scholarly journals Multivalent interaction of ESCO2 with the replication machinery is required for cohesion

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn Bender ◽  
Eulália Maria Lima Da Silva ◽  
Jingrong Chen ◽  
Annelise Poss ◽  
Lauren Gawey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cohesin Complex ◽  
Replication Machinery ◽  
Replicative Helicase ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Mcm Helicase ◽  
N Terminus ◽  
Processivity Factor

AbstractThe tethering together of sister chromatids by the cohesin complex ensures their accurate alignment and segregation during cell division. In vertebrates, the establishment of cohesion between sister chromatids requires the activity of the ESCO2 acetyltransferase, which modifies the Smc3 subunit of cohesin. It was shown recently that ESCO2 promotes cohesion through interaction with the MCM replicative helicase. However, ESCO2 does not significantly colocalize with the MCM helicase, suggesting there may be additional interactions that are important for ESCO2 function. Here we show that ESCO2 is recruited to replication factories, the sites of DNA replication. We show that ESCO2 contains multiple conserved PCNA-interaction motifs in its N-terminus, and that each of these motifs are essential to ESCO2’s ability to establish sister chromatid cohesion. We propose that multiple PCNA interaction motifs embedded in a largely flexible and disordered region of the protein underlie the ability of ESCO2 to establish cohesion between sister chromatids precisely as they are born during DNA replication.SummaryCohesin modification by the ESCO2 acetyltransferase is required for cohesion between sister chromatids. Here we identify multiple motifs in ESCO2 that mediate its interaction with the replication processivity factor PCNA, and show that their mutation abrogates the ability of ESCO2 to ensure cohesion.

scholarly journals Multivalent interaction of ESCO2 with the replication machinery is required for sister chromatid cohesion in vertebrates

2019 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 1081-1089 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn Bender ◽  
Eulália Maria Lima Da Silva ◽  
Jingrong Chen ◽  
Annelise Poss ◽  
Lauren Gawey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Replication Machinery ◽  
Replicative Helicase ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
N Terminus ◽  
Mcm Complex ◽  
Unique Ability

The tethering together of sister chromatids by the cohesin complex ensures their accurate alignment and segregation during cell division. In vertebrates, sister chromatid cohesion requires the activity of the ESCO2 acetyltransferase, which modifies the Smc3 subunit of cohesin. It was shown recently that ESCO2 promotes cohesion through interaction with the MCM replicative helicase. However, ESCO2 does not significantly colocalize with the MCM complex, suggesting there are additional interactions important for ESCO2 function. Here we show that ESCO2 is recruited to replication factories, sites of DNA replication, through interaction with PCNA. We show that ESCO2 contains multiple PCNA-interaction motifs in its N terminus, each of which is essential to its ability to establish cohesion. We propose that multiple PCNA-interaction motifs embedded in a largely flexible and disordered region of the protein underlie the unique ability of ESCO2 to establish cohesion between sister chromatids precisely as they are born during DNA replication.

scholarly journals Chromosome interaction over a distance in meiosis

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 150029 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Brady ◽  
Leocadia V. Paliulis
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Daughter Cell ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Physical Connection ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Random Segregation

The challenge of cell division is to distribute partner chromosomes (pairs of homologues, pairs of sex chromosomes or pairs of sister chromatids) correctly, one into each daughter cell. In the ‘standard’ meiosis, this problem is solved by linking partners together via a chiasma and/or sister chromatid cohesion, and then separating the linked partners from one another in anaphase; thus, the partners are kept track of, and correctly distributed. Many organisms, however, properly separate chromosomes in the absence of any obvious physical connection, and movements of unconnected partner chromosomes are coordinated at a distance. Meiotic distance interactions happen in many different ways and in different types of organisms. In this review, we discuss several different known types of distance segregation and propose possible explanations for non-random segregation of distance-segregating chromosomes.

scholarly journals Scc2-mediated loading of cohesin onto chromosomes in G1 yeast cells is insufficient to build cohesion during S phase

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim A Nasmyth
Keyword(s):  
Replication Fork ◽  
De Novo ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Cohesin Complex ◽  
Previous Conclusion ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Cohesin Subunit

SummarySister chromatids are held together from their replication until mitosis. Sister chromatid cohesion is mediated by the ring-shaped cohesin complex and it is thought that cohesin holds sister chromatids together by entrapping sister DNAs within the cohesin ring (Haering et al., 2008). However, how this occurs is not well understood. Because cohesin binds to DNA prior to replication it is possible that the replication fork passes through the lumen of the ring thereby placing replicated sisters inside cohesin rings. If this is the case, loading of cohesin in the G1 phase may be sufficient to build cohesion.We show here that Scc2, a cohesin subunit required for loading cohesin onto chromosomes de novo, is necessary for establishment of cohesion even after Scc2-mediated loading has already taken place during late G1 or early S phase. Our results challenge a previous conclusion based on related experiments whereby Scc2 was found not to be required for cohesion establishment during S phase (Lengronne et al., 2006).

scholarly journals Additional copies of the NOG2 and IST2 genes suppress the deficiency of cohesin Irr1p/Scc3p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

2002 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 421-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Białkowska ◽  
Anna Kurlandzka
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Colony Formation ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Mitotic Cell ◽  
Solid Support ◽  
Mrna Splicing ◽  
Cohesin Complex ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

The protein encoded by the IRR1/SCC3 gene is an element of the cohesin complex of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, responsible for establishing and maintaining sister chromatid cohesion during mitotic cell division. We noticed previously that lowering the level of expression of IRR1/SCC3 affects colony formation on solid support. Here we describe two dosage suppressors (IST2, NOG2) overcoming the inability to form colonies of an Irr1p-deficient strain. Ist2 is probably involved in osmotolerance, Nog2p is a putative GTPase required for 60S ribosomal subunit maturation, but may also participate in mRNA splicing.

scholarly journals Mitotic replisome disassembly in vertebrates

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Priego Moreno ◽  
Rebecca M. Jones ◽  
Divyasree Poovathumkadavil ◽  
Agnieszka Gambus
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Replication Machinery ◽  
Replicative Helicase ◽  
Egg Extract ◽  
Eukaryotic Dna ◽  
Higher Eukaryotes

ABSTRACTRecent years have brought a breakthrough in our understanding of the process of eukaryotic DNA replication termination. We have shown that the process of replication machinery (replisome) disassembly at the termination of DNA replication forks in S-phase of the cell cycle is driven through polyubiquitylation of one of the replicative helicase subunits Mcm7. Our previous work in C.elegans embryos suggested also an existence of a back-up pathway of replisome disassembly in mitosis. Here we show, that in Xenopus laevis egg extract, any replisome retained on chromatin after S-phase is indeed removed from chromatin in mitosis. This mitotic disassembly pathway depends on formation of K6 and K63 ubiquitin chains on Mcm7 by TRAIP ubiquitin ligase and activity of p97/VCP protein segregase. The mitotic replisome pathway is therefore conserved through evolution in higher eukaryotes. However, unlike in lower eukaryotes it does not require SUMO modifications. This process can also remove any helicases from chromatin, including “active” stalled ones, indicating a much wider application of this pathway than just a “back-up” for terminated helicases.

scholarly journals Biochemically distinct cohesin complexes mediate positioned loops between CTCF sites and dynamic loops within chromatin domains

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Liu ◽  
Job Dekker
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Structural Changes ◽  
Experimental Approach ◽  
Cohesin Complex ◽  
Genomic Context ◽  
Experimental Conditions ◽  
Chromatin Domains ◽  
Isolated Nuclei ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

The ring-like cohesin complex mediates sister chromatid cohesion by encircling pairs of sister chromatids. Cohesin also extrudes loops along chromatids. Whether the two activities involve similar mechanisms of DNA engagement is not known. We implemented an experimental approach based on isolated nuclei carrying engineered cleavable RAD21 proteins to precisely control cohesin ring integrity so that its role in chromatin looping could be studied under defined experimental conditions. This approach allowed us to identify cohesin complexes with distinct biochemical, and possibly structural properties, that mediate different sets of chromatin loops. When RAD21 is cleaved and the cohesin ring is opened, cohesin complexes at CTCF sites are released from DNA and loops at these elements are lost. In contrast, cohesin-dependent loops within chromatin domains and that are not anchored at CTCF sites are more resistant to RAD21 cleavage. The results show that the cohesin complex mediates loops in different ways depending on genomic context and suggests that it undergoes structural changes as it dynamically extrudes and encounters CTCF sites.

scholarly journals Cohesin regulates VSG monoallelic expression in trypanosomes

2009 ◽  
Vol 186 (2) ◽  
pp. 243-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Landeira ◽  
Jean-Mathieu Bart ◽  
Daria Van Tyne ◽  
Miguel Navarro
Keyword(s):  
Antigenic Variation ◽  
Epigenetic Inheritance ◽  
Surface Glycoprotein ◽  
Monoallelic Expression ◽  
Cohesin Complex ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Nuclear Site ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Polymerase I ◽  
Transcriptional State

Antigenic variation allows Trypanosoma brucei to evade the host immune response by switching the expression of 1 out of ∼15 telomeric variant surface glycoprotein (VSG) expression sites (ESs). VSG ES transcription is mediated by RNA polymerase I in a discrete nuclear site named the ES body (ESB). However, nothing is known about how the monoallelic VSG ES transcriptional state is maintained over generations. In this study, we show that during S and G2 phases and early mitosis, the active VSG ES locus remains associated with the single ESB and exhibits a delay in the separation of sister chromatids relative to control loci. This delay is dependent on the cohesin complex, as partial knockdown of cohesin subunits resulted in premature separation of sister chromatids of the active VSG ES. Cohesin depletion also prompted transcriptional switching from the active to previously inactive VSG ESs. Thus, in addition to maintaining sister chromatid cohesion during mitosis, the cohesin complex plays an essential role in the correct epigenetic inheritance of the active transcriptional VSG ES state.

Getting through anaphase: splitting the sisters and beyond

2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1639-1644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raquel A. Oliveira ◽  
Kim Nasmyth
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Present Review ◽  
Cohesin Complex ◽  
Physical Separation ◽  
Cohesive Forces ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Pulling Forces ◽  
Random Segregation

Sister-chromatid cohesion, thought to be primarily mediated by the cohesin complex, is essential for chromosome segregation. The forces holding the two sisters resist the tendency of microtubules to prematurely pull sister DNAs apart and thereby prevent random segregation of the genome during mitosis, and consequent aneuploidy. By counteracting the spindle pulling forces, cohesion between the two sisters generates the tension necessary to stabilize microtubule–kinetochore attachments. Upon entry into anaphase, however, the linkages that hold the two sister DNAs must be rapidly destroyed to allow physical separation of chromatids. Anaphase cells must therefore possess mechanisms that ensure faithful segregation of single chromatids that are now attached stably to the spindle in a manner no longer dependent on tension. In the present review, we discuss the nature of the cohesive forces that hold sister chromatids together, the mechanisms that trigger their physical separation, and the anaphase-specific changes that ensure proper segregation of single chromatids during the later stages of mitosis.

scholarly journals The p97 cofactor Ubxn7 facilitates replisome disassembly during S-phase

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeynep Tarcan ◽  
Divyasree Poovathumkadavil ◽  
Aggeliki Skagia ◽  
Agnieszka Gambus
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Molecular Mechanism ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligases ◽  
S Phase ◽  
E3 Ubiquitin Ligases ◽  
Replication Machinery ◽  
Replicative Helicase ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Eukaryotic Dna

Complex cellular processes are driven by the regulated assembly and disassembly of large multi-protein complexes. In eukaryotic DNA replication, whilst we are beginning to understand the molecular mechanism for assembly of the replication machinery (replisome), we still know relatively little about the regulation of its disassembly at replication termination. Over recent years, the first elements of this process have emerged, revealing that the replicative helicase, at the heart of the replisome, is polyubiquitylated prior to unloading and that this unloading requires p97 segregase activity. Two different E3 ubiquitin ligases are now known to ubiquitylate the helicase under different conditions: Cul2Lrr1 and TRAIP. Here we have found two p97 cofactors, Ubxn7 and Faf1, which can interact with p97 during replisome disassembly in S-phase. Only Ubxn7 however facilitates efficient replisome disassembly through its interaction with both Cul2Lrr1 and p97. Our data therefore characterise Ubxn7 as the first substrate-specific p97 cofactor regulating replisome disassembly in vertebrates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document