scholarly journals Deciphering the interstrand crosslink DNA repair network expressed by Trypanosoma brucei

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ambika Dattani ◽  
Shane Wilkinson

AbstractInterstrand crosslinks (ICLs) represent a highly toxic form of DNA damage that can block essential biological processes including DNA replication and transcription. To combat their deleterious effects all eukaryotes have developed cell cycle-dependent repair strategies that coopt various factors from ‘classical’ DNA repair pathways to resolve such lesions. Here, we report that Trypanosoma brucei, the causative agent of African trypanosomiasis, possesses such systems that show some intriguing differences to those mechanisms expressed in other organisms. Following the identification of trypanosomal homologues encoding for CSB, EXO1, SNM1, MRE11, RAD51 and BRCA2, gene deletion coupled with phenotypic studies demonstrated that all the above factors contribute to this pathogen’s ICL REPAIRtoire with their activities split across two epistatic groups. We show that one network, which encompasses TbCSB, TbEXO1 and TbSNM1, may operate throughout the cell cycle to repair ICLs encountered by transcriptional detection mechanisms while the other relies on homologous recombination enzymes that together may resolve lesions responsible for the stalling of DNA replication forks. By unravelling and comparing the T. brucei ICL REPAIRtoire to those systems found in its host, targets amenable to inhibitor design may be identified and could be used alongside trypanocidal ICL-inducing agents to exacerbate their effects.Author summaryParasites belonging to the Trypanosoma brucei complex cause a human and animal infections collectively known as African trypanosomiasis. Drugs used against these diseases are problematic as medical supervision is required for administration, they are costly, have limited efficacy, may cause unwanted side effects while drug resistance is emerging. Against this backdrop, there is a need for new therapies targeting these neglected tropical diseases. Previous studies have shown compounds that induce DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) formation are effective trypanocidal agents with the most potent invariably functioning as prodrugs. Despite the potential of ICL-inducing compounds to treat African trypanosomiasis little is known about the ICL repair mechanisms expressed by trypanosomes. Using a combination of gene deletion and epistatic analysis we report the first systematic dissection of how ICL repair might operate in T. brucei, a diverged eukaryote. It sheds light on the conservation and divergence of ICL repair in one of only a handful of protists that can be studied genetically, and offers the promise of developing or exploiting ICL-causing agents as new anti-parasite therapies. These findings emphasise the novelty and importance of understanding ICL repair in T. brucei and, more widely, in non-model eukaryotes.

1990 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Woodward ◽  
K. Gull

We have used immunofluorescent detection of 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine-substituted DNA in order to determine the timing of initiation and the duration of nuclear and kinetoplast S-phases within the procyclic stage of the Trypanosoma brucei cell cycle. Both nuclear and kinetoplast S-phases were shown to be periodic, occupying 0.18 and 0.12 of the unit cell cycle, respectively. In addition, initiation of both of these S-phases were in approximate synchrony, differing by only 0.03 of the unit cell cycle. We have also used a monoclonal antibody that recognises the basal bodies of T. brucei in order to visualise cells possessing a new pro-basal body and hence determine the time of pro-basal body formation within the cell cycle. Pro-basal body formation occurred within a few minutes of the initiation of nuclear S-phase, at 0.41 of the unit cell cycle. This provides detection of the earliest known cell cycle event in T. brucei at the level of the light microscope. Cell cycle events including initiation of nuclear and kinetoplast DNA replication and pro-basal body formation may be strictly coordinated in T. brucei in order to maintain the precise single-mitochondrion (kinetoplast), singleflagellum status of the interphase cell.


Cell Reports ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 3323-3338.e6
Author(s):  
Aftab Amin ◽  
Rentian Wu ◽  
Man Hei Cheung ◽  
John F. Scott ◽  
Ziyi Wang ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 872-883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Escribano-Díaz ◽  
Alexandre Orthwein ◽  
Amélie Fradet-Turcotte ◽  
Mengtan Xing ◽  
Jordan T.F. Young ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 329-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
E M McIntosh ◽  
T Atkinson ◽  
R K Storms ◽  
M Smith

Comparison of the 5'-flanking regions of several cell cycle-regulated DNA replication genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae has revealed the presence of a common sequence, 5'-ACGCGT-3', which is upstream and proximal to mapped transcription initiation sites. This sequence, which is the cleavage site for the restriction endonuclease MluI, is present twice in the upstream region of the yeast thymidylate synthase gene TMP1. Previous studies have implicated these MluI sites as critical components in the cell cycle-dependent transcription of TMP1. In this study, we examined more closely the importance of the ACGCGT sequences for the transcription of this gene. Using site-directed mutagenesis in combination with deletion analysis and subcloning experiments, we found that (i) while both of the TMP1 MluI sites contribute to the total transcription of this gene, the distal site is predominant and (ii) the 9-bp sequence ACGCGTTAA encompassing the distal MluI site exhibits properties of a cell cycle-stage dependent upstream activation sequence element. The results of this study support the notion that the ACGCGT sequence is an integral component of a transcription system which coordinates the cell cycle-dependent expression of DNA replication genes in S. cerevisiae.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guido Keijzers ◽  
Daniela Bakula ◽  
Michael Petr ◽  
Nils Madsen ◽  
Amanuel Teklu ◽  
...  

Human exonuclease 1 (EXO1), a 5′→3′ exonuclease, contributes to the regulation of the cell cycle checkpoints, replication fork maintenance, and post replicative DNA repair pathways. These processes are required for the resolution of stalled or blocked DNA replication that can lead to replication stress and potential collapse of the replication fork. Failure to restart the DNA replication process can result in double-strand breaks, cell-cycle arrest, cell death, or cellular transformation. In this review, we summarize the involvement of EXO1 in the replication, DNA repair pathways, cell cycle checkpoints, and the link between EXO1 and cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document