scholarly journals 11β-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 1 inhibition in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keira Markey ◽  
James Mitchell ◽  
Hannah Botfield ◽  
Ryan S Ottridge ◽  
Tim Matthews ◽  
...  

AbstractTreatment options for idiopathic intracranial hypertension are limited. The enzyme 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 has been implicated in regulating cerebrospinal fluid secretion, and its activity is associated with alterations in intracranial pressure in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. We assessed therapeutic efficacy, safety and tolerability, and investigate indicators of in vivo efficacy of the 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 inhibitor AZD4017 compared to placebo in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. A multicenter, UK, 16-week phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 12-weeks treatment with AZD4017 or placebo was conducted. Women aged 18 to 55 years with active idiopathic intracranial hypertension (>25cmH2O lumbar puncture opening pressure and active papilledema) were included. Participants received 400mg twice daily of oral AZD4017 compared to matching placebo over 12-weeks. The outcome measures were initial efficacy, safety and tolerability. The primary clinical outcome was lumbar puncture opening pressure at 12 weeks analysed by intention-to-treat. Secondary clinical outcomes were symptoms, visual function, papilledema, headache and anthropological measures. In vivo efficacy was evaluated in the central nervous system and systemically. 31 subjects (mean age 31.2 (SD=6.9) years and BMI 39.2 (SD=12.6) kg/m2) were randomized to AZD4017 (n=17) or placebo (n=14). At 12 weeks, lumbar puncture pressure was lower in the AZD4017 group (29.7 cmH2O) compared with placebo (31.3 cmH2O), but the difference between groups was not statistically significant (mean difference: −2.8, 95% confidence interval: −7.1-1.5; p=0.2). An exploratory analysis assessing mean change in lumbar puncture pressure within each group found a significant decrease in the AZD4017 group (mean change: −4.3 cmH2O (SD=5.7); p=0.009) but not in the placebo group (mean change: −0.3 cmH2O (SD=5.9); p=0.8). AZD4017 was safe, with no withdrawals related to adverse effects. Nine transient drug-related adverse events were reported. One serious adverse event occurred in the placebo group (deterioration requiring shunt surgery). In vivo biomarkers of 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 activity (urinary glucocorticoid metabolites, hepatic prednisolone generation and CSF cortisone to cortisol ratios) demonstrated significant enzyme inhibition. This is the first phase 2 randomized controlled trial in idiopathic intracranial hypertension evaluating a novel therapeutic target. AZD4017 was safe, well-tolerated and inhibited 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 activity in vivo. Possible clinical benefits were noted in this small cohort. A longer, larger study would now be of interest.

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Keira Markey ◽  
James Mitchell ◽  
Hannah Botfield ◽  
Ryan S Ottridge ◽  
Tim Matthews ◽  
...  

Abstract Treatment options for idiopathic intracranial hypertension are limited. The enzyme 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 has been implicated in regulating cerebrospinal fluid secretion, and its activity is associated with alterations in intracranial pressure in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. We assessed therapeutic efficacy, safety and tolerability and investigated indicators of in vivo efficacy of the 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 inhibitor AZD4017 compared with placebo in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. A multicenter, UK, 16-week phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 12-week treatment with AZD4017 or placebo was conducted. Women aged 18–55 years with active idiopathic intracranial hypertension (>25 cmH2O lumbar puncture opening pressure and active papilledema) were included. Participants received 400 mg of oral AZD4017 twice daily compared with matching placebo over 12 weeks. The outcome measures were initial efficacy, safety and tolerability. The primary clinical outcome was lumbar puncture opening pressure at 12 weeks analysed by intention-to-treat. Secondary clinical outcomes were symptoms, visual function, papilledema, headache and anthropometric measures. In vivo efficacy was evaluated in the central nervous system and systemically. A total of 31 subjects [mean age 31.2 (SD = 6.9) years and body mass index 39.2 (SD = 12.6) kg/m2] were randomized to AZD4017 (n = 17) or placebo (n = 14). At 12 weeks, lumbar puncture pressure was lower in the AZD4017 group (29.7 cmH2O) compared with placebo (31.3 cmH2O), but the difference between groups was not statistically significant (mean difference: −2.8, 95% confidence interval: −7.1 to 1.5; P = 0.2). An exploratory analysis assessing mean change in lumbar puncture pressure within each group found a significant decrease in the AZD4017 group [mean change: −4.3 cmH2O (SD = 5.7); P = 0.009] but not in the placebo group [mean change: −0.3 cmH2O (SD = 5.9); P = 0.8]. AZD4017 was safe, with no withdrawals related to adverse effects. Nine transient drug-related adverse events were reported. One serious adverse event occurred in the placebo group (deterioration requiring shunt surgery). In vivo biomarkers of 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 activity (urinary glucocorticoid metabolites, hepatic prednisolone generation, serum and cerebrospinal fluid cortisol:cortisone ratios) demonstrated significant enzyme inhibition with the reduction in serum cortisol:cortisone ratio correlating significantly with reduction in lumbar puncture pressure (P = 0.005, R = 0.70). This is the first phase II randomized controlled trial in idiopathic intracranial hypertension evaluating a novel therapeutic target. AZD4017 was safe and well tolerated and inhibited 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 activity in vivo. Reduction in serum cortisol:cortisone correlated with decreased intracranial pressure. Possible clinical benefits were noted in this small cohort. A longer, larger study would now be of interest.


Cephalalgia ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Yiangou ◽  
James Mitchell ◽  
Keira Annie Markey ◽  
William Scotton ◽  
Peter Nightingale ◽  
...  

Background Headache is disabling and prevalent in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Therapeutic lumbar punctures may be considered to manage headache. This study evaluated the acute effect of lumbar punctures on headache severity. Additionally, the effect of lumbar puncture pressure on post-lumbar puncture headache was evaluated. Methods Active idiopathic intracranial hypertension patients were prospectively recruited to a cohort study, lumbar puncture pressure and papilloedema grade were noted. Headache severity was recorded using a numeric rating scale (NRS) 0–10, pre-lumbar puncture and following lumbar puncture at 1, 4 and 6 hours and daily for 7 days. Results Fifty two patients were recruited (mean lumbar puncture opening pressure 32 (28–37 cmCSF). At any point in the week post-lumbar puncture, headache severity improved in 71% (but a small reduction of −1.1 ± 2.6 numeric rating scale) and exacerbated in 64%, with 30% experiencing a severe exacerbation ≥ 4 numeric rating scale. Therapeutic lumbar punctures are typically considered in idiopathic intracranial hypertension patients with severe headaches (numeric rating scale ≥ 7). In this cohort, the likelihood of improvement was 92% (a modest reduction of headache pain by −3.0 ± 2.8 numeric rating scale, p = 0.012, day 7), while 33% deteriorated. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension patients with mild (numeric rating scale 1–3) or no headache (on the day of lumbar puncture, prior to lumbar puncture) had a high risk of post- lumbar puncture headache exacerbation (81% and 67% respectively). Importantly, there was no relationship between lumbar puncture opening pressure and headache response after lumbar puncture. Conclusion Following lumbar puncture, the majority of idiopathic intracranial hypertension patients experience some improvement, but the benefit is small and post-lumbar puncture headache exacerbation is common, and in some prolonged and severe. Lumbar puncture pressure does not influence the post-lumbar puncture headache.


1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. N. Churchill ◽  
D. W. Taylor ◽  
S. I. Vas ◽  
J. Singer ◽  
M. L. Beecroft ◽  
...  

A double-blind randomized controlled trial compared the effectiveness of prophylactic oral trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (cotrimoxazole) to a placebo in preventing peritonitis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. A daily trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole dose of 160/800 mg gives a steady state dialysate concentration of 1.07/4.35 mg/L in the final dwell of each dosing interval. Identification of a 40% reduction in peritonitis probability with 80% statistical power and a type 1 error probability of 0.05 required 52 subjects per group. With stratification by previous peritonitis, 56 were allocated to cotrimoxazole and 49 to placebo. For cotrimoxazole there were five deaths and seven catheter losses. For placebo there were three deaths and nine catheter losses. There were 20 withdrawals from cotrimoxazole and 9 from the placebo group. With respect to time to peritonitis, there was no statistically significant difference between cotrimoxazole and placebo groups (p = 0.19). At 6 months, 64.1% of cotrimoxazole and 62.5% of placebo were peritonitis free; at 12 months 41.9% of cotrimoxazole and 35% of placebo were peritonitis free. There was no effect (p > 0.05) of age, sex, catheter care technique, spike or luer, or dialysate additives. Previous peritonitis increased the risk of peritonitis by 2.06 (95% CI, 3.61–1.18) while frequent (six weekly) extension tubing changes increased the risk of by 1.79, (95% CI, 3.04–1.02) when compared to six monthly changes. Cotrimoxazole appears ineffective in prevention of CAPD peritonitis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 252-260
Author(s):  
Felix Pastor Escartín ◽  
Vicent Quilis Quesada ◽  
Pau Capilla Guasch ◽  
Diego Tabarés Palacín ◽  
Esteban Vega Torres ◽  
...  

Objectives: Several papers have been published relating the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Syndrome (HTII) to the Arnold Chiari type I malformation (AC1M). Both entities have clinical and demographic similarities, a poorly defined etiology and, sometimes common therapeutic posibilities. A correlation between both entities has been suggested, especially in a subgroup of patients in whom posterior fossa decompression surgery fails. With regard to a case, we reviewed the literature and proposed our hypothesis about the origin of Chiari-HTII syndrome and its therapeutic possibilities. Case presentation: A 41year-old patient with mild obesity, menstrual abnormalities and empty Sella Turcicae, was operated on with an AC1M associating basilar impression and syringomyelia causing all together a centromedullary syndrome. After posterior fossa decompression surgery and successful arthrodesis, she improved in the immediate postoperative period. Nevertheless, she soon developed symptoms of intracranial hypertension (ICH), and showed increased opening pressure in lumbar puncture compatible with HTII syndrome. A ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) was implanted with clinical improvement and 12 months later the syringomyelia was absent on in the magnetic resonance (MRI). Conclusion: The Chiari I-HTII syndrome is described as the coexistence of ICH symptoms after failed posterior fossa surgery, in patients with no flow MRI anomalies, and increased opening pressure at the lumbar puncture. In our experience, both entities seem to overlap in a common syndrome and must be taken into account, especially in patients with atypical onset of symptoms or patients in whom conservative treatment fails.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document