. The results of this study suggest that movement does influence the perception of time, causing an overestimation of time. In agreement with the results of Denner et al. (1963) the subjects produced times which were longer than the target times.

scholarly journals The onset time of balance control during walking is phase-independent, but the magnitude of the response is not

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendrik Reimann ◽  
Tyler Fettrow ◽  
David Grenet ◽  
Elizabeth D. Thompson ◽  
John J. Jeka
Keyword(s):  
Nervous System ◽  
Gait Cycle ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Body Movement ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
The Body ◽  
Upper Body ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Lower Body ◽  
The Central Nervous System

AbstractThe human body is mechanically unstable during walking. Maintaining upright stability requires constant regulation of muscle force by the central nervous system to push against the ground and move the body mass in the desired way. Activation of muscles in the lower body in response to sensory or mechanical perturbations during walking is usually highly phase-dependent, because the effect any specific muscle force has on the body movement depends upon the body configuration. Yet the resulting movement patterns of the upper body after the same perturbations are largely phase-independent. This is puzzling, because any change of upper-body movement must be generated by parts of the lower body pushing against the ground. How do phase-dependent muscle activation patterns along the lower body generate phase-independent movement patterns of the upper body? We hypothesize that in response to a perceived threat to balance, the nervous system generates a functional response by pushing against the ground in any way possible with the current body configuration. This predicts that the changes in the ground reaction force patterns following a balance perturbation should be phase-independent. Here we test this hypothesis by disturbing upright balance using Galvanic vestibular stimulation at three different points in the gait cycle. We measure the resulting changes in whole-body center of mass movement and the location of the center of pressure of the ground reaction force. We find that the whole-body balance response is not phase-independent as expected: balance responses are initiated faster and are smaller following a disturbance late in the gait cycle. Somewhat paradoxically, the initial center of pressure changes are larger for perturbations late in the gait cycle. The onset of the center of pressure changes however, does not depend on the phase of the perturbation. The results partially support our hypothesis of a phase-independent functional balance response underlying the phase-dependent recruitment of different balance mechanisms at different points of the gait cycle. We conclude that the central nervous system recruits any available mechanism to push against the ground to maintain balance as fast as possible in response to a perturbation, but the different mechanisms do not have equal strength.

scholarly journals Stepping in the direction of the fall: the next foot placement can be predicted from current upper body state in steady-state walking

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 20140405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Wang ◽  
Manoj Srinivasan
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Linear Function ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Step Length ◽  
The Body ◽  
Upper Body ◽  
Significant Information ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Body State ◽  
Foot Position

During human walking, perturbations to the upper body can be partly corrected by placing the foot appropriately on the next step. Here, we infer aspects of such foot placement dynamics using step-to-step variability over hundreds of steps of steady-state walking data. In particular, we infer dependence of the ‘next’ foot position on upper body state at different phases during the ‘current’ step. We show that a linear function of the hip position and velocity state (approximating the body center of mass state) during mid-stance explains over 80% of the next lateral foot position variance, consistent with (but not proving) lateral stabilization using foot placement. This linear function implies that a rightward pelvic deviation during a left stance results in a larger step width and smaller step length than average on the next foot placement. The absolute position on the treadmill does not add significant information about the next foot relative to current stance foot over that already available in the pelvis position and velocity. Such walking dynamics inference with steady-state data may allow diagnostics of stability and inform biomimetic exoskeleton or robot design.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document