scholarly journals Measuring Directed Functional Connectivity Using Non-Parametric Directionality Analysis: Validation and Comparison with Non-Parametric Granger Causality

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy O. West ◽  
David M. Halliday ◽  
Steven L. Bressler ◽  
Simon F. Farmer ◽  
Vladimir Litvak

AbstractBackground‘Non-parametric directionality’ (NPD) is a novel method for estimation of directed functional connectivity (dFC) in neural data. The method has previously been verified in its ability to recover causal interactions in simulated spiking networks in Halliday et al. (2015)MethodsThis work presents a validation of NPD in continuous neural recordings (e.g. local field potentials). Specifically, we use autoregressive model to simulate time delayed correlations between neural signals. We then test for the accurate recovery of networks in the face of several confounds typically encountered in empirical data. We examine the effects of NPD under varying: a) signal-to-noise ratios, b) asymmetries in signal strength, c) instantaneous mixing, d) common drive, e) and parallel/convergent signal routing. We also apply NPD to data from a patient who underwent simultaneous magnetoencephalography and deep brain recording.ResultsWe demonstrate that NPD can accurately recover directed functional connectivity from simulations with known patterns of connectivity. The performance of the NPD metric is compared with non-parametric Granger causality (NPG), a well-established methodology for model free estimation of dFC. A series of simulations investigating synthetically imposed confounds demonstrate that NPD provides estimates of connectivity that are equivalent to NPG. However, we provide evidence that: i) NPD is less sensitive than NPG to degradation by noise; ii) NPD is more robust to the generation of false positive identification of connectivity resulting from SNR asymmetries; iii) NPD is more robust to corruption via moderate degrees of instantaneous signal mixing.ConclusionsThe results in this paper highlight that to be practically applied to neural data, connectivity metrics should not only be accurate in their recovery of causal networks but also resistant to the confounding effects often encountered in experimental recordings of multimodal data. Taken together, these findings position NPD at the state-of-the-art with respect to the estimation of directed functional connectivity in neuroimaging.HighlightsNon-parametric directionality (NPD) is a novel directed connectivity metric.NPD estimates are equivalent to Granger causality but more robust to signal confounds.Multivariate extensions of NPD can correctly identify signal routing.AbbreviationsdFCDirected functional connectivityEEGElectroencephalogramLFPLocal field potentialMEGMagnetoencephalogramMVARMultivariate autoregressive (model)NPDNon-parametric directionalityNPGNon-parametric Granger (causality)SMASupplementary motor areaSNRSignal-to-noise ratioSTNSubthalamic Nucleus

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meyer Gabriel ◽  
Caponcy Julien ◽  
Paul A. Salin ◽  
Comte Jean-Christophe

AbstractLocal field potential (LFP) recording is a very useful electrophysiological method to study brain processes. However, this method is criticized for recording low frequency activity in a large area of extracellular space potentially contaminated by distal activity. Here, we theoretically and experimentally compare ground-referenced (RR) with differential recordings (DR). We analyze electrical activity in the rat cortex with these two methods. Compared with RR, DR reveals the importance of local phasic oscillatory activities and their coherence between cortical areas. Finally, we show that DR provides a more faithful assessment of functional connectivity caused by an increase in the signal to noise ratio, and of the delay in the propagation of information between two cortical structures.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. e0209001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Meyer ◽  
Julien Carponcy ◽  
Paul Antoine Salin ◽  
Jean-Christophe Comte

NeuroImage ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 218 ◽  
pp. 116796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy O. West ◽  
David M. Halliday ◽  
Steven L. Bressler ◽  
Simon F. Farmer ◽  
Vladimir Litvak

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Yan Chen ◽  
Xinyu Liu ◽  
Shan Li ◽  
Hong Wan

Recent studies indicate that the local field potential (LFP) carries information about an animal’s behavior, but issues regarding whether there are any relationships between the LFP functional networks and behavior tasks as well as whether it is possible to employ LFP network features to decode the behavioral outcome in a single trial remain unresolved. In this study, we developed a network-based method to decode the behavioral outcomes in pigeons by using the functional connectivity strength values among LFPs recorded from the nidopallium caudolaterale (NCL). In our method, the functional connectivity strengths were first computed based on the synchronization likelihood. Second, the strength values were unwrapped into row vectors and their dimensions were then reduced by principal component analysis. Finally, the behavioral outcomes in single trials were decoded using leave-one-out combined with the k-nearest neighbor method. The results showed that the LFP functional network based on the gamma-band was related to the goal-directed behavior of pigeons. Moreover, the accuracy of the network features (74 ± 8%) was significantly higher than that of the power features (61 ± 12%). The proposed method provides a powerful tool for decoding animal behavior outcomes using a neural functional network.


Author(s):  
Bartosz Telenczuk ◽  
Maria Telenczuk ◽  
Alain Destexhe

AbstractBackgroundThe local field potential (LFP) is usually calculated from current sources arising from transmembrane currents, in particular in asymmetric cellular morphologies such as pyramidal neurons.New methodHere, we adopt a different point of view and relate the spiking of neurons to the LFP through efferent synaptic connections and provide a method to calculate LFPs.ResultsWe show that the so-called unitary LFPs (uLFP) provide the key to such a calculation. We show experimental measurements and simulations of uLFPs in neocortex and hippocampus, for both excitatory and inhibitory neurons. We fit a “kernel” function to measurements of uLFPs, and we estimate its spatial and temporal spread by using simulations of morphologically detailed reconstructions of hippocampal pyramidal neurons. Assuming that LFPs are the sum of uLFPs generated by every neuron in the network, the LFP generated by excitatory and inhibitory neurons can be calculated by convolving the trains of action potentials with the kernels estimated from uLFPs. This provides a method to calculate the LFP from networks of spiking neurons, even for point neurons for which the LFP is not easily defined. We show examples of LFPs calculated from networks of point neurons and compare to the LFP calculated from synaptic currents.ConclusionsThe kernel-based method provides a practical way to calculate LFPs from networks of point neurons.HighlightsWe provide a method to estimate the LFP from spiking neuronsThis method is based on kernels, estimated from experimental dataWe show applications of this method to calculate the LFP from networks of spiking neuronsWe show that the kernel-based method is a low-pass filtered version of the LFP calculated from synaptic currents


2018 ◽  
Vol 120 (1) ◽  
pp. 226-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. I. Arce-McShane ◽  
B. J. Sessle ◽  
C. F. Ross ◽  
N. G. Hatsopoulos

Spike-field coherence (SFC) is widely used to assess cortico-cortical interactions during sensorimotor behavioral tasks by measuring the consistency of the relative phases between the spike train of a neuron and the concurrent local field potentials (LFPs). Interpretations of SFC as a measure of functional connectivity are complicated by theoretical work suggesting that estimates of SFC depend on overall neuronal activity. We evaluated the dependence of SFC on neuronal firing rates, LFP power, and behavior in the primary motor (MIo) and primary somatosensory (SIo) areas of the orofacial sensorimotor cortex of monkeys ( Macaca mulatta) during performance of a tongue-protrusion task. Although we occasionally observed monotonically increasing linear relationships between coherence and firing rate, we most often found highly complex, nonmonotonic relationships in both SIo and MIo and sometimes even found that coherence decreased with increasing firing rate. The lack of linear relationships was also true for both LFP power and tongue-protrusive force. Moreover, the ratio between maximal firing rate and the firing rate at peak coherence deviated significantly from unity, indicating that MIo and SIo neurons achieved maximal SFC at a submaximal level of spiking. Overall, these results point to complex relationships of SFC to firing rates, LFP power, and behavior during sensorimotor cortico-cortical interactions: coherence is a measure of functional connectivity whose magnitude is not a mere monotonic reflection of changes in firing rate, LFP power, or the relevantly controlled behavioral parameter. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The concern that estimates of spike-field coherence depend on the firing rates of single neurons has influenced analytical methods employed by experimental studies investigating the functional interactions between cortical areas. Our study shows that the overwhelming majority of the estimated spike-field coherence exhibited complex relations with firing rates of neurons in the orofacial sensorimotor cortex. The lack of monotonic relations was also evident after testing the influence of local field potential power and force on spike-field coherence.


2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (02) ◽  
pp. 1350005 ◽  
Author(s):  
MENG HU ◽  
HUALOU LIANG

Generalized flash suppression (GFS), in which a salient visual stimulus can be rendered invisible despite continuous retinal input, provides a rare opportunity to directly study the neural mechanism of visual perception. Previous work based on linear methods, such as spectral analysis, on local field potential (LFP) during GFS has shown that the LFP power at distinctive frequency bands are differentially modulated by perceptual suppression. Yet, the linear method alone may be insufficient for the full assessment of neural dynamic due to the fundamentally nonlinear nature of neural signals. In this study, we set forth to analyze the LFP data collected from multiple visual areas in V1, V2 and V4 of macaque monkeys while performing the GFS task using a nonlinear method — adaptive multi-scale entropy (AME) — to reveal the neural dynamic of perceptual suppression. In addition, we propose a new cross-entropy measure at multiple scales, namely adaptive multi-scale cross-entropy (AMCE), to assess the nonlinear functional connectivity between two cortical areas. We show that: (1) multi-scale entropy exhibits percept-related changes in all three areas, with higher entropy observed during perceptual suppression; (2) the magnitude of the perception-related entropy changes increases systematically over successive hierarchical stages (i.e. from lower areas V1 to V2, up to higher area V4); and (3) cross-entropy between any two cortical areas reveals higher degree of asynchrony or dissimilarity during perceptual suppression, indicating a decreased functional connectivity between cortical areas. These results, taken together, suggest that perceptual suppression is related to a reduced functional connectivity and increased uncertainty of neural responses, and the modulation of perceptual suppression is more effective at higher visual cortical areas. AME is demonstrated to be a useful technique in revealing the underlying dynamic of nonlinear/nonstationary neural signal.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. e0228147
Author(s):  
Gabriel Meyer ◽  
Julien Carponcy ◽  
Paul Antoine Salin ◽  
Jean-Christophe Comte

2019 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 809-822
Author(s):  
Xiajing Gong ◽  
Wu Li ◽  
Hualou Liang

Neurotechnological innovations allow for simultaneous recording at various scales, ranging from spiking activity of individual neurons to large neural populations’ local field potentials (LFPs). This capability necessitates developing multiscale analysis of spike-field activity. A joint analysis of the hybrid neural data is crucial for bridging the scales between single neurons and local networks. Granger causality is a fundamental measure to evaluate directional influences among neural signals. However, it is mainly limited to inferring causal influence between the same type of signals—either LFPs or spike trains—and not well developed between two different signal types. Here we propose a model-free, nonparametric spike-field Granger causality measure for hybrid data analysis. Our measure is distinct from existing methods in that we use “binless” spikes (precise spike timing) rather than “binned” spikes (spike counts within small consecutive time windows). The latter clearly distort the information in the mixed analysis of spikes and LFP. Therefore, our spectral estimate of spike trains is directly applied to the neural point process itself, i.e., sequences of spike times rather than spike counts. Our measure is validated by an extensive set of simulated data. When the measure is applied to LFPs and spiking activity simultaneously recorded from visual areas V1 and V4 of monkeys performing a contour detection task, we are able to confirm computationally the long-standing experimental finding of the input-output relationship between LFPs and spikes. Importantly, we demonstrate that spike-field Granger causality can be used to reveal the modulatory effects that are inaccessible by traditional methods, such that spike→LFP Granger causality is modulated by the behavioral task, whereas LFP→spike Granger causality is mainly related to the average synaptic input. NEW & NOTEWORTHY It is a pressing question to study the directional interactions between local field potential (LFP) and spiking activity. In this report, we propose a model-free, nonparametric spike-field Granger causality measure that can be used to reveal directional influences between spikes and LFPs. This new measure is crucial for bridging the scales between single neurons and neural networks; hence it represents an important step to explicate how the brain orchestrates information processing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document