scholarly journals SciBet: a portable and fast single cell type identifier

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenwei Li ◽  
Baolin Liu ◽  
Boxi Kang ◽  
Zedao Liu ◽  
Yedan Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Local Computation ◽  
Local Data ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing ◽  
Cross Platform ◽  
Single Cell Type ◽  
User Friendly

ABSTRACTFast, robust and technology-independent computational methods are needed for supervised cell type annotation of single-cell RNA sequencing data. We present SciBet, a Bayesian classifier that accurately predicts cell identity for newly sequenced cells or cell clusters. We enable web client deployment of SciBet for rapid local computation without uploading local data to the server. This user-friendly and cross-platform tool can be widely useful for single cell type identification.

Critical downstream analysis steps for single-cell RNA sequencing data

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zilong Zhang ◽  
Feifei Cui ◽  
Chen Lin ◽  
Lingling Zhao ◽  
Chunyu Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Noisy Data ◽  
Single Cell Level ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Cell Level ◽  
Bioinformatics Tool ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing ◽  
Downstream Analysis

Abstract Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has enabled us to study biological questions at the single-cell level. Currently, many analysis tools are available to better utilize these relatively noisy data. In this review, we summarize the most widely used methods for critical downstream analysis steps (i.e. clustering, trajectory inference, cell-type annotation and integrating datasets). The advantages and limitations are comprehensively discussed, and we provide suggestions for choosing proper methods in different situations. We hope this paper will be useful for scRNA-seq data analysts and bioinformatics tool developers.

scholarly journals Identifying common and novel cell types in single-cell RNA-sequencing data using FR-Match

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Zhang ◽  
Brian Aevermann ◽  
Rohan Gala ◽  
Richard H. Scheuermann
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Sample Type ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Excellent Performance ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing ◽  
Accurate Performance ◽  
Cross Platform ◽  
Tissue Region

Reference cell type atlases powered by single cell transcriptomic profiling technologies have become available to study cellular diversity at a granular level. We present FR-Match for matching query datasets to reference atlases with robust and accurate performance for identifying novel cell types and non-optimally clustered cell types in the query data. This approach shows excellent performance for cross-platform, cross-sample type, cross-tissue region, and cross-data modality cell type matching.

scholarly journals scConsensus: combining supervised and unsupervised clustering for cell type identification in single-cell RNA sequencing data

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bobby Ranjan ◽  
Florian Schmidt ◽  
Wenjie Sun ◽  
Jinyu Park ◽  
Mohammad Amin Honardoost ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Differentially Expressed Genes ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Unsupervised Clustering ◽  
Differentially Expressed ◽  
Consensus Clustering ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing

Abstract Background Clustering is a crucial step in the analysis of single-cell data. Clusters identified in an unsupervised manner are typically annotated to cell types based on differentially expressed genes. In contrast, supervised methods use a reference panel of labelled transcriptomes to guide both clustering and cell type identification. Supervised and unsupervised clustering approaches have their distinct advantages and limitations. Therefore, they can lead to different but often complementary clustering results. Hence, a consensus approach leveraging the merits of both clustering paradigms could result in a more accurate clustering and a more precise cell type annotation. Results We present scConsensus, an $${\mathbf {R}}$$ R framework for generating a consensus clustering by (1) integrating results from both unsupervised and supervised approaches and (2) refining the consensus clusters using differentially expressed genes. The value of our approach is demonstrated on several existing single-cell RNA sequencing datasets, including data from sorted PBMC sub-populations. Conclusions scConsensus combines the merits of unsupervised and supervised approaches to partition cells with better cluster separation and homogeneity, thereby increasing our confidence in detecting distinct cell types. scConsensus is implemented in $${\mathbf {R}}$$ R and is freely available on GitHub at https://github.com/prabhakarlab/scConsensus.

scholarly journals A multi-center cross-platform single-cell RNA sequencing reference dataset

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Chen ◽  
Zhaowei Yang ◽  
Wanqiu Chen ◽  
Yongmei Zhao ◽  
Andrew Farmer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Whole Genome Sequencing Data ◽  
Differential Analysis ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Batch Correction ◽  
Distinct Cell ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing ◽  
Cross Platform ◽  
Reference Samples

AbstractSingle-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is developing rapidly, and investigators seeking to use this technology are left with a variety of options for both experimental platform and bioinformatics methods. There is an urgent need for scRNA-seq reference datasets for benchmarking of different scRNA-seq platforms and bioinformatics methods. To be broadly applicable, these should be generated from renewable, well characterized reference samples and processed in multiple centers across different platforms. Here we present a benchmark scRNA-seq dataset that includes 20 scRNA-seq datasets acquired either as mixtures or as individual samples from two biologically distinct cell lines for which a large amount of multi-platform whole genome sequencing data are also available. These scRNA-seq datasets were generated from multiple popular platforms across four sequencing centers. We believe the datasets we describe here will provide a resource that meets this need by allowing evaluation of various bioinformatics methods for scRNA-seq analyses, including but not limited to data preprocessing, imputation, normalization, clustering, batch correction, and differential analysis.

scholarly journals Evaluation of methods to assign cell type labels to cell clusters from single-cell RNA-sequencing data

F1000Research ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 296 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Javier Diaz-Mejia ◽  
Elaine C. Meng ◽  
Alexander R. Pico ◽  
Sonya A. MacParland ◽  
Troy Ketela ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Human Peripheral Blood ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Cell Clusters ◽  
Reference Cell ◽  
Mouse Tissues ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing

Background: Identification of cell type subpopulations from complex cell mixtures using single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data includes automated steps from normalization to cell clustering. However, assigning cell type labels to cell clusters is often conducted manually, resulting in limited documentation, low reproducibility and uncontrolled vocabularies. This is partially due to the scarcity of reference cell type signatures and because some methods support limited cell type signatures. Methods: In this study, we benchmarked five methods representing first-generation enrichment analysis (ORA), second-generation approaches (GSEA and GSVA), machine learning tools (CIBERSORT) and network-based neighbor voting (METANEIGHBOR), for the task of assigning cell type labels to cell clusters from scRNA-seq data. We used five scRNA-seq datasets: human liver, 11 Tabula Muris mouse tissues, two human peripheral blood mononuclear cell datasets, and mouse retinal neurons, for which reference cell type signatures were available. The datasets span Drop-seq, 10X Chromium and Seq-Well technologies and range in size from ~3,700 to ~68,000 cells. Results: Our results show that, in general, all five methods perform well in the task as evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (average area under the curve (AUC) = 0.91, sd = 0.06), whereas precision-recall analyses show a wide variation depending on the method and dataset (average AUC = 0.53, sd = 0.24). We observed an influence of the number of genes in cell type signatures on performance, with smaller signatures leading more frequently to incorrect results. Conclusions: GSVA was the overall top performer and was more robust in cell type signature subsampling simulations, although different methods performed well using different datasets. METANEIGHBOR and GSVA were the fastest methods. CIBERSORT and METANEIGHBOR were more influenced than the other methods by analyses including only expected cell types. We provide an extensible framework that can be used to evaluate other methods and datasets at https://github.com/jdime/scRNAseq_cell_cluster_labeling.

scholarly journals scConsensus: combining supervised and unsupervised clustering for cell type identification in single-cell RNA sequencing data

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bobby Ranjan ◽  
Florian Schmidt ◽  
Wenjie Sun ◽  
Jinyu Park ◽  
Mohammad Amin Honardoost ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Unsupervised Clustering ◽  
Differentially Expressed ◽  
Consensus Clustering ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing ◽  
Data Clusters

Clustering is a crucial step in the analysis of single-cell data. Clusters identified using unsupervised clustering are typically annotated to cell types based on differentially expressed genes. In contrast, supervised methods use a reference panel of labelled transcriptomes to guide both clustering and cell type identification. Supervised and unsupervised clustering strategies have their distinct advantages and limitations. Therefore, they can lead to different but often complementary clustering results. Hence, a consensus approach leveraging the merits of both clustering paradigms could result in a more accurate clustering and a more precise cell type annotation. We present scConsensus, an R framework for generating a consensus clustering by (i) integrating the results from both unsupervised and supervised approaches and (ii) refining the consensus clusters using differentially expressed (DE) genes. The value of our approach is demonstrated on several existing single-cell RNA sequencing datasets, including data from sorted PBMC sub-populations. scConsensus is freely available on GitHub at https://github.com/prabhakarlab/scConsensus.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document