scholarly journals The Frizzled-ligand Norrin acts as a tumour suppressor linking oncogenic RAS signalling to p53

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriele Sulli ◽  
Errico D’Elia ◽  
M. Cristina Moroni

AbstractTumour suppressor genes are frequently affected by somatic alterations in cancer, and the impairment of their normal function provides a strong contribution to tumourigenesis. Short-hairpin (sh) RNA library screens have been employed as powerful genetic tools to uncover important new players in human cancer 1–5. To identify potential novel tumour suppressor genes acting in the p53 pathway, we performed an shRNA screen using a cell-based model in which only a single additional genetic event disrupting the p53 pathway is required to obtain in vitro transformation. By using this approach, we report here on the identification of the Frizzled-ligand Norrin (Norrie disease protein) as a candidate tumour suppressor. Inhibition of Norrin expression promotes anchorage-independent growth, confers a strong growth advantage to cells and causes a reduction in p53 protein levels. Conversely, recombinant human Norrin increases p53 levels in a β-catenin dependent fashion. Interestingly, Norrin expression is stimulated by oncogenic H-RAS and BRAF, suggesting that Norrin is part of an early fail-safe mechanism to suppress transformation, and that mutation or down regulation of Norrin could contribute to tumour progression. Indeed, we found that Norrin expression is significantly decreased in melanoma, breast, prostate and ovarian cancer. These findings support the existence of a novel autocrine/paracrine feedback loop that constrains tumourigenesis, in which the crosstalk between the RAS and β–catenin pathways play an unanticipated role.

2000 ◽  
Vol 352 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted R. HUPP ◽  
David P. LANE ◽  
Kathryn L. BALL

Human cancer progression is driven in part by the mutation of oncogenes and tumour-suppressor genes which, under selective environmental pressures, give rise to evolving populations of biochemically altered cells with enhanced tumorigenic and metastatic potential. Given that human cancers are biologically and pathologically quite distinct, it has been quite surprising that a common event, perturbation of the p53 pathway, occurs in most if not all types of human cancers. The central role of p53 as a tumour-suppressor protein has fuelled interest in defining its mechanism of function and regulation, determining how its inactivation facilitates cancer progression, and exploring the possibility of restoring p53 function for therapeutic benefit. This review will highlight the key biochemical properties of p53 protein that affect its tumour-suppressor function and the experimental strategies that have been developed for the re-activation of the p53 pathway in cancers.


1993 ◽  
Vol 339 (1289) ◽  
pp. 369-373 ◽  

The two tumour suppressor genes that are most commonly inactivated in human cancer are the p53 gene on chromosome 17 and the retinoblastoma (Rb) gene on chromosome 11. Recent studies of both gene products suggest that they are able to act as powerful negative regulators of cell division. The Rb gene seems to exert this activity by physically complexing to a variety of specific transcription factors and inactivating their function. The capacity of Rb protein to bind these factors is regulated by phosphorylation. The Rb protein can therefore be seen to act as a chaperone for these factors. The p53 protein also may act in part by regulating transcription but may also interact directly with the DNA replication apparatus. The growth suppressive function of p53 is induced by DNA damage leading to an attractive model of p53 as an essential checkpoint control. The p53 protein interacts with members of the hsp70 chaperone family which we now show can regulate its function.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2449-2449
Author(s):  
Paul Sinclair ◽  
Joanna Cheng ◽  
Prahlad Raninga ◽  
Rebecca Hanna ◽  
Shaun Hollern ◽  
...  

Abstract B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) is accompanied by genomic mutations and rearrangements that commonly affect cytokines, transcription factors or signalling molecules that drive B-cell development or contribute to the pre-B cell receptor (pre-BCR) checkpoint. Deletions of the long arm of chromosome 6 [del(6q)] occur in ~10% of BCP-ALL and are also frequent in mature B and T-cell malignancies. Loss of function of the 6q genes EPHA7 and PRDM1, have been implicated in the genesis of lymphoma and BACH2, as a mediator of pre-BCR negative selection, is functionally a candidate tumour suppressor gene. However loss of these or other 6q genes have not been demonstrated, for example through biallelic inactivation, to contribute to BCP-ALL. Analysis of our own and published SNP6.0 data from ALL patients defined 5 focal recurrent regions of deletion on 6q, 4 mapping to 6q15-6q21, coincident with previously published common regions of deletion in ALL. These 4 regions contain 22 candidate genes, including EPHA7 but not BACH2 or PRDM1, which nevertheless mapped close to focal deletions and were also classed as candidate tumour suppressors. To develop the clone tracking assay, we adapted the SIN-SIEW lentiviral construct that expresses EGFP under the control of a spleen focus forming virus (SFFV) promoter. Candidate gene consensus coding sequence (CCDS) or a control luciferase cDNA were cloned between the promoter and an internal ribosomal entry site immediately upstream of EGFP. Transduction of the control (pSLIEW) or candidate gene SIN-SIEW-CCDS constructs consistently expressed EGFP in 697, a BCP-ALL cell line with del(6)(q14.1-22.3). For clone tracking, SIN-SIEW-CCDS constructs were assigned to 4 pools that also included pSLIEW. Pools were transduced into 697 cells that were both cultured in vitro and transplanted by intra-femoral injection into NOD/LtSz-scid IL2Rƴ null (NSG) mice. DNA was isolated from transduced cells immediately before transplant and then at 3 to 5 day intervals from cultured cells or from cells recovered from mouse bone marrow, spleen or liver at end stage disease. The pSLIEW construct facilitated monitoring of disease progression by in vivo imaging and also served as a control to measure CCDS construct copy number changes against. To quantify changes in integrated SIN-SIEW-CCDS, we developed a multiplex targeted Illumina sequencing approach. In vitro, highly significant (p<0.01) reductions in copy number relative to pSLIEW over time, occurred for constructs expressing FOXO3, POU3F2, SIM1, PRDM13, C6orf168 and both α and β isoforms of PRDM1 (Fig 1a). With the exception of C6orf168, these genes also strongly suppressed leukemia development in vivo in all tissues analysed (Fig 1b). The known tumour suppressor genes, BACH2 and EPHA7, had no effect on cell growth in vitro. In vivo a moderate reduction for one of two EPHA7 CCDS was observed though curiously cells expressing BACH2 increased in relative copy number by approximately 3 fold. RNA sequencing data from 697 and published array data for normal pre-B cells and cases of BCP-ALL showed no, or extremely low, levels of expression for POU3F2, SIM1, PRDM13 and C6orf168 making it unlikely that they function as tumour suppressor genes in BCP-ALL. However significant expression of the transcription factors FOXO3 and PRDM1 were seen across data sets. Western blot confirmed expression of FOXO3 and PRDM1 in 697 and other BCP-ALL cell lines and demonstrated substantial increases in the corresponding proteins after transduction of 697 with FOXO3 and PRDM1 SIN-SIEW CCDS constructs. Over-expression of FOXO3 and both isoforms of PRDM1 decreased the proportion of cells in S and G2 phases of the cell cycle, but failed to induce apoptosis as measured by Annexin-5 staining. Comparison of total mRNA sequencing profiles of 697 cells, FACS sorted for ectopic expression of FOXO3, PRDM1 or control construct, showed distinctive patterns of up or down regulated mRNA. The roles of FOXO3 and PRDM1 in early B-cell development are currently undefined but notably our data suggests they influence expression of components of the pre-BCR and related signalling pathways and therefore may contribute to the pre-BCR checkpoint. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Reproduction ◽  
2002 ◽  
pp. 341-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Liu ◽  
TS Ganesan

Ovarian cancer is the most frequent cause of death from gynaecological malignancies in the western world, and sporadic epithelial ovarian cancer is its most predominant form. The aetiology of sporadic ovarian cancer remains unknown. Genetic studies have enabled a better understanding of the evolution of tumour progression. A major focus of research has been to identify tumour suppressor genes implicated in sporadic ovarian cancer over the past decade. Several tumour suppressor genes have been identified by strategies such as positional cloning and differential expression display. Further research is warranted to understand fully their contribution to the pathogenesis of sporadic ovarian cancer.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Keke Shao ◽  
Weilin Pu ◽  
Jianfeng Zhang ◽  
Shicheng Guo ◽  
Fei Qian ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Aberrant DNA methylation has been firmly established as a factor contributing to the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) via its capacity to silence tumour suppressor genes. However, the methylation status of multiple tumour suppressor genes and their roles in promoting CRC metastasis are not well characterised. Methods We explored the methylation and expression profiles of CPEB1 (the gene encoding cytoplasmic polyadenylation element-binding protein 1), a candidate CRC tumour suppressor gene, using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and validated these results in both CRC cell lines and cells from Han Chinese CRC patients (n = 104). The functional role of CPEB1 in CRC was examined in experiments performed in vitro and in vivo. A candidate transcription factor capable of regulating CPEB1 expression was predicted in silico and validated by luciferase reporter, DNA pull-down, and electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Results Hypermethylation and decreased expression of CPEB1 in CRC tumour tissues were revealed by TCGA database. We also identified a significant inverse correlation (Pearson’s R = − 0.43, P < 0.001) between promoter methylation and CPEB1 expression. We validated these results in CRC samples and two CRC cell lines. We also demonstrated that up-regulation of CPEB1 resulted in significantly decreased tumour growth, migration, invasion, and tumorigenicity and promoted tumour cell apoptosis both in vitro and in vivo. We identified the transcription factors CCAAT enhancer-binding protein beta (CEBPB) and transcription factor CP2 (TFCP2) as critical regulators of CPEB1 expression. Hypermethylation of the CPEB1 promoter resulted in a simultaneous increase in the capacity for TFCP2 binding and a decreased likelihood of CEBPB binding, both of which led to diminished expression of CPEB1. Conclusions Our results identified a novel tumour-suppressive role of CPEB1 in CRC and found that hypermethylation of the CPEB1 promoter may lead to diminished expression due to decreased chromatin accessibility and transcription factor binding. Collectively, these results suggest a potential role for CPEB1 in the diagnosis and treatment of CRC.


Author(s):  
Anisur Rahman Khuda-Bukhsh ◽  
Sourav Sidkar

Background and objectives: DNA hyper-methylation is an important aspect involved in carcinogenesis and cancer progression, which affects mainly CpG islands of DNA and causes inactivation of tumour suppressor genes. Therefore DNA hypermethylation status of the genomic DNA in both the transformed cancerous cell lines and in carcinogen-induced lung cancer was ascertained by analysis of expressions of certain major lung cancer specific tumour suppressor genes. The other objective was to examine if ultra highly diluted homeopathic drug, Condurango 30C, had ability to modulate DNA methylation. Methods: DNA methylation activity, if any, has been ascertained in H460-NSCLC cells in vitro and in BaP-induced lung cancer of rats in vivo, in respect of tumour suppressor genes like p15, p16, p18 and p53 by using PCR-SSCP analyses. The ability of modulation of DNA methylation, if any, by Condurango 30C was also verified against placebo control in a blinded manner. Results: Condurango 30C-treated DNA showed significant decrease in band-intensity of p15 and p53 genes especially in methylated condition, in vitro, at the IC50 dose (2.43µl/100µl). SSCP analysis of p15 and p53 genes in Condurango 30C-treated DNA also supported ability of Condurango 30C to modulate methylation state, in vitro. Inhibition of p15 hypermethylation was observed after post cancer treatment of rat with Condurango 30C. SSCP results gave a better indication of differences in band-position and single strand separation of p15 and p53 in Condurango 30C treated samples. Conclusion: Condurango 30C could trigger epigenetic modification in lung cancer via modulation of DNA hypermethylation but placebos could not.


Open Biology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 170152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pere Llinàs-Arias ◽  
Manel Esteller

Cancer cells undergo many different alterations during their transformation, including genetic and epigenetic events. The controlled division of healthy cells can be impaired through the downregulation of tumour suppressor genes. Here, we provide an update of the mechanisms in which epigenetically altered coding and non-coding tumour suppressor genes are implicated. We will highlight the importance of epigenetics in the different molecular pathways that lead to enhanced and unlimited capacity of division, genomic instability, metabolic shift, acquisition of mesenchymal features that lead to metastasis, and tumour plasticity. We will briefly describe these pathways, focusing especially on genes whose epigenetic inactivation through DNA methylation has been recently described, as well as on those that are well established as being epigenetically silenced in cancer. A brief perspective of current clinical therapeutic approaches that can revert epigenetic inactivation of non-coding tumour suppressor genes will also be given.


2006 ◽  
Vol 95 (12) ◽  
pp. 1701-1707 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Christoph ◽  
C Kempkensteffen ◽  
S Weikert ◽  
J Köllermann ◽  
H Krause ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document