scholarly journals Perturbing neural representations of working memory with task-irrelevant interruption

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Hakim ◽  
Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld ◽  
Edward Awh ◽  
Edward K. Vogel

AbstractWorking memory maintains information so that it can be used in complex cognitive tasks. A key challenge for this system is to maintain relevant information in the face of task-irrelevant perturbations. In this series of experiments, we investigated the impact of task-irrelevant interruptions on neural representations of working memory. We recorded electroencephalogram (EEG) activity in humans while they performed a working memory task. On a subset of trials, we interrupted participants with salient, but task-irrelevant objects. To track the impact of these task-irrelevant interruptions on neural representations of working memory, we measured two well-characterized, temporally sensitive EEG markers that reflect active, prioritized working memory representations: the contralateral delay activity (CDA) and lateralized alpha power (8-12hz). Following interruption, we found that CDA momentarily sustained, but was gone by the end of the trial. Lateralized alpha power was immediately influenced by the interrupters, but recovered by the end of the trial. This suggests that dissociable neural processes contribute to the maintenance of working memory information. Additionally, we found that task expectancy modulated the timing and magnitude of how these two neural signals responded to task-irrelevant interruptions, suggesting that the brain’s response to task-irrelevant interruption is shaped by task context. The distinct time courses of and influence of task context on these two neural signatures of working memory have many interesting theoretical implications about how information is actively maintained in working memory.Significance statementWorking memory plays a central role in intelligent behaviors because it actively maintains relevant information that is easily accessible and manipulatable. In everyday life, we are often interrupted while performing such complex cognitive tasks. Therefore, understanding how working memory responds to and overcomes momentary task-irrelevant interruptions is critical for us to understand how complex cognition works. Here, we unveil how two distinct neural signatures of working memory respond to task-irrelevant interruptions by recording electroencephalogram activity in humans. Our findings raise long-standing theoretical questions about how different neural and cognitive processes contribute to the maintenance of information in working memory.

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 558-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Hakim ◽  
Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld ◽  
Edward Awh ◽  
Edward K. Vogel

Working memory maintains information so that it can be used in complex cognitive tasks. A key challenge for this system is to maintain relevant information in the face of task-irrelevant perturbations. Across two experiments, we investigated the impact of task-irrelevant interruptions on neural representations of working memory. We recorded EEG activity in humans while they performed a working memory task. On a subset of trials, we interrupted participants with salient but task-irrelevant objects. To track the impact of these task-irrelevant interruptions on neural representations of working memory, we measured two well-characterized, temporally sensitive EEG markers that reflect active, prioritized working memory representations: the contralateral delay activity and lateralized alpha power (8–12 Hz). After interruption, we found that contralateral delay activity amplitude momentarily sustained but was gone by the end of the trial. Lateralized alpha power was immediately influenced by the interrupters but recovered by the end of the trial. This suggests that dissociable neural processes contribute to the maintenance of working memory information and that brief irrelevant onsets disrupt two distinct online aspects of working memory. In addition, we found that task expectancy modulated the timing and magnitude of how these two neural signals responded to task-irrelevant interruptions, suggesting that the brain's response to task-irrelevant interruption is shaped by task context.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlene Roesner ◽  
Stefan Arnau ◽  
Isabel Skiba ◽  
Edmund Wascher ◽  
Daniel Schneider

There is an ongoing debate on the contribution of target enhancement and distractor inhibition processes to selective attention. In a working memory task, we presented to-be-memorized information in a way that posterior hemispheric asymmetries in oscillatory power could be unambiguously linked to lateral target vs. distractor processing. Alpha power asymmetries (8-14 Hz) were insensitive to the number of cued or non-cued items, supporting their relation to spatial attention. Furthermore, we found an increase in alpha power contralateral to non-cued working memory content and an alpha power suppression contralateral to relevant information. These oscillatory patterns relative to the positions of cued and non-cued items were related to the participants' ability to control for the impact of irrelevant information on working memory retrieval. Based on these results, we propose that spatially specific modulations of posterior alpha power are related to accessing vs. inhibiting the spatial context of information stored in working memory.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zsuzsanna Fodor ◽  
Csilla Marosi ◽  
László Tombor ◽  
Gábor Csukly

Abstract Focusing attention on relevant information while ignoring distracting stimuli is essential to the efficacy of working memory. Alpha- and theta-band oscillations have been linked to the inhibition of anticipated and attentionally avoidable distractors. However, the neurophysiological background of the rejection of task-irrelevant stimuli appearing in the focus of attention is not fully understood. We aimed to examine whether theta and alpha-band oscillations serve as an indicator of successful distractor rejection. Twenty-four students were enrolled in the study. 64-channel EEG was recorded during a modified Sternberg working memory task where weak and strong (salient) distractors were presented during the retention period. Event-related spectral perturbation in the alpha frequency band was significantly modulated by the saliency of the distracting stimuli, while theta oscillation was modulated by the need for cognitive control. Moreover, stronger alpha desynchronization to strong relative to weak distracting stimuli significantly increased the probability of mistakenly identifying the presented distractor as a member of the memory sequence. Therefore, our results suggest that alpha activity reflects the vulnerability of attention to distracting salient stimuli.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabrina Sghirripa ◽  
Lynton Graetz ◽  
Ashley Merkin ◽  
Nigel C Rogasch ◽  
Michael C Ridding ◽  
...  

AbstractAs working memory (WM) is limited in capacity, it is important to direct neural resources towards processing task-relevant information while ignoring distractors. Neural oscillations in the alpha frequency band (8-12 Hz) have been suggested to play a role in the inhibition of task-irrelevant information during WM, although results are mixed, possibly due to differences in the type of WM task employed. Here, we examined the role of alpha power in inhibition of anticipated distractors of varying strength using a modified Sternberg task where the encoding and retention periods were temporally separated. We recorded EEG while 20 young adults completed the task and found: 1) slower reaction times in strong distractor trials compared to weak distractor trials; 2) increased alpha power in posterior regions from baseline prior to presentation of a distractor regardless of condition; and 3) no differences in alpha power between strong and weak distractor conditions. Our results suggest that parieto-occipital alpha power is increased prior to a distractor. However we could not find evidence that alpha power is further modulated by distractor strength.


2014 ◽  
Vol 111 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arezoo Pooresmaeili ◽  
Dominik R. Bach ◽  
Raymond J. Dolan

Deciding whether a stimulus is the “same” or “different” from a previous presented one involves integrating among the incoming sensory information, working memory, and perceptual decision making. Visual selective attention plays a crucial role in selecting the relevant information that informs a subsequent course of action. Previous studies have mainly investigated the role of visual attention during the encoding phase of working memory tasks. In this study, we investigate whether manipulation of bottom-up attention by changing stimulus visual salience impacts on later stages of memory-based decisions. In two experiments, we asked subjects to identify whether a stimulus had either the same or a different feature to that of a memorized sample. We manipulated visual salience of the test stimuli by varying a task-irrelevant feature contrast. Subjects chose a visually salient item more often when they looked for matching features and less often so when they looked for a nonmatch. This pattern of results indicates that salient items are more likely to be identified as a match. We interpret the findings in terms of capacity limitations at a comparison stage where a visually salient item is more likely to exhaust resources leading it to be prematurely parsed as a match.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 244d
Author(s):  
Thomas C Sprague ◽  
Aspen H Yoo ◽  
Masih Rahmati ◽  
Grace E Hallenbeck ◽  
Wei Ji Ma ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 1229-1240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten C. S. Adam ◽  
Matthew K. Robison ◽  
Edward K. Vogel

Neural measures of working memory storage, such as the contralateral delay activity (CDA), are powerful tools in working memory research. CDA amplitude is sensitive to working memory load, reaches an asymptote at known behavioral limits, and predicts individual differences in capacity. An open question, however, is whether neural measures of load also track trial-by-trial fluctuations in performance. Here, we used a whole-report working memory task to test the relationship between CDA amplitude and working memory performance. If working memory failures are due to decision-based errors and retrieval failures, CDA amplitude would not differentiate good and poor performance trials when load is held constant. If failures arise during storage, then CDA amplitude should track both working memory load and trial-by-trial performance. As expected, CDA amplitude tracked load (Experiment 1), reaching an asymptote at three items. In Experiment 2, we tracked fluctuations in trial-by-trial performance. CDA amplitude was larger (more negative) for high-performance trials compared with low-performance trials, suggesting that fluctuations in performance were related to the successful storage of items. During working memory failures, participants oriented their attention to the correct side of the screen (lateralized P1) and maintained covert attention to the correct side during the delay period (lateralized alpha power suppression). Despite the preservation of attentional orienting, we found impairments consistent with an executive attention theory of individual differences in working memory capacity; fluctuations in executive control (indexed by pretrial frontal theta power) may be to blame for storage failures.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M Mok ◽  
M. Clare O'Donoghue ◽  
Nicholas E Myers ◽  
Erin H.S. Drazich ◽  
Anna Christina Nobre

Working memory (WM) is essential for normal cognitive function, but shows marked decline in aging. Studies have shown that the ability to attend selectively to relevant information amongst competing distractors is related to WM capacity. The extent to which WM deficits in aging are related to impairments in selective attention is unclear. To investigate the neural mechanisms supporting selective attention in WM in aging, we tested a large group of older adults using functional magnetic resonance imaging whilst they performed a category-based (faces/houses) selective-WM task. Older adults were able to use attention to encode targets and suppress distractors to reach high levels of task performance. A subsequent, surprise recognition-memory task showed strong consequences of selective attention. Attended items in the relevant category were recognised significantly better than items in the ignored category. Neural measures also showed reliable markers of selective attention during WM. Purported control regions including the dorsolateral and inferior prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex were reliably recruited for attention to both categories. Activation levels in category-sensitive visual cortex showed reliable modulation according to attentional demands, and positively correlated with subsequent memory measures of attention and WM span. Psychophysiological interaction analyses showed that activity in category-sensitive areas were coupled with non-sensory cortex known to be involved in cognitive control and memory processing, including regions in the PFC and hippocampus. In summary, we found that brain mechanisms of attention for selective WM are relatively preserved in aging, and individual differences in these abilities corresponded to the degree of attention-related modulation in the brain.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaohe Xue ◽  
Michael M. Halassa ◽  
Zhe S. Chen

AbstractPrefrontal cortical neurons play in important roles in performing rule-dependent tasks and working memory-based decision making. Motivated by experimental data, we develop an excitatory-inhibitory spiking recurrent neural network (SRNN) to perform a rule-dependent two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) task. We imposed several important biological constraints onto the SRNN, and adapted the spike frequency adaptation (SFA) and SuperSpike gradient methods to update the network parameters. These proposed strategies enabled us to train the SRNN efficiently and overcome the vanishing gradient problem during error back propagation through time. The trained SRNN produced rule-specific tuning in single-unit representations, showing rule-dependent population dynamics that strongly resemble experimentally observed data in rodent and monkey. Under varying test conditions, we further manipulated the parameters or configuration in computer simulation setups and investigated the impacts of rule-coding error, delay duration, weight connectivity and sparsity, and excitation/inhibition (E/I) balance on both task performance and neural representations. Overall, our modeling study provides a computational framework to understand neuronal representations at a fine timescale during working memory and cognitive control.Author SummaryWorking memory and decision making are fundamental cognitive functions of the brain, but the circuit mechanisms of these brain functions remain incompletely understood. Neuroscientists have trained animals (rodents or monkeys) to perform various cognitive tasks while simultaneously recording the neural activity from specific neural circuits. To complement the experimental investigations, computational modeling may provide an alternative way to examine the neural representations of neuronal assemblies during task behaviors. Here we develop and train a spiking recurrent neural network (SRNN) consisting of balanced excitatory and inhibitory neurons to perform the rule-dependent working memory tasks Our computer simulations produce qualitatively similar results as the experimental findings. Moreover, the imposed biological constraints on the trained network provide additional channel to investigate cell type-specific population responses, cortical connectivity and robustness. Our work provides a computational platform to investigate neural representations and dynamics of cortical circuits a fine timescale during complex cognitive tasks.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xueying Fu ◽  
Chaoxiong Ye ◽  
huzhonghua ◽  
Tengfei Liang ◽  
Ziyuan Li ◽  
...  

Memory performance can be improved by retrospectively cueing an item maintained in visual working memory (VWM). Different hypotheses have been proposed to explain the mechanisms behind retro-cueing and VWM. Previous behavioral studies suggest that different retro-cue validities may lead individuals to implement retro-cues in different ways to obtain a retro-cue effect. However, there is still no clear electroencephalogram (EEG) evidence to support that the retro-cue effect under different validity conditions is triggered by different mechanisms. Herein, we investigated whether retro-cue validity modulated the mechanisms underlying the retro-cue effect in VWM by using EEGs. We manipulated retro-cue validity by using blocks in a color change detection task. Contralateral delay activity (CDA) and lateralized alpha power were used assess spatial attention and memory storage, respectively. Significant retro-cue effects were observed under both high- and low-validity conditions. More importantly, although the retro-cue could redirect spatial attention under both high- and low-validity conditions, we found that participants maintained the non-cued items during a measured time interval under the low-validity condition, but dropped them out of VWM under the high-validity condition. Our results resolve previous contradictory findings. The retro-cue effect in our study can be explained by the removal hypothesis, prioritization hypothesis, and protection-during-retrieval hypothesis. This work suggests that the mechanisms underlying the retro-cue effect are not mutually exclusive, but determined by the cue validity. Individuals can voluntarily choose different mechanisms based on the expected retro-cue validity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document