scholarly journals A Systems Mechanism for KRAS Mutant Allele Specific Responses to Targeted Therapy

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas McFall ◽  
Jolene K Diedrich ◽  
Meron Mengistu ◽  
Stacy L Littlechild ◽  
Kendra V Paskvan ◽  
...  

A well-established genotype to phenotype relationship in genomic medicine is that activating KRAS mutations indicate resistance to anti-EGFR agents. We used a computational model of Ras signaling to investigate a confusing exception to this relationship whereby colorectal cancers with one specific, constitutively-active, mutant, KRAS G13D, respond to anti-EGFR agents. Our computational simulations of the biochemical processes that regulate Ras suggest EGFR inhibition reduces wild-type Ras activation in KRAS G13D mutant cancer cells more than in other KRAS mutant cancer cells. The model also reveals a non-intuitive, mutant-specific, dependency of wild-type Ras activation on EGFR. This dependency is determined by the interaction strength between a KRAS mutant and tumor suppressor neurofibromin. Our prospective experiments confirm this mechanism that arises from the systems-level regulation of Ras pathway signaling. Overall, our work demonstrates how systems approaches enable mechanism-based inference in genomic medicine.

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (600) ◽  
pp. eaaw8288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas McFall ◽  
Jolene K. Diedrich ◽  
Meron Mengistu ◽  
Stacy L. Littlechild ◽  
Kendra V. Paskvan ◽  
...  

Cancer treatment decisions are increasingly guided by which specific genes are mutated within each patient’s tumor. For example, agents inhibiting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) benefit many colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, with the general exception of those whose tumor includes a KRAS mutation. However, among the various KRAS mutations, that which encodes the G13D mutant protein (KRASG13D) behaves differently; for unknown reasons, KRASG13D CRC patients benefit from the EGFR-blocking antibody cetuximab. Controversy surrounds this observation, because it contradicts the well-established mechanisms of EGFR signaling with regard to RAS mutations. Here, we identified a systems-level, mechanistic explanation for why KRASG13D cancers respond to EGFR inhibition. A computational model of RAS signaling revealed that the biophysical differences between the three most common KRAS mutants were sufficient to generate different sensitivities to EGFR inhibition. Integrated computation with experimentation then revealed a nonintuitive, mutant-specific dependency of wild-type RAS activation by EGFR that is determined by the interaction strength between KRAS and the tumor suppressor neurofibromin (NF1). KRAS mutants that strongly interacted with and competitively inhibited NF1 drove wild-type RAS activation in an EGFR-independent manner, whereas KRASG13D weakly interacted with and could not competitively inhibit NF1 and, thus, KRASG13D cells remained dependent on EGFR for wild-type RAS activity. Overall, our work demonstrates how systems approaches enable mechanism-based inference in genomic medicine and can help identify patients for selective therapeutic strategies.


2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (16) ◽  
pp. 6993-7002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig Dorrell ◽  
Katsuto Takenaka ◽  
Mark D. Minden ◽  
Robert G. Hawley ◽  
John E. Dick

ABSTRACT The Ras pathway transduces divergent signals determining normal cell fate and is frequently activated in hematopoietic malignancies, but the manner in which activation contributes to human leukemia is poorly understood. We report that a high level of activated H-Ras signaling in transduced primary human hematopoietic progenitors reduced their proliferation and enhanced monocyte/macrophage differentiation. However, the exposure of these cells to a farnesyltransferase inhibitor and establishment of a moderate level of Ras activity showed increased proliferation, an elevated frequency of primitive blast-like cells, and progenitors with enhanced self-renewal capacity. These results suggest that the amplitude of Ras pathway signaling is a determinant of myeloid cell fate and that moderate Ras activation in primitive hematopoietic cells can be an early event in leukemogenesis.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 888-888
Author(s):  
Iman Fares ◽  
Rahul S. Vedula ◽  
Shabbir M. Vahanvaty ◽  
Christopher S Waters ◽  
Marlise R. Luskin ◽  
...  

Abstract Somatic mutations can have highly stereotyped positions in the myeloid clonal hierarchy and distinct patterns of co-occurring mutations. Gene mutations that cause aberrant activation of RAS/MAPK signaling are typically late events in myeloid disease progression and are closely associated with leukemic transformation. We hypothesized that the phenotypic output of oncogenic RAS signaling is dynamically reprogrammed during leukemogenesis based on evolving genetic and epigenetic context. To identify genetic alterations that may modulate RAS-mediated transformation, we evaluated 1273 adults with myelodysplastic syndrome, including 150 with mutations in NRAS, KRAS, PTPN11, CBL, RIT1, NF1, or FLT3. Somatic mutations in ASXL1 (q<0.0001), RUNX1 (q<0.0001), EZH2 (q<0.0001), BCOR (q=0.0002), and STAG2 (q=0.001) were most significantly associated with co-occurring RAS pathway mutations, compared to those without RAS pathway mutations, while TP53 mutations were less frequent (q=0.059). We validated these observations in an independent cohort of 6343 unselected patients, including 1081 patients harboring either RAS pathway mutations (n=651),TP53 mutations (n=494), or both (n=57). To define the effects of sequential acquisition of driver mutations, we developed a mouse serial transplantation model of somatic myeloid transformation. First, we used in vivo pI:pC treatment to induce biallelic inactivation of Tet2 in adult Mx1-Cre/Tet2flox/floxmice. After 12 weeks, we purified Tet2-/-or control hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) and used CRISPR/Cas9 to separately introduce inactivating mutations in Ezh2, Asxl1-exon12, Stag2, or Bcor, then evaluated their functional effects using ex vivo serial replating or in vivo competitive transplantation. Tet2-/-HSPCs with control sgRNA showed a modest enhancement of serial replating compared to Tet2-wild type HSPCs, while Tet2-/-HSPCs Asxl1, Stag2, and Bcor, but not Ezh2 sgRNA had markedly enhanced serial replating capacity (>6 platings in all replicates). In primary transplantation, secondary mutations caused in vivo clonal advantage after 16 weeks, but never resulted in histologic transformation to acute leukemia. We next evaluated the impact of tertiary NRASG12Dmutations in each pairwise Tet2-/-CRISPR combination (Asxl1, Bcor, Ezh2, Stag2, control). We purified HSPCs from recipient mice 16 weeks after primary transplantation, transduced with a lentiviral NRASG12Dexpression vector and transplanted into secondary recipients. Recipients of Tet2/Bcor/NRAS, Tet2/Asxl1/NRAS, or Tet2/Ezh2/NRAS cells succumbed to CD11b+myeloid disease with variable latency in Bcor (14 days), Ezh2 (50 days), and Asxl1 (120 days) cells, suggesting that combined Tet2 and PRC1/2 alterations may modify the effects of oncogenic RAS signaling. To determine whether pre-existing epigenetic mutations cooperate to alter the transcriptional response to acute oncogenic stress compared to wild type cells, weperformed RNA-seq 12 and 24 hours after induced expression of NRASG12D in isogenic immortalized mouse progenitor cells deficient for Tet2, Bcor, or both Tet2 and Bcor. We observed rapid activation of inflammatory and cellular senescence programs in all conditions, suggesting a genotype-independent immediate early response to oncogenic signaling. However, we also identified genotype-specific regulation of tumor suppressor and cell cycle checkpoint pathways. While Cdnk1a expression was strongly induced in all conditions, Cdnk2a expression (and p16Ink4a and p19ARF protein levels) was preferentially upregulated in the context of Bcor deficiency. Moreover, expression of the p53 negative regulator Mdm2 was increased 11-fold in Tet2/Bcor-deficient cells, but only 4 to 5-fold in wild type, Tet2-, or Bcor-deficient cells. Tet2/Bcor-deficient cells were significantly more sensitive to treatment with the Mdm2 antogonist, Nutlin, upon induction of NRAS expression than were wild-type cells, suggesting that Mdm2 overexpression directly mediates acquired tolerance of oncogene stress. These human genetic data and mouse models suggest that epigenetic alterations occurring during early myeloid leukemogenesis may enable evasion of oncogene protection mechanism. Bcor mutations can pair with initiating Tet2 mutations to facilitate RAS mediated transformation while incurring a dependency on Mdm2 overexpression. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 872
Author(s):  
Alexey S. Chubarov ◽  
Igor P. Oscorbin ◽  
Maxim L. Filipenko ◽  
Alexander A. Lomzov ◽  
Dmitrii V. Pyshnyi

Establishing the Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) mutational status is essential in terms of managing patients with various types of cancer. Allele-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction (AS-PCR) is a widely used method for somatic mutations detection. To improve the limited sensitivity and specificity, several blocking methods have been introduced in AS-PCR to block the amplification of wild-type templates. Herein, we used a novel modified oligonucleotide with internucleotide phosphates reshaped 1,3-dimethyl-2-imino-imidazolidine moieties (phosphoryl guanidine (PG) groups) as primers and blockers in the AS-PCR method. Four common KRAS mutations were chosen as a model to demonstrate the advantages of the PG primers and blockers utilizing a customized PCR protocol. The methods were evaluated on plasmid model systems providing a KRAS mutation detection limit of 20 copies of mutant DNA in a proportion as low as 0.1% of the total DNA, with excellent specificity. PG-modification can serve as the universal additional mismatch-like disturbance to increase the discrimination between wild-type and mutated DNA. Moreover, PG can serve to increase primer specificity by a synergetic effect with additional mismatch and would greatly facilitate medical research.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas McFall ◽  
Noah K. Schomburg ◽  
Kent L. Rossman ◽  
Edward C. Stites

Abstract Phase three clinical trial evidence suggests that colorectal cancers with the KRAS G13D mutation may benefit from EGFR inhibitors, like cetuximab, in contrast to the other most common KRAS mutations. A mechanism to explain why this mutation behaves differently from other KRAS mutations had long been lacking. Two recent studies have reproduced KRAS G13D specific sensitivity to cetuximab in cellular models, and both have implicated the tumor suppressor NF1 as a critical variable in determining sensitivity and resistance. One study proposes a mechanism that focuses on the inhibition of active, GTP-bound wild-type RAS, which is proposed to occur to a greater extent in KRAS G13D tumors due to the inability of KRAS G13D to bind NF1 well. The other study suggests NF1 can convert GTP-bound KRAS G13D to inactive, GDP-bound KRAS G13D. Here, we report an inability to reproduce cellular and biophysical studies that suggested NF1 has strong GTPase activity on KRAS G13D. We also report additional data that further suggests only WT RAS-GTP levels are reduced with EGFR inhibition and that KRAS G13D is impaired in binding to NF1. These new experiments further support a mechanism in which cetuximab inhibits wild-type (HRAS and NRAS) signals in KRAS G13D colorectal cancers.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4066-4066
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Arai ◽  
Andrew Elliott ◽  
Joanne Xiu ◽  
Jingyuan Wang ◽  
Francesca Battaglin ◽  
...  

4066 Background: NF1 encodes neurofibromin, which is a key GTPase-activating protein that downregulates RAS activation. Inactivating mutations in NF1 result in sustained activation of RAS signaling, a key driver for development of colorectal cancer (CRC), and have been suggested to be a potential mechanism of resistance to EGFR inhibition in RAS-wild type (WT) CRC. Little is known about molecular characteristics of NF1-mutated (MT) CRC. Methods: Tumor profiles from 8150 CRC patients (pts) with available NF1 mutation status were retrospectively reviewed. NextGen sequencing by a customized 592-gene panel was performed. Microsatellite instability (MSI) / mismatch repair (MMR) status, tumor mutational burden (TMB) and PD-L1 expression were tested. Molecular profiles between NF1-MT and NF1-WT pts were compared. Results: Out of 8150 pts, 176 (2.2%) had somatic NF1 mutations with pathogenic or presumed pathogenic function. A higher NF1-MT frequency was observed in MSI-H/dMMR vs MSS/pMMR (13.5% vs 1.4%, p < 0.0001), in right-sided vs left sided (2.9% vs 1.8%, p < 0.01), and in RAS-WT vs RAS-MT (3.0% vs 1.4%, p < 0.0001). In MSS/pMMR tumors, no association with sidedness was observed (right: 1.3% vs left: 1.2%, NS). The most prevalent co-mutations with NF-1 were APC (63.2%), ARID1A (57.5%), TP53 (51.5%), KMT2D (32.9%) and KRAS (32.4%) in all cases, and APC (76.2%), TP53 (69.5%), KRAS (38.8%), ARID1A (34.4%) and FBXW7 (21.5%) in MSS/pMMR cases. POLE mutation was observed in 18.4% of NF1-MT/MSS/pMMR pts. Compared to NF1-WT pts, NF1-MT pts had more frequent mutations in ARID1A (All: 57.5% vs 23.3%, p < 0.0001; MSS/pMMR: 34.4% vs 15.2%, p < 0.05), and less frequent mutations in KRAS (All: 32.4% vs 49.0%, p < 0.0001; MSS/pMMR: 38.8% vs 50.3%, p < 0.05). Also, NF1-MT pts had more frequent alterations in homologous recombination pathway compared to NF1-WT pts (All: 39.8% vs 7.5%, p < 0.0001; MSS/pMMR: 17.5% vs 4.4%, p < 0.0001). Mean TMB was significantly greater in NF1-MT than NF1-WT (All: 48.9/Mb vs 10.0/Mb, p < 0.0001; MSS/pMMR: 48.3/Mb vs 8.2/Mb, p < 0.0001). Also, PD-L1 positivity was higher in NF1-MT compared to NF1-WT (All: 12.9% vs 3.6%, p < 0.0001; MSS/pMMR: 7.1% vs 2.6%, p < 0.05). Conclusions: While more frequent than in RAS-MT pts, NF1-MT CRC was a small subset in RAS-WT pts. NF1-MT was associated with alterations in chromatin remodeling and DNA damage response pathways, as well as elevated TMB and PD-L1 expression, which may provide alternative therapeutic strategies beyond EGFR inhibition.


Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.N. Maloof ◽  
C. Kenyon

The Ras signaling pathway specifies a variety of cell fates in many organisms. However, little is known about the genes that function downstream of the conserved signaling cassette, or what imparts the specificity necessary to cause Ras activation to trigger different responses in different tissues. In C. elegans, activation of the Ras pathway induces cells in the central body region to generate the vulva. Vulval induction takes place in the domain of the Hox gene lin-39. We have found that lin-39 is absolutely required for Ras signaling to induce vulval development. During vulval induction, the Ras pathway, together with basal lin-39 activity, up-regulates lin-39 expression in vulval precursor cells. We find that if lin-39 function is absent at this time, no vulval cell divisions occur. Furthermore, if lin-39 is replaced with the posterior Hox gene mab-5, then posterior structures are induced instead of a vulva. Our findings suggest that in addition to permitting vulval cell divisions to occur, lin-39 is also required to specify the outcome of Ras signaling by selectively activating vulva-specific genes.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward C. Stites ◽  
Andrey S. Shaw

AbstractThe KRAS oncogene is the most common, activating, oncogenic mutation in human cancer. KRAS has proven difficult to target effectively. Two different strategies have recently been described for covalently targeting the most common activating KRAS mutant in lung cancer, KRAS G12C. Previously, we have developed a computational model of the processes that regulate Ras activation and this model has proven useful for understanding the complex behaviors of Ras signaling. Here, we use this model to perform a computational systems pharmacology analysis of KRAS G12C targeted covalent inhibitors. After updating our model to include Ras protein turnover, we verified the validity of our model for problems in this domain by comparing model behaviors with experimental behaviors. The model naturally reproduces previous experimental data, including several experimental observations that were interpreted as being contrary to conventional wisdom. Overall, this suggests that our model describes the Ras system well, including those areas where conventional wisdom struggles. We then used the model to investigate possible strategies to improve the ability of KRAS G12C inhibitors to inhibit Ras pathway signaling. We identify one, as of yet unexplored mechanism, that, if optimized, could improve the effectiveness of one class of KRAS inhibitor. We also simulated resistance to targeted therapies and found that resistance promoting mutations may reverse which class of KRAS G12C inhibitor inhibits the system better, suggesting that there may be value to pursuing both types of KRAS G12C inhibitors. Overall, this work demonstrates that systems biology approaches can provide insights that inform the drug development process.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baojun Ren ◽  
Zhuowei Gao ◽  
Kehong Zheng ◽  
Yong Yang ◽  
Pengfei Su ◽  
...  

AbstractColorectal cancer (CRC) is a common cancer causing substantial mortality and morbidity worldwide. Oncogene RAS mutations occur notably in ∼45% of CRCs, associated with a poor prognosis. KRAS is subject to multiple tiers of regulation, including kinase. Aurora kinases has been implicated in many types of tumor onsets and progression, making them as a promising therapeutic targets. Alisertib (ALS), selectively inhibits Aurora kinase A (AURKA) and exerts potent anticancer activities in vitro and in vivo studies, but the latent anticancer effect of ALS on CRC remains unclear in the context of different KRAS mutations. This study aimed to assess the effects of ALS on RAS signaling pathway in a panel of CRC lines expressing different KRAS alleles, including Caco-2 (KRAS WT), Colo-678 (KRAS G12D), SK-CO-1 (KRAS G12V), HCT116 (KRAS G13D), CCCL-18 (KRAS A146T), and HT29 (BRAF V600E). The results showed that ALS modulated the active form of KRAS in a RAS allele specific manner across the panel of CRC lines; ALS differentially regulated RAS signal via PI3K/Akt and MAPK pathways; and ALS induced apoptosis and autophagy in a RAS allele specific manner. Of note, in combination of ALS and MEK inhibitor, selumetinib, enhanced ALS regulatory effects in CRC lines in a RAS allele specific manner on apoptosis, autophagy, and cell growth. Taken together, this study suggests that ALS differentially regulates RAS signaling pathway and manipulates cell apoptosis and autophagy in RAS allele specific manner. The combinatorial approach of ALS and MEK inhibitor may represent a new therapeutic strategy for precision therapy of CRC in a RAS allele manner.


PLoS Genetics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. e1009738
Author(s):  
Jennifer Soler Beatty ◽  
Cristina Molnar ◽  
Carlos M. Luque ◽  
Jose F. de Celis ◽  
María D. Martín-Bermudo

Activation of Ras signaling occurs in ~30% of human cancers. However, activated Ras alone is insufficient to produce malignancy. Thus, it is imperative to identify those genes cooperating with activated Ras in driving tumoral growth. In this work, we have identified a novel EGFR inhibitor, which we have named EGFRAP, for EGFR adaptor protein. Elimination of EGFRAP potentiates activated Ras-induced overgrowth in the Drosophila wing imaginal disc. We show that EGFRAP interacts physically with the phosphorylated form of EGFR via its SH2 domain. EGFRAP is expressed at high levels in regions of maximal EGFR/Ras pathway activity, such as at the presumptive wing margin. In addition, EGFRAP expression is up-regulated in conditions of oncogenic EGFR/Ras activation. Normal and oncogenic EGFR/Ras-mediated upregulation of EGRAP levels depend on the Notch pathway. We also find that elimination of EGFRAP does not affect overall organogenesis or viability. However, simultaneous downregulation of EGFRAP and its ortholog PVRAP results in defects associated with increased EGFR function. Based on these results, we propose that EGFRAP is a new negative regulator of the EGFR/Ras pathway, which, while being required redundantly for normal morphogenesis, behaves as an important modulator of EGFR/Ras-driven tissue hyperplasia. We suggest that the ability of EGFRAP to functionally inhibit the EGFR pathway in oncogenic cells results from the activation of a feedback loop leading to increase EGFRAP expression. This could act as a surveillance mechanism to prevent excessive EGFR activity and uncontrolled cell growth.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document