scholarly journals Percolation models of pathogen spillover

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Washburne ◽  
Daniel E Crowley ◽  
Kezia Manlove ◽  
Daniel J Becker ◽  
Raina K Plowright

A series of logical events must occur for a pathogen to spill over from animals to people. The pathogen must be present in an animal reservoir, it must be shed from the reservoir into the environment or be transferred from the reservoir to a vector, it must persist in the environment or vector until contact with a human or amplifier host, and it must successfully enter, colonize, and reproduce within the human. These events each represent a barrier the pathogen must cross to successfully infect a human. Percolation models of pathogens completing the series of barriers or logical events can connect models of spillover risk with standard tools for statistical inference. Here, we develop percolation-based models of spillover risk and a theoretical framework for managing spillover as an inextricably multilevel process. Through analysis and simulation, we show that estimated associations between level-specific covariates and spillover events will err towards associations from dominant pathway to spillover, a potential problem if there are alternative pathways to spillover with different associations with covariates. Furthermore, estimated associations between covariates and spillover will better reflect associations between covariates and success probabilities of bottleneck events with the highest pathogen attrition rates in the data observed. If one agrees with a percolation model for spillover, then GLMs should not be used to estimate relative importance of various levels. We recommend always using nonlinear models for predicting spillover risk with quantitative covariates and discuss why switching regression models may be well suited for avoiding some obvious pitfalls in predicting spillover from alternative pathways or wildlife reservoirs. Finally, we demonstrate how percolation models formalize an intuitive management paradigm for mitigating risk in the inherently multilevel process of pathogen spillover.

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Rodrigues ◽  
António F Tavares

This work contributes to the literature on water governance by attempting to provide an answer to the question of what are the differences in efficiency of alternative governance arrangements of water utilities. We test hypotheses derived from property rights, principal–agent, and transaction costs theories using a comprehensive database of 260 water utility systems provided by the Portuguese Regulatory Authority of Water and Waste Services. Using endogenous switching regression models estimated through maximum likelihood, the study is designed in two steps. First, we investigate differences in efficiency between in-house options and externalization and find that in-house solutions as a set (direct provision and municipal companies) are more efficient than externalization options (mixed companies and concessions). Second, we test differences in efficiency within both in-house and externalization solutions, and fail to find statistically significant differences in efficiency between in-house bureaucracies and municipal companies and between mixed companies and concessions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document