scholarly journals Sexual selection does not increase the rate of compensatory adaptation to a mutation influencing a secondary sexual trait inDrosophila melanogaster

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher H. Chandler ◽  
Anna Mammel ◽  
Ian Dworkin
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Natural Selection ◽  
Spontaneous Mutation ◽  
Phenotypic Expression ◽  
Theoretical Work ◽  
Compensatory Evolution ◽  
Phenotypic Suppression ◽  
Compensatory Adaptation ◽  
Deleterious Alleles ◽  
Sex Comb

AbstractTheoretical work predicts that sexual selection can enhance natural selection, increasing the rate of adaptation to new environments and helping purge harmful mutations. While some experiments support these predictions, remarkably little work has addressed the role of sexual selection on compensatory adaptation—populations’ ability to compensate for the costs of deleterious alleles that are already present. We tested whether sexual selection, as well as the degree of standing genetic variation, affect the rate of compensatory evolution via phenotypic suppression in experimental populations ofDrosophila melanogaster. These populations were fixed for a spontaneous mutation causing mild abnormalities in the male sex comb, a structure important for mating success. We fine-mapped this mutation to an ∼85 kb region on the X chromosome containing three candidate genes, showed that the mutation is deleterious, and that its phenotypic expression and penetrance vary by genetic background. We then performed experimental evolution, including a treatment where opportunity for mate choice was limited by experimentally enforced monogamy. Although evolved populations did show some phenotypic suppression of the morphological abnormalities in the sex comb, the amount of suppression did not depend on the opportunity for sexual selection. Sexual selection, therefore, may not always enhance natural selection; instead, the interaction between these two forces may depend on additional factors.

scholarly journals Sexual Selection Does Not Increase the Rate of Compensatory Adaptation to a Mutation Influencing a Secondary Sexual Trait in Drosophila melanogaster

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1541-1551
Author(s):  
Christopher H. Chandler ◽  
Anna Mammel ◽  
Ian Dworkin
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Natural Selection ◽  
Spontaneous Mutation ◽  
Phenotypic Expression ◽  
Theoretical Work ◽  
Phenotypic Suppression ◽  
Compensatory Adaptation ◽  
Deleterious Alleles ◽  
Sex Comb

Theoretical work predicts that sexual selection can enhance natural selection, increasing the rate of adaptation to new environments and helping purge harmful mutations. While some experiments support these predictions, remarkably little work has addressed the role of sexual selection on compensatory adaptation—populations’ ability to compensate for the costs of deleterious alleles that are already present. We tested whether sexual selection, as well as the degree of standing genetic variation, affect the rate of compensatory evolution via phenotypic suppression in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster. These populations were fixed for a spontaneous mutation causing mild abnormalities in the male sex comb, a structure important for mating success. We fine-mapped this mutation to an ∼85 kb region on the X chromosome containing three candidate genes, showed that the mutation is deleterious, and that its phenotypic expression and penetrance vary by genetic background. We then performed experimental evolution, including a treatment where opportunity for mate choice was limited by experimentally enforced monogamy. Although evolved populations did show some phenotypic suppression of the morphological abnormalities in the sex comb, the amount of suppression did not depend on the opportunity for sexual selection. Sexual selection, therefore, may not always enhance natural selection; instead, the interaction between these two forces may depend on additional factors.

scholarly journals Compensatory evolution via cryptic genetic variation: Distinct trajectories to phenotypic and fitness recovery

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudarshan Chari ◽  
Christian Marier ◽  
Cody Porter ◽  
Emmalee Northrop ◽  
Alexandra Belinky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Variation ◽  
Natural Selection ◽  
Allelic Variation ◽  
Courtship Behavior ◽  
Natural Populations ◽  
Wing Morphology ◽  
Cryptic Genetic Variation ◽  
Compensatory Evolution ◽  
Compensatory Adaptation ◽  
Deleterious Alleles

AbstractPopulations are constantly exposed to deleterious alleles, most of which are purged via natural selection. However, deleterious fitness effects of alleles can also be suppressed by compensatory adaptation. Compensatory mutations can act directly to reduce deleterious effects of an allele. Alternatively, compensation may also occur by altering other aspects of an organisms’ phenotype or performance, without suppressing the phenotypic effects of the deleterious allele. Moreover, the origin of allelic variation contributing to compensatory adaptation remains poorly understood. Compensatory evolution driven by mutations that arise during the selective process are well studied. However less is known about the role standing (cryptic) genetic variation plays in compensatory adaptation. To address these questions, we examined evolutionary trajectories of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster fixed for mutations that disrupt wing morphology, resulting in deleterious effects on several components of fitness. Lineages subjected only to natural selection, evolved modifications to courtship behavior and several life history traits without compensation in wing morphology. Yet, we observed rapid phenotypic compensation of wing morphology under artificial selection, consistent with segregating variation for compensatory alleles. We show that alleles contributing to compensation of wing morphology have deleterious effects on other fitness components. These results demonstrate the potential for multiple independent avenues for rapid compensatory adaptation from standing genetic variation, which ultimately may reveal novel adaptive trajectories.

Darwinian Evolutionary Theory

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Ruse
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Natural Selection ◽  
Middle Class ◽  
Evolutionary Theory ◽  
Scientific Community ◽  
Homo Sapiens ◽  
Origin Of Species ◽  
Theory Of Evolution ◽  
Descent Of Man

Charles Robert Darwin, the English naturalist, published On the Origin of Species in 1859 and the follow-up work The Descent of Man in 1871. In these works, he argued for his theory of evolution through natural selection, applying it to all organisms, living and dead, including our own species, Homo sapiens. Although controversial from the start, Darwin’s thinking was deeply embedded in the culture of his day, that of a middle-class Englishman. Evolution as such was an immediate success in scientific circles, but although the mechanism of selection had supporters in the scientific community (especially among those working with fast-breeding organisms), its real success was in the popular domain. Natural selection, and particularly the side mechanism of sexual selection, were known to all and popular themes in fiction and elsewhere.

scholarly journals Natural selection increases female fitness by reversing the exaggeration of a male sexually selected trait

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kensuke Okada ◽  
Masako Katsuki ◽  
Manmohan D. Sharma ◽  
Katsuya Kiyose ◽  
Tomokazu Seko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Natural Selection ◽  
Experimental Evolution ◽  
Genetic Correlations ◽  
Lifetime Reproductive Success ◽  
Fundamental Theory ◽  
Female Fitness ◽  
Male Trait ◽  
Flour Beetles ◽  
Male Specific

AbstractTheory shows how sexual selection can exaggerate male traits beyond naturally selected optima and also how natural selection can ultimately halt trait elaboration. Empirical evidence supports this theory, but to our knowledge, there have been no experimental evolution studies directly testing this logic, and little examination of possible associated effects on female fitness. Here we use experimental evolution of replicate populations of broad-horned flour beetles to test for effects of sex-specific predation on an exaggerated sexually selected male trait (the mandibles), while also testing for effects on female lifetime reproductive success. We find that populations subjected to male-specific predation evolve smaller sexually selected mandibles and this indirectly increases female fitness, seemingly through intersexual genetic correlations we document. Predation solely on females has no effects. Our findings support fundamental theory, but also reveal unforseen outcomes—the indirect effect on females—when natural selection targets sex-limited sexually selected characters.

scholarly journals Evolution of correlated complexity in the radically different courtship signals of birds-of-paradise

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell A. Ligon ◽  
Christopher D. Diaz ◽  
Janelle L. Morano ◽  
Jolyon Troscianko ◽  
Martin Stevens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Natural Selection ◽  
Evolutionary Biology ◽  
Evolutionary Dynamics ◽  
Functional Integration ◽  
Empirical Support ◽  
Evolutionary Patterns ◽  
Evolutionary Innovation ◽  
Birds Of Paradise ◽  
Analytical Approaches

Ornaments used in courtship often vary wildly among species, reflecting the evolutionary interplay between mate preference functions and the constraints imposed by natural selection. Consequently, understanding the evolutionary dynamics responsible for ornament diversification has been a longstanding challenge in evolutionary biology. However, comparing radically different ornaments across species, as well as different classes of ornaments within species, is a profound challenge to understanding diversification of sexual signals. Using novel methods and a unique natural history dataset, we explore evolutionary patterns of ornament evolution in a group - the birds-of-paradise - exhibiting dramatic phenotypic diversification widely assumed to be driven by sexual selection. Rather than the tradeoff between ornament types originally envisioned by Darwin and Wallace, we found positive correlations among cross-modal (visual/acoustic) signals indicating functional integration of ornamental traits into a composite unit - the courtship phenotype. Furthermore, given the broad theoretical and empirical support for the idea that systemic robustness - functional overlap and interdependency - promotes evolutionary innovation, we posit that birds-of-paradise have radiated extensively through ornamental phenotype space as a consequence of the robustness in the courtship phenotype that we document at a phylogenetic scale. We suggest that the degree of robustness in courtship phenotypes among taxa can provide new insights into the relative influence of sexual and natural selection on phenotypic radiations.Author SummaryAnimals frequently vary widely in ornamentation, even among closely related species. Understanding the patterns that underlie this variation is a significant challenge, requiring comparisons among drastically different traits - like comparing apples to oranges. Here, we use novel analytical approaches to quantify variation in ornamental diversity and richness across the wildly divergent birds-of-paradise, a textbook example of how sexual selection can profoundly shape organismal phenotypes. We find that color and acoustic complexity, along with behavior and acoustic complexity, are positively correlated across evolutionary time-scales. Positive covariation among ornament classes suggests that selection is acting on correlated suites of traits - a composite courtship phenotype - and that this integration may be partially responsible for the extreme variation we see in birds-of-paradise.

Evolution: Natural selection, sexual selection, and the jaws of death

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (18) ◽  
pp. R1092-R1095
Author(s):  
Michal Polak ◽  
Joseph L. Tomkins
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Natural Selection

Adaptation

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee Cronk ◽  
Beth L. Leech
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Natural Selection ◽  
Levels Of Explanation ◽  
Different Levels ◽  
Culture And Language ◽  
Evolutionary Explanations

This chapter examines the concept of adaptation and how it is applied (and sometimes misapplied) to cooperation. It starts with George C. Williams's idea that adaptation is a “special and onerous concept that should be used only where it is really necessary,” which he articulated in Adaptation and Natural Selection. It then considers different levels of explanation that help clarify the notion of adaptation, fortuitous benefits and by-product mutualism in relation to adaptation, and the link between adaptation and natural, artificial, social, and sexual selection. It also explores how phylogeny constrains natural selection, the ways that adaptations solve specific problems found in specific environments, and how adaptation influences judgment. Finally, it analyzes the role of culture and language in adaptation and evolutionary explanations of morality.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document