scholarly journals Automated identification of Cell Types in Single Cell RNA Sequencing

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feiyang Ma ◽  
Matteo Pellegrini
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Marker Genes ◽  
Complex Data ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Human T Cell ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing

AbstractCell type identification is one of the major goals in single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). Current methods for assigning cell types typically involve the use of unsupervised clustering, the identification of signature genes in each cluster, followed by a manual lookup of these genes in the literature and databases to assign cell types. However, there are several limitations associated with these approaches, such as unwanted sources of variation that influence clustering and a lack of canonical markers for certain cell types. Here, we present ACTINN (Automated Cell Type Identification using Neural Networks), which employs a neural network with 3 hidden layers, trains on datasets with predefined cell types, and predicts cell types for other datasets based on the trained parameters. We trained the neural network on a mouse cell type atlas (Tabula Muris Atlas) and a human immune cell dataset, and used it to predict cell types for mouse leukocytes, human PBMCs and human T cell sub types. The results showed that our neural network is fast and accurate, and should therefore be a useful tool to complement existing scRNA-seq pipelines.Author SummarySingle cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) provides high resolution profiling of the transcriptomes of individual cells, which inevitably results in high volumes of data that require complex data processing pipelines. Usually, one of the first steps in the analysis of scRNA-seq is to assign individual cells to known cell types. To accomplish this, traditional methods first group the cells into different clusters, then find marker genes, and finally use these to manually assign cell types for each cluster. Thus these methods require prior knowledge of cell type canonical markers, and some level of subjectivity to make the cell type assignments. As a result, the process is often laborious and requires domain specific expertise, which is a barrier for inexperienced users. By contrast, our neural network ACTINN automatically learns the features for each predefined cell type and uses these features to predict cell types for individual cells. This approach is computationally efficient and requires no domain expertise of the tissues being studied. We believe ACTINN allows users to rapidly identify cell types in their datasets, thus rendering the analysis of their scRNA-seq datasets more efficient.

scholarly journals ACTINN: automated identification of cell types in single cell RNA sequencing

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feiyang Ma ◽  
Matteo Pellegrini
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Mouse Cell ◽  
Supplementary Information ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Human T Cell ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing

Abstract Motivation Cell type identification is one of the major goals in single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). Current methods for assigning cell types typically involve the use of unsupervised clustering, the identification of signature genes in each cluster, followed by a manual lookup of these genes in the literature and databases to assign cell types. However, there are several limitations associated with these approaches, such as unwanted sources of variation that influence clustering and a lack of canonical markers for certain cell types. Here, we present ACTINN (Automated Cell Type Identification using Neural Networks), which employs a neural network with three hidden layers, trains on datasets with predefined cell types and predicts cell types for other datasets based on the trained parameters. Results We trained the neural network on a mouse cell type atlas (Tabula Muris Atlas) and a human immune cell dataset, and used it to predict cell types for mouse leukocytes, human PBMCs and human T cell sub types. The results showed that our neural network is fast and accurate, and should therefore be a useful tool to complement existing scRNA-seq pipelines. Availability and implementation The codes and datasets are available at https://figshare.com/articles/ACTINN/8967116. Tutorial is available at https://github.com/mafeiyang/ACTINN. All codes are implemented in python. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Localization of migraine susceptibility genes in human brain by single-cell RNA sequencing

Cephalalgia ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (13) ◽  
pp. 1976-1983 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Renthal
Keyword(s):  
Human Brain ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Susceptibility Genes ◽  
Brain Cell ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing ◽  
Brain Cell Types

Background Migraine is a debilitating disorder characterized by severe headaches and associated neurological symptoms. A key challenge to understanding migraine has been the cellular complexity of the human brain and the multiple cell types implicated in its pathophysiology. The present study leverages recent advances in single-cell transcriptomics to localize the specific human brain cell types in which putative migraine susceptibility genes are expressed. Methods The cell-type specific expression of both familial and common migraine-associated genes was determined bioinformatically using data from 2,039 individual human brain cells across two published single-cell RNA sequencing datasets. Enrichment of migraine-associated genes was determined for each brain cell type. Results Analysis of single-brain cell RNA sequencing data from five major subtypes of cells in the human cortex (neurons, oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, microglia, and endothelial cells) indicates that over 40% of known migraine-associated genes are enriched in the expression profiles of a specific brain cell type. Further analysis of neuronal migraine-associated genes demonstrated that approximately 70% were significantly enriched in inhibitory neurons and 30% in excitatory neurons. Conclusions This study takes the next step in understanding the human brain cell types in which putative migraine susceptibility genes are expressed. Both familial and common migraine may arise from dysfunction of discrete cell types within the neurovascular unit, and localization of the affected cell type(s) in an individual patient may provide insight into to their susceptibility to migraine.

scholarly journals Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals cell type- and artery type-specific vascular remodelling in male spontaneously hypertensive rats

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Cheng ◽  
Wenduo Gu ◽  
Ting Lan ◽  
Jiacheng Deng ◽  
Zhichao Ni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Vascular Remodelling ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Hypertensive Rats ◽  
Spontaneously Hypertensive ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing ◽  
Cell Type Specific

Abstract Aims Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. However, vascular remodelling, a hallmark of hypertension, has not been systematically characterized yet. We described systematic vascular remodelling, especially the artery type- and cell type-specific changes, in hypertension using spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs). Methods and results Single-cell RNA sequencing was used to depict the cell atlas of mesenteric artery (MA) and aortic artery (AA) from SHRs. More than 20 000 cells were included in the analysis. The number of immune cells more than doubled in aortic aorta in SHRs compared to Wistar Kyoto controls, whereas an expansion of MA mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) was observed in SHRs. Comparison of corresponding artery types and cell types identified in integrated datasets unravels dysregulated genes specific for artery types and cell types. Intersection of dysregulated genes with curated gene sets including cytokines, growth factors, extracellular matrix (ECM), receptors, etc. revealed vascular remodelling events involving cell–cell interaction and ECM re-organization. Particularly, AA remodelling encompasses upregulated cytokine genes in smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells, and especially MSCs, whereas in MA, change of genes involving the contractile machinery and downregulation of ECM-related genes were more prominent. Macrophages and T cells within the aorta demonstrated significant dysregulation of cellular interaction with vascular cells. Conclusion Our findings provide the first cell landscape of resistant and conductive arteries in hypertensive animal models. Moreover, it also offers a systematic characterization of the dysregulated gene profiles with unbiased, artery type-specific and cell type-specific manners during hypertensive vascular remodelling.

scholarly journals Evaluation of single-cell classifiers for single-cell RNA sequencing data sets

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 1581-1595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinlei Zhao ◽  
Shuang Wu ◽  
Nan Fang ◽  
Xiao Sun ◽  
Jue Fan
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Reference Data ◽  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Superior Performance ◽  
Marker Genes ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing

Abstract Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has been rapidly developing and widely applied in biological and medical research. Identification of cell types in scRNA-seq data sets is an essential step before in-depth investigations of their functional and pathological roles. However, the conventional workflow based on clustering and marker genes is not scalable for an increasingly large number of scRNA-seq data sets due to complicated procedures and manual annotation. Therefore, a number of tools have been developed recently to predict cell types in new data sets using reference data sets. These methods have not been generally adapted due to a lack of tool benchmarking and user guidance. In this article, we performed a comprehensive and impartial evaluation of nine classification software tools specifically designed for scRNA-seq data sets. Results showed that Seurat based on random forest, SingleR based on correlation analysis and CaSTLe based on XGBoost performed better than others. A simple ensemble voting of all tools can improve the predictive accuracy. Under nonideal situations, such as small-sized and class-imbalanced reference data sets, tools based on cluster-level similarities have superior performance. However, even with the function of assigning ‘unassigned’ labels, it is still challenging to catch novel cell types by solely using any of the single-cell classifiers. This article provides a guideline for researchers to select and apply suitable classification tools in their analysis workflows and sheds some lights on potential direction of future improvement on classification tools.

scholarly journals CHETAH: a selective, hierarchical cell type identification method for single-cell RNA sequencing

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (16) ◽  
pp. e95-e95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jurrian K de Kanter ◽  
Philip Lijnzaad ◽  
Tito Candelli ◽  
Thanasis Margaritis ◽  
Frank C P Holstege
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Reference Data ◽  
Classification Tree ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Biological Information ◽  
Identification Algorithm ◽  
Intermediate Cell ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing

Abstract Cell type identification is essential for single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) studies, currently transforming the life sciences. CHETAH (CHaracterization of cEll Types Aided by Hierarchical classification) is an accurate cell type identification algorithm that is rapid and selective, including the possibility of intermediate or unassigned categories. Evidence for assignment is based on a classification tree of previously available scRNA-seq reference data and includes a confidence score based on the variance in gene expression per cell type. For cell types represented in the reference data, CHETAH’s accuracy is as good as existing methods. Its specificity is superior when cells of an unknown type are encountered, such as malignant cells in tumor samples which it pinpoints as intermediate or unassigned. Although designed for tumor samples in particular, the use of unassigned and intermediate types is also valuable in other exploratory studies. This is exemplified in pancreas datasets where CHETAH highlights cell populations not well represented in the reference dataset, including cells with profiles that lie on a continuum between that of acinar and ductal cell types. Having the possibility of unassigned and intermediate cell types is pivotal for preventing misclassification and can yield important biological information for previously unexplored tissues.

scholarly journals Information Theoretic Feature Selection Methods for Single Cell RNA-Sequencing

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umang Varma ◽  
Justin Colacino ◽  
Anna Gilbert
Keyword(s):  
Feature Selection ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Complex Mixture ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Marker Genes ◽  
Selection Methods ◽  
Information Theoretic ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing ◽  
Information Theoretic Methods

AbstractSingle cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) technologies have generated an expansive amount of new biological information, revealing new cellular populations and hierarchical relationships. A number of technologies complementary to scRNA-seq rely on the selection of a smaller number of marker genes (or features) to accurately differentiate cell types within a complex mixture of cells. In this paper, we benchmark differential expression methods against information-theoretic feature selection methods to evaluate the ability of these algorithms to identify small and efficient sets of genes that are informative about cell types. Unlike differential methods, that are strictly binary and univariate, information-theoretic methods can be used as any combination of binary or multiclass and univariate or multivariate. We show for some datasets, information theoretic methods can reveal genes that are both distinct from those selected by traditional algorithms and that are as informative, if not more, of the class labels. We also present detailed and principled theoretical analyses of these algorithms. All information theoretic methods in this paper are implemented in our PicturedRocks Python package that is compatible with the widely used scanpy package.

scholarly journals SIMPLEs: a single-cell RNA sequencing imputation strategy preserving gene modules and cell clusters variation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhirui Hu ◽  
Songpeng Zu ◽  
Jun S. Liu
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Stem Cell Differentiation ◽  
Marker Genes ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Imputation Methods ◽  
Cell Clusters ◽  
Main Challenge ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing ◽  
Gene Modules

AbstractA main challenge in analyzing single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNASeq) data is to reduce technical variations yet retain cell heterogeneity. Due to low mRNAs content per cell and molecule losses during the experiment (called “dropout”), the gene expression matrix has substantial zero read counts. Existing imputation methods either treat each cell or each gene identically and independently, which oversimplifies the gene correlation and cell type structure. We propose a statistical model-based approach, called SIMPLEs, which iteratively identifies correlated gene modules and cell clusters and imputes dropouts customized for individual gene module and cell type. Simultaneously, it quantifies the uncertainty of imputation and cell clustering. Optionally, SIMPLEs can integrate bulk RNASeq data for estimating dropout rates. In simulations, SIMPLEs performed significantly better than prevailing scRNASeq imputation methods by various metrics. By applying SIMPLEs to several real data sets, we discovered gene modules that can further classify subtypes of cells. Our imputations successfully recovered the expression trends of marker genes in stem cell differentiation and can discover putative pathways regulating biological processes.

scholarly journals RNA-seq library preparation from single pancreatic acinar cells

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damian Wollny ◽  
Sheng Zhao ◽  
Ana Martin-Villalba
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Acinar Cells ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Cellular Heterogeneity ◽  
Pancreatic Acinar Cells ◽  
Library Preparation ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Promising Tool ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing

Single cell RNA sequencing technology has emerged as a promising tool to uncover previously neglected cellular heterogeneity. Multiple methods and protocols have been developed to apply single cell sequencing to different cell types from various organs. However, library preparation for RNA sequencing remains challenging for cell types with high RNAse content due to rapid degradation of endogenous RNA molecules upon cell lysis. To this end, we developed a protocol based on the SMART-seq2 technology for single cell RNA sequencing of pancreatic acinar cells, the cell type with one of the highest ribonuclease concentration measured to date. This protocol reliably produces high quality libraries from single acinar cells reaching a total of 5x106 reads / cell and ∼ 80% transcript mapping rate with no detectable 3´end bias. Thus, our protocol makes single cell transcriptomics accessible to cell type with very high RNAse content.

scholarly journals Investigating transcriptome-wide sex dimorphism by multi-level analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing data in ten mouse cell types

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianyuan Lu ◽  
Jessica C. Mar
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Marker Genes ◽  
Biological Functions ◽  
Sex Dimorphism ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Transcriptional Regulatory ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing

Abstract Background It is a long established fact that sex is an important factor that influences the transcriptional regulatory processes of an organism. However, understanding sex-based differences in gene expression has been limited because existing studies typically sequence and analyze bulk tissue from female or male individuals. Such analyses average cell-specific gene expression levels where cell-to-cell variation can easily be concealed. We therefore sought to utilize data generated by the rapidly developing single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technology to explore sex dimorphism and its functional consequences at the single cell level. Methods Our study included scRNA-seq data of ten well-defined cell types from the brain and heart of female and male young adult mice in the publicly available tissue atlas dataset, Tabula Muris. We combined standard differential expression analysis with the identification of differential distributions in single cell transcriptomes to test for sex-based gene expression differences in each cell type. The marker genes that had sex-specific inter-cellular changes in gene expression formed the basis for further characterization of the cellular functions that were differentially regulated between the female and male cells. We also inferred activities of transcription factor-driven gene regulatory networks by leveraging knowledge of multidimensional protein-to-genome and protein-to-protein interactions and analyzed pathways that were potential modulators of sex differentiation and dimorphism. Results For each cell type in this study, we identified marker genes with significantly different mean expression levels or inter-cellular distribution characteristics between female and male cells. These marker genes were enriched in pathways that were closely related to the biological functions of each cell type. We also identified sub-cell types that possibly carry out distinct biological functions that displayed discrepancies between female and male cells. Additionally, we found that while genes under differential transcriptional regulation exhibited strong cell type specificity, six core transcription factor families responsible for most sex-dimorphic transcriptional regulation activities were conserved across the cell types, including ASCL2, EGR, GABPA, KLF/SP, RXRα, and ZF. Conclusions We explored novel gene expression-based biomarkers, functional cell group compositions, and transcriptional regulatory networks associated with sex dimorphism with a novel computational pipeline. Our findings indicated that sex dimorphism might be widespread across the transcriptomes of cell types, cell type-specific, and impactful for regulating cellular activities.

scholarly journals scConsensus: combining supervised and unsupervised clustering for cell type identification in single-cell RNA sequencing data

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bobby Ranjan ◽  
Florian Schmidt ◽  
Wenjie Sun ◽  
Jinyu Park ◽  
Mohammad Amin Honardoost ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Differentially Expressed Genes ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Unsupervised Clustering ◽  
Differentially Expressed ◽  
Consensus Clustering ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing

Abstract Background Clustering is a crucial step in the analysis of single-cell data. Clusters identified in an unsupervised manner are typically annotated to cell types based on differentially expressed genes. In contrast, supervised methods use a reference panel of labelled transcriptomes to guide both clustering and cell type identification. Supervised and unsupervised clustering approaches have their distinct advantages and limitations. Therefore, they can lead to different but often complementary clustering results. Hence, a consensus approach leveraging the merits of both clustering paradigms could result in a more accurate clustering and a more precise cell type annotation. Results We present scConsensus, an $${\mathbf {R}}$$ R framework for generating a consensus clustering by (1) integrating results from both unsupervised and supervised approaches and (2) refining the consensus clusters using differentially expressed genes. The value of our approach is demonstrated on several existing single-cell RNA sequencing datasets, including data from sorted PBMC sub-populations. Conclusions scConsensus combines the merits of unsupervised and supervised approaches to partition cells with better cluster separation and homogeneity, thereby increasing our confidence in detecting distinct cell types. scConsensus is implemented in $${\mathbf {R}}$$ R and is freely available on GitHub at https://github.com/prabhakarlab/scConsensus.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document