scholarly journals Synaptonemal complex proteins direct and constrain the localization of crossover-promoting proteins during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cori K. Cahoon ◽  
Jacquellyn M. Helm ◽  
Diana E. Libuda
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Synaptonemal Complex ◽  
Meiotic Chromosome ◽  
Variable Number ◽  
Specific Structure ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Late Prophase ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Double Strand Dna Breaks

AbstractCrossovers (COs) between homologous chromosomes are critical for meiotic chromosome segregation and form in the context of the synaptonemal complex (SC), a meiosis-specific structure that assembles between aligned homologs. During Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis, central region components of the SC (SYP proteins) are essential to repair double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) as COs, but the roles of these SYP proteins in promoting CO formation are poorly understood. Here, we investigate the relationships between the SYP proteins and conserved CO-promoting factors by examining the immunolocalization of these factors in meiotic mutants where SYP proteins are absent, reduced, or mis-localized. Although COs do not form in syp null mutants, CO-promoting proteins COSA-1, MSH-5, and ZHP-3 nevertheless become co-localized at a variable number of DSB-dependent sites during late prophase, reflecting an inherent affinity of these factors for DSB repair sites. In contrast, in mutants where SYP proteins are present but form aggregates or display abnormal synapsis, CO-promoting proteins consistently track with SYP-1 localization. Moreover, CO-promoting proteins usually localize to a single site per SYP-1 structure, even in SYP aggregates or in mutants where SC forms between sister-chromatids, suggesting that CO regulation occurs within these structures. Further, we find that sister chromatids in the meiotic cohesin mutant rec-8 require both CO-promoting proteins and the SC to remain connected. Taken together, our findings support a model in which SYP proteins promote CO formation by directing and constraining the localization of CO-promoting factors to ensure that CO maturation occurs only between properly aligned homologous chromosomes.Article SummaryErrors during meiosis are the leading cause of birth defects and miscarriages in humans. Thus, the coordinated control of meiosis events is critical for the faithful inheritance of the genome each generation. The synaptonemal complex (SC) is a meiosis-specific structure that assembles between homologs chromosomes and is critical for the establishment and regulation of crossovers, which ensure the accurate segregation of the homologous chromosomes at meiosis I. Here we show that the SC proteins function to regulate crossovers by directing and constraining the localization of proteins involved in promoting the formation of crossovers.

scholarly journals Caenorhabditis elegans DSB-3 reveals conservation and divergence among protein complexes promoting meiotic double-strand breaks

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (33) ◽  
pp. e2109306118
Author(s):  
Albert W. Hinman ◽  
Hsin-Yi Yeh ◽  
Baptiste Roelens ◽  
Kei Yamaya ◽  
Alexander Woglar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Meiotic Chromosome ◽  
Structured Illumination ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Structured Illumination Microscopy ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Double Strand Dna Breaks ◽  
Essential Components

Meiotic recombination plays dual roles in the evolution and stable inheritance of genomes: Recombination promotes genetic diversity by reassorting variants, and it establishes temporary connections between pairs of homologous chromosomes that ensure their future segregation. Meiotic recombination is initiated by generation of double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) by the conserved topoisomerase-like protein Spo11. Despite strong conservation of Spo11 across eukaryotic kingdoms, auxiliary complexes that interact with Spo11 complexes to promote DSB formation are poorly conserved. Here, we identify DSB-3 as a DSB-promoting protein in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Mutants lacking DSB-3 are proficient for homolog pairing and synapsis but fail to form crossovers. Lack of crossovers in dsb-3 mutants reflects a requirement for DSB-3 in meiotic DSB formation. DSB-3 concentrates in meiotic nuclei with timing similar to DSB-1 and DSB-2 (predicted homologs of yeast/mammalian Rec114/REC114), and DSB-1, DSB-2, and DSB-3 are interdependent for this localization. Bioinformatics analysis and interactions among the DSB proteins support the identity of DSB-3 as a homolog of MEI4 in conserved DSB-promoting complexes. This identification is reinforced by colocalization of pairwise combinations of DSB-1, DSB-2, and DSB-3 foci in structured illumination microscopy images of spread nuclei. However, unlike yeast Rec114, DSB-1 can interact directly with SPO-11, and in contrast to mouse REC114 and MEI4, DSB-1, DSB-2, and DSB-3 are not concentrated predominantly at meiotic chromosome axes. We speculate that variations in the meiotic program that have coevolved with distinct reproductive strategies in diverse organisms may contribute to and/or enable diversification of essential components of the meiotic machinery.

Coordinating the segregation of sister chromatids during the first meiotic division: evidence for sexual dimorphism

2001 ◽  
Vol 114 (13) ◽  
pp. 2417-2426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig A. Hodges ◽  
Renée LeMaire-Adkins ◽  
Patricia A. Hunt
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Dimorphism ◽  
Synaptonemal Complex ◽  
X Chromosome ◽  
Meiotic Division ◽  
Meiotic Chromosome ◽  
Female Meiosis ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Segregation ◽  
Protein Components

Errors during the first meiotic division are common in our species, but virtually all occur during female meiosis. The reason why oogenesis is more error prone than spermatogenesis remains unknown. Normal segregation of homologous chromosomes at the first meiotic division (MI) requires coordinated behavior of the sister chromatids of each homolog. Failure of sister kinetochores to act cooperatively at MI, or precocious sister chromatid segregation (PSCS), has been postulated to be a major contributor to human nondisjunction. To investigate the factors that influence PSCS we utilized the XO mouse, since the chromatids of the single X chromosome frequently segregate at MI, and the propensity for PSCS is influenced by genetic background. Our studies demonstrate that the strain-specific differences in PSCS are due to the actions of an autosomal trans-acting factor or factors. Since components of the synaptonemal complex are thought to play a role in centromere cohesion and kinetochore orientation, we evaluated the behavior of the X chromosome at prophase to determine if this factor influenced the propensity of the chromosome for self-synapsis. We were unable to directly correlate synaptic differences with subsequent segregation behavior. However, unexpectedly, we uncovered a sexual dimorphism that may partially explain sex-specific differences in the fidelity of meiotic chromosome segregation. Specifically, in the male remnants of the synaptonemal complex remain associated with the centromeres until anaphase of the second meiotic division (MII), whereas in the female, all traces of synaptonemal complex (SC) protein components are lost from the chromosomes before the onset of the first meiotic division. This finding suggests a sex-specific difference in the components used to correctly segregate chromosomes during meiosis, and may provide a reason for the high error frequency during female meiosis.

scholarly journals Condensin restructures chromosomes in preparation for meiotic divisions

2004 ◽  
Vol 167 (4) ◽  
pp. 613-625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond C. Chan ◽  
Aaron F. Severson ◽  
Barbara J. Meyer
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Germ Cells ◽  
Protein Complex ◽  
Mitotic Chromosome ◽  
Meiotic Chromosome ◽  
Ordered Structure ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromosome Resolution

The production of haploid gametes from diploid germ cells requires two rounds of meiotic chromosome segregation after one round of replication. Accurate meiotic chromosome segregation involves the remodeling of each pair of homologous chromosomes around the site of crossover into a highly condensed and ordered structure. We showed that condensin, the protein complex needed for mitotic chromosome compaction, restructures chromosomes during meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. In particular, condensin promotes both meiotic chromosome condensation after crossover recombination and the remodeling of sister chromatids. Condensin helps resolve cohesin-independent linkages between sister chromatids and alleviates recombination-independent linkages between homologues. The safeguarding of chromosome resolution by condensin permits chromosome segregation and is crucial for the formation of discrete, individualized bivalent chromosomes.

Roles of Caenorhabditis elegans WRN Helicase in DNA Damage Responses, and a Comparison with Its Mammalian Homolog: A Mini-Review

Gerontology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 296-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Sun Ryu ◽  
Hyeon-Sook Koo
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Werner Syndrome ◽  
Model Organisms ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Helicase Domain ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Double Strand Dna Breaks ◽  
Double Strand Dna

Werner syndrome protein (WRN) is unusual among RecQ family DNA helicases in having an additional exonuclease activity. WRN is involved in the repair of double-strand DNA breaks via the homologous recombination and nonhomologous end joining pathways, and also in the base excision repair pathway. In addition, the protein promotes the recovery of stalled replication forks. The helicase activity is thought to unwind DNA duplexes, thereby moving replication forks or Holliday junctions. The targets of the exonuclease could be the nascent DNA strands at a replication fork or the ends of double-strand DNA breaks. However, it is not clear which enzyme activities are essential for repairing different types of DNA damage. Model organisms such as mice, flies, and worms deficient in WRN homologs have been investigated to understand the physiological results of defects in WRN activity. Premature aging, the most remarkable characteristic of Werner syndrome, is also seen in the mutant mice and worms, and hypersensitivity to DNA damage has been observed in WRN mutants of all three model organisms, pointing to conservation of the functions of WRN. In the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, the WRN homolog contains a helicase domain but no exonuclease domain, so that this animal is very useful for studying the in vivo functions of the helicase without interference from the activity of the exonuclease. Here, we review the current status of investigations of C. elegans WRN-1 and discuss its functional differences from the mammalian homologs.

scholarly journals Three-dimensional Ultrastructure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Meiotic Spindles

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 1178-1188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Winey ◽  
Garry P. Morgan ◽  
Paul D. Straight ◽  
Thomas H. Giddings ◽  
David N. Mastronarde
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Meiotic Chromosome ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
Mitotic Spindles ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Single Nucleus ◽  
Meiotic Spindles

Meiotic chromosome segregation leads to the production of haploid germ cells. During meiosis I (MI), the paired homologous chromosomes are separated. Meiosis II (MII) segregation leads to the separation of paired sister chromatids. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, both of these divisions take place in a single nucleus, giving rise to the four-spored ascus. We have modeled the microtubules in 20 MI and 15 MII spindles by using reconstruction from electron micrographs of serially sectioned meiotic cells. Meiotic spindles contain more microtubules than their mitotic counterparts, with the highest number in MI spindles. It is possible to differentiate between MI versus MII spindles based on microtubule numbers and organization. Similar to mitotic spindles, kinetochores in either MI or MII are attached by a single microtubule. The models indicate that the kinetochores of paired homologous chromosomes in MI or sister chromatids in MII are separated at metaphase, similar to mitotic cells. Examination of both MI and MII spindles reveals that anaphase A likely occurs in addition to anaphase B and that these movements are concurrent. This analysis offers a structural basis for considering meiotic segregation in yeast and for the analysis of mutants defective in this process.

scholarly journals Crossing over is coupled to late meiotic prophase bivalent differentiation through asymmetric disassembly of the SC

2005 ◽  
Vol 168 (5) ◽  
pp. 683-689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kentaro Nabeshima ◽  
Anne M. Villeneuve ◽  
Monica P. Colaiácovo
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Symmetry Breaking ◽  
Synaptonemal Complex ◽  
Central Region ◽  
Meiotic Prophase ◽  
Homologous Chromosome ◽  
Meiotic Chromosome ◽  
Crossing Over ◽  
Γ Irradiation ◽  
Irradiation Treatment

Homologous chromosome pairs (bivalents) undergo restructuring during meiotic prophase to convert a configuration that promotes crossover recombination into one that promotes bipolar spindle attachment and localized cohesion loss. We have imaged remodeling of meiotic chromosome structures after pachytene exit in Caenorhabditis elegans. Chromosome shortening during diplonema is accompanied by coiling of chromosome axes and highly asymmetric departure of synaptonemal complex (SC) central region proteins SYP-1 and SYP-2, which diminish over most of the length of each desynapsing bivalent while becoming concentrated on axis segments distal to the single emerging chiasma. This and other manifestations of asymmetry along chromosomes are lost in synapsis-proficient crossover-defective mutants, which often retain SYP-1,2 along the full lengths of coiled diplotene axes. Moreover, a γ-irradiation treatment that restores crossovers in the spo-11 mutant also restores asymmetry of SYP-1 localization. We propose that crossovers or crossover precursors serve as symmetry-breaking events that promote differentiation of subregions of the bivalent by triggering asymmetric disassembly of the SC.

scholarly journals akirin is required for diakinesis bivalent structure and synaptonemal complex disassembly at meiotic prophase I

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 1053-1067 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy M. Clemons ◽  
Heather M. Brockway ◽  
Yizhi Yin ◽  
Bhavatharini Kasinathan ◽  
Yaron S. Butterfield ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Synaptonemal Complex ◽  
Meiotic Prophase ◽  
Chromosome Condensation ◽  
Late Prophase ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Prophase I ◽  
Meiotic Prophase I ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved ◽  
Key Events

During meiosis, evolutionarily conserved mechanisms regulate chromosome remodeling, leading to the formation of a tight bivalent structure. This bivalent, a linked pair of homologous chromosomes, is essential for proper chromosome segregation in meiosis. The formation of a tight bivalent involves chromosome condensation and restructuring around the crossover. The synaptonemal complex (SC), which mediates homologous chromosome association before crossover formation, disassembles concurrently with increased condensation during bivalent remodeling. Both chromosome condensation and SC disassembly are likely critical steps in acquiring functional bivalent structure. The mechanisms controlling SC disassembly, however, remain unclear. Here we identify akir-1 as a gene involved in key events of meiotic prophase I in Caenorhabditis elegans. AKIR-1 is a protein conserved among metazoans that lacks any previously known function in meiosis. We show that akir-1 mutants exhibit severe meiotic defects in late prophase I, including improper disassembly of the SC and aberrant chromosome condensation, independently of the condensin complexes. These late-prophase defects then lead to aberrant reconfiguring of the bivalent. The meiotic divisions are delayed in akir-1 mutants and are accompanied by lagging chromosomes. Our analysis therefore provides evidence for an important role of proper SC disassembly in configuring a functional bivalent structure.

scholarly journals A compartmentalized signaling network mediates crossover control in meiosis

eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liangyu Zhang ◽  
Simone Köhler ◽  
Regina Rillo-Bohn ◽  
Abby F Dernburg
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Symmetry Breaking ◽  
Synaptonemal Complex ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Molecular Basis ◽  
Liquid Crystalline ◽  
Ring Finger ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Crossover Interference ◽  
Ring Finger Proteins

During meiosis, each pair of homologous chromosomes typically undergoes at least one crossover (crossover assurance), but these exchanges are strictly limited in number and widely spaced along chromosomes (crossover interference). The molecular basis for this chromosome-wide regulation remains mysterious. A family of meiotic RING finger proteins has been implicated in crossover regulation across eukaryotes. Caenorhabditis elegans expresses four such proteins, of which one (ZHP-3) is known to be required for crossovers. Here we investigate the functions of ZHP-1, ZHP-2, and ZHP-4. We find that all four ZHP proteins, like their homologs in other species, localize to the synaptonemal complex, an unusual, liquid crystalline compartment that assembles between paired homologs. Together they promote accumulation of pro-crossover factors, including ZHP-3 and ZHP-4, at a single recombination intermediate, thereby patterning exchanges along paired chromosomes. These proteins also act at the top of a hierarchical, symmetry-breaking process that enables crossovers to direct accurate chromosome segregation.

scholarly journals Sister chromatid repair maintains genomic integrity during meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Toraason ◽  
Cordell Clark ◽  
Anna Horacek ◽  
Marissa L. Glover ◽  
Alina Salagean ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Meiotic Prophase ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Early Prophase ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Late Prophase ◽  
Exogenous Dna ◽  
Prophase I ◽  
Meiotic Prophase I

SummaryDuring meiosis, the maintenance of genome integrity is critical for generating viable haploid gametes [1]. In meiotic prophase I, double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) are induced and a subset of these DSBs are repaired as interhomolog crossovers to ensure proper chromosome segregation. DSBs in excess of the permitted number of crossovers must be repaired by other pathways to ensure genome integrity [2]. To determine if the sister chromatid is engaged for meiotic DSB repair during oogenesis, we developed an assay to detect sister chromatid repair events at a defined DSB site during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis. Using this assay, we directly demonstrate that the sister chromatid is available as a meiotic repair template for both crossover and noncrossover recombination, with noncrossovers being the predominant recombination outcome. We additionally find that the sister chromatid is the exclusive recombination partner for DSBs during late meiotic prophase I. Analysis of noncrossover conversion tract sequences reveals that DSBs are processed similarly throughout prophase I and recombination intermediates remain central around the DSB site. Further, we demonstrate that the SMC-5/6 complex is required for long conversion tracts in early prophase I and intersister crossovers during late meiotic prophase I; whereas, the XPF-1 nuclease is required only in late prophase to promote sister chromatid repair. In response to exogenous DNA damage at different stages of meiosis, we find that mutants for SMC-5/6 and XPF-1 have differential effects on progeny viability. Overall, we propose that SMC-5/6 both processes recombination intermediates and promotes sister chromatid repair within meiotic prophase I, while XPF-1 is required as an intersister resolvase only in late prophase I.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document