scholarly journals Dot1L-dependent H3K79 methylation facilitates histone variant H2A.Z exchange at DNA double strand breaks and is required for high fidelity, homology-directed DNA repair

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nehemiah S. Alvarez ◽  
Pavla Brachova ◽  
Timothy A. Fields ◽  
Patrick E. Fields
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Repair Process ◽  
Histone Variant ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Open Chromatin ◽  
High Fidelity ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

AbstractIn eukaryotic cells, the homology-directed repair (HDR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathways are required for the repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSB). The high-fidelity HDR pathway is particularly important for maintenance of genomic stability. In mammals, histone post-translational modifications and histone variant exchange into nucleosomes at sites of DSB generate an open chromatin state necessary for repair to take place. However, the specific contributions of histone modifications to histone variant exchange at DSB sites and the influence of these changes on the DNA repair process and genome stability are incompletely understood. Here we show that Dot1L-catalyzed methylation of H3 histone on lysine 79 (H3K79) is required for efficient HDR of DSB. In cells with DNA DSB either lacking Dot1L or expressing a methylation-dead Dot1L, there is altered kinetics of DNA repair factor recruitment, markedly decreased H2A.Z incorporation at DSB sites, and a specific and profound reduction in HDR, which results in significant genomic instability. These findings demonstrate a new role for Dot1L, identifying it as a critical regulator of the DNA repair process and a steward of genomic integrity.

scholarly journals Loss of autophagy causes a synthetic lethal deficiency in DNA repair

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (3) ◽  
pp. 773-778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Y. Liu ◽  
Naihan Xu ◽  
Jim O’Prey ◽  
Laurence Y. Lao ◽  
Sanket Joshi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Repair Process ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
Cytoplasmic Process ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Synthetic Lethal ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Genomic Damage

(Macro)autophagy delivers cellular constituents to lysosomes for degradation. Although a cytoplasmic process, autophagy-deficient cells accumulate genomic damage, but an explanation for this effect is currently unclear. We report here that inhibition of autophagy causes elevated proteasomal activity leading to enhanced degradation of checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1), a pivotal factor for the error-free DNA repair process, homologous recombination (HR). We show that loss of autophagy critically impairs HR and that autophagy-deficient cells accrue micronuclei and sub-G1 DNA, indicators of diminished genomic integrity. Moreover, due to impaired HR, autophagy-deficient cells are hyperdependent on nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) for repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Consequently, inhibition of NHEJ following DNA damage in the absence of autophagy results in persistence of genomic lesions and rapid cell death. Because autophagy deficiency occurs in several diseases, these findings constitute an important link between autophagy and DNA repair and highlight a synthetic lethal strategy to kill autophagy-deficient cells.

scholarly journals DNA repair goes hip-hop: SMARCA and CHD chromatin remodellers join the break dance

2017 ◽  
Vol 372 (1731) ◽  
pp. 20160285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena B. Rother ◽  
Haico van Attikum
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Posttranslational Modifications ◽  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Hip Hop ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks

Proper signalling and repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) is critical to prevent genome instability and diseases such as cancer. The packaging of DNA into chromatin, however, has evolved as a mere obstacle to these DSB responses. Posttranslational modifications and ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling help to overcome this barrier by modulating nucleosome structures and allow signalling and repair machineries access to DSBs in chromatin. Here we recap our current knowledge on how ATP-dependent SMARCA- and CHD-type chromatin remodellers alter chromatin structure during the signalling and repair of DSBs and discuss how their dysfunction impacts genome stability and human disease. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Chromatin modifiers and remodellers in DNA repair and signalling’.

scholarly journals ATM antagonizes NHEJ proteins assembly and DNA-ends synapsis at single-ended DNA double strand breaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (17) ◽  
pp. 9710-9723
Author(s):  
Sébastien Britton ◽  
Pauline Chanut ◽  
Christine Delteil ◽  
Nadia Barboule ◽  
Philippe Frit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Dna Strand ◽  
Dna Ends

Abstract Two DNA repair pathways operate at DNA double strand breaks (DSBs): non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), that requires two adjacent DNA ends for ligation, and homologous recombination (HR), that resects one DNA strand for invasion of a homologous duplex. Faithful repair of replicative single-ended DSBs (seDSBs) is mediated by HR, due to the lack of a second DNA end for end-joining. ATM stimulates resection at such breaks through multiple mechanisms including CtIP phosphorylation, which also promotes removal of the DNA-ends sensor and NHEJ protein Ku. Here, using a new method for imaging the recruitment of the Ku partner DNA-PKcs at DSBs, we uncover an unanticipated role of ATM in removing DNA-PKcs from seDSBs in human cells. Phosphorylation of DNA-PKcs on the ABCDE cluster is necessary not only for DNA-PKcs clearance but also for the subsequent MRE11/CtIP-dependent release of Ku from these breaks. We propose that at seDSBs, ATM activity is necessary for the release of both Ku and DNA-PKcs components of the NHEJ apparatus, and thereby prevents subsequent aberrant interactions between seDSBs accompanied by DNA-PKcs autophosphorylation and detrimental commitment to Lig4-dependent end-joining.

scholarly journals Role of the yeast DNA repair protein Nej1 in end processing during the repair of DNA double strand breaks by non-homologous end joining

DNA Repair ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Yang ◽  
Yoshihiro Matsumoto ◽  
Kelly M. Trujillo ◽  
Susan P. Lees-Miller ◽  
Mary Ann Osley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Repair Protein ◽  
Dna Repair Protein ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

scholarly journals DROSHA is recruited to DNA damage sites by the MRN complex to promote non-homologous end-joining

2021 ◽  
pp. jcs.249706
Author(s):  
Matteo Cabrini ◽  
Marco Roncador ◽  
Alessandro Galbiati ◽  
Lina Cipolla ◽  
Antonio Maffia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Mrn Complex ◽  
Break Site ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Dna Ends

The DNA damage response (DDR) is the signaling cascade that recognizes DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) and promotes their resolution via the DNA repair pathways of Non-Homologous End Joining (NHEJ) or Homologous Recombination (HR). We and others have shown that DDR activation requires DROSHA. However, whether DROSHA exerts its functions by associating with damage sites, what controls its recruitment and how DROSHA influences DNA repair, remains poorly understood. Here we show that DROSHA associates to DSBs independently from transcription. Neither H2AX, nor ATM nor DNA-PK kinase activities are required for its recruitment to break site. Rather, DROSHA interacts with RAD50 and inhibition of MRN by Mirin treatment abolishes this interaction. MRN inactivation by RAD50 knockdown or mirin treatment prevents DROSHA recruitment to DSB and, as a consequence, also 53BP1 recruitment. During DNA repair, DROSHA inactivation reduces NHEJ and boosts HR frequency. Indeed, DROSHA knockdown also increase the association of downstream HR factors such as RAD51 to DNA ends. Overall, our results demonstrate that DROSHA is recruited at DSBs by the MRN complex and direct DNA repair toward NHEJ.

scholarly journals CRISPR-Cas immunity, DNA repair and genome stability

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Cubbon ◽  
Ivana Ivancic-Bace ◽  
Edward L. Bolt
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Genome Editing ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Short Review ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Repair Enzymes ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Repair Enzymes ◽  
Maintain Genome Stability

Co-opting of CRISPR-Cas ‘Interference’ reactions for editing the genomes of eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells has highlighted crucial support roles for DNA repair systems that strive to maintain genome stability. As front-runners in genome editing that targets DNA, the class 2 CRISPR-Cas enzymes Cas9 and Cas12a rely on repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DDSBs) by host DNA repair enzymes, using mechanisms that vary in how well they are understood. Data are emerging about the identities of DNA repair enzymes that support genome editing in human cells. At the same time, it is becoming apparent that CRISPR-Cas systems functioning in their native environment, bacteria or archaea, also need DNA repair enzymes. In this short review, we survey how DNA repair and CRISPR-Cas systems are intertwined. We consider how understanding DNA repair and CRISPR-Cas interference reactions in nature might help improve the efficacy of genome editing procedures that utilise homologous or analogous systems in human and other cells.

scholarly journals Recruitment of lysine demethylase 2A to DNA double strand breaks and its interaction with 53BP1 ensures genome stability

Oncotarget ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (22) ◽  
pp. 15915-15930 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murilo T.D. Bueno ◽  
Marta Baldascini ◽  
Stéphane Richard ◽  
Noel F. Lowndes
Keyword(s):  
Genome Stability ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Lysine Demethylase

scholarly journals Genetic dissection of vertebrate 53BP1: A major role in non-homologous end joining of DNA double strand breaks

DNA Repair ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 741-749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyoko Nakamura ◽  
Wataru Sakai ◽  
Takuo Kawamoto ◽  
Ronan T. Bree ◽  
Noel F. Lowndes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Genetic Dissection ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

scholarly journals End-resection at DNA double-strand breaks in the three domains of life

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 314-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
John K. Blackwood ◽  
Neil J. Rzechorzek ◽  
Sian M. Bray ◽  
Joseph D. Maman ◽  
Luca Pellegrini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Domains Of Life ◽  
Strand Invasion ◽  
End Resection

During DNA repair by HR (homologous recombination), the ends of a DNA DSB (double-strand break) must be resected to generate single-stranded tails, which are required for strand invasion and exchange with homologous chromosomes. This 5′–3′ end-resection of the DNA duplex is an essential process, conserved across all three domains of life: the bacteria, eukaryota and archaea. In the present review, we examine the numerous and redundant helicase and nuclease systems that function as the enzymatic analogues for this crucial process in the three major phylogenetic divisions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document