scholarly journals Established rodent community delays recovery of dominant competitor following experimental disturbance

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica M. Christensen ◽  
Gavin L. Simpson ◽  
S.K. Morgan Ernest

AbstractHuman activities alter processes that control local biodiversity, causing changes in the abundance and identity of species in many ecosystems. However, restoring biodiversity to a previous state is rarely as simple as reintroducing lost species or restoring processes to their pre-disturbance state. Theory suggests that established species can impede shifts in species composition via a variety of mechanisms, including direct interference (e.g. territoriality), preempting resources, or habitat alteration. Here we use a long-term experimental manipulation of a desert rodent community to examine differences in the recolonization dynamics of a dominant competitor (kangaroo rats of the genus Dipodomys) when patches were already occupied by an existing rodent community relative to when patches were empty. Recovery of kangaroo rat populations was slow on plots with an established community of other rodent species, taking approximately two years. In contrast, recovery of kangaroo rat populations was rapid on empty plots with no established residents (approximately 3 months). We found little evidence that the delay in kangaroo rat colonization was due to direct interference from competitors, or could be explained by differences in habitat, implicating resource preemption by the established community as the most likely mechanism. These results demonstrate that the presence of an established alternate community inhibits recolonization by new species, even those that should be dominant in the community. This has important implications for understanding how biodiversity may change in the future, and what processes may slow or prevent this change.Significance statementEcological communities are changing due to human activities altering the processes governing local biodiversity. However restoring these processes often fails to restore the previous biodiversity state, implying that additional mechanisms contribute to community dynamics. Here we use an experimental manipulation of a desert rodent community—in which dominant competitors (kangaroo rats) were removed and then reintroduced years later—to show that the presence of previously-established species alters the dynamics of the dominant competitor’s recovery. Kangaroo rat populations took two years to recover on patches where inferior competitors were already established, compared to three months on uninhabited patches. This suggests that priority effects and initial conditions are critical to consider when predicting community response to disturbance, or in ecological restoration projects.

2019 ◽  
Vol 286 (1917) ◽  
pp. 20192269
Author(s):  
Erica M. Christensen ◽  
Gavin L. Simpson ◽  
S. K. Morgan Ernest

Human activities alter processes that control local biodiversity, causing changes in the abundance and identity of species in ecosystems. However, restoring biodiversity to a previous state is rarely as simple as reintroducing lost species or restoring processes to their pre-disturbance state. Theory suggests that established species can impede shifts in species composition via a variety of mechanisms, including direct interference, pre-empting resources or habitat alteration. These mechanisms can create transitory dynamics that delay convergence to an expected end state. We use an experimental manipulation of a desert rodent community to examine differences in recolonization dynamics of a dominant competitor (kangaroo rats of the genus Dipodomys ) when patches were already occupied by an existing rodent community relative to when patches were empty. Recovery of kangaroo rat populations was slow on plots with an established community, taking approximately 2 years, in contrast with rapid recovery on empty plots with no established residents (approx. three months). These results demonstrate that the presence of an established alternate community inhibits recolonization by new species, even those that should be dominant in the community. This has important implications for understanding how biodiversity may change in the future, and what processes may slow or prevent this change.


2011 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
pp. 840-851 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucina Hernández ◽  
John W. Laundré ◽  
Alberto González-Romero ◽  
Jorge López-Portillo ◽  
Karina M. Grajales

Ecology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 99 (7) ◽  
pp. 1523-1529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica M. Christensen ◽  
David J. Harris ◽  
S. K. Morgan Ernest

2000 ◽  
Vol 203 (4) ◽  
pp. 773-781 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.L. Tracy ◽  
G.E. Walsberg

Previous estimates suggested that ventilatory evaporation constitutes the major source of water loss in kangaroo rats (Dipodomys spp.). We quantified rates of water loss in Merriam's kangaroo rat (Dipodomys merriami) and demonstrate the degree to which acclimation to a particular thermal and hydric environment plays a role in the intraspecific variation in water loss evident in this species. We draw the following conclusions: (1) that water loss varies intraspecifically in Merriam's kangaroo rat, in association with habitats of contrasting aridity and temperature; (2) that animals from more xeric locations have lower water loss rates than those from more mesic sites; (3) that most water loss is cutaneous, with ventilatory evaporative water loss contributing, at most, only 44% to total evaporative water loss; and (4) that intraspecific differences in rates of water loss are not acclimatory, but fixed. After acclimating under the same conditions, xeric-site animals still show a 33% lower rate of evaporative water loss than mesic-site animals.


2004 ◽  
Vol 164 (5) ◽  
pp. 670-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ethan P. White ◽  
S. K. Morgan Ernest ◽  
Katherine M. Thibault

2004 ◽  
Vol 164 (5) ◽  
pp. 670
Author(s):  
White ◽  
S. K. Morgan Ernest ◽  
Thibault

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document