scholarly journals HIV-1 co-receptor usage and variable loop contact impacts V3 loop bnAb susceptibility

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludy Registre ◽  
Yvetane Moreau ◽  
Sila Toksoz Ataca ◽  
Surya Pulukuri ◽  
Timothy J. Henrich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homology Modeling ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Sequence Data ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
V3 Loop ◽  
Neutralization Sensitivity ◽  
Receptor Usage ◽  
Variable Loop ◽  
Ccr5 Receptor ◽  
Hiv 1

ABSTRACTIn clinical trials, HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) effectively lower plasma viremia and delay virus reemergence after antiretroviral treatment is stopped among infected individuals that have undetectable virus levels. Presence of less neutralization susceptible strains prior to treatment, however, decreases the efficacy of these antibody-based treatments. The HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein harbors extensive genetic variation, and thus, neutralization sensitivity often cannot be predicted by sequence analysis alone. Sequence-based prediction methods are needed because phenotypic-based assays are labor intensive and not sensitive. Based on the finding that phenotypically confirmed CXCR4- as compared to exclusive CCR5-utilizing strains are less neutralization sensitive, especially to variable loop 1 and 2 (V1-V2) and V3 loop bnAbs, we show that an algorithm that predicts receptor usage identifies envelopes with decreased V3 loop bnAb susceptibility. Homology modeling suggests that the primary V3 loop bnAb epitope is equally accessible among CCR5- and CXCR4-using strains although variants that exclusively use CXCR4 have V3 loop protrusions that interfere with CCR5 receptor interactions. On the other hand, homology modeling also shows that envelope V1 loop orientation interferes with V3 loop directed bnAb binding, and this accounts for decreased neutralization sensitivity in some but not all cases. Thus, there are likely different structural reasons for the co-receptor usage restriction and the differential bnAb susceptibility. Algorithms that use sequence data to predict receptor usage and antibody-envelope homology models can be used to identify variants with decreased sensitivity to V3 loop and potentially other bnAbs.AUTHOR SUMMARYHIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibody (bnAb) therapies are effective, but the pre-existence of less susceptible variants may lead to therapeutic failure. Sequence-based methods are needed to predict pre-treatment variants’ neutralization sensitivity. HIV-1 strains that use the CXCR4 as compared to the CCR5 receptor are less neutralization susceptible, especially to V1-V2 and V3 loop bnAbs. A sequence-based algorithm that predicts receptor usage can identify envelope variants with decreased V3 loop bnAb susceptibility. While the inability to utilize the CCR5 receptor maps to a predicted protrusion in the envelope V3 loop, this viral determinant does not directly influence V3 loop bnAb sensitivity. Furthermore, homology modeling predicted contact between the envelope V1 loop and an antibody also impact V3 loop bnAb susceptibility in some but not all cases. An algorithm that predicts receptor usage and homology modeling can be used to predict sensitivity to bnAbs that target the V3 loop and potentially other envelope domains. These sequence-based methods will be useful as HIV-1 bnAbs enter the clinical arena.

scholarly journals HIV-1 Coreceptor Usage and Variable Loop Contact Impact V3 Loop Broadly Neutralizing Antibody Susceptibility

2019 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludy Registre ◽  
Yvetane Moreau ◽  
Sila Toksoz Ataca ◽  
Surya Pulukuri ◽  
Timothy J. Henrich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homology Modeling ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
V3 Loop ◽  
Plasma Viremia ◽  
Neutralization Sensitivity ◽  
Variable Loop ◽  
Ccr5 Receptor ◽  
Broadly Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Hiv 1 ◽  
Homology Models

ABSTRACT In clinical trials, HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) effectively lower plasma viremia and delay virus reemergence. The presence of less neutralization-susceptible strains prior to treatment decreases the efficacy of these antibody-based treatments, but neutralization sensitivity often cannot be predicted by sequence analysis alone. We found that phenotypically confirmed CXCR4-utilizing strains are less neutralization sensitive, especially to variable loop 3 (V3 loop)-directed bnAbs, than exclusively CCR5-utilizing strains in some, but not all, cases. Homology modeling suggested that the primary V3 loop bnAb epitope is equally accessible among CCR5- and CXCR4-using strains, although variants that exclusively use CXCR4 have V3 loop protrusions that interfere with CCR5 receptor interactions. Homology modeling also showed that among some, but not all, envelopes with decreased neutralization sensitivity, V1 loop orientation interfered with V3 loop-directed bnAb binding. Thus, there are likely different structural reasons for the coreceptor usage restriction and the different bnAb susceptibilities. Importantly, we show that individuals harboring envelopes with higher likelihood of using CXCR4 or greater predicted V1 loop interference have faster virus rebound and a lower maximum decrease in plasma viremia, respectively, after treatment with a V3 loop bnAb. Knowledge of receptor usage and homology models may be useful in developing future algorithms that predict treatment efficacy with V3 loop bnAbs. IMPORTANCE The efficacy of HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibody (bnAb) therapies may be compromised by the preexistence of less susceptible variants. Sequence-based methods are needed to predict pretreatment variants’ neutralization sensitivities. HIV-1 strains that exclusively use the CXCR4 receptor rather than the CCR5 receptor are less neutralization susceptible, especially to variable loop 3 (V3 loop) bnAbs in some, but not all, instances. While the inability to utilize the CCR5 receptor maps to a predicted protrusion in the envelope V3 loop, this viral determinant does not directly influence V3 loop bnAb sensitivity. Homology modeling predicts that contact between the envelope V1 loop and the antibody impacts V3 loop bnAb susceptibility in some cases. Among pretreatment envelopes, increased probability of using CXCR4 and greater predicted V1 interference are associated with faster virus rebound and a smaller decrease in the plasma virus level, respectively, after V3 loop bnAb treatment. Receptor usage information and homology models may be useful for predicting V3 loop bnAb therapy efficacy.

scholarly journals Vaccine-Elicited V3 Loop-Specific Antibodies in Rhesus Monkeys and Control of a Simian-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Expressing a Primary Patient Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Isolate Envelope

2001 ◽  
Vol 75 (9) ◽  
pp. 4165-4175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman L. Letvin ◽  
Suzanne Robinson ◽  
Daniela Rohne ◽  
Michael K. Axthelm ◽  
John W. Fanton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type ◽  
Virus Type ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Peptide Vaccine ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
V3 Loop ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Hiv 1

ABSTRACT Vaccine-elicited antibodies specific for the third hypervariable domain of the surface gp120 of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) (V3 loop) were assessed for their contribution to protection against infection in the simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV)/rhesus monkey model. Peptide vaccine-elicited anti-V3 loop antibody responses were examined for their ability to contain replication of SHIV-89.6, a nonpathogenic SHIV expressing a primary patient isolate HIV-1 envelope, as well as SHIV-89.6P, a pathogenic variant of that virus. Low-titer neutralizing antibodies to SHIV-89.6 that provided partial protection against viremia following SHIV-89.6 infection were generated. A similarly low-titer neutralizing antibody response to SHIV-89.6P that did not contain viremia after infection with SHIV-89.6P was generated, but a trend toward protection against CD4+ T-lymphocyte loss was seen in these infected monkeys. These observations suggest that the V3 loop on some primary patient HIV-1 isolates may be a partially effective target for neutralizing antibodies induced by peptide immunogens.

scholarly journals Determinants of Neutralization Resistance in the Envelope Glycoproteins of a Simian-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Passaged In Vivo

1999 ◽  
Vol 73 (10) ◽  
pp. 8873-8879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bijan Etemad-Moghadam ◽  
Ying Sun ◽  
Emma K. Nicholson ◽  
Gunilla B. Karlsson ◽  
Dominik Schenten ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Envelope Glycoproteins ◽  
V3 Loop ◽  
Variable Loop ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Cd4 Binding Site ◽  
Hiv 1

ABSTRACT In vivo passage of a simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV-89.6) generated a virus, SHIV-89.6P, that exhibited increased resistance to some neutralizing antibodies (G. B. Karlsson et al., J. Exp. Med. 188:1159–1171, 1998). Here we examine the range of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) neutralizing antibodies to which the passaged virus became resistant and identify envelope glycoprotein determinants of antibody resistance. Compared with the envelope glycoproteins derived from the parental SHIV-89.6, the envelope glycoproteins of the passaged virus were resistant to antibodies directed against the gp120 V3 variable loop and the CD4 binding site. By contrast, both viral envelope glycoproteins were equally sensitive to neutralization by two antibodies, 2G12 and 2F5, that recognize poorly immunogenic structures on gp120 and gp41, respectively. Changes in the V2 and V3 variable loops of gp120 were necessary and sufficient for full resistance to the IgG1b12 antibody, which is directed against the CD4 binding site. Changes in the V3 loop specified complete resistance to a V3 loop-directed antibody, while changes in the V1/V2 loops conferred partial resistance to this antibody. The epitopes of the neutralizing antibodies were not disrupted by the resistance-associated changes. These results indicate that in vivo selection occurs for HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins with variable loop conformations that restrict the access of antibodies to immunogenic neutralization epitopes.

scholarly journals Antibody Responses Elicited in Macaques Immunized with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) SF162-Derived gp140 Envelope Immunogens: Comparison with Those Elicited during Homologous Simian/Human Immunodeficiency Virus SHIVSF162P4 and Heterologous HIV-1 Infection

2006 ◽  
Vol 80 (17) ◽  
pp. 8745-8762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina R. Derby ◽  
Zane Kraft ◽  
Elaine Kan ◽  
Emma T. Crooks ◽  
Susan W. Barnett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Rhesus Macaques ◽  
Hypervariable Region ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Antibody Responses ◽  
V3 Loop ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Hiv 1

ABSTRACT The antibody responses elicited in rhesus macaques immunized with soluble human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) Env gp140 proteins derived from the R5-tropic HIV-1 SF162 virus were analyzed and compared to the broadly reactive neutralizing antibody responses elicited during chronic infection of a macaque with a simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) expressing the HIV-1 SF162 Env, SHIVSF162P4, and humans infected with heterologous HIV-1 isolates. Four gp140 immunogens were evaluated: SF162gp140, ΔV2gp140 (lacking the crown of the V2 loop), ΔV3gp140 (lacking the crown of the V3 loop), and ΔV2ΔV3gp140 (lacking both the V2 and V3 loop crowns). SF162gp140 and ΔV2gp140 have been previously evaluated by our group in a pilot study, but here, a more comprehensive analysis of their immunogenic properties was performed. All four gp140 immunogens elicited stronger anti-gp120 than anti-gp41 antibodies and potent homologous neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) that primarily targeted the first hypervariable region (V1 loop) of gp120, although SF162gp140 also elicited anti-V3 NAbs. Heterologous NAbs were elicited by SF162gp140 and ΔV2gp140 but were weak in potency and narrow in specificity. No heterologous NAbs were elicited by ΔV3gp140 or ΔV2ΔV3gp140. In contrast, the SHIVSF162P4-infected macaque and HIV-infected humans generated similar titers of anti-gp120 and anti-gp41 antibodies and NAbs of significant breadth against primary HIV-1 isolates, which did not target the V1 loop. The difference in V1 loop immunogenicity between soluble gp140 and virion-associated gp160 Env proteins derived from SF162 may be the basis for the observed difference in the breadth of neutralization in sera from the immunized and infected animals studied here.

scholarly journals Distinct conformations of the HIV-1 V3 loop crown are targetable for broad neutralization

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolas Friedrich ◽  
Emanuel Stiegeler ◽  
Matthias Glögl ◽  
Thomas Lemmin ◽  
Simon Hansen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
V3 Loop ◽  
Therapeutic Approaches ◽  
Conformational Preferences ◽  
Ankyrin Repeat Proteins ◽  
Env Protein ◽  
Hiv 1

AbstractThe V3 loop of the HIV-1 envelope (Env) protein elicits a vigorous, but largely non-neutralizing antibody response directed to the V3-crown, whereas rare broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) target the V3-base. Challenging this view, we present V3-crown directed broadly neutralizing Designed Ankyrin Repeat Proteins (bnDs) matching the breadth of V3-base bnAbs. While most bnAbs target prefusion Env, V3-crown bnDs bind open Env conformations triggered by CD4 engagement. BnDs achieve breadth by focusing on highly conserved residues that are accessible in two distinct V3 conformations, one of which resembles CCR5-bound V3. We further show that these V3-crown conformations can, in principle, be attacked by antibodies. Supporting this conclusion, analysis of antibody binding activity in the Swiss 4.5 K HIV-1 cohort (n = 4,281) revealed a co-evolution of V3-crown reactivities and neutralization breadth. Our results indicate a role of V3-crown responses and its conformational preferences in bnAb development to be considered in preventive and therapeutic approaches.

scholarly journals Characterization and Implementation of a Diverse Simian Immunodeficiency Virus SIVsm Envelope Panel in the Assessment of Neutralizing Antibody Breadth Elicited in Rhesus Macaques by Multimodal Vaccines Expressing the SIVmac239 Envelope

2015 ◽  
Vol 89 (16) ◽  
pp. 8130-8151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie M. Kilgore ◽  
Megan K. Murphy ◽  
Samantha L. Burton ◽  
Katherine S. Wetzel ◽  
S. Abigail Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Simian Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Nonhuman Primate ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Rhesus Macaques ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Cd40 Ligand ◽  
Antibody Activity ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Antibody Profile ◽  
Hiv 1

ABSTRACTAntibodies that can neutralize diverse viral strains are likely to be an important component of a protective human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vaccine. To this end, preclinical simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-based nonhuman primate immunization regimens have been designed to evaluate and enhance antibody-mediated protection. However, these trials often rely on a limited selection of SIV strains with extreme neutralization phenotypes to assess vaccine-elicited antibody activity. To mirror the viral panels used to assess HIV-1 antibody breadth, we created and characterized a novel panel of 14 genetically and phenotypically diverse SIVsm envelope (Env) glycoproteins. To assess the utility of this panel, we characterized the neutralizing activity elicited by four SIVmac239 envelope-expressing DNA/modified vaccinia virus Ankara vector- and protein-based vaccination regimens that included the immunomodulatory adjuvants granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands, and CD40 ligand. The SIVsm Env panel exhibited a spectrum of neutralization sensitivity to SIV-infected plasma pools and monoclonal antibodies, allowing categorization into three tiers. Pooled sera from 91 rhesus macaques immunized in the four trials consistently neutralized only the highly sensitive tier 1a SIVsm Envs, regardless of the immunization regimen. The inability of vaccine-mediated antibodies to neutralize the moderately resistant tier 1b and tier 2 SIVsm Envs defined here suggests that those antibodies were directed toward epitopes that are not accessible on most SIVsm Envs. To achieve a broader and more effective neutralization profile in preclinical vaccine studies that is relevant to known features of HIV-1 neutralization, more emphasis should be placed on optimizing the Env immunogen, as the neutralization profile achieved by the addition of adjuvants does not appear to supersede the neutralizing antibody profile determined by the immunogen.IMPORTANCEMany in the HIV/AIDS vaccine field believe that the ability to elicit broadly neutralizing antibodies capable of blocking genetically diverse HIV-1 variants is a critical component of a protective vaccine. Various SIV-based nonhuman primate vaccine studies have investigated ways to improve antibody-mediated protection against a heterologous SIV challenge, including administering adjuvants that might stimulate a greater neutralization breadth. Using a novel SIV neutralization panel and samples from four rhesus macaque vaccine trials designed for cross comparison, we show that different regimens expressing the same SIV envelope immunogen consistently elicit antibodies that neutralize only the very sensitive tier 1a SIV variants. The results argue that the neutralizing antibody profile elicited by a vaccine is primarily determined by the envelope immunogen and is not substantially broadened by including adjuvants, resulting in the conclusion that the envelope immunogen itself should be the primary consideration in efforts to elicit antibodies with greater neutralization breadth.

scholarly journals Early Pro-Inflammatory Signal and T-Cell Activation Associate With Vaccine-Induced Anti-Vaccinia Protective Neutralizing Antibodies

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jue Hou ◽  
Shuhui Wang ◽  
Dan Li ◽  
Lindsay N. Carpp ◽  
Tong Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
T Cell Activation ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Cell Activation ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Activator Protein 1 ◽  
Successful Vaccine ◽  
Hiv 1 ◽  
Core Genes

Both vaccine “take” and neutralizing antibody (nAb) titer are historical correlates for vaccine-induced protection from smallpox. We analyzed a subset of samples from a phase 2a trial of three DNA/HIV-1 primes and a recombinant Tiantan vaccinia virus-vectored (rTV)/HIV-1 booster and found that a proportion of participants showed no anti-vaccinia nAb response to the rTV/HIV-1 booster, despite successful vaccine “take.” Using a rich transcriptomic and vaccinia-specific immunological dataset with fine kinetic sampling, we investigated the molecular mechanisms underlying nAb response. Blood transcription module analysis revealed the downregulation of the activator protein 1 (AP-1) pathway in responders, but not in non-responders, and the upregulation of T-cell activation in responders. Furthermore, transcriptional factor network reconstruction revealed the upregulation of AP-1 core genes at hour 4 and day 1 post-rTV/HIV-1 vaccination, followed by a downregulation from day 3 until day 28 in responders. In contrast, AP-1 core and pro-inflammatory genes were upregulated on day 7 in non-responders. We speculate that persistent pro-inflammatory signaling early post-rTV/HIV-1 vaccination inhibits the nAb response.

scholarly journals Neutralizing Antibody Responses in Acute Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype C Infection

2007 ◽  
Vol 81 (12) ◽  
pp. 6187-6196 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. S. Gray ◽  
P. L. Moore ◽  
I. A. Choge ◽  
J. M. Decker ◽  
F. Bibollet-Ruche ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type ◽  
Virus Type ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Antibody Responses ◽  
Subtype C ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Hiv 1

ABSTRACT The study of the evolution and specificities of neutralizing antibodies during the course of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection may be important in the discovery of possible targets for vaccine design. In this study, we assessed the autologous and heterologous neutralization responses of 14 HIV-1 subtype C-infected individuals, using envelope clones obtained within the first 2 months postinfection. Our data show that potent but relatively strain-specific neutralizing antibodies develop within 3 to 12 months of HIV-1 infection. The magnitude of this response was associated with shorter V1-to-V5 envelope lengths and fewer glycosylation sites, particularly in the V1-V2 region. Anti-MPER antibodies were detected in 4 of 14 individuals within a year of infection, while antibodies to CD4-induced (CD4i) epitopes developed to high titers in 12 participants, in most cases before the development of autologous neutralizing antibodies. However, neither anti-MPER nor anti-CD4i antibody specificity conferred neutralization breadth. These data provide insights into the kinetics, potency, breadth, and epitope specificity of neutralizing antibody responses in acute HIV-1 subtype C infection.

scholarly journals Structure/Function Studies Involving the V3 Region of the HIV-1 Envelope Delineate Multiple Factors That Affect Neutralization Sensitivity

2015 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 636-649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Zolla-Pazner ◽  
Sandra Sharpe Cohen ◽  
David Boyd ◽  
Xiang-Peng Kong ◽  
Michael Seaman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Hiv Infection ◽  
Chemokine Receptors ◽  
Variable Region ◽  
Single Amino Acid ◽  
V3 Loop ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Neutralization Sensitivity ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Hiv 1

ABSTRACTAntibodies (Abs) specific for the V3 loop of the HIV-1 gp120 envelope neutralize most tier 1 and many tier 2 viruses and are present in essentially all HIV-infected individuals as well as immunized humans and animals. Vaccine-induced V3 Abs are associated with reduced HIV infection rates in humans and affect the nature of transmitted viruses in infected vaccinees, despite the fact that V3 is often occluded in the envelope trimer. Here, we link structural and experimental data showing how conformational alterations of the envelope trimer render viruses exceptionally sensitive to V3 Abs. The experiments interrogated the neutralization sensitivity of pseudoviruses with single amino acid mutations in various regions of gp120 that were predicted to alter packing of the V3 loop in the Env trimer. The results indicate that the V3 loop is metastable in the envelope trimer on the virion surface, flickering between states in which V3 is either occluded or available for binding to chemokine receptors (leading to infection) and to V3 Abs (leading to virus neutralization). The spring-loaded V3 in the envelope trimer is easily released by disruption of the stability of the V3 pocket in the unliganded trimer or disruption of favorable V3/pocket interactions. Formation of the V3 pocket requires appropriate positioning of the V1V2 domain, which is, in turn, dependent on the conformation of the bridging sheet and on the stability of the V1V2 B-C strand-connecting loop.IMPORTANCEThe levels of antibodies to the third variable region (V3) of the HIV envelope protein correlate with reduced HIV infection rates. Previous studies showed that V3 is often occluded, as it sits in a pocket of the envelope trimer on the surface of virions; however, the trimer is flexible, allowing occluded portions of the envelope (like V3) to flicker into an exposed position that binds antibodies. Here we provide a systematic interrogation of mechanisms by which single amino acid changes in various regions of gp120 (i) render viruses sensitive to neutralization by V3 antibodies, (ii) result in altered packing of the V3 loop, and (iii) activate an open conformation that exposes V3 to the effects of V3 Abs. Taken together, these and previous studies explain how V3 antibodies can protect against HIV-1 infection and why they should be one of the targets of vaccine-induced antibodies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document