scholarly journals The evolution of contact prediction: Evidence that contact selection in statistical contact prediction is changing

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Chonofsky ◽  
Saulo H. P. de Oliveira ◽  
Konrad Krawczyk ◽  
Charlotte M. Deane

AbstractOver the last few years, the field of protein structure prediction has been transformed by increasingly-accurate contact prediction software. These methods are based on the detection of coevolutionary relationships between residues from multiple sequence alignments. However, despite speculation, there is little evidence of a link between contact prediction and the physico-chemical interactions which drive amino-acid coevolution. Furthermore, existing protocols predict only a fraction of all protein contacts and it is not clear why some contacts are favoured over others.Using a dataset of 863 protein domains, we assessed the physico-chemical interactions of contacts predicted by CCMpred, MetaPSICOV, and DNCON2, as examples of direct coupling analysis, meta-prediction, and deep learning, respectively. To further investigate what sets these predicted contacts apart, we considered correctly-predicted contacts and compared their properties against the protein contacts that were not predicted.We found that predicted contacts tend to form more bonds than non-predicted contacts, which suggests these contacts may be more important. Comparing the contacts predicted by each method, we found that metaPSICOV and DNCON2 favour accuracy whereas CCMPred detects contacts with more bonds. This suggests that the push for higher accuracy may lead to a loss of physico-chemically important contacts.These results underscore the connection between protein physico-chemistry and the coevolutionary couplings that can be derived from multiple sequence alignments. This relationship is likely to be relevant to protein structure prediction and functional analysis of protein structure and may be key to understanding their utility for different problems in structural biology.Author summaryAccurate contact prediction has allowed scientists to predict protein structures with unprecedented levels of accuracy. The success of contact prediction methods, which are based on inferring correlations between amino acids in protein multiple sequence alignments, has prompted a great deal of work to improve the quality of contact prediction, leading to the development of several different methods for detecting amino acids in proximity.In this paper, we investigate the properties of these contact prediction methods. We find that contacts which are predicted differ from the other contacts in the protein, in particular they have more physico-chemical bonds, and the predicted contacts are more strongly conserved than other contacts across protein families. We also compared the properties of different contact prediction methods and found that the characteristics of the predicted sets depend on the prediction method used.Our results point to a link between physico-chemical bonding interactions and the evolutionary history of proteins, a connection which is reflected in their amino acid sequences.

Author(s):  
Mark Chonofsky ◽  
Saulo H P de Oliveira ◽  
Konrad Krawczyk ◽  
Charlotte M Deane

Abstract Motivation Over the last few years, the field of protein structure prediction has been transformed by increasingly-accurate contact prediction software. These methods are based on the detection of coevolutionary relationships between residues from multiple sequence alignments. However, despite speculation, there is little evidence of a link between contact prediction and the physico-chemical interactions which drive amino-acid coevolution. Furthermore, existing protocols predict only a fraction of all protein contacts and it is not clear why some contacts are favoured over others. Using a dataset of 863 protein domains, we assessed the physico-chemical interactions of contacts predicted by CCMpred, MetaPSICOV, and DNCON2, as examples of direct coupling analysis, meta-prediction, and deep learning. Results We considered correctly-predicted contacts and compared their properties against the protein contacts that were not predicted. Predicted contacts tend to form more bonds than non-predicted contacts, which suggests these contacts may be more important than contacts that were not predicted. Comparing the contacts predicted by each method, we found that metaPSICOV and DNCON2 favour accuracy whereas CCMPred detects contacts with more bonds. This suggests that the push for higher accuracy may lead to a loss of physico-chemically important contacts. These results underscore the connection between protein physico-chemistry and the coevolutionary couplings that can be derived from multiple sequence alignments. This relationship is likely to be relevant to protein structure prediction and functional analysis of protein structure and may be key to understanding their utility for different problems in structural biology. Availability We use publicly-available databases. Our code is available for download at http://opig.stats.ox.ac.uk/. Supplementary information Supplementary information is available at Bioinformatics online.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aashish Jain ◽  
Genki Terashi ◽  
Yuki Kagaya ◽  
Sai Raghavendra Maddhuri Venkata Subramaniya ◽  
Charles Christoffer ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTProtein 3D structure prediction has advanced significantly in recent years due to improving contact prediction accuracy. This improvement has been largely due to deep learning approaches that predict inter-residue contacts and, more recently, distances using multiple sequence alignments (MSAs). In this work we present AttentiveDist, a novel approach that uses different MSAs generated with different E-values in a single model to increase the co-evolutionary information provided to the model. To determine the importance of each MSA’s feature at the inter-residue level, we added an attention layer to the deep neural network. The model is trained in a multi-task fashion to also predict backbone and orientation angles further improving the inter-residue distance prediction. We show that AttentiveDist outperforms the top methods for contact prediction in the CASP13 structure prediction competition. To aid in structure modeling we also developed two new deep learning-based sidechain center distance and peptide-bond nitrogen-oxygen distance prediction models. Together these led to a 12% increase in TM-score from the best server method in CASP13 for structure prediction.


2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 814-820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gearóid Fox ◽  
Fabian Sievers ◽  
Desmond G. Higgins

Abstract Motivation: Multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) with large numbers of sequences are now commonplace. However, current multiple alignment benchmarks are ill-suited for testing these types of alignments, as test cases either contain a very small number of sequences or are based purely on simulation rather than empirical data. Results: We take advantage of recent developments in protein structure prediction methods to create a benchmark (ContTest) for protein MSAs containing many thousands of sequences in each test case and which is based on empirical biological data. We rank popular MSA methods using this benchmark and verify a recent result showing that chained guide trees increase the accuracy of progressive alignment packages on datasets with thousands of proteins. Availability and implementation: Benchmark data and scripts are available for download at http://www.bioinf.ucd.ie/download/ContTest.tar.gz. Contact: [email protected] Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.


Molecules ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Patrice Koehl ◽  
Henri Orland ◽  
Marc Delarue

Residues in proteins that are in close spatial proximity are more prone to covariate as their interactions are likely to be preserved due to structural and evolutionary constraints. If we can detect and quantify such covariation, physical contacts may then be predicted in the structure of a protein solely from the sequences that decorate it. To carry out such predictions, and following the work of others, we have implemented a multivariate Gaussian model to analyze correlation in multiple sequence alignments. We have explored and tested several numerical encodings of amino acids within this model. We have shown that 1D encodings based on amino acid biochemical and biophysical properties, as well as higher dimensional encodings computed from the principal components of experimentally derived mutation/substitution matrices, do not perform as well as a simple twenty dimensional encoding with each amino acid represented with a vector of one along its own dimension and zero elsewhere. The optimum obtained from representations based on substitution matrices is reached by using 10 to 12 principal components; the corresponding performance is less than the performance obtained with the 20-dimensional binary encoding. We highlight also the importance of the prior when constructing the multivariate Gaussian model of a multiple sequence alignment.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Hong ◽  
Siqi Sun ◽  
Liangzhen Zheng ◽  
Qingxiong Tan ◽  
Yu Li

Evolutionarily related sequences provide information for the protein structure and function. Multiple sequence alignment, which includes homolog searching from large databases and sequence alignment, is efficient to dig out the information and assist protein structure and function prediction, whose efficiency has been proved by AlphaFold. Despite the existing tools for multiple sequence alignment, searching homologs from the entire UniProt is still time-consuming. Considering the success of AlphaFold, foreseeably, large- scale multiple sequence alignments against massive databases will be a trend in the field. It is very desirable to accelerate this step. Here, we propose a novel method, fastMSA, to improve the speed significantly. Our idea is orthogonal to all the previous accelerating methods. Taking advantage of the protein language model based on BERT, we propose a novel dual encoder architecture that can embed the protein sequences into a low-dimension space and filter the unrelated sequences efficiently before running BLAST. Extensive experimental results suggest that we can recall most of the homologs with a 34-fold speed-up. Moreover, our method is compatible with the downstream tasks, such as structure prediction using AlphaFold. Using multiple sequence alignments generated from our method, we have little performance compromise on the protein structure prediction with much less running time. fastMSA will effectively assist protein sequence, structure, and function analysis based on homologs and multiple sequence alignment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc-André Bossanyi ◽  
Valentin Carpentier ◽  
Jean-Pierre S Glouzon ◽  
Aïda Ouangraoua ◽  
Yoann Anselmetti

Abstract Predicting RNA structure is crucial for understanding RNA’s mechanism of action. Comparative approaches for the prediction of RNA structures can be classified into four main strategies. The three first—align-and-fold, align-then-fold and fold-then-align—exploit multiple sequence alignments to improve the accuracy of conserved RNA-structure prediction. Align-and-fold methods perform generally better, but are also typically slower than the other alignment-based methods. The fourth strategy—alignment-free—consists in predicting the conserved RNA structure without relying on sequence alignment. This strategy has the advantage of being the faster, while predicting accurate structures through the use of latent representations of the candidate structures for each sequence. This paper presents aliFreeFoldMulti, an extension of the aliFreeFold algorithm. This algorithm predicts a representative secondary structure of multiple RNA homologs by using a vector representation of their suboptimal structures. aliFreeFoldMulti improves on aliFreeFold by additionally computing the conserved structure for each sequence. aliFreeFoldMulti is assessed by comparing its prediction performance and time efficiency with a set of leading RNA-structure prediction methods. aliFreeFoldMulti has the lowest computing times and the highest maximum accuracy scores. It achieves comparable average structure prediction accuracy as other methods, except TurboFoldII which is the best in terms of average accuracy but with the highest computing times. We present aliFreeFoldMulti as an illustration of the potential of alignment-free approaches to provide fast and accurate RNA-structure prediction methods.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha Petti ◽  
Nicholas Bhattacharya ◽  
Roshan Rao ◽  
Justas Dauparas ◽  
Neil Thomas ◽  
...  

Multiple Sequence Alignments (MSAs) of homologous sequences contain information on structural and functional constraints and their evolutionary histories. Despite their importance for many downstream tasks, such as structure prediction, MSA generation is often treated as a separate pre-processing step, without any guidance from the application it will be used for. Here, we implement a smooth and differentiable version of the Smith-Waterman pairwise alignment algorithm that enables jointly learning an MSA and a downstream machine learning system in an end-to-end fashion. To demonstrate its utility, we introduce SMURF (Smooth Markov Unaligned Random Field), a new method that jointly learns an alignment and the parameters of a Markov Random Field for unsupervised contact prediction. We find that SMURF mildly improves contact prediction on a diverse set of protein and RNA families. As a proof of concept, we demonstrate that by connecting our differentiable alignment module to AlphaFold2 and maximizing the predicted confidence metric, we can learn MSAs that improve structure predictions over the initial MSAs. This work highlights the potential of differentiable dynamic programming to improve neural network pipelines that rely on an alignment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document