scholarly journals The impact of stroma on the discovery of molecular subtypes and prognostic gene signatures in serous ovarian cancer

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Schwede ◽  
Levi Waldron ◽  
Samuel C. Mok ◽  
Wei Wei ◽  
Azfar Basunia ◽  
...  

AbstractPurposeRecent efforts to improve outcomes for high-grade serous ovarian cancer, a leading cause of cancer death in women, have focused on identifying molecular subtypes and prognostic gene signatures, but existing subtypes have poor cross-study robustness. We tested the contribution of cell admixture in published ovarian cancer molecular subtypes and prognostic gene signatures.Experimental DesignPublic gene expression data, two molecular subtype classifications, and 61 published gene signatures of ovarian cancer were examined. Using microdissected data, we developed gene signatures of ovarian tumor and stroma. Computational simulations of increasing stromal cell proportion were performed by mixing gene expression profiles of paired microdissected ovarian tumor and stroma.ResultsEstablished ovarian cancer molecular subtypes are strongly associated with the cell admixture. Tumors were classified as different molecular subtypes in simulations, when the percentage of stromal cells increased. Stromal gene expression in bulk tumor was weakly prognostic, and in one dataset, increased stroma was associated with anatomic sampling location. Five published prognostic gene signatures were no longer prognostic in a multivariate model that adjusted for stromal content alone.ConclusionsThe discovery that molecular subtypes of high grade serous ovarian cancer is influenced by cell admixture, and stromal cell gene expression is crucial for interpretation and reproduction of ovarian cancer molecular subtypes and gene signatures derived from bulk tissue. Single cell analysis may be required to refine the molecular subtypes of high grade serous ovarian cancer. Because stroma proportion was weakly prognostic, elucidating the role of the tumor microenvironment’s components will be important.Translational relevanceOvarian cancer is a leading cause of cancer death in women in the United States. Although the tumor responds to standard therapy for the majority of patients, it frequently recurs and becomes drug-resistant. Recent efforts have focused on identifying molecular subtypes and prognostic gene signatures of ovarian cancer in order to tailor therapy and improve outcomes. This study demonstrates that molecular subtype identification depends on the ratio of tumor to stroma within the specimen. We show that the specific anatomic location of the biopsy may influence the proportion of stromal involvement and potentially the resulting gene expression pattern. It will be crucial for these factors to be taken into consideration when interpreting and reproducing ovarian cancer molecular subtypes and gene signatures derived using bulk tissue and single cells. Furthermore, it will be important to define the relative proportions of stromal cells and model their prognostic importance in the tumor microenvironment.

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 1240-1250 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Millstein ◽  
T. Budden ◽  
E.L. Goode ◽  
M.S. Anglesio ◽  
A. Talhouk ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17091-e17091
Author(s):  
Elena Ioana Braicu ◽  
Hagen Kulbe ◽  
Felix Dreher ◽  
Eliane T Taube ◽  
Frauke Ringel ◽  
...  

e17091 Background: Previously four molecular subtypes of high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) with distinct biological features and clinical outcome have been described: C1 (mesenchymal), C2 (immunoreactive), C4 (differentiated), and C5 (proliferative). Using Nanostring technique and a minimal signature of 39 classifier genes could reproduce the subtypes identified by microarray gene expression profiling (Leong HS et al. Australian Ovarian Cancer Study. J Pathol. 2015). Methods: We characterized paraffin embedded tissue samples from 279 HGSOC patients for molecular subtypes, utilizing the 39 classifier signature and 9 control genes by Nanostring nCounter Analysis System. From 16 patients paired primary and relapsed samples were available. Only chemonaive primary HGSOC patients were included in the study. FFPEs and clinical data were provided by TOC ( www.toc-network.de ). For each sample, probability scores for the four molecular subtypes (C1, C2, C4, and C5) were calculated. The highest calculated score determined the most likely subtype of the tumor. Results: Of all analyzed primary tumor samples, 88 (31.5%) were classified as C1, 83 (29.8%), 53 (19.0%) and 55 (19.7%) as subtypes C2, C4 and C5, respectively. Our results confirmed data by the AOCS study, which described the distribution of HGSOC with 40.2% (C1), 22.5% (C2), 20.1% (C4) and 17.2% (C5), respectively. Within the paired samples, for 12 of the 16 patients dynamic changes in the molecular subtypes between primary and relapse occurred, while in the remaining 4 patients the phenotype was stable. Conclusions: Molecular subtypes of HGSOC using Nanostring technology with a small panel of classifier genes can be confirmed. Furthermore, the data showed that a change of the established molecular subtype might occur during the evolution of the disease, and therefore translate in a different clinical outcome.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 509-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Schwede ◽  
Levi Waldron ◽  
Samuel C. Mok ◽  
Wei Wei ◽  
Azfar Basunia ◽  
...  

Radiology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 274 (3) ◽  
pp. 742-751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hebert Alberto Vargas ◽  
Maura Miccò ◽  
Seong Im Hong ◽  
Debra A. Goldman ◽  
Fanny Dao ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17544-e17544
Author(s):  
Wanja Nikolai Kassuhn ◽  
Oliver Klein ◽  
Silvia Darb-Esfahani ◽  
Hedwig Lammert ◽  
Sylwia Handzik ◽  
...  

e17544 Background: High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) can be separated by gene expression profiling into four molecular subtypes with clear correlation of the clinical outcome. However, these gene signatures have not been implemented in clinical practice to stratify patients for targeted therapy. This is mainly due to a lack of easy, cost-effective and reproducible methods, as well as the high heterogeneity of HGSOC. Hence, we aimed to examine the potential of unsupervised matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization imaging mass spectrometry (MALDI-IMS) to stratify patients, which might benefit from targeted therapeutic strategies. Methods: Molecular subtyping of paraffin-embedded tissue samples from 279 HGSOC patients was performed by NanoString analysis (ground truth labeling). Next, we applied MALDI-IMS, a novel technology to identify distinct mass profiles on the same paraffin-embedded tissue sections paired with machine learning algorithms to identify HGSOC subtypes by proteomic signature. Finally, we devised a novel strategy to annotate spectra of stromal origin. Results: We elucidated a MALDI-derived proteomic signature (135 peptides) able to classify HGSOC subtypes. Random forest classifiers achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.983. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the exclusion of stroma associated spectra provides tangible improvements to classification quality (AUC = 0.988). False discovery rates (FDR) were reduced from 10.2% to 8.0%. Finally, novel MALDI-based stroma annotation achieved near-perfect classifications (AUC = 0.999, FDR < 1.0%). Conclusions: Here, we present a concept integrating MALDI-IMS with machine learning algorithms to classify patients according to distinct molecular subtypes of HGSOC. This has great potential to assign patients for targeted therapies.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory P. Way ◽  
James Rudd ◽  
Chen Wang ◽  
Habib Hamidi ◽  
Brooke L. Fridley ◽  
...  

AbstractFour gene expression subtypes of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) have been previously described. In these studies, a fraction of samples that did not fit well into the four subtype classifications were excluded. Therefore, we sought to systematically determine the concordance of transcriptomic HGSC subtypes across populations without removing any samples. We created a bioinformatics pipeline to independently cluster the five largest mRNA expression datasets using k-means and non-negative matrix factorization (NMF). We summarized differential expression patterns to compare clusters across studies. While previous studies reported four subtypes, our cross-population comparison does not support four. Because these results contrast with previous reports, we attempted to reproduce analyses performed in those studies. Our results suggest that early results favoring four subtypes may have been driven by including serous borderline tumors. In summary, our analysis suggests that either two or three, but not four, gene expression subtypes are most consistent across datasets.CONFLICTS OF INTERESTThe authors do not declare any conflicts of interest.OTHER PRESENTATIONSAspects of this study were presented at the 2015 AACR Conference and the 2015 Rocky Mountain Bioinformatics Conference.


2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (1) ◽  
pp. 178-187
Author(s):  
Fangfang Song ◽  
Lian Li ◽  
Baifeng Zhang ◽  
Yanrui Zhao ◽  
Hong Zheng ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document