scholarly journals Spatially and temporally distinct encoding of muscle and kinematic information in rostral and caudal primary motor cortex

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Kolasinski ◽  
Diana C. Dima ◽  
David M. A. Mehler ◽  
Alice Stephenson ◽  
Sara Valadan ◽  
...  

AbstractHand movements are controlled by neuronal networks in primary motor cortex (M1). The organising principle in M1 does not follow an anatomical body map, but rather a distributed representational structure in which motor primitives are combined to produce motor outputs. Both electrophysiological recordings in primates and human imaging data suggest that M1 encodes kinematic features of movements, such as joint position and velocity. However, M1 exhibits well-documented sensory responses to cutaneous and proprioceptive stimuli, raising questions regarding the origins of kinematic motor representations: are they relevant in top-down motor control, or are they an epiphenomenon of bottom-up sensory feedback during movement? Moreover, to what extent is information related to muscle activity encoded in motor cortex? Here we provide evidence for spatially and temporally distinct encoding of kinematic and muscle information in human M1 during the production of a wide variety of naturalistic hand movements. Using a powerful combination of high-field fMRI and MEG, a spatial and temporal multivariate representational similarity analysis revealed encoding of kinematic information from data glove recordings in more caudal regions of M1, over 200ms before movement onset. In contrast, patterns of muscle activity from EMG were encoded in more rostral motor regions later in the cycle of movement. Our spatial and temporal analysis provide compelling evidence that top-down control of dexterous movement engages kinematic representations in caudal regions of M1 prior to movement production; an area with direct cortico-motorneuronal connections. Muscle information encoded more rostrally in M1 was engaged later, suggestive of involvement in bottom-up signalling.

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
James Kolasinski ◽  
Diana C Dima ◽  
David M A Mehler ◽  
Alice Stephenson ◽  
Sara Valadan ◽  
...  

Abstract The organizing principle of human motor cortex does not follow an anatomical body map, but rather a distributed representational structure in which motor primitives are combined to produce motor outputs. Electrophysiological recordings in primates and human imaging data suggest that M1 encodes kinematic features of movements, such as joint position and velocity. However, M1 exhibits well-documented sensory responses to cutaneous and proprioceptive stimuli, raising questions regarding the origins of kinematic motor representations: are they relevant in top-down motor control, or are they an epiphenomenon of bottom-up sensory feedback during movement? Here we provide evidence for spatially and temporally distinct encoding of kinematic and muscle information in human M1 during the production of a wide variety of naturalistic hand movements. Using a powerful combination of high-field functional magnetic resonance imaging and magnetoencephalography, a spatial and temporal multivariate representational similarity analysis revealed encoding of kinematic information in more caudal regions of M1, over 200 ms before movement onset. In contrast, patterns of muscle activity were encoded in more rostral motor regions much later after movements began. We provide compelling evidence that top-down control of dexterous movement engages kinematic representations in caudal regions of M1 prior to movement production.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (34) ◽  
pp. eabb8395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darcy M. Griffin ◽  
Peter L. Strick

Even the simplest movements are generated by a remarkably complex pattern of muscle activity. Fast, accurate movements at a single joint are produced by a stereotyped pattern that includes a decrease in any preexisting activity in antagonist muscles. This premovement suppression is necessary to prevent the antagonist muscle from opposing movement generated by the agonist muscle. Here, we provide evidence that the primary motor cortex (M1) sends a command signal that generates this premovement suppression. Thus, output neurons in M1 sculpt complex spatiotemporal patterns of motor output not only by actively turning on muscles but also by actively turning them off.


1994 ◽  
Vol 663 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryuta Kawashima ◽  
Per E. Roland ◽  
Brendan T. O'Sullivan

1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. 2446-2465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gail L. Widener ◽  
Paul D. Cheney

Widener, Gail L. and Paul D. Cheney. Effects on muscle activity from microstimuli applied to somatosensory and motor cortex during voluntary movement in the monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 77: 2446–2465, 1997. It is well known that electrical stimulation of primary somatosensory cortex (SI) evokes movements that resemble those evoked from primary motor cortex. These findings have led to the concept that SI may possess motor capabilities paralleling those of motor cortex and speculation that SI could function as a robust relay mediating motor responses from central and peripheral inputs. The purpose of this study was to rigorously examine the motor output capabilities of SI areas with the use of the techniques of spike- and stimulus-triggered averaging of electromyographic (EMG) activity in awake monkeys. Unit recordings were obtained from primary motor cortex and SI areas 3a, 3b, 1, and 2 in three rhesus monkeys. Spike-triggered averaging was used to assess the output linkage between individual cells and motoneurons of the recorded muscles. Cells in motor cortex producing postspike facilitation (PSpF) in spike-triggered averages of rectified EMG activity were designated corticomotoneuronal (CM) cells. Motor output efficacy was also assessed by applying stimuli through the microelectrode and computing stimulus-triggered averages of rectified EMG activity. One hundred seventy-one sites in motor cortex and 68 sites in SI were characterized functionally and tested for motor output effects on muscle activity. The incidence, character, and magnitude of motor output effects from SI areas were in sharp contrast to effects from CM cell sites in primary motor cortex. Of 68 SI cells tested with spike-triggered averaging, only one area 3a cell produced significant PSpF in spike-triggered averages of EMG activity. In comparison, 20 of 171 (12%) motor cortex cells tested produced significant postspike effects. Single-pulse intracortical microstimulation produced effects at all CM cell sites in motor cortex but at only 14% of SI sites. The large fraction of SI effects that was inhibitory represented yet another marked difference between CM cell sites in motor cortex and SI sites (25% vs 93%). The fact that motor output effects from SI were frequently absent or very weak and predominantly inhibitory emphasizes the differing motor capabilities of SI compared with primary motor cortex.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 1721-1725.e3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew S. Persichetti ◽  
Jason A. Avery ◽  
Laurentius Huber ◽  
Elisha P. Merriam ◽  
Alex Martin

2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Duque ◽  
Nagako Murase ◽  
Pablo Celnik ◽  
Friedhelm Hummel ◽  
Michelle Harris-Love ◽  
...  

Interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) between motor cortical areas is thought to play a critical role in motor control and could influence manual dexterity. The purpose of this study was to investigate IHI preceding movements of the dominant and nondominant hands of healthy volunteers. Movement-related IHI was studied by means of a double-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol in right-handed individuals in a simple reaction time paradigm. IHI targeting the motor cortex contralateral (IHIc) and ipsilateral (IHIi) to each moving finger was determined. IHIc was comparable after the go signal, a long time preceding movement onset, in both hands. Closer to movement onset, IHIc reversed into facilitation for the right dominant hand but remained inhibitory for left nondominant hand movements. IHIi displayed a nearly constant inhibition with a trough early in the premovement period in both hands. In conclusion, our results unveil a more important modulation of interhemispheric interactions during generation of dominant than nondominant hand movements. This modulation essentially consisted of a shift from a balanced IHI at rest to an IHI predominantly directed toward the ipsilateral primary motor cortex at movement onset. Such a mechanism might release muscles from inhibition in the contralateral primary motor cortex while preventing the occurrence of the mirror activity in ipsilateral primary motor cortex and could therefore contribute to intermanual differences in dexterity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document