scholarly journals Comparative analyses of saprotrophy in Salisapilia sapeloensis and diverse plant pathogenic oomycetes reveal lifestyle-specific gene expression

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie de Vries ◽  
Jan de Vries ◽  
John M Archibald ◽  
Claudio H Slamovits
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Plant Pathogens ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Reference Points ◽  
Global Perspective ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Gene Regulatory ◽  
Specific Array

Oomycetes include many well-studied, devastating plant pathogens. Across oomycete diversity, plant-infecting lineages are interspersed by non-pathogenic ones. Unfortunately, our understanding of the evolution of lifestyle switches is hampered by a scarcity of data on the molecular biology of saprotrophic oomycetes, ecologically important primary colonizers of dead tissue that can serve as informative reference points for understanding the evolution of pathogens. Here, we established Salisapilia sapeloensis growing on axenic litter as a tractable system for the study of saprotrophic oomycetes. We generated multiple transcriptomes from S. sapeloensis and compared them to (a) 22 oomycete genomes and (b) the transcriptomes of eight pathogenic oomycetes grown under 13 conditions (three pathogenic lifestyles, six hosts/substrates, and four tissues). From these analyses we obtained a global perspective on the gene expression signatures of oomycete lifestyles. Our data reveal that oomycete saprotrophs and pathogens use generally similar molecular mechanisms for colonization, but exhibit distinct expression patterns. We identify S. sapeloensis' specific array and expression of carbohydrate-active enzymes and regulatory differences in pathogenicity-associated factors, including the virulence factor EpiC2B. Further, S. sapeloensis was found to express only a small repertoire of effector genes. In conclusion, our analyses reveal lifestyle-specific gene regulatory signatures and suggest that, in addition to variation in gene content, shifts in gene regulatory networks might underpin the evolution of oomycete lifestyles.

scholarly journals Comparative analyses of saprotrophy in Salisapilia sapeloensis and diverse plant pathogenic oomycetes reveal lifestyle-specific gene expression

2020 ◽  
Vol 96 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie de Vries ◽  
Jan de Vries ◽  
John M Archibald ◽  
Claudio H Slamovits
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Plant Pathogens ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Reference Points ◽  
Global Perspective ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Gene Regulatory ◽  
Specific Array

ABSTRACT Oomycetes include many devastating plant pathogens. Across oomycete diversity, plant-infecting lineages are interspersed by non-pathogenic ones. Unfortunately, our understanding of the evolution of lifestyle switches is hampered by a scarcity of data on the molecular biology of saprotrophic oomycetes, ecologically important primary colonizers of dead tissue that can serve as informative reference points for understanding the evolution of pathogens. Here, we established Salisapilia sapeloensis as a tractable system for the study of saprotrophic oomycetes. We generated multiple transcriptomes from S. sapeloensis and compared them with (i) 22 oomycete genomes and (ii) the transcriptomes of eight pathogenic oomycetes grown under 13 conditions. We obtained a global perspective on gene expression signatures of oomycete lifestyles. Our data reveal that oomycete saprotrophs and pathogens use similar molecular mechanisms for colonization but exhibit distinct expression patterns. We identify a S. sapeloensis-specific array and expression of carbohydrate-active enzymes and putative regulatory differences, highlighted by distinct expression levels of transcription factors. Salisapilia sapeloensis expresses only a small repertoire of candidates for virulence-associated genes. Our analyses suggest lifestyle-specific gene regulatory signatures and that, in addition to variation in gene content, shifts in gene regulatory networks underpin the evolution of oomycete lifestyles.

scholarly journals Expression pattern determines regulatory logic

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. e0244864
Author(s):  
Carlos Mora-Martinez
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Regulatory Networks ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
In Silico ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Evolutionary Strategy ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Gene Regulatory

Large amounts of effort have been invested in trying to understand how a single genome is able to specify the identity of hundreds of cell types. Inspired by some aspects of Caenorhabditis elegans biology, we implemented an in silico evolutionary strategy to produce gene regulatory networks (GRNs) that drive cell-specific gene expression patterns, mimicking the process of terminal cell differentiation. Dynamics of the gene regulatory networks are governed by a thermodynamic model of gene expression, which uses DNA sequences and transcription factor degenerate position weight matrixes as input. In a version of the model, we included chromatin accessibility. Experimentally, it has been determined that cell-specific and broadly expressed genes are regulated differently. In our in silico evolved GRNs, broadly expressed genes are regulated very redundantly and the architecture of their cis-regulatory modules is different, in accordance to what has been found in C. elegans and also in other systems. Finally, we found differences in topological positions in GRNs between these two classes of genes, which help to explain why broadly expressed genes are so resilient to mutations. Overall, our results offer an explanatory hypothesis on why broadly expressed genes are regulated so redundantly compared to cell-specific genes, which can be extrapolated to phenomena such as ChIP-seq HOT regions.

Regulation of gene expression in the nervous system

2008 ◽  
Vol 414 (3) ◽  
pp. 327-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lezanne Ooi ◽  
Ian C. Wood
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Gene Regulatory Networks ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Gene Regulatory

The nervous system contains a multitude of cell types which are specified during development by cascades of transcription factors acting combinatorially. Some of these transcription factors are only active during development, whereas others continue to function in the mature nervous system to maintain appropriate gene-expression patterns in differentiated cells. Underpinning the function of the nervous system is its plasticity in response to external stimuli, and many transcription factors are involved in regulating gene expression in response to neuronal activity, allowing us to learn, remember and make complex decisions. Here we review some of the recent findings that have uncovered the molecular mechanisms that underpin the control of gene regulatory networks within the nervous system. We highlight some recent insights into the gene-regulatory circuits in the development and differentiation of cells within the nervous system and discuss some of the mechanisms by which synaptic transmission influences transcription-factor activity in the mature nervous system. Mutations in genes that are important in epigenetic regulation (by influencing DNA methylation and post-translational histone modifications) have long been associated with neuronal disorders in humans such as Rett syndrome, Huntington's disease and some forms of mental retardation, and recent work has focused on unravelling their mechanisms of action. Finally, the discovery of microRNAs has produced a paradigm shift in gene expression, and we provide some examples and discuss the contribution of microRNAs to maintaining dynamic gene regulatory networks in the brain.

scholarly journals Comparative transcriptomics identifies differences in the regulation of the floral transition between Arabidopsis and Brassica rapa cultivars

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Calderwood ◽  
Jo Hepworth ◽  
Shannon Woodhouse ◽  
Lorelei Bilham ◽  
D. Marc Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Brassica Rapa ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Detailed Comparison ◽  
Developmental Time ◽  
Floral Transition ◽  
Gene Regulatory

AbstractThe timing of the floral transition affects reproduction and yield, however its regulation in crops remains poorly understood. Here, we use RNA-Seq to determine and compare gene expression dynamics through the floral transition in the model species Arabidopsis thaliana and the closely related crop Brassica rapa. A direct comparison of gene expression over time between species shows little similarity, which could lead to the inference that different gene regulatory networks are at play. However, these differences can be largely resolved by synchronisation, through curve registration, of gene expression profiles. We find that different registration functions are required for different genes, indicating that there is no common ‘developmental time’ to which Arabidopsis and B. rapa can be mapped through gene expression. Instead, the expression patterns of different genes progress at different rates. We find that co-regulated genes show similar changes in synchronisation between species, suggesting that similar gene regulatory sub-network structures may be active with different wiring between them. A detailed comparison of the regulation of the floral transition between Arabidopsis and B. rapa, and between two B. rapa accessions reveals different modes of regulation of the key floral integrator SOC1, and that the floral transition in the B. rapa accessions is triggered by different pathways, even when grown under the same environmental conditions. Our study adds to the mechanistic understanding of the regulatory network of flowering time in rapid cycling B. rapa under long days and highlights the importance of registration methods for the comparison of developmental gene expression data.

scholarly journals Convergent evolution of venom gland transcriptomes across Metazoa

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia Zancolli ◽  
Maarten Reijnders ◽  
Robert Waterhouse ◽  
Marc Robinson-Rechavi
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Venom Gland ◽  
Bioactive Molecules ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Animal Kingdom ◽  
Venom Glands

Animals have repeatedly evolved specialized organs and anatomical structures to produce and deliver a cocktail of potent bioactive molecules to subdue prey or predators: venom. This makes it one of the most widespread convergent functions in the animal kingdom. Whether animals have adopted the same genetic toolkit to evolved venom systems is a fascinating question that still eludes us. Here, we performed the first comparative analysis of venom gland transcriptomes from 20 venomous species spanning the main Metazoan lineages, to test whether different animals have independently adopted similar molecular mechanisms to perform the same function. We found a strong convergence in gene expression profiles, with venom glands being more similar to each other than to any other tissue from the same species, and their differences closely mirroring the species phylogeny. Although venom glands secrete some of the fastest evolving molecules (toxins), their gene expression does not evolve faster than evolutionarily older tissues. We found 15 venom gland specific gene modules enriched in endoplasmic reticulum stress and unfolded protein response pathways, indicating that animals have independently adopted stress response mechanisms to cope with mass production of toxins. This, in turns, activates regulatory networks for epithelial development, cell turnover and maintenance which seem composed of both convergent and lineage-specific factors, possibly reflecting the different developmental origins of venom glands. This study represents the first step towards an understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the repeated evolution of one of the most successful adaptive traits in the animal kingdom.

scholarly journals Inference of differential gene regulatory networks based on gene expression and genetic perturbation data

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 197-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Zhou ◽  
Xiaodong Cai
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Regulatory Networks ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Supplementary Information ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Joint Inference ◽  
Perturbation Data ◽  
Gene Regulatory ◽  
The Difference

Abstract Motivation Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) of the same organism can be different under different conditions, although the overall network structure may be similar. Understanding the difference in GRNs under different conditions is important to understand condition-specific gene regulation. When gene expression and other relevant data under two different conditions are available, they can be used by an existing network inference algorithm to estimate two GRNs separately, and then to identify the difference between the two GRNs. However, such an approach does not exploit the similarity in two GRNs, and may sacrifice inference accuracy. Results In this paper, we model GRNs with the structural equation model (SEM) that can integrate gene expression and genetic perturbation data, and develop an algorithm named fused sparse SEM (FSSEM), to jointly infer GRNs under two conditions, and then to identify difference of the two GRNs. Computer simulations demonstrate that the FSSEM algorithm outperforms the approaches that estimate two GRNs separately. Analysis of a dataset of lung cancer and another dataset of gastric cancer with FSSEM inferred differential GRNs in cancer versus normal tissues, whose genes with largest network degrees have been reported to be implicated in tumorigenesis. The FSSEM algorithm provides a valuable tool for joint inference of two GRNs and identification of the differential GRN under two conditions. Availability and implementation The R package fssemR implementing the FSSEM algorithm is available at https://github.com/Ivis4ml/fssemR.git. It is also available on CRAN. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

scholarly journals Limit cycle dynamics can guide the evolution of gene regulatory networks towards point attractors

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart P. Wilson ◽  
Sebastian S. James ◽  
Daniel J. Whiteley ◽  
Leah A. Krubitzer
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Limit Cycles ◽  
Gene Networks ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Boolean Models ◽  
A Genome ◽  
Order Of Magnitude ◽  
Accelerate Evolution

AbstractDevelopmental dynamics in Boolean models of gene networks self-organize, either into point attractors (stable repeating patterns of gene expression) or limit cycles (stable repeating sequences of patterns), depending on the network interactions specified by a genome of evolvable bits. Genome specifications for dynamics that can map specific gene expression patterns in early development onto specific point attractor patterns in later development are essentially impossible to discover by chance mutation alone, even for small networks. We show that selection for approximate mappings, dynamically maintained in the states comprising limit cycles, can accelerate evolution by at least an order of magnitude. These results suggest that self-organizing dynamics that occur within lifetimes can, in principle, guide natural selection across lifetimes.

scholarly journals Identification of context-specific gene regulatory networks with GEMULA—gene expression modeling using LAsso

2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geert Geeven ◽  
Ronald E. van Kesteren ◽  
August B. Smit ◽  
Mathisca C. M. de Gunst
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Regulatory Networks ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Gene Regulatory ◽  
Context Specific

scholarly journals Single-cell genomic atlas of great ape cerebral organoids uncovers human-specific features of brain development

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabina Kanton ◽  
Michael James Boyle ◽  
Zhisong He ◽  
Malgorzata Santel ◽  
Anne Weigert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Adult Brain ◽  
The Other ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Great Ape ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Regulatory ◽  
Human Specific

ABSTRACTThe human brain has changed dramatically since humans diverged from our closest living relatives, chimpanzees and the other great apes1–5. However, the genetic and developmental programs underlying this divergence are not fully understood6–8. Here, we have analyzed stem cell-derived cerebral organoids using single-cell transcriptomics (scRNA-seq) and accessible chromatin profiling (scATAC-seq) to explore gene regulatory changes that are specific to humans. We first analyze cell composition and reconstruct differentiation trajectories over the entire course of human cerebral organoid development from pluripotency, through neuroectoderm and neuroepithelial stages, followed by divergence into neuronal fates within the dorsal and ventral forebrain, midbrain and hindbrain regions. We find that brain region composition varies in organoids from different iPSC lines, yet regional gene expression patterns are largely reproducible across individuals. We then analyze chimpanzee and macaque cerebral organoids and find that human neuronal development proceeds at a delayed pace relative to the other two primates. Through pseudotemporal alignment of differentiation paths, we identify human-specific gene expression resolved to distinct cell states along progenitor to neuron lineages in the cortex. We find that chromatin accessibility is dynamic during cortex development, and identify instances of accessibility divergence between human and chimpanzee that correlate with human-specific gene expression and genetic change. Finally, we map human-specific expression in adult prefrontal cortex using single-nucleus RNA-seq and find developmental differences that persist into adulthood, as well as cell state-specific changes that occur exclusively in the adult brain. Our data provide a temporal cell atlas of great ape forebrain development, and illuminate dynamic gene regulatory features that are unique to humans.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document