scholarly journals Elucidating the Influence of Linker Histone Variants on Chromatosome Dynamics and Energetics

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dustin C. Woods ◽  
Jeff Wereszczynski

AbstractLinker histones are epigenetic regulators that bind to nucleosomes and alter chromatin structures and dynamics. Biophysical studies have revealed two binding modes in the linker histone/nucleosome complex, the chromatosome, where the linker histone is either centered on or askew from the dyad axis. Each has been posited to have distinct effects on chromatin, however the molecular and thermodynamic mechanisms that drive them and their dependence on linker histone compositions remain poorly understood. We present molecular dynamics simulations of chromatosomes with the globular domain of two linker histone variants, generic H1 (genGH1) and H1.0 (GH1.0), to determine how their differences influence chromatosome structures, energetics, and dynamics. Results show that both unbound linker histones adopt a single compact conformation. Upon binding, DNA flexibility is reduced, resulting in increased chromatosome compaction. While both variants enthalpically favor on-dyad binding, energetic benefits are significantly higher for GH1.0, suggesting that GH1.0 is more capable than genGH1 of overcoming the large entropic reduction required for on-dyad binding which helps rationalize experiments that have consistently demonstrated GH1.0 in on-dyad states but that show genGH1 in both locations. These simulations highlight the thermodynamic basis for different linker histone binding motifs, and details their physical and chemical effects on chromatosomes.

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 3591-3604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dustin C Woods ◽  
Jeff Wereszczynski

Abstract Linker histones are epigenetic regulators that bind to nucleosomes and alter chromatin structures and dynamics. Biophysical studies have revealed two binding modes in the linker histone/nucleosome complex, the chromatosome, where the linker histone is either centered on or askew from the dyad axis. Each has been posited to have distinct effects on chromatin, however the molecular and thermodynamic mechanisms that drive them and their dependence on linker histone compositions remain poorly understood. We present molecular dynamics simulations of chromatosomes with the globular domain of two linker histone variants, generic H1 (genGH1) and H1.0 (GH1.0), to determine how their differences influence chromatosome structures, energetics and dynamics. Results show that both unbound linker histones adopt a single compact conformation. Upon binding, DNA flexibility is reduced, resulting in increased chromatosome compaction. While both variants enthalpically favor on-dyad binding, energetic benefits are significantly higher for GH1.0, suggesting that GH1.0 is more capable than genGH1 of overcoming the large entropic reduction required for on-dyad binding which helps rationalize experiments that have consistently demonstrated GH1.0 in on-dyad states but that show genGH1 in both locations. These simulations highlight the thermodynamic basis for different linker histone binding motifs, and details their physical and chemical effects on chromatosomes.


2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (21) ◽  
pp. 2681-2696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsuru Okuwaki ◽  
Mayumi Abe ◽  
Miharu Hisaoka ◽  
Kyosuke Nagata

Linker histones play important roles in the genomic organization of mammalian cells. Of the linker histone variants, H1.X shows the most dynamic behavior in the nucleus. Recent research has suggested that the linker histone variants H1.X and H1.0 have different chromosomal binding site preferences. However, it remains unclear how the dynamics and binding site preferences of linker histones are determined. Here, we biochemically demonstrated that the DNA/nucleosome and histone chaperone binding activities of H1.X are significantly lower than those of other linker histones. This explains why H1.X moves more rapidly than other linker histonesin vivo. Domain swapping between H1.0 and H1.X suggests that the globular domain (GD) and C-terminal domain (CTD) of H1.X independently contribute to the dynamic behavior of H1.X. Our results also suggest that the N-terminal domain (NTD), GD, and CTD cooperatively determine the preferential binding sites, and the contribution of each domain for this determination is different depending on the target genes. We also found that linker histones accumulate in the nucleoli when the nucleosome binding activities of the GDs are weak. Our results contribute to understanding the molecular mechanisms of dynamic behaviors, binding site selection, and localization of linker histones.


1998 ◽  
Vol 95 (16) ◽  
pp. 9117-9122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline M. Groft ◽  
Sacha N. Uljon ◽  
Rong Wang ◽  
Milton H. Werner

The three-dimensional structure of the human Rap30 DNA-binding domain has been solved by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy. The structure of the globular domain is strikingly similar to that of linker histone H5 and its fold places Rap30 into the “winged” helix–turn–helix family of eukaryotic transcription factors. Although the domain interacts weakly with DNA, the binding surface was identified and shown to be consistent with the structure of the HNF-3/fork head–DNA complex. The architecture of the Rap30 DNA-binding domain has important implications for the function of Rap30 in the assembly of the preinitiation complex. In analogy to the function of linker histones in chromatin formation, the fold of the Rap30 DNA-binding domain suggests that its role in transcription initiation may be that of a condensation factor for preinitiation complex assembly. Functional similarity to linker histones may explain the dependence of Rap30 binding on the bent DNA environment induced by the TATA box-binding protein. Cryptic sequence identity and functional homology between the Rap30 DNA-binding domain and region 4 of Escherichia coli σ70 may indicate that the σ factors also possess a linker histone-like activity in the formation of a prokaryotic closed complex.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ankita Saha ◽  
Christopher Seward ◽  
Lisa Stubbs ◽  
Craig Andrew Mizzen

ABSTRACTCore histone variants like H2A.X and H3.3 and their modified forms serve specialized roles in chromatin processes that depend on their genomic distributions and their interaction with chromatin components. Similarly, previous evidence from our lab and others suggest that amino acid sequence variant forms of the linker histone family and specific posttranslational modifications on these variants also result in distinct functions. These inferences are contrary to the notion that the H1 family function as redundant repressors. Here, we provide the first genome-wide evidence that when phosphorylated at a specific C-terminal domain site i.e serine 187, the linker histone H1.4 is enriched at active promoters. This is in direct contrast to previous reports that suggest that phosphorylation of H1 leads to their dissociation from chromatin. Using a highly specific pS187H1.4 antibody earlier developed in the lab, we studied the distribution patterns of pS187H1.4 in estradiol-responsive MCF7 cells where we demonstrated the inducible nature of this modification. We also used public MCF7 data to confirm the association of pS187H1.4 with well-known active transcription marks. These data suggest that linker histones and their modified forms have a more nuanced role than previously understood and may even play a role in transcription regulation.


2005 ◽  
Vol 102 (16) ◽  
pp. 5697-5702 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Saeki ◽  
K. Ohsumi ◽  
H. Aihara ◽  
T. Ito ◽  
S. Hirose ◽  
...  

FEBS Journal ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 276 (14) ◽  
pp. 3685-3697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Wood ◽  
Ambrosius Snijders ◽  
James Williamson ◽  
Colin Reynolds ◽  
John Baldwin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document