scholarly journals NMR-based analysis of nucleotide π-stacking in a crowded environment: Implications for prebiotic reactions

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niraja V. Bapat ◽  
Harshad Paithankar ◽  
Jeetender Chugh ◽  
Sudha Rajamani

AbstractThe inherent heterogeneity of the prebiotic milieu is often overlooked when studying nonenzymatic reactions. However, it is important to note that the prebiotic soup of a putative ‘RNA World’ would have been replete with a plethora of molecules resulting from complex chemical syntheses, as well as exogeneous delivery. The presence of such background molecules could lead to pertinent phenomenon such as molecular crowding, which can potentially affect how a reaction would advent in a crowded milieu. In the current study, we have analyzed the effect of crowding on the stacking ability of the RNA monomers, using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Our findings corroborate that the purine monomers possess better stacking efficiency than pyrimidine based monomers. Significantly, this competence is further enhanced in the presence of a crowding agent. Interestingly, this enhanced stacking could result in higher sequestration of the purine monomers, putting their ready availability for relevant nonenzymatic polymerization and replication reactions into question. Taken together, this study demonstrates the need for systematic biophysical characterization of molecular crowding in the context of prebiotically pertinent processes. Unravelling such phenomena is essential to gather a real understanding of how the transition from abiotic to biotic, would have happened during the origin of life.

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 499-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pramod Kumar ◽  
Dipak N. Patil ◽  
Anshul Chaudhary ◽  
Shailly Tomar ◽  
Dinesh Yernool ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (31) ◽  
pp. 3935-3943 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ionov ◽  
K. Ciepluch ◽  
B. Moreno ◽  
D. Appelhans ◽  
J. Sanchez-Nieves ◽  
...  

Sci ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
Prasanta S. Bandyopadhyay ◽  
Nolan Grunska ◽  
Don Dcruz ◽  
Mark C. Greenwood

We address the need for a model by considering two competing theories regarding the origin of life: (i) the Metabolism First theory and (ii) the RNA World theory. We discuss two inter-related points. (I) Models are valuable tools in understanding both the processes and intricacies of the origin of life issues. (II) Insights from models also help us to evaluate the core objection to origin of life theories called “the inefficiency objection” commonly raised by proponents of both the Metabolism First theory and the RNA World theory against each other. We use Simpson’s paradox as a tool for challenging this objection. We will use models in various senses ranging from taking them as representations of reality to treating them as theories/accounts that provide heuristics for probing reality. In this paper, we will frequently use models and theories interchangeably. Additionally, we investigate Conway’s Game of Life and contrast it with our Simpson’s Paradox (SP)-based approach to emergence of life issues. Finally, we discuss some of the consequences of our view. A scientific model is testable in three senses: (i) a logical sense, (ii) a nomological sense, and (iii) a current technological sense. The SP-based model is testable in the logical sense. It is also testable nomologically. However, it is not currently feasible to test it.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document